Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Comparison of immunohistochemistry methods in embryonic chicken corneal tissue
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.30.715369
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A–C) Limbal region, showing TAP1 signal primarily associated with the stromal compartment, with marked differences in signal intensity and continuity across processing methods. (D–F) Central cornea, showing background or negative staining across all processing methods. (G–I) Kidney tissue, serving as a TAP1-positive control, showing robust TAP1 expression with clear cellular and subcellular definition in Wax and Wax AR sections and reduced structural resolution in cryo-embedded tissue. * marks one positive cell in stroma
Article Snippet: Slides were then incubated with monoclonal primary antibodies Rb P40 (Abcam AB203826, 1:200), Rb Cd68 (Abcam AB213363, 1:100), Rb Pax6 (Abcam AB195045, 1:500), Ms Pax6 (Abcam AB78545, 1:100), Ms CD11c (Abcam AB254183, 1:250), Ms Actin (DSHB AB_528068, 1:8.5), Ms Pax6-S (DSHB AB_528427, 1:12), and Ms TAP1 (DSHB AB_531780, 1:55).
Techniques: Negative Staining, Positive Control, Expressing