psb12379 (MedChemExpress)
Structured Review

Psb12379, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 6 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/psb12379/product/MedChemExpress
Average 93 stars, based on 6 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Synergistic Disruption of Survival and Metastatic Potential in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Cells Through Combined Inhibition of HIF1α and CD73"
Article Title: Synergistic Disruption of Survival and Metastatic Potential in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Cells Through Combined Inhibition of HIF1α and CD73
Journal: Cancers
doi: 10.3390/cancers17244016
Figure Legend Snippet: EAC cells are sensitive to HIF1α and NT5E inhibition, with enhanced effects under hypoxic conditions. ( A , B ) HIF1α and NT5E expression measured by qPCR ( A ) and cell viability measurements expressed as % growth (cell titer relative to day 0) ( B ) upon NT5E knockdown; qPCR data represent mean ± SEM of n = 4; statistical significance determined by unpaired two-tailed t -test. ( C ) Cell viability in HIF1α knockdown alone and in combination with NT5E knockdown under normoxic or hypoxic conditions at 72 h; data are mean ± SEM ( n = 3); comparisons analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s correction. ( D ) % cell growth (cell titer relative to day 0) comparing acriflavine treatment in normoxic and hypoxic conditions. ( E ) % cell growth for combined treatment with acriflavine and PSB12379 under normoxic and hypoxic conditions, showing synergistic viability reduction. ( F ) NT5E CRISPR dependency scores from DepMap across cancer lineages, indicating NT5E is broadly non-essential. ns = not significant; * p -value < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Inhibition, Expressing, Knockdown, Two Tailed Test, CRISPR
Figure Legend Snippet: HIF1α and NT5E inhibition alter purinergic metabolite levels in esophageal adenocarcinoma cells. ( A ) Schematic illustrating hypoxia-induced NT5E expression and the enzymatic conversion of AMP to adenosine. ( B ) Intracellular and extracellular adenosine levels in FLO-1 cells measured by LC-MS, cultured under normoxia or hypoxia. Data represent mean ± SD ( n = 3 biological replicates); significance determined by unpaired two-tailed t -test. ( C ) Intracellular and extracellular AMP levels under the same conditions. Data represent mean ± SD ( n = 3); significance determined by unpaired two-tailed t -test. ( D ) Dose-dependent changes in intracellular adenosine following treatment with PSB12379 , acriflavine, or their combination under hypoxia. Data represent mean ± SD ( n = 3); analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ( E ) Adenosine levels in conditioned media from the same experiment, showing dose-dependent accumulation at low and intermediate PSB12379 concentrations, followed by reduction at the highest dose. Data represent mean ± SD ( n = 3); analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. ( F ) Intracellular AMP levels under the same treatment conditions; PSB12379 -induced AMP accumulation further enhanced by acriflavine co-treatment. Data represent mean ± SD ( n = 3); analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ns = not significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Inhibition, Expressing, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy, Cell Culture, Two Tailed Test, Comparison
