Review



human monocytic leukemia cell line  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    ATCC human monocytic leukemia cell line
    Human Monocytic Leukemia Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 19440 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human monocytic leukemia cell line/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 19440 article reviews
    human monocytic leukemia cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    ATCC human monocytic leukemia cell line
    Human Monocytic Leukemia Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human monocytic leukemia cell line/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human monocytic leukemia cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC raw264 7
    Raw264 7, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/raw264 7/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    raw264 7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC raw 264 7
    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of CT26 tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Raw 264 7, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/raw 264 7/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    raw 264 7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    dmem  (ATCC)
    99
    ATCC dmem
    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of CT26 tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Dmem, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dmem/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dmem - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC immunomodulation assay
    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of CT26 tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Immunomodulation Assay, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/immunomodulation assay/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    immunomodulation assay - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC macrophages
    Single-cell and immune-profiling analysis reveals an imbalanced osteo-immune microenvironment in peri-implantitis. (A) Immune infiltration scores of peri-implant tissues. (B) UMAP visualization of peri-implant tissues, colored by cell-type ontology, showing the distribution of major cell populations. (C, D) Expression patterns of key markers Mrc1 and Tnf projected onto the UMAP space. The color gradient from yellow to blue indicates expression levels from low to high. (E) Dot plot showing the expression of M1-associated ( Tnf , Il6 , Nos2 ) and M2-associated ( Mrc1 , Arg1 , Il10 ) <t>macrophage</t> signature genes. The dot size represents the percentage of cells expressing the gene, and color intensity indicates the average expression level. (F, G) Violin plots illustrating the expression distribution of M1/M2 signature genes across different cell types. (H) Osteogenic genes ( Alpl , Col1a1 ) are specifically and highly expressed in osteoblast clusters. Abbreviation: UMAP, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection.
    Macrophages, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/macrophages/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    macrophages - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC raw 264.7
    Single-cell and immune-profiling analysis reveals an imbalanced osteo-immune microenvironment in peri-implantitis. (A) Immune infiltration scores of peri-implant tissues. (B) UMAP visualization of peri-implant tissues, colored by cell-type ontology, showing the distribution of major cell populations. (C, D) Expression patterns of key markers Mrc1 and Tnf projected onto the UMAP space. The color gradient from yellow to blue indicates expression levels from low to high. (E) Dot plot showing the expression of M1-associated ( Tnf , Il6 , Nos2 ) and M2-associated ( Mrc1 , Arg1 , Il10 ) <t>macrophage</t> signature genes. The dot size represents the percentage of cells expressing the gene, and color intensity indicates the average expression level. (F, G) Violin plots illustrating the expression distribution of M1/M2 signature genes across different cell types. (H) Osteogenic genes ( Alpl , Col1a1 ) are specifically and highly expressed in osteoblast clusters. Abbreviation: UMAP, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection.
    Raw 264.7, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/raw 264.7/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    raw 264.7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC raw 264 7 murine macrophage cells
    Single-cell and immune-profiling analysis reveals an imbalanced osteo-immune microenvironment in peri-implantitis. (A) Immune infiltration scores of peri-implant tissues. (B) UMAP visualization of peri-implant tissues, colored by cell-type ontology, showing the distribution of major cell populations. (C, D) Expression patterns of key markers Mrc1 and Tnf projected onto the UMAP space. The color gradient from yellow to blue indicates expression levels from low to high. (E) Dot plot showing the expression of M1-associated ( Tnf , Il6 , Nos2 ) and M2-associated ( Mrc1 , Arg1 , Il10 ) <t>macrophage</t> signature genes. The dot size represents the percentage of cells expressing the gene, and color intensity indicates the average expression level. (F, G) Violin plots illustrating the expression distribution of M1/M2 signature genes across different cell types. (H) Osteogenic genes ( Alpl , Col1a1 ) are specifically and highly expressed in osteoblast clusters. Abbreviation: UMAP, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection.
    Raw 264 7 Murine Macrophage Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/raw 264 7 murine macrophage cells/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    raw 264 7 murine macrophage cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC mouse monocyte macrophages
    Schematic illustration of the preparation of CPs@SS31, and the corresponding in vivo therapy of acute lung injury via NIR enhanced ROS scavenging, inflammation inhibition, <t>macrophage</t> M2 polarization, and T cells immunoactivation, as well as specifically targeting mitochondria, activating mitochondrial function, and inducing mitophagy to reprogram lung redox homeostasis, and promote tissue repair.
    Mouse Monocyte Macrophages, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monocyte macrophages/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monocyte macrophages - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC raw 264 7 cells
    Characterization, and Cytocompatibility Validation of HCOC. (A) Schematic illustration of the development of HCOC. (B) FTIR spectrum of OSA, CMCS and OC hydrogel. (C) Time-dependent evolution of gelation of OC and HCOC. (D) SEM images of HCOC and EDS mapping images of C, N, O and Cu for HCOC. (E) FTIR spectra of HC, OC and HCOC. (F) Dynamic frequency sweep measurements of OC and HCOC. (G) Frequency-dependent viscoelastic behavior of OC and HCOC. (H) Alternating strain sweep with alternating strains of 1% and 1000% at 100s intervals and (I) Self-healing behavior of HCOC. (J) Live/dead staining showing the metabolic activity of L929 and RAW 264.7 cells after treatment with HCOC for 48 h. Rates of proliferation of (K) L929 cells and (L) RAW 264.7 cells after treatment with PBS or HCOC. (∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001).
    Raw 264 7 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/raw 264 7 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    raw 264 7 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of CT26 tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Chronic inflammation-responsive hydrogel restores myeloid-T cell crosstalk to reinvigorate antitumor immunity against metastatic colorectal cancer

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.03.012

    Figure Lengend Snippet: PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of CT26 tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Article Snippet: CT26 cells and Raw 264.7 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA).

    Techniques: Gene Expression, Incubation, Concentration Assay, In Vitro, Expressing, Cell Culture

    TRANS modulates macrophage polarization and promotes antigen present ation. (A) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization of myeloid cells in the TME following PBS or TRANS treatment. (B) UMAP clusters of myeloid cells. (C) Cell-type-specific marker genes expression of different clusters. (D) Proportion distribution of myeloid cell clusters. (E) KEGG enrichment in M1 macrophages (TRANS vs PBS). (F) GSEA of NOD-like receptor and JAK-STAT signaling pathways in M1. (G) KEGG enrichment in M2 macrophages (TRANS vs PBS). (H) Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis and antigen processing/presentation in M2. (I) Scheme of M0 macrophages treated with different TCM. (J) M1 and M2 polarization from M0 macrophages under various treatments; n = 3. (K) STAT1 expression in Raw 264.7 cells. (L) Scheme of M2 macrophages treated with different TCM. (M) Repolarization of M2 macrophages under different treatments; n = 3. (N) H-2K b /SIINFEKL + macrophages in vitro ; n = 3. (O and P) Relative expression of antitumor genes (O) and inflammatory genes (P) in macrophages under different treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (Q) CD69 expression on T cells after co-incubating TCM-treated macrophages and anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated splenic T cells; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance of multiple-group comparisons was calculated using One-way ANOVA. Significance of two-group comparison was calculated using Student's t -test.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Chronic inflammation-responsive hydrogel restores myeloid-T cell crosstalk to reinvigorate antitumor immunity against metastatic colorectal cancer

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.03.012

    Figure Lengend Snippet: TRANS modulates macrophage polarization and promotes antigen present ation. (A) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization of myeloid cells in the TME following PBS or TRANS treatment. (B) UMAP clusters of myeloid cells. (C) Cell-type-specific marker genes expression of different clusters. (D) Proportion distribution of myeloid cell clusters. (E) KEGG enrichment in M1 macrophages (TRANS vs PBS). (F) GSEA of NOD-like receptor and JAK-STAT signaling pathways in M1. (G) KEGG enrichment in M2 macrophages (TRANS vs PBS). (H) Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis and antigen processing/presentation in M2. (I) Scheme of M0 macrophages treated with different TCM. (J) M1 and M2 polarization from M0 macrophages under various treatments; n = 3. (K) STAT1 expression in Raw 264.7 cells. (L) Scheme of M2 macrophages treated with different TCM. (M) Repolarization of M2 macrophages under different treatments; n = 3. (N) H-2K b /SIINFEKL + macrophages in vitro ; n = 3. (O and P) Relative expression of antitumor genes (O) and inflammatory genes (P) in macrophages under different treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (Q) CD69 expression on T cells after co-incubating TCM-treated macrophages and anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated splenic T cells; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance of multiple-group comparisons was calculated using One-way ANOVA. Significance of two-group comparison was calculated using Student's t -test.

    Article Snippet: CT26 cells and Raw 264.7 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA).

    Techniques: Marker, Expressing, Protein-Protein interactions, In Vitro, Comparison

    Single-cell and immune-profiling analysis reveals an imbalanced osteo-immune microenvironment in peri-implantitis. (A) Immune infiltration scores of peri-implant tissues. (B) UMAP visualization of peri-implant tissues, colored by cell-type ontology, showing the distribution of major cell populations. (C, D) Expression patterns of key markers Mrc1 and Tnf projected onto the UMAP space. The color gradient from yellow to blue indicates expression levels from low to high. (E) Dot plot showing the expression of M1-associated ( Tnf , Il6 , Nos2 ) and M2-associated ( Mrc1 , Arg1 , Il10 ) macrophage signature genes. The dot size represents the percentage of cells expressing the gene, and color intensity indicates the average expression level. (F, G) Violin plots illustrating the expression distribution of M1/M2 signature genes across different cell types. (H) Osteogenic genes ( Alpl , Col1a1 ) are specifically and highly expressed in osteoblast clusters. Abbreviation: UMAP, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Chiral Fe 3 O 4 /GelMA hydrogels regulate the osteoimmune microenvironment via Itgb3-mediated macrophage polarization to combat peri-implantitis

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.03.055

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Single-cell and immune-profiling analysis reveals an imbalanced osteo-immune microenvironment in peri-implantitis. (A) Immune infiltration scores of peri-implant tissues. (B) UMAP visualization of peri-implant tissues, colored by cell-type ontology, showing the distribution of major cell populations. (C, D) Expression patterns of key markers Mrc1 and Tnf projected onto the UMAP space. The color gradient from yellow to blue indicates expression levels from low to high. (E) Dot plot showing the expression of M1-associated ( Tnf , Il6 , Nos2 ) and M2-associated ( Mrc1 , Arg1 , Il10 ) macrophage signature genes. The dot size represents the percentage of cells expressing the gene, and color intensity indicates the average expression level. (F, G) Violin plots illustrating the expression distribution of M1/M2 signature genes across different cell types. (H) Osteogenic genes ( Alpl , Col1a1 ) are specifically and highly expressed in osteoblast clusters. Abbreviation: UMAP, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection.

    Article Snippet: Macrophages (RAW 264.7, ATCC) were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, USA) at 5% CO 2 and 37 °C.

    Techniques: Single Cell, Expressing

    In vitro experiments validate the mechanism by which chiral hydrogels modulate the bone immune microenvironment. (A) GO and (B) KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs with elevated D-FG relative to L-FG. (C) Protein expression levels of p-AKT and AKT after 48-h co-culture with different hydrogels. (D, E) Intracellular ROS fluorescence levels and quantitative analysis after SC79-mediated PI3K/Akt activation. (F, G) ROS levels and quantification in RAW264.7 cells after LPS stimulation and 24 h co-culture with different hydrogels. (H, I) ROS levels and quantification in RAW264.7 cells after 72 h co-culture with different hydrogels. (J, K) Representative fluorescence images and quantitative analysis of Fe 2+ release and ROS kinetics in chiral hydrogel-treated macrophages. Scale bar = 50 μm. (n = 3, compared with the control group, ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 vs. GelMA group. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001). (L) Schematic representation of the bone immunomodulatory mechanism of chiral hydrogels. Abbreviation: KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; p-AKT, phosphorylated AKT; AKT, protein kinase B.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Chiral Fe 3 O 4 /GelMA hydrogels regulate the osteoimmune microenvironment via Itgb3-mediated macrophage polarization to combat peri-implantitis

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.03.055

    Figure Lengend Snippet: In vitro experiments validate the mechanism by which chiral hydrogels modulate the bone immune microenvironment. (A) GO and (B) KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs with elevated D-FG relative to L-FG. (C) Protein expression levels of p-AKT and AKT after 48-h co-culture with different hydrogels. (D, E) Intracellular ROS fluorescence levels and quantitative analysis after SC79-mediated PI3K/Akt activation. (F, G) ROS levels and quantification in RAW264.7 cells after LPS stimulation and 24 h co-culture with different hydrogels. (H, I) ROS levels and quantification in RAW264.7 cells after 72 h co-culture with different hydrogels. (J, K) Representative fluorescence images and quantitative analysis of Fe 2+ release and ROS kinetics in chiral hydrogel-treated macrophages. Scale bar = 50 μm. (n = 3, compared with the control group, ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 vs. GelMA group. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001). (L) Schematic representation of the bone immunomodulatory mechanism of chiral hydrogels. Abbreviation: KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; p-AKT, phosphorylated AKT; AKT, protein kinase B.

    Article Snippet: Macrophages (RAW 264.7, ATCC) were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, USA) at 5% CO 2 and 37 °C.

    Techniques: In Vitro, Expressing, Co-Culture Assay, Fluorescence, Activation Assay, Control

    Schematic illustration of the preparation of CPs@SS31, and the corresponding in vivo therapy of acute lung injury via NIR enhanced ROS scavenging, inflammation inhibition, macrophage M2 polarization, and T cells immunoactivation, as well as specifically targeting mitochondria, activating mitochondrial function, and inducing mitophagy to reprogram lung redox homeostasis, and promote tissue repair.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Near infrared enhanced palladium loaded siraitia grosvenorii carbon dots amplify mitophagy for acute lung injury immunotherapy

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.040

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic illustration of the preparation of CPs@SS31, and the corresponding in vivo therapy of acute lung injury via NIR enhanced ROS scavenging, inflammation inhibition, macrophage M2 polarization, and T cells immunoactivation, as well as specifically targeting mitochondria, activating mitochondrial function, and inducing mitophagy to reprogram lung redox homeostasis, and promote tissue repair.

    Article Snippet: Cell viability testing : Mouse monocyte macrophages (RAW264.7, ATCC, USA) were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Solarbio, China).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Inhibition

    Characterization, and Cytocompatibility Validation of HCOC. (A) Schematic illustration of the development of HCOC. (B) FTIR spectrum of OSA, CMCS and OC hydrogel. (C) Time-dependent evolution of gelation of OC and HCOC. (D) SEM images of HCOC and EDS mapping images of C, N, O and Cu for HCOC. (E) FTIR spectra of HC, OC and HCOC. (F) Dynamic frequency sweep measurements of OC and HCOC. (G) Frequency-dependent viscoelastic behavior of OC and HCOC. (H) Alternating strain sweep with alternating strains of 1% and 1000% at 100s intervals and (I) Self-healing behavior of HCOC. (J) Live/dead staining showing the metabolic activity of L929 and RAW 264.7 cells after treatment with HCOC for 48 h. Rates of proliferation of (K) L929 cells and (L) RAW 264.7 cells after treatment with PBS or HCOC. (∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001).

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Smart microenvironment-adaptive nanocatalytic hydrogel for sequential antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and regenerative therapy of biofilm-infected wounds

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.043

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Characterization, and Cytocompatibility Validation of HCOC. (A) Schematic illustration of the development of HCOC. (B) FTIR spectrum of OSA, CMCS and OC hydrogel. (C) Time-dependent evolution of gelation of OC and HCOC. (D) SEM images of HCOC and EDS mapping images of C, N, O and Cu for HCOC. (E) FTIR spectra of HC, OC and HCOC. (F) Dynamic frequency sweep measurements of OC and HCOC. (G) Frequency-dependent viscoelastic behavior of OC and HCOC. (H) Alternating strain sweep with alternating strains of 1% and 1000% at 100s intervals and (I) Self-healing behavior of HCOC. (J) Live/dead staining showing the metabolic activity of L929 and RAW 264.7 cells after treatment with HCOC for 48 h. Rates of proliferation of (K) L929 cells and (L) RAW 264.7 cells after treatment with PBS or HCOC. (∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001).

    Article Snippet: L929 and RAW 264.7 cells were purchased from the American-Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Staining, Activity Assay

    Macrophage immunoregulation, cell proliferation and angiogenesis in vitro triggered by HCOC. (A) Localization of CD86 (orange, M1 marker) and CD206 (green, M2 marker) in RAW 264.7 macrophages after stimulation (24 h) with different test materials (PBS, 40 ng/mL IL-4, 2 mg/mL Cu 5.4 O, 2 mg/mL HAs, 2 mg/mL HC, 2 mg/mL HCOC). (B) Flow cytometric analysis quantifying CD86 + and CD206 + cell populations after 24 h inflammatory stimulation and different concentrations of HCOC. (C) Western blot analysis of key signaling proteins and phenotypic markers in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages treated with HCOC (0.5 or 1.0 mg/mL) or IL-4 (20 ng/mL). Protein levels were normalized to GAPDH or the corresponding total protein. (D–G) mRNA expression of (D) TNF-α, (E) Arg1, (F) Axin2, and (G) IL-10 measured by real-time RT-PCR. Data are expressed relative to the LPS-only control group and presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. (H) Following H 2 O 2 pretreatment, L929 cell migration and (I) HUVEC tube formation ( in vitro angiogenesis) were assessed after treatment with varying HCOC concentrations over a 24-h period. Quantitative analysis of (J) L929 cell migration rate and the formed (K tube length and (L) branch points. (∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001).

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Smart microenvironment-adaptive nanocatalytic hydrogel for sequential antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and regenerative therapy of biofilm-infected wounds

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.043

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Macrophage immunoregulation, cell proliferation and angiogenesis in vitro triggered by HCOC. (A) Localization of CD86 (orange, M1 marker) and CD206 (green, M2 marker) in RAW 264.7 macrophages after stimulation (24 h) with different test materials (PBS, 40 ng/mL IL-4, 2 mg/mL Cu 5.4 O, 2 mg/mL HAs, 2 mg/mL HC, 2 mg/mL HCOC). (B) Flow cytometric analysis quantifying CD86 + and CD206 + cell populations after 24 h inflammatory stimulation and different concentrations of HCOC. (C) Western blot analysis of key signaling proteins and phenotypic markers in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages treated with HCOC (0.5 or 1.0 mg/mL) or IL-4 (20 ng/mL). Protein levels were normalized to GAPDH or the corresponding total protein. (D–G) mRNA expression of (D) TNF-α, (E) Arg1, (F) Axin2, and (G) IL-10 measured by real-time RT-PCR. Data are expressed relative to the LPS-only control group and presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. (H) Following H 2 O 2 pretreatment, L929 cell migration and (I) HUVEC tube formation ( in vitro angiogenesis) were assessed after treatment with varying HCOC concentrations over a 24-h period. Quantitative analysis of (J) L929 cell migration rate and the formed (K tube length and (L) branch points. (∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001).

    Article Snippet: L929 and RAW 264.7 cells were purchased from the American-Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: In Vitro, Marker, Western Blot, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Migration