Review



dapt  (Tocris)


Bioz Verified Symbol Tocris is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Tocris manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Tocris dapt
    Dapt, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dapt/product/Tocris
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dapt - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    95
    MedChemExpress dapt
    Dapt, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dapt/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dapt - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    dapt  (Tocris)
    96
    Tocris dapt
    Dapt, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dapt/product/Tocris
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dapt - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Selleck Chemicals dapt
    Dapt, supplied by Selleck Chemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dapt/product/Selleck Chemicals
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dapt - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    iwp  (Tocris)
    96
    Tocris iwp
    Iwp, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/iwp/product/Tocris
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    iwp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Selleck Chemicals notch inhibitor dapt
    <t>Simultaneous</t> <t>TGF-β,</t> ROCK, and Notch pathway inhibition promotes VFE proliferation while maintaining core epithelial phenotype (A) Effect of candidate small-molecule inhibitors on VFE proliferation. Cells (5 × 10 4 ) were incubated with 1 μM A-83-01 (TGF-β inhibitor), 10 μM Y-27632 (ROCK inhibitor), and 5 μM <t>DAPT</t> (Notch inhibitor), as indicated. Counts were performed at day 9; data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 6); p values were obtained using mixed-model ANOVA with planned pairwise comparisons shown. Additional dose-response data for DAPT are presented in . (B) Experimental conditions used for subsequent experiments. Cells in the 3i-VFE condition were incubated with a three-molecule cocktail of 1 μM A-83-01, 10 μM Y-27632, and 5 μM DAPT; cells in the VFE condition were incubated with DMSO vehicle. (C) Bright-field images of live cells at passage 3; all cells exhibited cuboidal morphology over serial passages. Scale bar, 20 μm. (D) Single-passage growth curves and population doubling times. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 4); p values were obtained using mixed-model ANOVA. (E) Flow cytometry data showing KRT14 and KRT19 expression. Positive/negative gates (versus unstained controls) are shown in gray. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 3); p values were obtained using a paired t test. (F) RT-qPCR data showing TP63 , PROM1 , KIT , CDH1 , and MUC1 transcription; TUBB is reported as an additional reference standard. Data are presented as fold change relative to VFE (mean ± SEM; n = 3); p values were obtained using a paired t test. (G) Transepithelial electrical resistance. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 6); the p value was obtained using a paired t test. (H) Flow cytometry data showing CD90 and MUC1 (also known as CD227) expression; VFFs are included as a non-epithelial cell control. High/low gates are shown in black. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 3); p values were obtained using paired and unpaired t tests. Note that the 3i-VFE data (light blue) are largely superimposed on the VFE data (dark blue) in the dot plot.
    Notch Inhibitor Dapt, supplied by Selleck Chemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/notch inhibitor dapt/product/Selleck Chemicals
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    notch inhibitor dapt - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Simultaneous TGF-β, ROCK, and Notch pathway inhibition promotes VFE proliferation while maintaining core epithelial phenotype (A) Effect of candidate small-molecule inhibitors on VFE proliferation. Cells (5 × 10 4 ) were incubated with 1 μM A-83-01 (TGF-β inhibitor), 10 μM Y-27632 (ROCK inhibitor), and 5 μM DAPT (Notch inhibitor), as indicated. Counts were performed at day 9; data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 6); p values were obtained using mixed-model ANOVA with planned pairwise comparisons shown. Additional dose-response data for DAPT are presented in . (B) Experimental conditions used for subsequent experiments. Cells in the 3i-VFE condition were incubated with a three-molecule cocktail of 1 μM A-83-01, 10 μM Y-27632, and 5 μM DAPT; cells in the VFE condition were incubated with DMSO vehicle. (C) Bright-field images of live cells at passage 3; all cells exhibited cuboidal morphology over serial passages. Scale bar, 20 μm. (D) Single-passage growth curves and population doubling times. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 4); p values were obtained using mixed-model ANOVA. (E) Flow cytometry data showing KRT14 and KRT19 expression. Positive/negative gates (versus unstained controls) are shown in gray. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 3); p values were obtained using a paired t test. (F) RT-qPCR data showing TP63 , PROM1 , KIT , CDH1 , and MUC1 transcription; TUBB is reported as an additional reference standard. Data are presented as fold change relative to VFE (mean ± SEM; n = 3); p values were obtained using a paired t test. (G) Transepithelial electrical resistance. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 6); the p value was obtained using a paired t test. (H) Flow cytometry data showing CD90 and MUC1 (also known as CD227) expression; VFFs are included as a non-epithelial cell control. High/low gates are shown in black. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 3); p values were obtained using paired and unpaired t tests. Note that the 3i-VFE data (light blue) are largely superimposed on the VFE data (dark blue) in the dot plot.

    Journal: Cell Reports Methods

    Article Title: Rapid expansion of primary human vocal fold epithelial cells via targeted pathway inhibition and anchorage-independent sphere culture

    doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2026.101310

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Simultaneous TGF-β, ROCK, and Notch pathway inhibition promotes VFE proliferation while maintaining core epithelial phenotype (A) Effect of candidate small-molecule inhibitors on VFE proliferation. Cells (5 × 10 4 ) were incubated with 1 μM A-83-01 (TGF-β inhibitor), 10 μM Y-27632 (ROCK inhibitor), and 5 μM DAPT (Notch inhibitor), as indicated. Counts were performed at day 9; data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 6); p values were obtained using mixed-model ANOVA with planned pairwise comparisons shown. Additional dose-response data for DAPT are presented in . (B) Experimental conditions used for subsequent experiments. Cells in the 3i-VFE condition were incubated with a three-molecule cocktail of 1 μM A-83-01, 10 μM Y-27632, and 5 μM DAPT; cells in the VFE condition were incubated with DMSO vehicle. (C) Bright-field images of live cells at passage 3; all cells exhibited cuboidal morphology over serial passages. Scale bar, 20 μm. (D) Single-passage growth curves and population doubling times. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 4); p values were obtained using mixed-model ANOVA. (E) Flow cytometry data showing KRT14 and KRT19 expression. Positive/negative gates (versus unstained controls) are shown in gray. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 3); p values were obtained using a paired t test. (F) RT-qPCR data showing TP63 , PROM1 , KIT , CDH1 , and MUC1 transcription; TUBB is reported as an additional reference standard. Data are presented as fold change relative to VFE (mean ± SEM; n = 3); p values were obtained using a paired t test. (G) Transepithelial electrical resistance. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 6); the p value was obtained using a paired t test. (H) Flow cytometry data showing CD90 and MUC1 (also known as CD227) expression; VFFs are included as a non-epithelial cell control. High/low gates are shown in black. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM ( n = 3); p values were obtained using paired and unpaired t tests. Note that the 3i-VFE data (light blue) are largely superimposed on the VFE data (dark blue) in the dot plot.

    Article Snippet: VFE were seeded in 24-well plates (Corning) at a density of 5 × 10 4 cells per well, cultured in VFE-orientated medium until ∼30% confluent, serum starved for 12 h, then incubated with various combinations of 1 μM TGF-β inhibitor A-83-01, 10 μM ROCK inhibitor Y-27632, and 5 μM Notch inhibitor DAPT (Selleck Chemicals), each prepared from a 1,000× stock solution in DMSO (Thermo Fisher).

    Techniques: Inhibition, Incubation, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control