cdk4 6i abemaciclib (MedChemExpress)
Structured Review

Cdk4 6i Abemaciclib, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cdk4 6i abemaciclib/product/MedChemExpress
Average 93 stars, based on 5 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "CDK4/6 inhibition sensitizes breast cancer to NK cell therapy by inducing immune-interactive surface proteins"
Article Title: CDK4/6 inhibition sensitizes breast cancer to NK cell therapy by inducing immune-interactive surface proteins
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.04.19.719504
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Representative flow cytometry plots showing surface expression of indicated NK cell-activating and inhibiting signals in a PDO158 treated with 1 μM abemaciclib or vehicle control for 5 days. ( B ) Quantification of surface marker expression across 11 PDOs treated as in (A). n=3. ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 (two-way ANOVA). ( C ) Pie chart showing the proportion of PDOs that upregulated stress ligands and ICAM-1 after CDK4/6i treatment based on data in (B).
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Control, Marker
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A, B ) Schematic of in vivo experiments administering CDK4/6i and NK cells sequentially (A) or concurrently (B). For sequential treatment (experiments 1 and 2, C-F), mice were pretreated with abemaciclib for 7-11 days, followed by a single NK cell infusion (10×10⁶ cells/injection). For concurrent treatment (experiment 3, G-H), mice were pretreated with abemaciclib for one week, and abemaciclib and NK cells (10×10⁶ cells/injection, weekly) were administered simultaneously. ( C ) Experiment 1, sequential treatment. Tumor growth curves in PDX-bearing mice treated with abemaciclib (75 mg/kg, daily) and NK92 cells. The treatment schedule is as shown in (A). n = 5 mice/group. Statistical significance calculated using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test. ( D ) Corresponding survival curves for the experiment in (C). The Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to compare the combo and vehicle groups. ( E-F ) Tumor growth and survival in Experiment 2 with sequential treatment. The treatment scheme is shown in (A). Doses and analyses as in (C-D). n = 5 mice/group. ( G-H ) Tumor growth and survival in Experiment 3 with concurrent treatment. The treatment scheme is shown in (B). Doses and analyses as in (C-D). n = 5 mice/group.
Techniques Used: In Vivo, Injection


![HCT116 cells (5 × 10³ cells/well) were exposed for 48 h to increasing concentrations of (A) 5-fluorouracil (0.77–7700 μM), (B) SN-38 (0.02–200 nM), (C) oxaliplatin (0.125–250 μM), and (D) <t>the</t> <t>CDK4/6</t> inhibitors abemaciclib (25–3000 nM) or palbociclib (25–6400 nM). Cell viability was assessed by Calcein AM fluorescence and expressed as a percentage of the untreated control (100%). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM of six independent biological replicates. Dose–response curves were fitted by nonlinear regression using a four-parameter logistic model (variable slope; log[inhibitor] vs. normalized response) in GraphPad Prism 8.4.3.](https://bio-rxiv-images-cdn.bioz.com/dois_ending_with_43/10__64898_slash_2026__04__15__718743/10__64898_slash_2026__04__15__718743___F1.large.jpg)