angiogenic factors (Cusabio)
Structured Review

Angiogenic Factors, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 20 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/angiogenic factors/product/Cusabio
Average 93 stars, based on 20 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Urine-derived stem cells efficiently assemble into micro-bone organoids supported by decellularized bone matrix microparticles for rapidly repairing bone defects through direct filling and paracrine functions"
Article Title: Urine-derived stem cells efficiently assemble into micro-bone organoids supported by decellularized bone matrix microparticles for rapidly repairing bone defects through direct filling and paracrine functions
Journal: Materials Today Bio
doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102533
Figure Legend Snippet: mRNA-seq reveals the in vitro formation mechanism of uBOs. (A) Schematic diagram of the research design. (B) Volcano plot depicting DEGs profiles in uBOs compared to USCs@DBM-MPs. (C) Heatmap analysis of the DEGs. (D) GO enrichment analysis of osteogenic and angiogenic related biological processes based on upregulated DEGs in uBOs. (E) KEGG analysis of osteogenic and angiogenic related signaling pathways using the upregulated DEGs in uBOs. (F) Heatmap analysis and GSEA analysis of ossification and blood vessel morphogenesis.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Protein-Protein interactions
Figure Legend Snippet: uBOs can stimulate osteogenesis and angiogenesis through paracrine mechanisms. (A) Schematic diagram of the research design. (B) ELISA was performed to quantify osteogenic cytokines ( OPG , IGF-2 ) and angiogenic cytokines ( VEGF , ANG-5 ) in uBOs-CM, USCs-CM, and CTL-CM. (C) ALP and ARS staining showed the stimulating effects of uBOs-CM, USCs-CM, and CTL-CM on the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs. Scale bar = 250 μm. (D, E) The expression levels of osteogenic markers ( RUNX2 , OCN ) were assessed by qRT-PCR and WB in each group. (F) Transwell and tube formation assays showed the chemotactic and tube formation stimulating effects of uBOs-CM, USCs-CM, and CTL-CM on HUVECs. Scale bar = 200 μm. (G, H) The expression levels of angiogenic markers ( HIF-1α , VEGF ) were evaluated by qRT-PCR and WB in each group. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). p-values are calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, and “ns” indicates no significance.
Techniques Used: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Staining, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: Evaluation of the in-vivo biological functions of uBOs and its in-vivo tracing. (A, B) After 3 weeks of modeling, immunofluorescence staining was employed to assess the expression levels of osteogenic markers ( RUNX2 , OCN ) and angiogenic markers ( CD31 , VEGF ), and semi-quantitative analysis was performed. Scale bar = 1 mm or 250 μm. (C) qRT-PCR was used to quantitatively detect the gene expression levels of osteogenic markers ( RUNX2 , OCN ) and angiogenic markers ( PDGF-BB , VEGF ) in newly formed bone tissue. (D) After 6 weeks of implantation of uBOs, in-vivo cell tracking was performed using immunohistochemistry. In the uBOs group, more human nuclei-stained cells were detected within the bone trabeculae. Scale bar = 200 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). p-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, and “ns” indicates no significance.
Techniques Used: In Vivo, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Gene Expression, Cell Tracking Assay, Immunohistochemistry
