Review



tlr9 antagonist  (MedChemExpress)


Bioz Verified Symbol MedChemExpress is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol MedChemExpress manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 94
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    MedChemExpress tlr9 antagonist
    The TLR4‐P38 MAPK/P65 NF‐kB signaling pathways mediate the‐pyroptotic‐microenvironment‐induced MET formation. A) Western blot analysis of p‐ERK, p‐p38, p‐JNK and p‐p65 levels in macrophages cocultured with pyroptotic‐CM for 4 h. B,C) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of the ERK, JNK, p38 MAPK, and p65 NF‐kB pathways prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM. The MET formation by macrophages was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in B and the quantification of B is shown in C (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). D) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4, <t>TLR9</t> and RAGE prior to coculture with pyroptotic‐CM, and the p‐p38 and p‐p65 levels in macrophages were measured by western blotting. E,F) The MET formation of macrophages pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4 and RAGE prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in E and the quantification of E is shown in F (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
    Tlr9 Antagonist, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 4 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tlr9 antagonist/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 4 article reviews
    tlr9 antagonist - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "HMGB1 Derived from the Pyroptotic Microenvironment Promotes Macrophage Extracellular Traps in Hirschsprung‐Associated Enterocolitis"

    Article Title: HMGB1 Derived from the Pyroptotic Microenvironment Promotes Macrophage Extracellular Traps in Hirschsprung‐Associated Enterocolitis

    Journal: Advanced Biology

    doi: 10.1002/adbi.202400761

    The TLR4‐P38 MAPK/P65 NF‐kB signaling pathways mediate the‐pyroptotic‐microenvironment‐induced MET formation. A) Western blot analysis of p‐ERK, p‐p38, p‐JNK and p‐p65 levels in macrophages cocultured with pyroptotic‐CM for 4 h. B,C) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of the ERK, JNK, p38 MAPK, and p65 NF‐kB pathways prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM. The MET formation by macrophages was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in B and the quantification of B is shown in C (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). D) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4, TLR9 and RAGE prior to coculture with pyroptotic‐CM, and the p‐p38 and p‐p65 levels in macrophages were measured by western blotting. E,F) The MET formation of macrophages pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4 and RAGE prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in E and the quantification of E is shown in F (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: The TLR4‐P38 MAPK/P65 NF‐kB signaling pathways mediate the‐pyroptotic‐microenvironment‐induced MET formation. A) Western blot analysis of p‐ERK, p‐p38, p‐JNK and p‐p65 levels in macrophages cocultured with pyroptotic‐CM for 4 h. B,C) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of the ERK, JNK, p38 MAPK, and p65 NF‐kB pathways prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM. The MET formation by macrophages was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in B and the quantification of B is shown in C (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). D) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4, TLR9 and RAGE prior to coculture with pyroptotic‐CM, and the p‐p38 and p‐p65 levels in macrophages were measured by western blotting. E,F) The MET formation of macrophages pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4 and RAGE prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in E and the quantification of E is shown in F (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

    Techniques Used: Protein-Protein interactions, Western Blot, Incubation, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Comparison



    Similar Products

    tlr9 antagonist  (MedChemExpress)
    94
    MedChemExpress tlr9 antagonist
    The TLR4‐P38 MAPK/P65 NF‐kB signaling pathways mediate the‐pyroptotic‐microenvironment‐induced MET formation. A) Western blot analysis of p‐ERK, p‐p38, p‐JNK and p‐p65 levels in macrophages cocultured with pyroptotic‐CM for 4 h. B,C) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of the ERK, JNK, p38 MAPK, and p65 NF‐kB pathways prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM. The MET formation by macrophages was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in B and the quantification of B is shown in C (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). D) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4, <t>TLR9</t> and RAGE prior to coculture with pyroptotic‐CM, and the p‐p38 and p‐p65 levels in macrophages were measured by western blotting. E,F) The MET formation of macrophages pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4 and RAGE prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in E and the quantification of E is shown in F (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
    Tlr9 Antagonist, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tlr9 antagonist/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tlr9 antagonist - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    tlr7 9  (MedChemExpress)
    94
    MedChemExpress tlr7 9
    The TLR4‐P38 MAPK/P65 NF‐kB signaling pathways mediate the‐pyroptotic‐microenvironment‐induced MET formation. A) Western blot analysis of p‐ERK, p‐p38, p‐JNK and p‐p65 levels in macrophages cocultured with pyroptotic‐CM for 4 h. B,C) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of the ERK, JNK, p38 MAPK, and p65 NF‐kB pathways prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM. The MET formation by macrophages was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in B and the quantification of B is shown in C (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). D) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4, <t>TLR9</t> and RAGE prior to coculture with pyroptotic‐CM, and the p‐p38 and p‐p65 levels in macrophages were measured by western blotting. E,F) The MET formation of macrophages pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4 and RAGE prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in E and the quantification of E is shown in F (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
    Tlr7 9, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tlr7 9/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tlr7 9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    tlr7/8/9-in-1  (MedChemExpress)
    94
    MedChemExpress tlr7/8/9-in-1
    The TLR4‐P38 MAPK/P65 NF‐kB signaling pathways mediate the‐pyroptotic‐microenvironment‐induced MET formation. A) Western blot analysis of p‐ERK, p‐p38, p‐JNK and p‐p65 levels in macrophages cocultured with pyroptotic‐CM for 4 h. B,C) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of the ERK, JNK, p38 MAPK, and p65 NF‐kB pathways prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM. The MET formation by macrophages was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in B and the quantification of B is shown in C (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). D) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4, <t>TLR9</t> and RAGE prior to coculture with pyroptotic‐CM, and the p‐p38 and p‐p65 levels in macrophages were measured by western blotting. E,F) The MET formation of macrophages pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4 and RAGE prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in E and the quantification of E is shown in F (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
    Tlr7/8/9 In 1, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tlr7/8/9-in-1/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tlr7/8/9-in-1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The TLR4‐P38 MAPK/P65 NF‐kB signaling pathways mediate the‐pyroptotic‐microenvironment‐induced MET formation. A) Western blot analysis of p‐ERK, p‐p38, p‐JNK and p‐p65 levels in macrophages cocultured with pyroptotic‐CM for 4 h. B,C) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of the ERK, JNK, p38 MAPK, and p65 NF‐kB pathways prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM. The MET formation by macrophages was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in B and the quantification of B is shown in C (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). D) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4, TLR9 and RAGE prior to coculture with pyroptotic‐CM, and the p‐p38 and p‐p65 levels in macrophages were measured by western blotting. E,F) The MET formation of macrophages pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4 and RAGE prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in E and the quantification of E is shown in F (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Advanced Biology

    Article Title: HMGB1 Derived from the Pyroptotic Microenvironment Promotes Macrophage Extracellular Traps in Hirschsprung‐Associated Enterocolitis

    doi: 10.1002/adbi.202400761

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The TLR4‐P38 MAPK/P65 NF‐kB signaling pathways mediate the‐pyroptotic‐microenvironment‐induced MET formation. A) Western blot analysis of p‐ERK, p‐p38, p‐JNK and p‐p65 levels in macrophages cocultured with pyroptotic‐CM for 4 h. B,C) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of the ERK, JNK, p38 MAPK, and p65 NF‐kB pathways prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM. The MET formation by macrophages was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in B and the quantification of B is shown in C (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). D) Macrophages were pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4, TLR9 and RAGE prior to coculture with pyroptotic‐CM, and the p‐p38 and p‐p65 levels in macrophages were measured by western blotting. E,F) The MET formation of macrophages pretreated with inhibitors of TLR2, TLR4 and RAGE prior to incubation with pyroptotic‐CM was evaluated with SYTOX Green staining and detected by flow cytometry. The representative images are shown in E and the quantification of E is shown in F (one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple‐comparison test, n = 3 per group). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: The inhibitors used in this study included an HMGB1 antagonist (HY‐N0184, MCE, USA), a p38 MAPK pathway inhibitor (HY‐12839, MCE, USA), a p65 NF‐kB pathway inhibitor (HY‐138537, MCE, USA), an ERK pathway inhibitor (HY‐112287, MCE, USA), a JNK inhibitor (HY‐12041, MCE, USA), a TLR2 antagonist (HY‐112146, MCE, USA), a TLR4 antagonist (HY‐11109, MCE, USA), a TLR9 antagonist ( HY131952 , MCE, USA), and a RAGE antagonist (HY‐P2268).

    Techniques: Protein-Protein interactions, Western Blot, Incubation, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Comparison