ev a71 (ATCC)
Structured Review

Ev A71, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 75 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ev a71/product/ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 75 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Salt-inducible kinase 1 is a key gene in suppressing EVD68-induced asthma by modulating antiviral immunity"
Article Title: Salt-inducible kinase 1 is a key gene in suppressing EVD68-induced asthma by modulating antiviral immunity
Journal: Genes & Diseases
doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101845
Figure Legend Snippet: SIK1 shows antiviral effects in various viral infections. (A, B) A549 cells were infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.1 or 1) for 24 h. (A) Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (B) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-D68 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (C, D) RD cells were infected with EV-A71 (MOI = 0.1 or 0.5) for 24 h. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of relative SIK1 mRNA expression. The results were normalized to GAPDH expression. (D) Western blotting analysis of SIK1 and EV-A71 VP1 protein expression. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (E, F) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. (E) The relative viral RNA copy numbers were determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. (F) The protein expression levels of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected by western blotting. β-actin was used as the loading control. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (G, H) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with EV-D68 (MOI = 0.5) for 24 h. The viral replication and protein expression level of EV-D68 VP1 and SIK1 were detected as described above. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (I, J) A549 cells were infected with VSV-GFP for 6 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.5) or HSV-1 for 24 h (MOI = 0.1, 0.2), and then the relative mRNA expression of SIK1 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (K, L) Box plots represent the normalized expression levels of SIK1 using Z-score normalization in GSE157103 (for CV-A6) and GSE243200 (for SARS-COV-2) datasets. SIK1 expression correlation was analyzed using Spearman's method. (M, N) A549 cells were transfected with si-SIK1 or si-NC and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. The replication of VSV-GFP was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 50 μm), and VSV-GFP RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (O, P) A549 cells were transfected with plasmid pCDH-SIK1 or empty pCDH vector and then infected with VSV-GFP (MOI = 0.5) for 12 h. To detect viral replication by quantitative PCR, viral titers were determined by plaque assay as described in the methods section, and viral RNA synthesis was determined by RT-qPCR analysis. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. (Q, R) SIK1 was interfered with by si-SIK1 or overexpressed via transfection of plasmid pCDH-SIK1 in A549 cells, and then the cells were infected with HSV-1. Viral replication was determined by RT-qPCR. Values were from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ns, non-significant.
Techniques Used: Infection, Reverse Transcription, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Western Blot, Control, Standard Deviation, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Immunofluorescence, Microscopy, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Plaque Assay
![Identification of host factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 <t>and</t> <t>HCoV-229E</t> replication (A) Schematic overview of the siRNA screening. HEK293 A/T cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected twice with siRNAs targeting 91 host genes previously identified as being involved in influenza virus replication. Cells were then infected with SARS-CoV-2 (100 plaque-forming unit [PFU]/100 μL) one day after the second transfection. Supernatants were collected at 2 days post-infection (dpi) and titrated by plaque assay. (B) Results of the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen. The 91 host factors were divided into four batches, each including a non-targeting siRNA as a negative control (N) and siRNA targeting SARS-CoV-2 nsp12 as a positive control (P). Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and its corresponding negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. (C) The seven host factors identified in the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen were further examined in HCoV-229E, along with the negative control siRNA (N) and positive control siRNA (P) targeting the HCoV-229E N gene. Following the same method described in (A), MRC-5 cells were infected with HCoV-229E (50 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 )/100 μL). Supernatants were collected at 3 dpi and titrated by TCID 50 assay. Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and the negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D) Cell viability was measured in duplicate wells across two independent experiments using CellTiter-Glo following siRNA transfection. See also and .](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_0041/pmc12930041/pmc12930041__gr1.jpg)

