Review



anti wnt10a  (Proteintech)


Bioz Verified Symbol Proteintech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Proteintech anti wnt10a
    Anti Wnt10a, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 7 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti wnt10a/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 7 article reviews
    anti wnt10a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    Sino Biological wnt10a
    Wnt10a, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/wnt10a/product/Sino Biological
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wnt10a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bioss wnt10a antibody
    Wnt10a Antibody, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/wnt10a antibody/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wnt10a antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Cusabio wnt10a
    a – d Knockout of Smoc1/2 leads to elevated Wnt activity. a Gene Ontology and KEGG analyses of differentially expressed genes in the mesenchyme of control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. b , c Quantitation of expression levels of Axin2 and Lef within individual apical pulp cells of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 DKO. Two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test; Axin2 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001; Lef1 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001. d Mip-seq analysis showing RNA expression of Axin2 and Lef1 in the incisor of control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice. Scale bars: 50 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. e – g Knockout of Smoc1/2 did not significantly affect Wnt6 and <t>Wnt10a</t> RNA levels but changed their protein distribution. e UMAP feature plots showed comparable transcription levels of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. f MIP-seq data showed similar RNA expression levels and patterns of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate controls and Smoc1/2 DKO mice embryos at E16.5. g Antibody staining of WNT6 and WNT10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 KO embryos at E16.5. Scale bars: 100 μm. White arrows indicate RNA probe signals in incisor epithelium, while yellow arrows show RNA probe signals in incisors mesenchyme. White asterisks indicate positive immunostaining signals, while yellow asterisks show low signals in the apical pulp regions of incisors. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. h , i Quantitation of panels ( f ) revealed no significant difference in the percentage of cells expressing Wnt6 or Wnt10a RNA between control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors. j , k Quantitation of g showed significantly more pulp cells positive for WNT6+ and WNT10a+ immunostaining in Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors compared to controls. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Wnt6 + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.2071; Wn10a + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.6739, WNT6+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0003; WNT10a+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0026; N.S.: not significant. l – v Organ culture of incisor tooth germs at E16.5. l The schematic drawing illustrates the experimental scheme for the explant culture. Created with MedPeer (medpeer.cn). Organ culture experiments were conducted using wild-type control incisor explants incubated with WNT6 beads ( m ), WNT6 + SMOC2 beads ( n ), WNT10a beads ( o ), or WNT10a + SMOC2 beads ( p ). The samples were subsequently stained with WNT6 or WNT10a antibodies, respectively, and the staining results were quantified in ( u ). q – t Similar beads explant experiments were performed using Smoc1/2 DKO incisor embryos at E16.5, and the results were quantified in ( v ). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. WNT6+ cell: control-WNT6 vs control-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.4189, control-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6, p < 0.0001, DKO-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.0001; WNT10a+ cell: control-WNT10a vs control-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.8690, control-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a, p = 0.0003, DKO-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.00; N.S.: not significant. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Wnt10a, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/wnt10a/product/Cusabio
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wnt10a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Assay Genie human wnt10a hufi01965
    a – d Knockout of Smoc1/2 leads to elevated Wnt activity. a Gene Ontology and KEGG analyses of differentially expressed genes in the mesenchyme of control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. b , c Quantitation of expression levels of Axin2 and Lef within individual apical pulp cells of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 DKO. Two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test; Axin2 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001; Lef1 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001. d Mip-seq analysis showing RNA expression of Axin2 and Lef1 in the incisor of control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice. Scale bars: 50 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. e – g Knockout of Smoc1/2 did not significantly affect Wnt6 and <t>Wnt10a</t> RNA levels but changed their protein distribution. e UMAP feature plots showed comparable transcription levels of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. f MIP-seq data showed similar RNA expression levels and patterns of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate controls and Smoc1/2 DKO mice embryos at E16.5. g Antibody staining of WNT6 and WNT10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 KO embryos at E16.5. Scale bars: 100 μm. White arrows indicate RNA probe signals in incisor epithelium, while yellow arrows show RNA probe signals in incisors mesenchyme. White asterisks indicate positive immunostaining signals, while yellow asterisks show low signals in the apical pulp regions of incisors. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. h , i Quantitation of panels ( f ) revealed no significant difference in the percentage of cells expressing Wnt6 or Wnt10a RNA between control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors. j , k Quantitation of g showed significantly more pulp cells positive for WNT6+ and WNT10a+ immunostaining in Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors compared to controls. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Wnt6 + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.2071; Wn10a + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.6739, WNT6+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0003; WNT10a+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0026; N.S.: not significant. l – v Organ culture of incisor tooth germs at E16.5. l The schematic drawing illustrates the experimental scheme for the explant culture. Created with MedPeer (medpeer.cn). Organ culture experiments were conducted using wild-type control incisor explants incubated with WNT6 beads ( m ), WNT6 + SMOC2 beads ( n ), WNT10a beads ( o ), or WNT10a + SMOC2 beads ( p ). The samples were subsequently stained with WNT6 or WNT10a antibodies, respectively, and the staining results were quantified in ( u ). q – t Similar beads explant experiments were performed using Smoc1/2 DKO incisor embryos at E16.5, and the results were quantified in ( v ). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. WNT6+ cell: control-WNT6 vs control-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.4189, control-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6, p < 0.0001, DKO-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.0001; WNT10a+ cell: control-WNT10a vs control-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.8690, control-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a, p = 0.0003, DKO-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.00; N.S.: not significant. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Human Wnt10a Hufi01965, supplied by Assay Genie, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human wnt10a hufi01965/product/Assay Genie
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human wnt10a hufi01965 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech anti wnt10a
    a – d Knockout of Smoc1/2 leads to elevated Wnt activity. a Gene Ontology and KEGG analyses of differentially expressed genes in the mesenchyme of control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. b , c Quantitation of expression levels of Axin2 and Lef within individual apical pulp cells of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 DKO. Two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test; Axin2 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001; Lef1 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001. d Mip-seq analysis showing RNA expression of Axin2 and Lef1 in the incisor of control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice. Scale bars: 50 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. e – g Knockout of Smoc1/2 did not significantly affect Wnt6 and <t>Wnt10a</t> RNA levels but changed their protein distribution. e UMAP feature plots showed comparable transcription levels of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. f MIP-seq data showed similar RNA expression levels and patterns of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate controls and Smoc1/2 DKO mice embryos at E16.5. g Antibody staining of WNT6 and WNT10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 KO embryos at E16.5. Scale bars: 100 μm. White arrows indicate RNA probe signals in incisor epithelium, while yellow arrows show RNA probe signals in incisors mesenchyme. White asterisks indicate positive immunostaining signals, while yellow asterisks show low signals in the apical pulp regions of incisors. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. h , i Quantitation of panels ( f ) revealed no significant difference in the percentage of cells expressing Wnt6 or Wnt10a RNA between control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors. j , k Quantitation of g showed significantly more pulp cells positive for WNT6+ and WNT10a+ immunostaining in Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors compared to controls. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Wnt6 + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.2071; Wn10a + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.6739, WNT6+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0003; WNT10a+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0026; N.S.: not significant. l – v Organ culture of incisor tooth germs at E16.5. l The schematic drawing illustrates the experimental scheme for the explant culture. Created with MedPeer (medpeer.cn). Organ culture experiments were conducted using wild-type control incisor explants incubated with WNT6 beads ( m ), WNT6 + SMOC2 beads ( n ), WNT10a beads ( o ), or WNT10a + SMOC2 beads ( p ). The samples were subsequently stained with WNT6 or WNT10a antibodies, respectively, and the staining results were quantified in ( u ). q – t Similar beads explant experiments were performed using Smoc1/2 DKO incisor embryos at E16.5, and the results were quantified in ( v ). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. WNT6+ cell: control-WNT6 vs control-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.4189, control-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6, p < 0.0001, DKO-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.0001; WNT10a+ cell: control-WNT10a vs control-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.8690, control-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a, p = 0.0003, DKO-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.00; N.S.: not significant. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Anti Wnt10a, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti wnt10a/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti wnt10a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    VectorBuilder GmbH a lentivirus encoding a combined cas9 and wnt10a specific guide rna
    a – d Knockout of Smoc1/2 leads to elevated Wnt activity. a Gene Ontology and KEGG analyses of differentially expressed genes in the mesenchyme of control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. b , c Quantitation of expression levels of Axin2 and Lef within individual apical pulp cells of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 DKO. Two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test; Axin2 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001; Lef1 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001. d Mip-seq analysis showing RNA expression of Axin2 and Lef1 in the incisor of control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice. Scale bars: 50 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. e – g Knockout of Smoc1/2 did not significantly affect Wnt6 and <t>Wnt10a</t> RNA levels but changed their protein distribution. e UMAP feature plots showed comparable transcription levels of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. f MIP-seq data showed similar RNA expression levels and patterns of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate controls and Smoc1/2 DKO mice embryos at E16.5. g Antibody staining of WNT6 and WNT10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 KO embryos at E16.5. Scale bars: 100 μm. White arrows indicate RNA probe signals in incisor epithelium, while yellow arrows show RNA probe signals in incisors mesenchyme. White asterisks indicate positive immunostaining signals, while yellow asterisks show low signals in the apical pulp regions of incisors. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. h , i Quantitation of panels ( f ) revealed no significant difference in the percentage of cells expressing Wnt6 or Wnt10a RNA between control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors. j , k Quantitation of g showed significantly more pulp cells positive for WNT6+ and WNT10a+ immunostaining in Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors compared to controls. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Wnt6 + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.2071; Wn10a + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.6739, WNT6+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0003; WNT10a+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0026; N.S.: not significant. l – v Organ culture of incisor tooth germs at E16.5. l The schematic drawing illustrates the experimental scheme for the explant culture. Created with MedPeer (medpeer.cn). Organ culture experiments were conducted using wild-type control incisor explants incubated with WNT6 beads ( m ), WNT6 + SMOC2 beads ( n ), WNT10a beads ( o ), or WNT10a + SMOC2 beads ( p ). The samples were subsequently stained with WNT6 or WNT10a antibodies, respectively, and the staining results were quantified in ( u ). q – t Similar beads explant experiments were performed using Smoc1/2 DKO incisor embryos at E16.5, and the results were quantified in ( v ). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. WNT6+ cell: control-WNT6 vs control-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.4189, control-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6, p < 0.0001, DKO-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.0001; WNT10a+ cell: control-WNT10a vs control-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.8690, control-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a, p = 0.0003, DKO-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.00; N.S.: not significant. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    A Lentivirus Encoding A Combined Cas9 And Wnt10a Specific Guide Rna, supplied by VectorBuilder GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/a lentivirus encoding a combined cas9 and wnt10a specific guide rna/product/VectorBuilder GmbH
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    a lentivirus encoding a combined cas9 and wnt10a specific guide rna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    VectorBuilder GmbH lentivirus encoding a combined cas9 and wnt10a specific guide rna vb201126–1208bqw
    a – d Knockout of Smoc1/2 leads to elevated Wnt activity. a Gene Ontology and KEGG analyses of differentially expressed genes in the mesenchyme of control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. b , c Quantitation of expression levels of Axin2 and Lef within individual apical pulp cells of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 DKO. Two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test; Axin2 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001; Lef1 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001. d Mip-seq analysis showing RNA expression of Axin2 and Lef1 in the incisor of control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice. Scale bars: 50 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. e – g Knockout of Smoc1/2 did not significantly affect Wnt6 and <t>Wnt10a</t> RNA levels but changed their protein distribution. e UMAP feature plots showed comparable transcription levels of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. f MIP-seq data showed similar RNA expression levels and patterns of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate controls and Smoc1/2 DKO mice embryos at E16.5. g Antibody staining of WNT6 and WNT10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 KO embryos at E16.5. Scale bars: 100 μm. White arrows indicate RNA probe signals in incisor epithelium, while yellow arrows show RNA probe signals in incisors mesenchyme. White asterisks indicate positive immunostaining signals, while yellow asterisks show low signals in the apical pulp regions of incisors. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. h , i Quantitation of panels ( f ) revealed no significant difference in the percentage of cells expressing Wnt6 or Wnt10a RNA between control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors. j , k Quantitation of g showed significantly more pulp cells positive for WNT6+ and WNT10a+ immunostaining in Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors compared to controls. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Wnt6 + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.2071; Wn10a + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.6739, WNT6+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0003; WNT10a+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0026; N.S.: not significant. l – v Organ culture of incisor tooth germs at E16.5. l The schematic drawing illustrates the experimental scheme for the explant culture. Created with MedPeer (medpeer.cn). Organ culture experiments were conducted using wild-type control incisor explants incubated with WNT6 beads ( m ), WNT6 + SMOC2 beads ( n ), WNT10a beads ( o ), or WNT10a + SMOC2 beads ( p ). The samples were subsequently stained with WNT6 or WNT10a antibodies, respectively, and the staining results were quantified in ( u ). q – t Similar beads explant experiments were performed using Smoc1/2 DKO incisor embryos at E16.5, and the results were quantified in ( v ). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. WNT6+ cell: control-WNT6 vs control-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.4189, control-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6, p < 0.0001, DKO-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.0001; WNT10a+ cell: control-WNT10a vs control-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.8690, control-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a, p = 0.0003, DKO-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.00; N.S.: not significant. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Lentivirus Encoding A Combined Cas9 And Wnt10a Specific Guide Rna Vb201126–1208bqw, supplied by VectorBuilder GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lentivirus encoding a combined cas9 and wnt10a specific guide rna vb201126–1208bqw/product/VectorBuilder GmbH
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lentivirus encoding a combined cas9 and wnt10a specific guide rna vb201126–1208bqw - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a – d Knockout of Smoc1/2 leads to elevated Wnt activity. a Gene Ontology and KEGG analyses of differentially expressed genes in the mesenchyme of control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. b , c Quantitation of expression levels of Axin2 and Lef within individual apical pulp cells of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 DKO. Two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test; Axin2 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001; Lef1 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001. d Mip-seq analysis showing RNA expression of Axin2 and Lef1 in the incisor of control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice. Scale bars: 50 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. e – g Knockout of Smoc1/2 did not significantly affect Wnt6 and Wnt10a RNA levels but changed their protein distribution. e UMAP feature plots showed comparable transcription levels of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. f MIP-seq data showed similar RNA expression levels and patterns of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate controls and Smoc1/2 DKO mice embryos at E16.5. g Antibody staining of WNT6 and WNT10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 KO embryos at E16.5. Scale bars: 100 μm. White arrows indicate RNA probe signals in incisor epithelium, while yellow arrows show RNA probe signals in incisors mesenchyme. White asterisks indicate positive immunostaining signals, while yellow asterisks show low signals in the apical pulp regions of incisors. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. h , i Quantitation of panels ( f ) revealed no significant difference in the percentage of cells expressing Wnt6 or Wnt10a RNA between control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors. j , k Quantitation of g showed significantly more pulp cells positive for WNT6+ and WNT10a+ immunostaining in Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors compared to controls. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Wnt6 + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.2071; Wn10a + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.6739, WNT6+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0003; WNT10a+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0026; N.S.: not significant. l – v Organ culture of incisor tooth germs at E16.5. l The schematic drawing illustrates the experimental scheme for the explant culture. Created with MedPeer (medpeer.cn). Organ culture experiments were conducted using wild-type control incisor explants incubated with WNT6 beads ( m ), WNT6 + SMOC2 beads ( n ), WNT10a beads ( o ), or WNT10a + SMOC2 beads ( p ). The samples were subsequently stained with WNT6 or WNT10a antibodies, respectively, and the staining results were quantified in ( u ). q – t Similar beads explant experiments were performed using Smoc1/2 DKO incisor embryos at E16.5, and the results were quantified in ( v ). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. WNT6+ cell: control-WNT6 vs control-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.4189, control-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6, p < 0.0001, DKO-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.0001; WNT10a+ cell: control-WNT10a vs control-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.8690, control-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a, p = 0.0003, DKO-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.00; N.S.: not significant. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Autocrine ECM molecules establish MSC quiescence during incisor development by disrupting WNT ligand trafficking process

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-65705-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a – d Knockout of Smoc1/2 leads to elevated Wnt activity. a Gene Ontology and KEGG analyses of differentially expressed genes in the mesenchyme of control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. b , c Quantitation of expression levels of Axin2 and Lef within individual apical pulp cells of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 DKO. Two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test; Axin2 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001; Lef1 : control vs DKO, p < 0.0001. d Mip-seq analysis showing RNA expression of Axin2 and Lef1 in the incisor of control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice. Scale bars: 50 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. e – g Knockout of Smoc1/2 did not significantly affect Wnt6 and Wnt10a RNA levels but changed their protein distribution. e UMAP feature plots showed comparable transcription levels of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in control versus Smoc1/2 DKO incisors at E16.5. f MIP-seq data showed similar RNA expression levels and patterns of Wnt6 and Wnt10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate controls and Smoc1/2 DKO mice embryos at E16.5. g Antibody staining of WNT6 and WNT10a in incisors of Smoc2 + /- littermate control and Smoc1/2 KO embryos at E16.5. Scale bars: 100 μm. White arrows indicate RNA probe signals in incisor epithelium, while yellow arrows show RNA probe signals in incisors mesenchyme. White asterisks indicate positive immunostaining signals, while yellow asterisks show low signals in the apical pulp regions of incisors. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. h , i Quantitation of panels ( f ) revealed no significant difference in the percentage of cells expressing Wnt6 or Wnt10a RNA between control and Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors. j , k Quantitation of g showed significantly more pulp cells positive for WNT6+ and WNT10a+ immunostaining in Smoc1/2 DKO mice incisors compared to controls. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Wnt6 + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.2071; Wn10a + cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.6739, WNT6+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0003; WNT10a+ cell: control vs DKO, p = 0.0026; N.S.: not significant. l – v Organ culture of incisor tooth germs at E16.5. l The schematic drawing illustrates the experimental scheme for the explant culture. Created with MedPeer (medpeer.cn). Organ culture experiments were conducted using wild-type control incisor explants incubated with WNT6 beads ( m ), WNT6 + SMOC2 beads ( n ), WNT10a beads ( o ), or WNT10a + SMOC2 beads ( p ). The samples were subsequently stained with WNT6 or WNT10a antibodies, respectively, and the staining results were quantified in ( u ). q – t Similar beads explant experiments were performed using Smoc1/2 DKO incisor embryos at E16.5, and the results were quantified in ( v ). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. WNT6+ cell: control-WNT6 vs control-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.4189, control-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6, p < 0.0001, DKO-WNT6 vs DKO-WNT6-SMOC2, p = 0.0001; WNT10a+ cell: control-WNT10a vs control-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.8690, control-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a, p = 0.0003, DKO-WNT10a vs DKO-WNT10a-SMOC2, p = 0.00; N.S.: not significant. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant Wnt6 (CSB-EP026140MO, CUSABIO) and Wnt10a (CSB-EP026129MO, CUSABIO) proteins were procured for the preparation of Wnt6-beads and Wnt10a-beads.

    Techniques: Knock-Out, Activity Assay, Control, Quantitation Assay, Expressing, Two Tailed Test, MANN-WHITNEY, RNA Expression, Staining, Immunostaining, Organ Culture, Incubation

    a Expression of active β-Catenin and its downstream targets c-Myc, Cyclin D1, and LEF1 in DPCs after Smoc1 or Smoc2 overexpression, as assessed by western blot. b Expression level of active β-Catenin and its downstream targets c-Myc, and Cyclin D1 in DPCs after Smoc1/2 overexpression alone or simultaneously. c Immunostaining of β-Catenin in control, Wnt agonist WAY and WAY with Smoc1/2 treated groups. Scale bars: 10 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. SMOC1/2 interfere with Wnt10a transportation. d The schematic drawing illustrates the experimental scheme of DPCs supplied with beads. Created with MedPeer (medpeer.cn). e Immunostaining of Wnt10a in cultured DPCs supplied with beads. White arrows indicate WNT Dynabeads. Scale bars: 10 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. f Expression of active β-Catenin and its downstream targets c-Myc, Cyclin D1, and LEF1 in DPCs after Gpc6 silencing, as assessed by western blot. g Immunostaining of β-Catenin in siRNA negative control (si NC ), WAY with si NC and WAY with si Gpc6 treated groups. Scale bars: 10 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. h Co-IP of GPC6 with SMOC1 or SMOC2 in DPCs. i Co-localization analysis of SMOC1/2 with GPC6, as assessed by immunostaining. White arrows indicate co-localization signals. Scale bars: 10 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. j Co-IP of GPC6 with WNT10a in DPCs in control , Smoc2 or Smoc1 overexpression groups. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. k Mechanism diagram. SMOC1/2 inhibit WNT trafficking by competitively binding to GPC6, thereby disrupting WNT ligand distribution within the niche. Created with MedPeer (medpeer.cn).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Autocrine ECM molecules establish MSC quiescence during incisor development by disrupting WNT ligand trafficking process

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-65705-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Expression of active β-Catenin and its downstream targets c-Myc, Cyclin D1, and LEF1 in DPCs after Smoc1 or Smoc2 overexpression, as assessed by western blot. b Expression level of active β-Catenin and its downstream targets c-Myc, and Cyclin D1 in DPCs after Smoc1/2 overexpression alone or simultaneously. c Immunostaining of β-Catenin in control, Wnt agonist WAY and WAY with Smoc1/2 treated groups. Scale bars: 10 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. SMOC1/2 interfere with Wnt10a transportation. d The schematic drawing illustrates the experimental scheme of DPCs supplied with beads. Created with MedPeer (medpeer.cn). e Immunostaining of Wnt10a in cultured DPCs supplied with beads. White arrows indicate WNT Dynabeads. Scale bars: 10 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. f Expression of active β-Catenin and its downstream targets c-Myc, Cyclin D1, and LEF1 in DPCs after Gpc6 silencing, as assessed by western blot. g Immunostaining of β-Catenin in siRNA negative control (si NC ), WAY with si NC and WAY with si Gpc6 treated groups. Scale bars: 10 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. h Co-IP of GPC6 with SMOC1 or SMOC2 in DPCs. i Co-localization analysis of SMOC1/2 with GPC6, as assessed by immunostaining. White arrows indicate co-localization signals. Scale bars: 10 μm. Representative images from three independent experiments with similar results. j Co-IP of GPC6 with WNT10a in DPCs in control , Smoc2 or Smoc1 overexpression groups. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. k Mechanism diagram. SMOC1/2 inhibit WNT trafficking by competitively binding to GPC6, thereby disrupting WNT ligand distribution within the niche. Created with MedPeer (medpeer.cn).

    Article Snippet: Recombinant Wnt6 (CSB-EP026140MO, CUSABIO) and Wnt10a (CSB-EP026129MO, CUSABIO) proteins were procured for the preparation of Wnt6-beads and Wnt10a-beads.

    Techniques: Expressing, Over Expression, Western Blot, Immunostaining, Control, Cell Culture, Negative Control, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Binding Assay