Review



vero e6  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    ATCC vero e6
    Characterization and anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Isolation of CBNK cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. (b) Collection of CBNK-EVs and NTA for size distribution and concentration. (c) Morphological observation of CBNK-EVs by transmission electron microscopy, scale bar:100 nm. (d) WB analysis of specific markers for CBNK-EVs. (e) Anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs assessed by immunofluorescence. <t>Vero-E6</t> cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 1 × 10 5 cells per well one day prior to experiments. Cells were pretreated with varying volumes of CBNK-EVs (stock concentration: 3 × 10 11 particles/mL) for 1 h to achieve the indicated final particle counts, followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h in the presence of fresh medium containing the same EVs. ZIKV-infected cells were quantified by counting E protein-positive cells in three random fields by two independent investigators. Scale bar, 40 μm. (f) Statistical analysis of the data presented in (e) panel. (g) Vero-E6 cells were treated as in (e) and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h. (h) ZIKV E and NS1 RNA levels were detected by quantitative RT-PCR. Data were normalized to GAPDH, log10-transformed, and presented as fold change compared to the virus control group (set to 1). Negative values indicate inhibition of viral replication. (i) Plaque reduction assay assessing the antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs against ZIKV. (j) Statistical analysis of the percentage of plaque reduction. (k) ZIKV NS5 protein levels in (g) were analyzed by Western blot. Data in panels (f, h, j and k) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
    Vero E6, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 20171 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/vero e6/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 20171 article reviews
    vero e6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Cord blood natural killer cell-derived extracellular vesicles inhibit Zika virus infectivity through ITGB2/perforin-mediated envelope disruption in vitro and in vivo"

    Article Title: Cord blood natural killer cell-derived extracellular vesicles inhibit Zika virus infectivity through ITGB2/perforin-mediated envelope disruption in vitro and in vivo

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.01.030

    Characterization and anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Isolation of CBNK cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. (b) Collection of CBNK-EVs and NTA for size distribution and concentration. (c) Morphological observation of CBNK-EVs by transmission electron microscopy, scale bar:100 nm. (d) WB analysis of specific markers for CBNK-EVs. (e) Anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs assessed by immunofluorescence. Vero-E6 cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 1 × 10 5 cells per well one day prior to experiments. Cells were pretreated with varying volumes of CBNK-EVs (stock concentration: 3 × 10 11 particles/mL) for 1 h to achieve the indicated final particle counts, followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h in the presence of fresh medium containing the same EVs. ZIKV-infected cells were quantified by counting E protein-positive cells in three random fields by two independent investigators. Scale bar, 40 μm. (f) Statistical analysis of the data presented in (e) panel. (g) Vero-E6 cells were treated as in (e) and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h. (h) ZIKV E and NS1 RNA levels were detected by quantitative RT-PCR. Data were normalized to GAPDH, log10-transformed, and presented as fold change compared to the virus control group (set to 1). Negative values indicate inhibition of viral replication. (i) Plaque reduction assay assessing the antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs against ZIKV. (j) Statistical analysis of the percentage of plaque reduction. (k) ZIKV NS5 protein levels in (g) were analyzed by Western blot. Data in panels (f, h, j and k) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Characterization and anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Isolation of CBNK cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. (b) Collection of CBNK-EVs and NTA for size distribution and concentration. (c) Morphological observation of CBNK-EVs by transmission electron microscopy, scale bar:100 nm. (d) WB analysis of specific markers for CBNK-EVs. (e) Anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs assessed by immunofluorescence. Vero-E6 cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 1 × 10 5 cells per well one day prior to experiments. Cells were pretreated with varying volumes of CBNK-EVs (stock concentration: 3 × 10 11 particles/mL) for 1 h to achieve the indicated final particle counts, followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h in the presence of fresh medium containing the same EVs. ZIKV-infected cells were quantified by counting E protein-positive cells in three random fields by two independent investigators. Scale bar, 40 μm. (f) Statistical analysis of the data presented in (e) panel. (g) Vero-E6 cells were treated as in (e) and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h. (h) ZIKV E and NS1 RNA levels were detected by quantitative RT-PCR. Data were normalized to GAPDH, log10-transformed, and presented as fold change compared to the virus control group (set to 1). Negative values indicate inhibition of viral replication. (i) Plaque reduction assay assessing the antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs against ZIKV. (j) Statistical analysis of the percentage of plaque reduction. (k) ZIKV NS5 protein levels in (g) were analyzed by Western blot. Data in panels (f, h, j and k) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Isolation, Fluorescence, FACS, Concentration Assay, Transmission Assay, Electron Microscopy, Immunofluorescence, Infection, Quantitative RT-PCR, Transformation Assay, Virus, Control, Inhibition, Western Blot

    Functional components and mechanisms of CBNK-EVs in combating ZIKV infection. (a) Schematic of three treatment modalities: 1) pre-treatment of cells with CBNK-EVs, 2) pre-treatment of virus with CBNK-EVs, and 3) co-incubation of CBNK-EVs with ZIKV. (b) Vero-E6 cells were seeded at 1 × 10 5 cells per well in 12-well plates and subjected to the treatments outlined in (a), followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h. After 48 h, ZIKV E and ZIKV NS5 protein levels were analyzed by Western blot (left). Densitometric analysis of the protein bands is shown (right, n = 3). (c) Schematic workflow for functional component inactivation in CBNK-EVs (e.g., by heat, protease, or nuclease treatment). (d) Vero-E6 cells were treated with inactivated CBNK-EVs as per the scheme in (c), followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h. ZIKV E and ZIKV NS5 protein levels were analyzed by Western blot after 24 h. Densitometric analysis of the protein bands is shown (right, n = 3). (e) Represent images of the co-localization of CBNK-EVs, ZIKV E and host cells by confocal microscope, scale bar: 5 μm. (f) Fluorescence intensity of CBNK-EV and β-actin co-localization signals (white arrows) in the EVs group. (g) Fluorescence co-localization signals (yellow arrows) of CBNK-EVs and ZIKV in the co-culture group. (h) TEM images of CBNK-EVs, ZIKV particles, and their interactions. Scale bar: 100 nm. (i) Membrane disruption assay. ZIKV particles were co-incubated with CBNK-EVs, followed by treatment with micrococcal nuclease to digest unprotected RNA. Intact viral RNA, indicative of membrane integrity, was then measured by RT-qPCR targeting the ZIKV E. Mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Functional components and mechanisms of CBNK-EVs in combating ZIKV infection. (a) Schematic of three treatment modalities: 1) pre-treatment of cells with CBNK-EVs, 2) pre-treatment of virus with CBNK-EVs, and 3) co-incubation of CBNK-EVs with ZIKV. (b) Vero-E6 cells were seeded at 1 × 10 5 cells per well in 12-well plates and subjected to the treatments outlined in (a), followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h. After 48 h, ZIKV E and ZIKV NS5 protein levels were analyzed by Western blot (left). Densitometric analysis of the protein bands is shown (right, n = 3). (c) Schematic workflow for functional component inactivation in CBNK-EVs (e.g., by heat, protease, or nuclease treatment). (d) Vero-E6 cells were treated with inactivated CBNK-EVs as per the scheme in (c), followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h. ZIKV E and ZIKV NS5 protein levels were analyzed by Western blot after 24 h. Densitometric analysis of the protein bands is shown (right, n = 3). (e) Represent images of the co-localization of CBNK-EVs, ZIKV E and host cells by confocal microscope, scale bar: 5 μm. (f) Fluorescence intensity of CBNK-EV and β-actin co-localization signals (white arrows) in the EVs group. (g) Fluorescence co-localization signals (yellow arrows) of CBNK-EVs and ZIKV in the co-culture group. (h) TEM images of CBNK-EVs, ZIKV particles, and their interactions. Scale bar: 100 nm. (i) Membrane disruption assay. ZIKV particles were co-incubated with CBNK-EVs, followed by treatment with micrococcal nuclease to digest unprotected RNA. Intact viral RNA, indicative of membrane integrity, was then measured by RT-qPCR targeting the ZIKV E. Mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).

    Techniques Used: Functional Assay, Infection, Virus, Incubation, Western Blot, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Co-Culture Assay, Membrane, Disruption, Quantitative RT-PCR

    Perforin mediates the direct virion-disrupting activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Quantification of perforin and granzyme B in CBNK-EVs by ELISA. (b) Vero-E6 cells were infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) after pre-incubation of viral particles with 40 ng/L of recombinant perforin or granzyme B for 2 h. ZIKV E protein levels were assessed by Western blot after 24 h, densitometric analysis of the protein bands is shown (right, n = 3). (c) CBNK-EVs were pre-incubated with ZIKV in the presence or absence of 10 mM EGTA, followed by micrococcal nuclease digestion. Protected ZIKV E RNA was quantified by RT-qPCR to assess virion integrity. (d) Western blot analysis of perforin expression in CBNK cells after transfection with the indicated siRNAs. (e) Quantification of perforin levels from (d). (f) Perforin levels in CBNK-EVs collected from control or perforin-knockdown cells, measured by ELISA and normalized to particle count (per 10 11 particles, n = 6). (g) Vero-E6 cells were infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) that had been pre-incubated with control or perforin-knockdown CBNK-EVs. ZIKV E protein levels were evaluated by Western blot. (h) Analysis of ZIKV E protein levels from (g). (i) Characterization of ITGB2-EVs and control EVs from 293T cells by NTA and TEM. Scale bar, 100 nm. (j) Zeta potential measurements of ITGB2-EVs and control EVs. (k) Western blot analysis of EV markers and ITGB2 expression in ITGB2-EVs and control EVs. (l) Antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs and ITGB2-EVs evaluated by cell-based ZIKV E protein ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Perforin mediates the direct virion-disrupting activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Quantification of perforin and granzyme B in CBNK-EVs by ELISA. (b) Vero-E6 cells were infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) after pre-incubation of viral particles with 40 ng/L of recombinant perforin or granzyme B for 2 h. ZIKV E protein levels were assessed by Western blot after 24 h, densitometric analysis of the protein bands is shown (right, n = 3). (c) CBNK-EVs were pre-incubated with ZIKV in the presence or absence of 10 mM EGTA, followed by micrococcal nuclease digestion. Protected ZIKV E RNA was quantified by RT-qPCR to assess virion integrity. (d) Western blot analysis of perforin expression in CBNK cells after transfection with the indicated siRNAs. (e) Quantification of perforin levels from (d). (f) Perforin levels in CBNK-EVs collected from control or perforin-knockdown cells, measured by ELISA and normalized to particle count (per 10 11 particles, n = 6). (g) Vero-E6 cells were infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) that had been pre-incubated with control or perforin-knockdown CBNK-EVs. ZIKV E protein levels were evaluated by Western blot. (h) Analysis of ZIKV E protein levels from (g). (i) Characterization of ITGB2-EVs and control EVs from 293T cells by NTA and TEM. Scale bar, 100 nm. (j) Zeta potential measurements of ITGB2-EVs and control EVs. (k) Western blot analysis of EV markers and ITGB2 expression in ITGB2-EVs and control EVs. (l) Antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs and ITGB2-EVs evaluated by cell-based ZIKV E protein ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).

    Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Infection, Incubation, Recombinant, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Transfection, Control, Knockdown, Zeta Potential Analyzer

    ITGB2 facilitates CBNK-EVs binding to Zika virions and enhances cellular susceptibility to ZIKV. (a) Multicolor immunofluorescence staining of 293T cells transfected with ITGB2, showing co-localization (yellow) between ITGB2 (green) and ZIKV E protein (red). Scale bar: 20 μm. (b) Quantitative analysis of ZIKV E-positive 293T cells from (a). (c) Fluorescence intensity profile along white arrows in (a), indicating sites of ITGB2 and ZIKV E co-localization. (d) 293T cells were transfected with increasing amounts (0.5, 1, 2 μg) of ITGB2 plasmid and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h. ZIKV RNA levels were measured by qPCR to assess infection susceptibility (mean ± SD, n = 3). (e) Molecular docking model predicting the interaction interface between ITGB2 and ZIKV E protein. (f) Co-IP assay in 293T cells, followed by immunoblotting with anti-ZIKV E protein antibody. (g) CBNK-EVs were pre-incubated with ITGB2 mAb (0, 5, 20 μg/mL) before being applied to Vero-E6 or BHK-21 cells. Cells were then infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h, and antiviral activity was assessed by measuring ZIKV RNA levels at 24 h post-infection. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 for d and g; n = 6 for b). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).
    Figure Legend Snippet: ITGB2 facilitates CBNK-EVs binding to Zika virions and enhances cellular susceptibility to ZIKV. (a) Multicolor immunofluorescence staining of 293T cells transfected with ITGB2, showing co-localization (yellow) between ITGB2 (green) and ZIKV E protein (red). Scale bar: 20 μm. (b) Quantitative analysis of ZIKV E-positive 293T cells from (a). (c) Fluorescence intensity profile along white arrows in (a), indicating sites of ITGB2 and ZIKV E co-localization. (d) 293T cells were transfected with increasing amounts (0.5, 1, 2 μg) of ITGB2 plasmid and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h. ZIKV RNA levels were measured by qPCR to assess infection susceptibility (mean ± SD, n = 3). (e) Molecular docking model predicting the interaction interface between ITGB2 and ZIKV E protein. (f) Co-IP assay in 293T cells, followed by immunoblotting with anti-ZIKV E protein antibody. (g) CBNK-EVs were pre-incubated with ITGB2 mAb (0, 5, 20 μg/mL) before being applied to Vero-E6 or BHK-21 cells. Cells were then infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h, and antiviral activity was assessed by measuring ZIKV RNA levels at 24 h post-infection. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 for d and g; n = 6 for b). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).

    Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Multicolor Immunofluorescence Staining, Transfection, Fluorescence, Plasmid Preparation, Infection, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Western Blot, Incubation, Activity Assay



    Similar Products

    99
    ATCC vero e6
    Characterization and anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Isolation of CBNK cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. (b) Collection of CBNK-EVs and NTA for size distribution and concentration. (c) Morphological observation of CBNK-EVs by transmission electron microscopy, scale bar:100 nm. (d) WB analysis of specific markers for CBNK-EVs. (e) Anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs assessed by immunofluorescence. <t>Vero-E6</t> cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 1 × 10 5 cells per well one day prior to experiments. Cells were pretreated with varying volumes of CBNK-EVs (stock concentration: 3 × 10 11 particles/mL) for 1 h to achieve the indicated final particle counts, followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h in the presence of fresh medium containing the same EVs. ZIKV-infected cells were quantified by counting E protein-positive cells in three random fields by two independent investigators. Scale bar, 40 μm. (f) Statistical analysis of the data presented in (e) panel. (g) Vero-E6 cells were treated as in (e) and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h. (h) ZIKV E and NS1 RNA levels were detected by quantitative RT-PCR. Data were normalized to GAPDH, log10-transformed, and presented as fold change compared to the virus control group (set to 1). Negative values indicate inhibition of viral replication. (i) Plaque reduction assay assessing the antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs against ZIKV. (j) Statistical analysis of the percentage of plaque reduction. (k) ZIKV NS5 protein levels in (g) were analyzed by Western blot. Data in panels (f, h, j and k) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
    Vero E6, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/vero e6/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    vero e6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Aerocrine Inc niox vero
    Characterization and anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Isolation of CBNK cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. (b) Collection of CBNK-EVs and NTA for size distribution and concentration. (c) Morphological observation of CBNK-EVs by transmission electron microscopy, scale bar:100 nm. (d) WB analysis of specific markers for CBNK-EVs. (e) Anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs assessed by immunofluorescence. <t>Vero-E6</t> cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 1 × 10 5 cells per well one day prior to experiments. Cells were pretreated with varying volumes of CBNK-EVs (stock concentration: 3 × 10 11 particles/mL) for 1 h to achieve the indicated final particle counts, followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h in the presence of fresh medium containing the same EVs. ZIKV-infected cells were quantified by counting E protein-positive cells in three random fields by two independent investigators. Scale bar, 40 μm. (f) Statistical analysis of the data presented in (e) panel. (g) Vero-E6 cells were treated as in (e) and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h. (h) ZIKV E and NS1 RNA levels were detected by quantitative RT-PCR. Data were normalized to GAPDH, log10-transformed, and presented as fold change compared to the virus control group (set to 1). Negative values indicate inhibition of viral replication. (i) Plaque reduction assay assessing the antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs against ZIKV. (j) Statistical analysis of the percentage of plaque reduction. (k) ZIKV NS5 protein levels in (g) were analyzed by Western blot. Data in panels (f, h, j and k) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
    Niox Vero, supplied by Aerocrine Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/niox vero/product/Aerocrine Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    niox vero - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC vero e6 cells
    Characterization and anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Isolation of CBNK cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. (b) Collection of CBNK-EVs and NTA for size distribution and concentration. (c) Morphological observation of CBNK-EVs by transmission electron microscopy, scale bar:100 nm. (d) WB analysis of specific markers for CBNK-EVs. (e) Anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs assessed by immunofluorescence. <t>Vero-E6</t> cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 1 × 10 5 cells per well one day prior to experiments. Cells were pretreated with varying volumes of CBNK-EVs (stock concentration: 3 × 10 11 particles/mL) for 1 h to achieve the indicated final particle counts, followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h in the presence of fresh medium containing the same EVs. ZIKV-infected cells were quantified by counting E protein-positive cells in three random fields by two independent investigators. Scale bar, 40 μm. (f) Statistical analysis of the data presented in (e) panel. (g) Vero-E6 cells were treated as in (e) and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h. (h) ZIKV E and NS1 RNA levels were detected by quantitative RT-PCR. Data were normalized to GAPDH, log10-transformed, and presented as fold change compared to the virus control group (set to 1). Negative values indicate inhibition of viral replication. (i) Plaque reduction assay assessing the antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs against ZIKV. (j) Statistical analysis of the percentage of plaque reduction. (k) ZIKV NS5 protein levels in (g) were analyzed by Western blot. Data in panels (f, h, j and k) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
    Vero E6 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/vero e6 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    vero e6 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC inoculation
    Characterization and anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Isolation of CBNK cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. (b) Collection of CBNK-EVs and NTA for size distribution and concentration. (c) Morphological observation of CBNK-EVs by transmission electron microscopy, scale bar:100 nm. (d) WB analysis of specific markers for CBNK-EVs. (e) Anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs assessed by immunofluorescence. <t>Vero-E6</t> cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 1 × 10 5 cells per well one day prior to experiments. Cells were pretreated with varying volumes of CBNK-EVs (stock concentration: 3 × 10 11 particles/mL) for 1 h to achieve the indicated final particle counts, followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h in the presence of fresh medium containing the same EVs. ZIKV-infected cells were quantified by counting E protein-positive cells in three random fields by two independent investigators. Scale bar, 40 μm. (f) Statistical analysis of the data presented in (e) panel. (g) Vero-E6 cells were treated as in (e) and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h. (h) ZIKV E and NS1 RNA levels were detected by quantitative RT-PCR. Data were normalized to GAPDH, log10-transformed, and presented as fold change compared to the virus control group (set to 1). Negative values indicate inhibition of viral replication. (i) Plaque reduction assay assessing the antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs against ZIKV. (j) Statistical analysis of the percentage of plaque reduction. (k) ZIKV NS5 protein levels in (g) were analyzed by Western blot. Data in panels (f, h, j and k) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
    Inoculation, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/inoculation/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    inoculation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    vero  (ATCC)
    99
    ATCC vero
    Characterization and anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Isolation of CBNK cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. (b) Collection of CBNK-EVs and NTA for size distribution and concentration. (c) Morphological observation of CBNK-EVs by transmission electron microscopy, scale bar:100 nm. (d) WB analysis of specific markers for CBNK-EVs. (e) Anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs assessed by immunofluorescence. <t>Vero-E6</t> cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 1 × 10 5 cells per well one day prior to experiments. Cells were pretreated with varying volumes of CBNK-EVs (stock concentration: 3 × 10 11 particles/mL) for 1 h to achieve the indicated final particle counts, followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h in the presence of fresh medium containing the same EVs. ZIKV-infected cells were quantified by counting E protein-positive cells in three random fields by two independent investigators. Scale bar, 40 μm. (f) Statistical analysis of the data presented in (e) panel. (g) Vero-E6 cells were treated as in (e) and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h. (h) ZIKV E and NS1 RNA levels were detected by quantitative RT-PCR. Data were normalized to GAPDH, log10-transformed, and presented as fold change compared to the virus control group (set to 1). Negative values indicate inhibition of viral replication. (i) Plaque reduction assay assessing the antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs against ZIKV. (j) Statistical analysis of the percentage of plaque reduction. (k) ZIKV NS5 protein levels in (g) were analyzed by Western blot. Data in panels (f, h, j and k) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
    Vero, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/vero/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    vero - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    ccl  (ATCC)
    99
    ATCC ccl
    Characterization and anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Isolation of CBNK cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. (b) Collection of CBNK-EVs and NTA for size distribution and concentration. (c) Morphological observation of CBNK-EVs by transmission electron microscopy, scale bar:100 nm. (d) WB analysis of specific markers for CBNK-EVs. (e) Anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs assessed by immunofluorescence. <t>Vero-E6</t> cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 1 × 10 5 cells per well one day prior to experiments. Cells were pretreated with varying volumes of CBNK-EVs (stock concentration: 3 × 10 11 particles/mL) for 1 h to achieve the indicated final particle counts, followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h in the presence of fresh medium containing the same EVs. ZIKV-infected cells were quantified by counting E protein-positive cells in three random fields by two independent investigators. Scale bar, 40 μm. (f) Statistical analysis of the data presented in (e) panel. (g) Vero-E6 cells were treated as in (e) and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h. (h) ZIKV E and NS1 RNA levels were detected by quantitative RT-PCR. Data were normalized to GAPDH, log10-transformed, and presented as fold change compared to the virus control group (set to 1). Negative values indicate inhibition of viral replication. (i) Plaque reduction assay assessing the antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs against ZIKV. (j) Statistical analysis of the percentage of plaque reduction. (k) ZIKV NS5 protein levels in (g) were analyzed by Western blot. Data in panels (f, h, j and k) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
    Ccl, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ccl/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ccl - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC vero cells
    MV-Blina, an oncolytic measles virus encoding the CD19/CD3-bispecific T cell engager, replicates and is cytotoxic (A) Schematic of MV-Blina. Genomes of the parental MV-Edm strain and <t>the</t> <t>recombinant</t> MV-Blina. The bsTE construct contains the anti-human-CD19 variable heavy/light domain (CD19 V H/L ) and the anti-human-CD3 variable heavy/light domain (CD3 V H/L ). (B) Enhanced replication of MV-Blina compared to MV-Edm. Replication of MV-Blina was assessed by infecting <t>Vero</t> cells at MOI 0.01 or 1.0 with MV-Blina and MV-Edm, respectively. Viral titers at the indicated time points were determined with a titration assay. Results are shown as means ± SD of n = 3 from independent experiments seeded in duplicates. (C) Comparable cytotoxicity of MV-Blina and parental MV-Edm. Vero cells were infected with MOI 0.01, 0.1, or 1.0 of MV-Blina and MV-Edm, respectively. Cell viability was determined using the MTT assay at the indicated time points. Results are shown as means ± SD of n ≥ 3 from independent experiments seeded in sextuplicates. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. ns, not significant; ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01; ∗∗∗, p < 0.001; and ∗∗∗∗, p < 0.0001.
    Vero Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/vero cells/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    vero cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Characterization and anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Isolation of CBNK cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. (b) Collection of CBNK-EVs and NTA for size distribution and concentration. (c) Morphological observation of CBNK-EVs by transmission electron microscopy, scale bar:100 nm. (d) WB analysis of specific markers for CBNK-EVs. (e) Anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs assessed by immunofluorescence. Vero-E6 cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 1 × 10 5 cells per well one day prior to experiments. Cells were pretreated with varying volumes of CBNK-EVs (stock concentration: 3 × 10 11 particles/mL) for 1 h to achieve the indicated final particle counts, followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h in the presence of fresh medium containing the same EVs. ZIKV-infected cells were quantified by counting E protein-positive cells in three random fields by two independent investigators. Scale bar, 40 μm. (f) Statistical analysis of the data presented in (e) panel. (g) Vero-E6 cells were treated as in (e) and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h. (h) ZIKV E and NS1 RNA levels were detected by quantitative RT-PCR. Data were normalized to GAPDH, log10-transformed, and presented as fold change compared to the virus control group (set to 1). Negative values indicate inhibition of viral replication. (i) Plaque reduction assay assessing the antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs against ZIKV. (j) Statistical analysis of the percentage of plaque reduction. (k) ZIKV NS5 protein levels in (g) were analyzed by Western blot. Data in panels (f, h, j and k) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Cord blood natural killer cell-derived extracellular vesicles inhibit Zika virus infectivity through ITGB2/perforin-mediated envelope disruption in vitro and in vivo

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.01.030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Characterization and anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Isolation of CBNK cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. (b) Collection of CBNK-EVs and NTA for size distribution and concentration. (c) Morphological observation of CBNK-EVs by transmission electron microscopy, scale bar:100 nm. (d) WB analysis of specific markers for CBNK-EVs. (e) Anti-ZIKV activity of CBNK-EVs assessed by immunofluorescence. Vero-E6 cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 1 × 10 5 cells per well one day prior to experiments. Cells were pretreated with varying volumes of CBNK-EVs (stock concentration: 3 × 10 11 particles/mL) for 1 h to achieve the indicated final particle counts, followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h in the presence of fresh medium containing the same EVs. ZIKV-infected cells were quantified by counting E protein-positive cells in three random fields by two independent investigators. Scale bar, 40 μm. (f) Statistical analysis of the data presented in (e) panel. (g) Vero-E6 cells were treated as in (e) and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 24 h. (h) ZIKV E and NS1 RNA levels were detected by quantitative RT-PCR. Data were normalized to GAPDH, log10-transformed, and presented as fold change compared to the virus control group (set to 1). Negative values indicate inhibition of viral replication. (i) Plaque reduction assay assessing the antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs against ZIKV. (j) Statistical analysis of the percentage of plaque reduction. (k) ZIKV NS5 protein levels in (g) were analyzed by Western blot. Data in panels (f, h, j and k) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Vero E6, BHK21, 293T and HTR-8/Svneo cells were purchased from ATCC.

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Isolation, Fluorescence, FACS, Concentration Assay, Transmission Assay, Electron Microscopy, Immunofluorescence, Infection, Quantitative RT-PCR, Transformation Assay, Virus, Control, Inhibition, Western Blot

    Functional components and mechanisms of CBNK-EVs in combating ZIKV infection. (a) Schematic of three treatment modalities: 1) pre-treatment of cells with CBNK-EVs, 2) pre-treatment of virus with CBNK-EVs, and 3) co-incubation of CBNK-EVs with ZIKV. (b) Vero-E6 cells were seeded at 1 × 10 5 cells per well in 12-well plates and subjected to the treatments outlined in (a), followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h. After 48 h, ZIKV E and ZIKV NS5 protein levels were analyzed by Western blot (left). Densitometric analysis of the protein bands is shown (right, n = 3). (c) Schematic workflow for functional component inactivation in CBNK-EVs (e.g., by heat, protease, or nuclease treatment). (d) Vero-E6 cells were treated with inactivated CBNK-EVs as per the scheme in (c), followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h. ZIKV E and ZIKV NS5 protein levels were analyzed by Western blot after 24 h. Densitometric analysis of the protein bands is shown (right, n = 3). (e) Represent images of the co-localization of CBNK-EVs, ZIKV E and host cells by confocal microscope, scale bar: 5 μm. (f) Fluorescence intensity of CBNK-EV and β-actin co-localization signals (white arrows) in the EVs group. (g) Fluorescence co-localization signals (yellow arrows) of CBNK-EVs and ZIKV in the co-culture group. (h) TEM images of CBNK-EVs, ZIKV particles, and their interactions. Scale bar: 100 nm. (i) Membrane disruption assay. ZIKV particles were co-incubated with CBNK-EVs, followed by treatment with micrococcal nuclease to digest unprotected RNA. Intact viral RNA, indicative of membrane integrity, was then measured by RT-qPCR targeting the ZIKV E. Mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Cord blood natural killer cell-derived extracellular vesicles inhibit Zika virus infectivity through ITGB2/perforin-mediated envelope disruption in vitro and in vivo

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.01.030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional components and mechanisms of CBNK-EVs in combating ZIKV infection. (a) Schematic of three treatment modalities: 1) pre-treatment of cells with CBNK-EVs, 2) pre-treatment of virus with CBNK-EVs, and 3) co-incubation of CBNK-EVs with ZIKV. (b) Vero-E6 cells were seeded at 1 × 10 5 cells per well in 12-well plates and subjected to the treatments outlined in (a), followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h. After 48 h, ZIKV E and ZIKV NS5 protein levels were analyzed by Western blot (left). Densitometric analysis of the protein bands is shown (right, n = 3). (c) Schematic workflow for functional component inactivation in CBNK-EVs (e.g., by heat, protease, or nuclease treatment). (d) Vero-E6 cells were treated with inactivated CBNK-EVs as per the scheme in (c), followed by infection with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h. ZIKV E and ZIKV NS5 protein levels were analyzed by Western blot after 24 h. Densitometric analysis of the protein bands is shown (right, n = 3). (e) Represent images of the co-localization of CBNK-EVs, ZIKV E and host cells by confocal microscope, scale bar: 5 μm. (f) Fluorescence intensity of CBNK-EV and β-actin co-localization signals (white arrows) in the EVs group. (g) Fluorescence co-localization signals (yellow arrows) of CBNK-EVs and ZIKV in the co-culture group. (h) TEM images of CBNK-EVs, ZIKV particles, and their interactions. Scale bar: 100 nm. (i) Membrane disruption assay. ZIKV particles were co-incubated with CBNK-EVs, followed by treatment with micrococcal nuclease to digest unprotected RNA. Intact viral RNA, indicative of membrane integrity, was then measured by RT-qPCR targeting the ZIKV E. Mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).

    Article Snippet: Vero E6, BHK21, 293T and HTR-8/Svneo cells were purchased from ATCC.

    Techniques: Functional Assay, Infection, Virus, Incubation, Western Blot, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Co-Culture Assay, Membrane, Disruption, Quantitative RT-PCR

    Perforin mediates the direct virion-disrupting activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Quantification of perforin and granzyme B in CBNK-EVs by ELISA. (b) Vero-E6 cells were infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) after pre-incubation of viral particles with 40 ng/L of recombinant perforin or granzyme B for 2 h. ZIKV E protein levels were assessed by Western blot after 24 h, densitometric analysis of the protein bands is shown (right, n = 3). (c) CBNK-EVs were pre-incubated with ZIKV in the presence or absence of 10 mM EGTA, followed by micrococcal nuclease digestion. Protected ZIKV E RNA was quantified by RT-qPCR to assess virion integrity. (d) Western blot analysis of perforin expression in CBNK cells after transfection with the indicated siRNAs. (e) Quantification of perforin levels from (d). (f) Perforin levels in CBNK-EVs collected from control or perforin-knockdown cells, measured by ELISA and normalized to particle count (per 10 11 particles, n = 6). (g) Vero-E6 cells were infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) that had been pre-incubated with control or perforin-knockdown CBNK-EVs. ZIKV E protein levels were evaluated by Western blot. (h) Analysis of ZIKV E protein levels from (g). (i) Characterization of ITGB2-EVs and control EVs from 293T cells by NTA and TEM. Scale bar, 100 nm. (j) Zeta potential measurements of ITGB2-EVs and control EVs. (k) Western blot analysis of EV markers and ITGB2 expression in ITGB2-EVs and control EVs. (l) Antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs and ITGB2-EVs evaluated by cell-based ZIKV E protein ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Cord blood natural killer cell-derived extracellular vesicles inhibit Zika virus infectivity through ITGB2/perforin-mediated envelope disruption in vitro and in vivo

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.01.030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Perforin mediates the direct virion-disrupting activity of CBNK-EVs. (a) Quantification of perforin and granzyme B in CBNK-EVs by ELISA. (b) Vero-E6 cells were infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) after pre-incubation of viral particles with 40 ng/L of recombinant perforin or granzyme B for 2 h. ZIKV E protein levels were assessed by Western blot after 24 h, densitometric analysis of the protein bands is shown (right, n = 3). (c) CBNK-EVs were pre-incubated with ZIKV in the presence or absence of 10 mM EGTA, followed by micrococcal nuclease digestion. Protected ZIKV E RNA was quantified by RT-qPCR to assess virion integrity. (d) Western blot analysis of perforin expression in CBNK cells after transfection with the indicated siRNAs. (e) Quantification of perforin levels from (d). (f) Perforin levels in CBNK-EVs collected from control or perforin-knockdown cells, measured by ELISA and normalized to particle count (per 10 11 particles, n = 6). (g) Vero-E6 cells were infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) that had been pre-incubated with control or perforin-knockdown CBNK-EVs. ZIKV E protein levels were evaluated by Western blot. (h) Analysis of ZIKV E protein levels from (g). (i) Characterization of ITGB2-EVs and control EVs from 293T cells by NTA and TEM. Scale bar, 100 nm. (j) Zeta potential measurements of ITGB2-EVs and control EVs. (k) Western blot analysis of EV markers and ITGB2 expression in ITGB2-EVs and control EVs. (l) Antiviral activity of CBNK-EVs and ITGB2-EVs evaluated by cell-based ZIKV E protein ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).

    Article Snippet: Vero E6, BHK21, 293T and HTR-8/Svneo cells were purchased from ATCC.

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Infection, Incubation, Recombinant, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Transfection, Control, Knockdown, Zeta Potential Analyzer

    ITGB2 facilitates CBNK-EVs binding to Zika virions and enhances cellular susceptibility to ZIKV. (a) Multicolor immunofluorescence staining of 293T cells transfected with ITGB2, showing co-localization (yellow) between ITGB2 (green) and ZIKV E protein (red). Scale bar: 20 μm. (b) Quantitative analysis of ZIKV E-positive 293T cells from (a). (c) Fluorescence intensity profile along white arrows in (a), indicating sites of ITGB2 and ZIKV E co-localization. (d) 293T cells were transfected with increasing amounts (0.5, 1, 2 μg) of ITGB2 plasmid and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h. ZIKV RNA levels were measured by qPCR to assess infection susceptibility (mean ± SD, n = 3). (e) Molecular docking model predicting the interaction interface between ITGB2 and ZIKV E protein. (f) Co-IP assay in 293T cells, followed by immunoblotting with anti-ZIKV E protein antibody. (g) CBNK-EVs were pre-incubated with ITGB2 mAb (0, 5, 20 μg/mL) before being applied to Vero-E6 or BHK-21 cells. Cells were then infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h, and antiviral activity was assessed by measuring ZIKV RNA levels at 24 h post-infection. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 for d and g; n = 6 for b). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Cord blood natural killer cell-derived extracellular vesicles inhibit Zika virus infectivity through ITGB2/perforin-mediated envelope disruption in vitro and in vivo

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.01.030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ITGB2 facilitates CBNK-EVs binding to Zika virions and enhances cellular susceptibility to ZIKV. (a) Multicolor immunofluorescence staining of 293T cells transfected with ITGB2, showing co-localization (yellow) between ITGB2 (green) and ZIKV E protein (red). Scale bar: 20 μm. (b) Quantitative analysis of ZIKV E-positive 293T cells from (a). (c) Fluorescence intensity profile along white arrows in (a), indicating sites of ITGB2 and ZIKV E co-localization. (d) 293T cells were transfected with increasing amounts (0.5, 1, 2 μg) of ITGB2 plasmid and infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h. ZIKV RNA levels were measured by qPCR to assess infection susceptibility (mean ± SD, n = 3). (e) Molecular docking model predicting the interaction interface between ITGB2 and ZIKV E protein. (f) Co-IP assay in 293T cells, followed by immunoblotting with anti-ZIKV E protein antibody. (g) CBNK-EVs were pre-incubated with ITGB2 mAb (0, 5, 20 μg/mL) before being applied to Vero-E6 or BHK-21 cells. Cells were then infected with ZIKV (MOI = 1) for 1 h, and antiviral activity was assessed by measuring ZIKV RNA levels at 24 h post-infection. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 for d and g; n = 6 for b). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).

    Article Snippet: Vero E6, BHK21, 293T and HTR-8/Svneo cells were purchased from ATCC.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Multicolor Immunofluorescence Staining, Transfection, Fluorescence, Plasmid Preparation, Infection, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Western Blot, Incubation, Activity Assay

    MV-Blina, an oncolytic measles virus encoding the CD19/CD3-bispecific T cell engager, replicates and is cytotoxic (A) Schematic of MV-Blina. Genomes of the parental MV-Edm strain and the recombinant MV-Blina. The bsTE construct contains the anti-human-CD19 variable heavy/light domain (CD19 V H/L ) and the anti-human-CD3 variable heavy/light domain (CD3 V H/L ). (B) Enhanced replication of MV-Blina compared to MV-Edm. Replication of MV-Blina was assessed by infecting Vero cells at MOI 0.01 or 1.0 with MV-Blina and MV-Edm, respectively. Viral titers at the indicated time points were determined with a titration assay. Results are shown as means ± SD of n = 3 from independent experiments seeded in duplicates. (C) Comparable cytotoxicity of MV-Blina and parental MV-Edm. Vero cells were infected with MOI 0.01, 0.1, or 1.0 of MV-Blina and MV-Edm, respectively. Cell viability was determined using the MTT assay at the indicated time points. Results are shown as means ± SD of n ≥ 3 from independent experiments seeded in sextuplicates. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. ns, not significant; ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01; ∗∗∗, p < 0.001; and ∗∗∗∗, p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy Oncology

    Article Title: A measles virus encoding a CD19/CD3 bispecific T cell engager shows enhanced preclinical anti-BCP-ALL efficacy without significant toxicity

    doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2026.201127

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MV-Blina, an oncolytic measles virus encoding the CD19/CD3-bispecific T cell engager, replicates and is cytotoxic (A) Schematic of MV-Blina. Genomes of the parental MV-Edm strain and the recombinant MV-Blina. The bsTE construct contains the anti-human-CD19 variable heavy/light domain (CD19 V H/L ) and the anti-human-CD3 variable heavy/light domain (CD3 V H/L ). (B) Enhanced replication of MV-Blina compared to MV-Edm. Replication of MV-Blina was assessed by infecting Vero cells at MOI 0.01 or 1.0 with MV-Blina and MV-Edm, respectively. Viral titers at the indicated time points were determined with a titration assay. Results are shown as means ± SD of n = 3 from independent experiments seeded in duplicates. (C) Comparable cytotoxicity of MV-Blina and parental MV-Edm. Vero cells were infected with MOI 0.01, 0.1, or 1.0 of MV-Blina and MV-Edm, respectively. Cell viability was determined using the MTT assay at the indicated time points. Results are shown as means ± SD of n ≥ 3 from independent experiments seeded in sextuplicates. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. ns, not significant; ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01; ∗∗∗, p < 0.001; and ∗∗∗∗, p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: The recombinant MV-bsTE virus was generated by transfecting Vero cells with antigenomic cDNA constructs as described previously., The MV-Edmonston B strain (VR-24, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) was obtained and amplified prior to experiments.

    Techniques: Virus, Recombinant, Construct, Titration, Infection, MTT Assay

    MV-Blina infected cells secrete target-binding secBlina, which initiates ALL cell kill more efficiently than CD19/CD3-bsTE (A) Vero cells secrete secBlina. secBlina was harvested from the supernatant of infected Vero cells, followed by purification and concentration. Eluate (2 μg protein) was detected via His-tag by Western Blot in comparison to the commercial CD19/CD3-bsTE (1.8 μg). (B) Purified and concentrated secBlina binds specifically to target cells. Binding to target cells was confirmed by flow cytometry using CD3 − CD19 + REH, CD3 + CD19 - Jurkat, and CD3 − CD19 - K562 cell lines incubated with secBlina. Binding of secBlina to target cells was detected by flow cytometry via a His-tag antibody. (C) secBlina strongly binds to REH target cells. The REH cell line was first incubated with 1 μg secBlina. Increasing concentrations of CD19/CD3-bsTE were then added to displace cell-bound secBlina. Cell-bound secBlina was detected via an HA tag antibody by flow cytometry. (D) T cells in human PBMCs are activated by secBlina. Pooled PBMCs were stimulated with an (E) T cells are activated by secBlina during co-culture of PBMCs with REH cells. Pooled PBMCs were co-cultured with REH cells in a 1:1-ratio for 24 h while being treated with secBlina or the CD19/CD3-bsTE. Activated CD2 + CD69 + T cells were detected by flow cytometry. (F) MV-Blina infected leukemia cells produce and secrete secBlina. REH and Jurkat cells are shown 72 h post MV infection or Opti-MEM control. secBlina was detected by His-tag IF staining. Scale bars 50 μm. (G) secBlina effectively induces REH target cell kill compared to CD19/CD3-bsTE, whereas K562 control cells are unaffected. Target (T) cells REH (left panels) and negative control cells K562 (right panels) were incubated with secBlina (green) or CD19/CD3-bsTE (blue) for 24 h at indicated concentrations in the presence of PBMCs (effector; E) at different E:T ratios. Specific cell kill was determined by flow cytometry. Results in A, B, C, and F are shown as representatives of three independent experiments. Data are shown as mean ± SD of n = 3 (D, E) or n = 5 (G) independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. ns, not significant; ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01; ∗∗∗, p < 0.001; and ∗∗∗∗, p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy Oncology

    Article Title: A measles virus encoding a CD19/CD3 bispecific T cell engager shows enhanced preclinical anti-BCP-ALL efficacy without significant toxicity

    doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2026.201127

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MV-Blina infected cells secrete target-binding secBlina, which initiates ALL cell kill more efficiently than CD19/CD3-bsTE (A) Vero cells secrete secBlina. secBlina was harvested from the supernatant of infected Vero cells, followed by purification and concentration. Eluate (2 μg protein) was detected via His-tag by Western Blot in comparison to the commercial CD19/CD3-bsTE (1.8 μg). (B) Purified and concentrated secBlina binds specifically to target cells. Binding to target cells was confirmed by flow cytometry using CD3 − CD19 + REH, CD3 + CD19 - Jurkat, and CD3 − CD19 - K562 cell lines incubated with secBlina. Binding of secBlina to target cells was detected by flow cytometry via a His-tag antibody. (C) secBlina strongly binds to REH target cells. The REH cell line was first incubated with 1 μg secBlina. Increasing concentrations of CD19/CD3-bsTE were then added to displace cell-bound secBlina. Cell-bound secBlina was detected via an HA tag antibody by flow cytometry. (D) T cells in human PBMCs are activated by secBlina. Pooled PBMCs were stimulated with an (E) T cells are activated by secBlina during co-culture of PBMCs with REH cells. Pooled PBMCs were co-cultured with REH cells in a 1:1-ratio for 24 h while being treated with secBlina or the CD19/CD3-bsTE. Activated CD2 + CD69 + T cells were detected by flow cytometry. (F) MV-Blina infected leukemia cells produce and secrete secBlina. REH and Jurkat cells are shown 72 h post MV infection or Opti-MEM control. secBlina was detected by His-tag IF staining. Scale bars 50 μm. (G) secBlina effectively induces REH target cell kill compared to CD19/CD3-bsTE, whereas K562 control cells are unaffected. Target (T) cells REH (left panels) and negative control cells K562 (right panels) were incubated with secBlina (green) or CD19/CD3-bsTE (blue) for 24 h at indicated concentrations in the presence of PBMCs (effector; E) at different E:T ratios. Specific cell kill was determined by flow cytometry. Results in A, B, C, and F are shown as representatives of three independent experiments. Data are shown as mean ± SD of n = 3 (D, E) or n = 5 (G) independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. ns, not significant; ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01; ∗∗∗, p < 0.001; and ∗∗∗∗, p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: The recombinant MV-bsTE virus was generated by transfecting Vero cells with antigenomic cDNA constructs as described previously., The MV-Edmonston B strain (VR-24, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) was obtained and amplified prior to experiments.

    Techniques: Infection, Binding Assay, Purification, Concentration Assay, Western Blot, Comparison, Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Co-Culture Assay, Cell Culture, Control, Staining, Negative Control