Review



cidec  (MedChemExpress)


Bioz Verified Symbol MedChemExpress is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol MedChemExpress manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    MedChemExpress cidec
    Cidec, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cidec/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cidec - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    MedChemExpress cidec
    Cidec, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cidec/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cidec - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Thermo Fisher gene exp cidec mm00617672 m1
    Hepatic gene expression and immunoblot analysis of lipogenic enzymes. Sham and OVX mice were pair-fed either a 5% ethanol (EtOH)-containing liquid diet or control diet for 10 days followed by a single oral dose of EtOH (5 g/kg, 30% EtOH solution) on day 11, and mRNA and liver homogenate were prepared for the assays as described in the Experimental procedures section. A , Liver Srebp1 , Cd36 , Scd1 , Scd2 , Fas , and Acc1a mRNAs (n = 5–6). B , Liver Pparγ mRNA and ( C ) liver Fsp27 / <t>Cidec</t> mRNA (n = 6). D , Liver PPARγ protein, E , liver FSP27/CIDEC protein, F , liver FAS protein, and ( G ) liver ACC1α protein (n = 3–4). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 between indicated groups. OVX, ovariectomy; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma.
    Gene Exp Cidec Mm00617672 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp cidec mm00617672 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gene exp cidec mm00617672 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech tukey s multiple comparison test ◂ rabbit anti cidec
    Hepatic gene expression and immunoblot analysis of lipogenic enzymes. Sham and OVX mice were pair-fed either a 5% ethanol (EtOH)-containing liquid diet or control diet for 10 days followed by a single oral dose of EtOH (5 g/kg, 30% EtOH solution) on day 11, and mRNA and liver homogenate were prepared for the assays as described in the Experimental procedures section. A , Liver Srebp1 , Cd36 , Scd1 , Scd2 , Fas , and Acc1a mRNAs (n = 5–6). B , Liver Pparγ mRNA and ( C ) liver Fsp27 / <t>Cidec</t> mRNA (n = 6). D , Liver PPARγ protein, E , liver FSP27/CIDEC protein, F , liver FAS protein, and ( G ) liver ACC1α protein (n = 3–4). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 between indicated groups. OVX, ovariectomy; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma.
    Tukey S Multiple Comparison Test ◂ Rabbit Anti Cidec, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tukey s multiple comparison test ◂ rabbit anti cidec/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tukey s multiple comparison test ◂ rabbit anti cidec - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech rabbit anti cidec
    Hepatic gene expression and immunoblot analysis of lipogenic enzymes. Sham and OVX mice were pair-fed either a 5% ethanol (EtOH)-containing liquid diet or control diet for 10 days followed by a single oral dose of EtOH (5 g/kg, 30% EtOH solution) on day 11, and mRNA and liver homogenate were prepared for the assays as described in the Experimental procedures section. A , Liver Srebp1 , Cd36 , Scd1 , Scd2 , Fas , and Acc1a mRNAs (n = 5–6). B , Liver Pparγ mRNA and ( C ) liver Fsp27 / <t>Cidec</t> mRNA (n = 6). D , Liver PPARγ protein, E , liver FSP27/CIDEC protein, F , liver FAS protein, and ( G ) liver ACC1α protein (n = 3–4). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 between indicated groups. OVX, ovariectomy; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma.
    Rabbit Anti Cidec, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti cidec/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti cidec - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Beyotime anti-cidec
    Hepatic gene expression and immunoblot analysis of lipogenic enzymes. Sham and OVX mice were pair-fed either a 5% ethanol (EtOH)-containing liquid diet or control diet for 10 days followed by a single oral dose of EtOH (5 g/kg, 30% EtOH solution) on day 11, and mRNA and liver homogenate were prepared for the assays as described in the Experimental procedures section. A , Liver Srebp1 , Cd36 , Scd1 , Scd2 , Fas , and Acc1a mRNAs (n = 5–6). B , Liver Pparγ mRNA and ( C ) liver Fsp27 / <t>Cidec</t> mRNA (n = 6). D , Liver PPARγ protein, E , liver FSP27/CIDEC protein, F , liver FAS protein, and ( G ) liver ACC1α protein (n = 3–4). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 between indicated groups. OVX, ovariectomy; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma.
    Anti Cidec, supplied by Beyotime, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-cidec/product/Beyotime
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-cidec - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    85
    Thermo Fisher gene exp cidec hs01032998 m1
    ( a ) Bubble plots showing the significant positive correlation values (R∈[0;1], p-value ≤ 0.05) between the expression of the three selected genes ( HOXA2 , <t>CIDEC</t> and PPARγ) in breast non-tumor/normal and cancer tissues from our cohort (left graph) and from TCGA dataset (right graph). Bubble color (from light to dark blue) indicates the strength (R value) of the correlation. Of note, a strong correlation is in dark blue and corresponds to a R = 1, while a weak correlation is in light blue and corresponds to a R = 0. Bubble size indicates the significance (p-value) of the correlation; bigger is the size of the bubble, lower is the p-value. ( b, c ) The mRNA expression of CIDEC ( b ) and of PPARγ ( c ) was measured in hTERT-HME1 cells wild type (WT) or knockout ( HOXA KO ) for HOXA2 by RT-qPCR. GAPDH was used as endogenous control. ( d, e ) Western blot analysis of the expression of CIDEC and PPARγ in WT and HOXA2 KO cells ( d ) and in WT and HOXA2 KO cells transfected with HOXA2 plasmid (pHOXA2) or the control vector (pCMV) ( e ). Antibodies for Flag ( e ) or β-actin ( d, e ) were employed as control of overexpression of HOXA2 or as loading control, respectively. Experimental workflow employed for lipid droplet tracing ( f ) ( f ; created with BioRender.com). Confocal microscopy images (scale bar equals 10 μm) ( g ) and quantification of the number ( h ) of intracellular lipid droplets (LDs) normalized to cell area and expressed as fold change (FC) to control in hTERT-HME1 WT and HOXA2 KO cells with (+pHOXA2) or without (−pHOXA2) restoration of HOXA2 expression. LDs were stained with BODIPY 493/503 (green), and nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue). b – e , h Data are presented as mean of ± SD from one representative experiment and analyzed with Student’s t -test or ANOVA. FC fold change; hTERT_WT hTERT-HME1 wild type cells; hTERT_HOXA2 KO hTERT-HME1 HOXA2 knockout cells; RT-qPCR reverse-transcription quantitative real time PCR.
    Gene Exp Cidec Hs01032998 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 85/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp cidec hs01032998 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 85 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gene exp cidec hs01032998 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    85/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Thermo Fisher gene exp cidec hs00535724 gh
    Plots for selected genes from microarray gene expression. Total RNA extracted from frozen liver was evaluated for changes using microarray. ( A ) Adh4; ( B ) Aldh4a1; ( C ) Cyp2b10 ; ( D ) <t>Cidec</t> ; ( E ) Ppargc1a ; ( F ) Apoa4 ; ( G ) Tnfrsf12a ; ( H ) Cyp2b9 ; ( I ) Cyp2b13 ; ( J ) Sult2a1 ; ( K ) Sult2a2 ; and ( L ) Acot2 . Data represents mean ± SEM (n = 6). ∗ P ≤ .05, ∗∗ P ≤ .01, ∗∗∗ P ≤ .001, ∗∗∗∗ P ≤ .0001 between indicated groups.
    Gene Exp Cidec Hs00535724 Gh, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp cidec hs00535724 gh/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gene exp cidec hs00535724 gh - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Novus Biologicals fsp27
    Plots for selected genes from microarray gene expression. Total RNA extracted from frozen liver was evaluated for changes using microarray. ( A ) Adh4; ( B ) Aldh4a1; ( C ) Cyp2b10 ; ( D ) <t>Cidec</t> ; ( E ) Ppargc1a ; ( F ) Apoa4 ; ( G ) Tnfrsf12a ; ( H ) Cyp2b9 ; ( I ) Cyp2b13 ; ( J ) Sult2a1 ; ( K ) Sult2a2 ; and ( L ) Acot2 . Data represents mean ± SEM (n = 6). ∗ P ≤ .05, ∗∗ P ≤ .01, ∗∗∗ P ≤ .001, ∗∗∗∗ P ≤ .0001 between indicated groups.
    Fsp27, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fsp27/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fsp27 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Hepatic gene expression and immunoblot analysis of lipogenic enzymes. Sham and OVX mice were pair-fed either a 5% ethanol (EtOH)-containing liquid diet or control diet for 10 days followed by a single oral dose of EtOH (5 g/kg, 30% EtOH solution) on day 11, and mRNA and liver homogenate were prepared for the assays as described in the Experimental procedures section. A , Liver Srebp1 , Cd36 , Scd1 , Scd2 , Fas , and Acc1a mRNAs (n = 5–6). B , Liver Pparγ mRNA and ( C ) liver Fsp27 / Cidec mRNA (n = 6). D , Liver PPARγ protein, E , liver FSP27/CIDEC protein, F , liver FAS protein, and ( G ) liver ACC1α protein (n = 3–4). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 between indicated groups. OVX, ovariectomy; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma.

    Journal: The Journal of Biological Chemistry

    Article Title: Blockade of the estrogen receptor alpha–pregnane X receptor axis protects ovariectomized mice against ethanol-induced hepatotoxicity

    doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110238

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Hepatic gene expression and immunoblot analysis of lipogenic enzymes. Sham and OVX mice were pair-fed either a 5% ethanol (EtOH)-containing liquid diet or control diet for 10 days followed by a single oral dose of EtOH (5 g/kg, 30% EtOH solution) on day 11, and mRNA and liver homogenate were prepared for the assays as described in the Experimental procedures section. A , Liver Srebp1 , Cd36 , Scd1 , Scd2 , Fas , and Acc1a mRNAs (n = 5–6). B , Liver Pparγ mRNA and ( C ) liver Fsp27 / Cidec mRNA (n = 6). D , Liver PPARγ protein, E , liver FSP27/CIDEC protein, F , liver FAS protein, and ( G ) liver ACC1α protein (n = 3–4). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 between indicated groups. OVX, ovariectomy; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma.

    Article Snippet: Fsp27/Cidec , ThermoFisher , Mm00617672_m1.

    Techniques: Gene Expression, Western Blot, Control

    ( a ) Bubble plots showing the significant positive correlation values (R∈[0;1], p-value ≤ 0.05) between the expression of the three selected genes ( HOXA2 , CIDEC and PPARγ) in breast non-tumor/normal and cancer tissues from our cohort (left graph) and from TCGA dataset (right graph). Bubble color (from light to dark blue) indicates the strength (R value) of the correlation. Of note, a strong correlation is in dark blue and corresponds to a R = 1, while a weak correlation is in light blue and corresponds to a R = 0. Bubble size indicates the significance (p-value) of the correlation; bigger is the size of the bubble, lower is the p-value. ( b, c ) The mRNA expression of CIDEC ( b ) and of PPARγ ( c ) was measured in hTERT-HME1 cells wild type (WT) or knockout ( HOXA KO ) for HOXA2 by RT-qPCR. GAPDH was used as endogenous control. ( d, e ) Western blot analysis of the expression of CIDEC and PPARγ in WT and HOXA2 KO cells ( d ) and in WT and HOXA2 KO cells transfected with HOXA2 plasmid (pHOXA2) or the control vector (pCMV) ( e ). Antibodies for Flag ( e ) or β-actin ( d, e ) were employed as control of overexpression of HOXA2 or as loading control, respectively. Experimental workflow employed for lipid droplet tracing ( f ) ( f ; created with BioRender.com). Confocal microscopy images (scale bar equals 10 μm) ( g ) and quantification of the number ( h ) of intracellular lipid droplets (LDs) normalized to cell area and expressed as fold change (FC) to control in hTERT-HME1 WT and HOXA2 KO cells with (+pHOXA2) or without (−pHOXA2) restoration of HOXA2 expression. LDs were stained with BODIPY 493/503 (green), and nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue). b – e , h Data are presented as mean of ± SD from one representative experiment and analyzed with Student’s t -test or ANOVA. FC fold change; hTERT_WT hTERT-HME1 wild type cells; hTERT_HOXA2 KO hTERT-HME1 HOXA2 knockout cells; RT-qPCR reverse-transcription quantitative real time PCR.

    Journal: Cell Death and Differentiation

    Article Title: Epigenetic regulation of HOXA2 expression affects tumor progression and predicts breast cancer patient survival

    doi: 10.1038/s41418-024-01430-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Bubble plots showing the significant positive correlation values (R∈[0;1], p-value ≤ 0.05) between the expression of the three selected genes ( HOXA2 , CIDEC and PPARγ) in breast non-tumor/normal and cancer tissues from our cohort (left graph) and from TCGA dataset (right graph). Bubble color (from light to dark blue) indicates the strength (R value) of the correlation. Of note, a strong correlation is in dark blue and corresponds to a R = 1, while a weak correlation is in light blue and corresponds to a R = 0. Bubble size indicates the significance (p-value) of the correlation; bigger is the size of the bubble, lower is the p-value. ( b, c ) The mRNA expression of CIDEC ( b ) and of PPARγ ( c ) was measured in hTERT-HME1 cells wild type (WT) or knockout ( HOXA KO ) for HOXA2 by RT-qPCR. GAPDH was used as endogenous control. ( d, e ) Western blot analysis of the expression of CIDEC and PPARγ in WT and HOXA2 KO cells ( d ) and in WT and HOXA2 KO cells transfected with HOXA2 plasmid (pHOXA2) or the control vector (pCMV) ( e ). Antibodies for Flag ( e ) or β-actin ( d, e ) were employed as control of overexpression of HOXA2 or as loading control, respectively. Experimental workflow employed for lipid droplet tracing ( f ) ( f ; created with BioRender.com). Confocal microscopy images (scale bar equals 10 μm) ( g ) and quantification of the number ( h ) of intracellular lipid droplets (LDs) normalized to cell area and expressed as fold change (FC) to control in hTERT-HME1 WT and HOXA2 KO cells with (+pHOXA2) or without (−pHOXA2) restoration of HOXA2 expression. LDs were stained with BODIPY 493/503 (green), and nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue). b – e , h Data are presented as mean of ± SD from one representative experiment and analyzed with Student’s t -test or ANOVA. FC fold change; hTERT_WT hTERT-HME1 wild type cells; hTERT_HOXA2 KO hTERT-HME1 HOXA2 knockout cells; RT-qPCR reverse-transcription quantitative real time PCR.

    Article Snippet: Then, 100 ng of cDNA were amplified with specific Taqman probes ( HOXA2: Hs00534579_m1, PPARG: Hs01115513_m1, CIDEC : Hs01032998_m1, all from Thermo Fisher Scientific) carrying out the qPCR on the StepOne TM Real-time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using TaqMan Fast Advanced Master Mix (Applied Biosystems TM ), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Techniques: Expressing, Knock-Out, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Western Blot, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Over Expression, Confocal Microscopy, Staining, Reverse Transcription, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction

    Plots for selected genes from microarray gene expression. Total RNA extracted from frozen liver was evaluated for changes using microarray. ( A ) Adh4; ( B ) Aldh4a1; ( C ) Cyp2b10 ; ( D ) Cidec ; ( E ) Ppargc1a ; ( F ) Apoa4 ; ( G ) Tnfrsf12a ; ( H ) Cyp2b9 ; ( I ) Cyp2b13 ; ( J ) Sult2a1 ; ( K ) Sult2a2 ; and ( L ) Acot2 . Data represents mean ± SEM (n = 6). ∗ P ≤ .05, ∗∗ P ≤ .01, ∗∗∗ P ≤ .001, ∗∗∗∗ P ≤ .0001 between indicated groups.

    Journal: Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology

    Article Title: Human PXR Signaling Exacerbates Ethanol-induced Liver Injury in Females: Evidence From Mouse Models and Human Alcohol-associated Liver Disease Cohorts

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2025.101589

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Plots for selected genes from microarray gene expression. Total RNA extracted from frozen liver was evaluated for changes using microarray. ( A ) Adh4; ( B ) Aldh4a1; ( C ) Cyp2b10 ; ( D ) Cidec ; ( E ) Ppargc1a ; ( F ) Apoa4 ; ( G ) Tnfrsf12a ; ( H ) Cyp2b9 ; ( I ) Cyp2b13 ; ( J ) Sult2a1 ; ( K ) Sult2a2 ; and ( L ) Acot2 . Data represents mean ± SEM (n = 6). ∗ P ≤ .05, ∗∗ P ≤ .01, ∗∗∗ P ≤ .001, ∗∗∗∗ P ≤ .0001 between indicated groups.

    Article Snippet: CIDEC , Hs00535724_gH.

    Techniques: Microarray, Gene Expression

    Effect of ethanol on alcohol metabolism and PXR target genes. Total RNA was extracted from frozen liver obtained and evaluated for changes in mRNA expression of the following genes by RT-qPCR relative to the housekeeping Gapdh mRNA : ( A ) Adh1 ; ( B ) Aldh2 ; ( C ) Aldh1b1 ; ( D ) Aldh1a1 ; ( E ) Cat ; ( F ) m Pxr ; ( G ) h PXR ; ( H ) Cyp3a11 ; ( I ) Pparg ; ( J ) Cidec ; ( K ) Fsp27b ; and ( L ) Cd36 . Frozen liver homogenates were evaluated for changes in expression of the following proteins by Western blot relative to the housekeeping protein α-tubulin: ( M ) ADH protein for WT; ( N ) ADH protein for hPXR; ( O ) ALDH2 protein for WT; ( P ) ALDH2 protein for hPXR; ( Q ) ALDH1B1 protein for WT; ( R ) ALDH1B1 protein for hPXR; ( S ) PXR protein for WT; ( T ) PXR protein for hPXR; ( U ) CYP3A protein for WT; and ( V ) CYP3A protein for hPXR. The membranes used to probe for ADH1 ( M ), PXR ( S ), and CYP3A ( U ) protein expression were stripped and reprobed with primary antibodies against ALDH2 ( O ), ALDH1B1 ( Q ) and PXR ( T ). Data represents mean ± SEM (n = 6). ∗ P ≤ .05, ∗∗ P ≤ .01, ∗∗∗ P ≤ .001, ∗∗∗∗ P ≤ .0001 between indicated groups.

    Journal: Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology

    Article Title: Human PXR Signaling Exacerbates Ethanol-induced Liver Injury in Females: Evidence From Mouse Models and Human Alcohol-associated Liver Disease Cohorts

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2025.101589

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of ethanol on alcohol metabolism and PXR target genes. Total RNA was extracted from frozen liver obtained and evaluated for changes in mRNA expression of the following genes by RT-qPCR relative to the housekeeping Gapdh mRNA : ( A ) Adh1 ; ( B ) Aldh2 ; ( C ) Aldh1b1 ; ( D ) Aldh1a1 ; ( E ) Cat ; ( F ) m Pxr ; ( G ) h PXR ; ( H ) Cyp3a11 ; ( I ) Pparg ; ( J ) Cidec ; ( K ) Fsp27b ; and ( L ) Cd36 . Frozen liver homogenates were evaluated for changes in expression of the following proteins by Western blot relative to the housekeeping protein α-tubulin: ( M ) ADH protein for WT; ( N ) ADH protein for hPXR; ( O ) ALDH2 protein for WT; ( P ) ALDH2 protein for hPXR; ( Q ) ALDH1B1 protein for WT; ( R ) ALDH1B1 protein for hPXR; ( S ) PXR protein for WT; ( T ) PXR protein for hPXR; ( U ) CYP3A protein for WT; and ( V ) CYP3A protein for hPXR. The membranes used to probe for ADH1 ( M ), PXR ( S ), and CYP3A ( U ) protein expression were stripped and reprobed with primary antibodies against ALDH2 ( O ), ALDH1B1 ( Q ) and PXR ( T ). Data represents mean ± SEM (n = 6). ∗ P ≤ .05, ∗∗ P ≤ .01, ∗∗∗ P ≤ .001, ∗∗∗∗ P ≤ .0001 between indicated groups.

    Article Snippet: CIDEC , Hs00535724_gH.

    Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot

    Patients with ALD also presented with upregulated lipogenic, inflammatory, and hepatotoxic genes. Total RNA was extracted from liver obtained from ALD and normal patients evaluated for changes in mRNA expression of the following genes by RT-qPCR relative to the housekeeping Gapdh mRNA : ( A ) PXR ; ( B ) CYP2B6 ; ( C ) CIDEC ; ( D ) AKR1B10 ; ( E ) FGF21 ; and ( F ) TNFRSF12A . TMA from liver also presented these results: ( G ) PXR1; ( H ) CYP2B6. Data represents mean ± SEM (n = 4–12). ∗ P ≤ .05, ∗∗ P ≤ .01, ∗∗∗ P ≤ .001, ∗∗∗∗ P ≤ .0001 between indicated groups.

    Journal: Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology

    Article Title: Human PXR Signaling Exacerbates Ethanol-induced Liver Injury in Females: Evidence From Mouse Models and Human Alcohol-associated Liver Disease Cohorts

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2025.101589

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Patients with ALD also presented with upregulated lipogenic, inflammatory, and hepatotoxic genes. Total RNA was extracted from liver obtained from ALD and normal patients evaluated for changes in mRNA expression of the following genes by RT-qPCR relative to the housekeeping Gapdh mRNA : ( A ) PXR ; ( B ) CYP2B6 ; ( C ) CIDEC ; ( D ) AKR1B10 ; ( E ) FGF21 ; and ( F ) TNFRSF12A . TMA from liver also presented these results: ( G ) PXR1; ( H ) CYP2B6. Data represents mean ± SEM (n = 4–12). ∗ P ≤ .05, ∗∗ P ≤ .01, ∗∗∗ P ≤ .001, ∗∗∗∗ P ≤ .0001 between indicated groups.

    Article Snippet: CIDEC , Hs00535724_gH.

    Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR

    No significant changes in gene expression were observed between patients with ALD steatohepatitis and patients with ALD cirrhosis. Total RNA was extracted from liver obtained from ALD and normal patients evaluated for changes in mRNA expression of the following genes by RT-qPCR relative to the housekeeping Gapdh mRNA: ( A ) PXR ; ( B ) CYP2B6 ; ( C ) CIDEC ; ( D ) AKR1B10 ; ( E ) FGF21 ; ( F ) TNFRSF12A . Data represents mean ± SEM (n = 2–11). ∗ P ≤ .05, ∗∗ P ≤ .01, ∗∗∗ P ≤ .001, ∗∗∗∗ P ≤ .0001 between indicated groups.

    Journal: Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology

    Article Title: Human PXR Signaling Exacerbates Ethanol-induced Liver Injury in Females: Evidence From Mouse Models and Human Alcohol-associated Liver Disease Cohorts

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2025.101589

    Figure Lengend Snippet: No significant changes in gene expression were observed between patients with ALD steatohepatitis and patients with ALD cirrhosis. Total RNA was extracted from liver obtained from ALD and normal patients evaluated for changes in mRNA expression of the following genes by RT-qPCR relative to the housekeeping Gapdh mRNA: ( A ) PXR ; ( B ) CYP2B6 ; ( C ) CIDEC ; ( D ) AKR1B10 ; ( E ) FGF21 ; ( F ) TNFRSF12A . Data represents mean ± SEM (n = 2–11). ∗ P ≤ .05, ∗∗ P ≤ .01, ∗∗∗ P ≤ .001, ∗∗∗∗ P ≤ .0001 between indicated groups.

    Article Snippet: CIDEC , Hs00535724_gH.

    Techniques: Gene Expression, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR