Review



mouse spermatogonial gc1  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    ATCC mouse spermatogonial gc1
    Determination of the IC50 values (μ m ) for <t>GC1</t> and GC2 cell lines following 24 h SAL exposure. Representative phase‐contrast images demonstrate the typical epithelioid morphology of cells maintained under standard culture conditions and the reduced viability observed at the IC50 concentration of SAL. The cell images on the left side represent control (C) cells, while the images on the right side represent cells treated with IC50 concentrations of SAL (IC50 SAL). Black arrow: Living cell. White arrow: Dead cell. Scale bar: 100 μm.
    Mouse Spermatogonial Gc1, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 271 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse spermatogonial gc1/product/ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 271 article reviews
    mouse spermatogonial gc1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "The effect of salubrinal on the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway in heat‐stressed spermatogonial cells in vitro"

    Article Title: The effect of salubrinal on the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway in heat‐stressed spermatogonial cells in vitro

    Journal: FEBS Open Bio

    doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.70169

    Determination of the IC50 values (μ m ) for GC1 and GC2 cell lines following 24 h SAL exposure. Representative phase‐contrast images demonstrate the typical epithelioid morphology of cells maintained under standard culture conditions and the reduced viability observed at the IC50 concentration of SAL. The cell images on the left side represent control (C) cells, while the images on the right side represent cells treated with IC50 concentrations of SAL (IC50 SAL). Black arrow: Living cell. White arrow: Dead cell. Scale bar: 100 μm.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Determination of the IC50 values (μ m ) for GC1 and GC2 cell lines following 24 h SAL exposure. Representative phase‐contrast images demonstrate the typical epithelioid morphology of cells maintained under standard culture conditions and the reduced viability observed at the IC50 concentration of SAL. The cell images on the left side represent control (C) cells, while the images on the right side represent cells treated with IC50 concentrations of SAL (IC50 SAL). Black arrow: Living cell. White arrow: Dead cell. Scale bar: 100 μm.

    Techniques Used: Concentration Assay, Control

    Inverted microscope images of GC1 and GC2 experimental groups. Quantitative analysis shows a decrease in viable cell numbers in the HSM‐applied groups compared to controls. Data are expressed as mean ± SD ( n = 3, 10 randomly selected fields per group). Statistical analysis: one‐way ANOVA, followed by Sidak's post hoc test. (** P < 0.05; statistical analysis was performed using graphpad Software). Scale bar: 100 μm.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Inverted microscope images of GC1 and GC2 experimental groups. Quantitative analysis shows a decrease in viable cell numbers in the HSM‐applied groups compared to controls. Data are expressed as mean ± SD ( n = 3, 10 randomly selected fields per group). Statistical analysis: one‐way ANOVA, followed by Sidak's post hoc test. (** P < 0.05; statistical analysis was performed using graphpad Software). Scale bar: 100 μm.

    Techniques Used: Inverted Microscopy, Software

    Representative fluorescent images (each image is an overlay with DAPI nuclear staining) and quantitative CTCF values for HSP70, GRP78, p‐IRE1α, p‐PERK, p‐eIF2α, and ATF6 in GC1 cells across all groups (C, SAL, HSM, HSMSAL). Composite images were generated by merging individual fluorescence channels. Data are expressed as mean ± SD ( n = 3, 10 fields/group). Statistical analysis: one‐way ANOVA, followed by Sidak's post hoc test. (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001; statistical analysis was performed using graphpad Software). Scale bar: 50 μm.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Representative fluorescent images (each image is an overlay with DAPI nuclear staining) and quantitative CTCF values for HSP70, GRP78, p‐IRE1α, p‐PERK, p‐eIF2α, and ATF6 in GC1 cells across all groups (C, SAL, HSM, HSMSAL). Composite images were generated by merging individual fluorescence channels. Data are expressed as mean ± SD ( n = 3, 10 fields/group). Statistical analysis: one‐way ANOVA, followed by Sidak's post hoc test. (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001; statistical analysis was performed using graphpad Software). Scale bar: 50 μm.

    Techniques Used: Staining, Generated, Fluorescence, Software

    Relative mRNA expression levels of GRP78 (A), PERK (B), and eIF2α (C) in GC1 and GC2 cells. Gene expression was quantified by qRT‐PCR and analyzed using the 2 − Δ Δ C t method. The control groups (GC1C and GC2C) were designated as calibrators and normalized to a fixed value of 1.0 by definition. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent biological replicates, each analyzed in technical triplicates. Individual data points are shown for all groups. Statistical evaluation was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn's post hoc test (* P < 0.05; statistical analysis was performed using graphpad Software).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Relative mRNA expression levels of GRP78 (A), PERK (B), and eIF2α (C) in GC1 and GC2 cells. Gene expression was quantified by qRT‐PCR and analyzed using the 2 − Δ Δ C t method. The control groups (GC1C and GC2C) were designated as calibrators and normalized to a fixed value of 1.0 by definition. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent biological replicates, each analyzed in technical triplicates. Individual data points are shown for all groups. Statistical evaluation was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn's post hoc test (* P < 0.05; statistical analysis was performed using graphpad Software).

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Gene Expression, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Software



    Similar Products

    96
    ATCC mouse spermatogonial gc1
    Determination of the IC50 values (μ m ) for <t>GC1</t> and GC2 cell lines following 24 h SAL exposure. Representative phase‐contrast images demonstrate the typical epithelioid morphology of cells maintained under standard culture conditions and the reduced viability observed at the IC50 concentration of SAL. The cell images on the left side represent control (C) cells, while the images on the right side represent cells treated with IC50 concentrations of SAL (IC50 SAL). Black arrow: Living cell. White arrow: Dead cell. Scale bar: 100 μm.
    Mouse Spermatogonial Gc1, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse spermatogonial gc1/product/ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse spermatogonial gc1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    gc1  (ATCC)
    96
    ATCC gc1
    Determination of the IC50 values (μ m ) for <t>GC1</t> and GC2 cell lines following 24 h SAL exposure. Representative phase‐contrast images demonstrate the typical epithelioid morphology of cells maintained under standard culture conditions and the reduced viability observed at the IC50 concentration of SAL. The cell images on the left side represent control (C) cells, while the images on the right side represent cells treated with IC50 concentrations of SAL (IC50 SAL). Black arrow: Living cell. White arrow: Dead cell. Scale bar: 100 μm.
    Gc1, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gc1/product/ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gc1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC mouse derived gc1 spg
    Determination of the IC50 values (μ m ) for <t>GC1</t> and GC2 cell lines following 24 h SAL exposure. Representative phase‐contrast images demonstrate the typical epithelioid morphology of cells maintained under standard culture conditions and the reduced viability observed at the IC50 concentration of SAL. The cell images on the left side represent control (C) cells, while the images on the right side represent cells treated with IC50 concentrations of SAL (IC50 SAL). Black arrow: Living cell. White arrow: Dead cell. Scale bar: 100 μm.
    Mouse Derived Gc1 Spg, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse derived gc1 spg/product/ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse derived gc1 spg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC gc1 cells
    Determination of the IC50 values (μ m ) for <t>GC1</t> and GC2 cell lines following 24 h SAL exposure. Representative phase‐contrast images demonstrate the typical epithelioid morphology of cells maintained under standard culture conditions and the reduced viability observed at the IC50 concentration of SAL. The cell images on the left side represent control (C) cells, while the images on the right side represent cells treated with IC50 concentrations of SAL (IC50 SAL). Black arrow: Living cell. White arrow: Dead cell. Scale bar: 100 μm.
    Gc1 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gc1 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gc1 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Molecular Instruments gc1-rb -b2
    KEY RESOURCES TABLE
    Gc1 Rb B2, supplied by Molecular Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gc1-rb -b2/product/Molecular Instruments
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gc1-rb -b2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech gc1
    ( A ) Immunoblotting analysis of the expression of phototransduction proteins, including RHO, <t>GC1,</t> GC2, GRK1, and PDE6B in retinas of P30 WT and KO mice. GAPDH was used as a loading control. ( B ) Quantification of immunoblotting signals shown in ( A ). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; unpaired t -test. ( C, D ) Immunostaining of P30 mouse retinal sections to label RHO, GC1, GC2, PDE6B, GRK1, and GCAP2 (green). Nuclei were label with DAPI (blue). OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( E ) COS-7 cells transfected to co-express recombinant RHO-mCherry with EGFP (upper panel) or REEP6-EGFP (lower panel). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm.
    Gc1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gc1/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gc1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech anti gc1
    ( A ) Immunoblotting analysis of the expression of phototransduction proteins, including RHO, <t>GC1,</t> GC2, GRK1, and PDE6B in retinas of P30 WT and KO mice. GAPDH was used as a loading control. ( B ) Quantification of immunoblotting signals shown in ( A ). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; unpaired t -test. ( C, D ) Immunostaining of P30 mouse retinal sections to label RHO, GC1, GC2, PDE6B, GRK1, and GCAP2 (green). Nuclei were label with DAPI (blue). OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( E ) COS-7 cells transfected to co-express recombinant RHO-mCherry with EGFP (upper panel) or REEP6-EGFP (lower panel). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm.
    Anti Gc1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti gc1/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti gc1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Determination of the IC50 values (μ m ) for GC1 and GC2 cell lines following 24 h SAL exposure. Representative phase‐contrast images demonstrate the typical epithelioid morphology of cells maintained under standard culture conditions and the reduced viability observed at the IC50 concentration of SAL. The cell images on the left side represent control (C) cells, while the images on the right side represent cells treated with IC50 concentrations of SAL (IC50 SAL). Black arrow: Living cell. White arrow: Dead cell. Scale bar: 100 μm.

    Journal: FEBS Open Bio

    Article Title: The effect of salubrinal on the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway in heat‐stressed spermatogonial cells in vitro

    doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.70169

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Determination of the IC50 values (μ m ) for GC1 and GC2 cell lines following 24 h SAL exposure. Representative phase‐contrast images demonstrate the typical epithelioid morphology of cells maintained under standard culture conditions and the reduced viability observed at the IC50 concentration of SAL. The cell images on the left side represent control (C) cells, while the images on the right side represent cells treated with IC50 concentrations of SAL (IC50 SAL). Black arrow: Living cell. White arrow: Dead cell. Scale bar: 100 μm.

    Article Snippet: The mouse spermatogonial GC1 (ATCC® CRL‐2053TM Manassas, VA, USA) and GC2 (ATCC® CRL‐2196TM Manassas, VA, USA) cell lines used in the study were purchased commercially from ATCC (USA).

    Techniques: Concentration Assay, Control

    Inverted microscope images of GC1 and GC2 experimental groups. Quantitative analysis shows a decrease in viable cell numbers in the HSM‐applied groups compared to controls. Data are expressed as mean ± SD ( n = 3, 10 randomly selected fields per group). Statistical analysis: one‐way ANOVA, followed by Sidak's post hoc test. (** P < 0.05; statistical analysis was performed using graphpad Software). Scale bar: 100 μm.

    Journal: FEBS Open Bio

    Article Title: The effect of salubrinal on the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway in heat‐stressed spermatogonial cells in vitro

    doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.70169

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Inverted microscope images of GC1 and GC2 experimental groups. Quantitative analysis shows a decrease in viable cell numbers in the HSM‐applied groups compared to controls. Data are expressed as mean ± SD ( n = 3, 10 randomly selected fields per group). Statistical analysis: one‐way ANOVA, followed by Sidak's post hoc test. (** P < 0.05; statistical analysis was performed using graphpad Software). Scale bar: 100 μm.

    Article Snippet: The mouse spermatogonial GC1 (ATCC® CRL‐2053TM Manassas, VA, USA) and GC2 (ATCC® CRL‐2196TM Manassas, VA, USA) cell lines used in the study were purchased commercially from ATCC (USA).

    Techniques: Inverted Microscopy, Software

    Representative fluorescent images (each image is an overlay with DAPI nuclear staining) and quantitative CTCF values for HSP70, GRP78, p‐IRE1α, p‐PERK, p‐eIF2α, and ATF6 in GC1 cells across all groups (C, SAL, HSM, HSMSAL). Composite images were generated by merging individual fluorescence channels. Data are expressed as mean ± SD ( n = 3, 10 fields/group). Statistical analysis: one‐way ANOVA, followed by Sidak's post hoc test. (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001; statistical analysis was performed using graphpad Software). Scale bar: 50 μm.

    Journal: FEBS Open Bio

    Article Title: The effect of salubrinal on the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway in heat‐stressed spermatogonial cells in vitro

    doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.70169

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative fluorescent images (each image is an overlay with DAPI nuclear staining) and quantitative CTCF values for HSP70, GRP78, p‐IRE1α, p‐PERK, p‐eIF2α, and ATF6 in GC1 cells across all groups (C, SAL, HSM, HSMSAL). Composite images were generated by merging individual fluorescence channels. Data are expressed as mean ± SD ( n = 3, 10 fields/group). Statistical analysis: one‐way ANOVA, followed by Sidak's post hoc test. (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001; statistical analysis was performed using graphpad Software). Scale bar: 50 μm.

    Article Snippet: The mouse spermatogonial GC1 (ATCC® CRL‐2053TM Manassas, VA, USA) and GC2 (ATCC® CRL‐2196TM Manassas, VA, USA) cell lines used in the study were purchased commercially from ATCC (USA).

    Techniques: Staining, Generated, Fluorescence, Software

    Relative mRNA expression levels of GRP78 (A), PERK (B), and eIF2α (C) in GC1 and GC2 cells. Gene expression was quantified by qRT‐PCR and analyzed using the 2 − Δ Δ C t method. The control groups (GC1C and GC2C) were designated as calibrators and normalized to a fixed value of 1.0 by definition. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent biological replicates, each analyzed in technical triplicates. Individual data points are shown for all groups. Statistical evaluation was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn's post hoc test (* P < 0.05; statistical analysis was performed using graphpad Software).

    Journal: FEBS Open Bio

    Article Title: The effect of salubrinal on the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway in heat‐stressed spermatogonial cells in vitro

    doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.70169

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Relative mRNA expression levels of GRP78 (A), PERK (B), and eIF2α (C) in GC1 and GC2 cells. Gene expression was quantified by qRT‐PCR and analyzed using the 2 − Δ Δ C t method. The control groups (GC1C and GC2C) were designated as calibrators and normalized to a fixed value of 1.0 by definition. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent biological replicates, each analyzed in technical triplicates. Individual data points are shown for all groups. Statistical evaluation was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn's post hoc test (* P < 0.05; statistical analysis was performed using graphpad Software).

    Article Snippet: The mouse spermatogonial GC1 (ATCC® CRL‐2053TM Manassas, VA, USA) and GC2 (ATCC® CRL‐2196TM Manassas, VA, USA) cell lines used in the study were purchased commercially from ATCC (USA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Gene Expression, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Software

    KEY RESOURCES TABLE

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: mRNA decay pre-complex assembly drives timely cell-state transitions during differentiation

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.115138

    Figure Lengend Snippet: KEY RESOURCES TABLE

    Article Snippet: GC1-RB -B2 , Molecular Instruments , GenBank: NM_001275561.

    Techniques: Recombinant, Staining, Software

    ( A ) Immunoblotting analysis of the expression of phototransduction proteins, including RHO, GC1, GC2, GRK1, and PDE6B in retinas of P30 WT and KO mice. GAPDH was used as a loading control. ( B ) Quantification of immunoblotting signals shown in ( A ). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; unpaired t -test. ( C, D ) Immunostaining of P30 mouse retinal sections to label RHO, GC1, GC2, PDE6B, GRK1, and GCAP2 (green). Nuclei were label with DAPI (blue). OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( E ) COS-7 cells transfected to co-express recombinant RHO-mCherry with EGFP (upper panel) or REEP6-EGFP (lower panel). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: REEP6 deficiency impairs ER and Golgi morphologies and causes retinal degeneration by attenuating the expression of phototransduction proteins

    doi: 10.1101/2025.03.02.641069

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Immunoblotting analysis of the expression of phototransduction proteins, including RHO, GC1, GC2, GRK1, and PDE6B in retinas of P30 WT and KO mice. GAPDH was used as a loading control. ( B ) Quantification of immunoblotting signals shown in ( A ). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; unpaired t -test. ( C, D ) Immunostaining of P30 mouse retinal sections to label RHO, GC1, GC2, PDE6B, GRK1, and GCAP2 (green). Nuclei were label with DAPI (blue). OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( E ) COS-7 cells transfected to co-express recombinant RHO-mCherry with EGFP (upper panel) or REEP6-EGFP (lower panel). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm.

    Article Snippet: The sections were immunostained as previously described using primary antibodies against the following proteins: rhodopsin (1:1,000, custom-made ( )), GC1 (1:200, Proteintech, China), GC2 (1:500, a gift from Dr. Wolfgang Baehr at the University of Utah), PDE6B (1:500, Proteintech, China), GRK1 (1:200, Proteintech, China), and GCAP2 (1:500, a gift from Dr. Wolfgang Baehr at the University of Utah).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Control, Immunostaining, Transfection, Recombinant, Staining

    ( A ) Immunoblotting analysis of the expression of phototransduction proteins, including RHO, GC1, GC2, GRK1, and PDE6B in retinas of P30 WT and KO mice. GAPDH was used as a loading control. ( B ) Quantification of immunoblotting signals shown in ( A ). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; unpaired t -test. ( C, D ) Immunostaining of P30 mouse retinal sections to label RHO, GC1, GC2, PDE6B, GRK1, and GCAP2 (green). Nuclei were label with DAPI (blue). OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( E ) COS-7 cells transfected to co-express recombinant RHO-mCherry with EGFP (upper panel) or REEP6-EGFP (lower panel). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: REEP6 deficiency impairs ER and Golgi morphologies and causes retinal degeneration by attenuating the expression of phototransduction proteins

    doi: 10.1101/2025.03.02.641069

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Immunoblotting analysis of the expression of phototransduction proteins, including RHO, GC1, GC2, GRK1, and PDE6B in retinas of P30 WT and KO mice. GAPDH was used as a loading control. ( B ) Quantification of immunoblotting signals shown in ( A ). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; unpaired t -test. ( C, D ) Immunostaining of P30 mouse retinal sections to label RHO, GC1, GC2, PDE6B, GRK1, and GCAP2 (green). Nuclei were label with DAPI (blue). OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer. Scale bar, 20 μm. ( E ) COS-7 cells transfected to co-express recombinant RHO-mCherry with EGFP (upper panel) or REEP6-EGFP (lower panel). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm.

    Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used at the given dilution: anti-REEP6 (1:2,000, Proteintech, China), anti-GAPDH (1:10,000, Proteintech, China), anti-rhodopsin (1:10,000, custom-made ( )), anti-GC1 (1:5000, Proteinch, China), anti-GRK1 (1:5,000, Proteintech, China), anti-GC2 (1:5,000, a gift from Dr. Wolfgang Baehr at the University of Utah), and anti-PDE6B (1:5,000, Proteintech, China).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Control, Immunostaining, Transfection, Recombinant, Staining