Review



anti sox2  (Bioss)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bioss is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Bioss manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Bioss anti sox2
    Anti Sox2, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 27 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti sox2/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 27 article reviews
    anti sox2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank sox2 dshb
    Sox2 Dshb, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/sox2 dshb/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sox2 dshb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Thermo Fisher gene exp sox2 mm03053810 s1
    The 3D culture of esophageal organoids in EEM hydrogel. a) Brightfield images of esophageal organoids cultured in various concentrations of EEM hydrogels and MAT at day 9. b) Quantification of organoid formation efficiency in EEM hydrogels, relative to MAT ( n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). c) qRT-PCR analysis to compare gene expression of a basal layer marker ( Krt14 ) and a suprabasal layer marker ( Krt13 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogels and MAT at day 9 ( n = 4, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). d) Relative gene expression of basal layer markers ( <t>Sox2</t> and Krt14 ) and suprabasal layer markers ( Krt13 and Krt4 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT at day 9 ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT). e) Morphology of esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 9 days. f) Immunofluorescent staining for basal layer markers (CK14, SOX2, and p63), suprabasal layer markers (CK13 and CK4), F-actin, a cell-cell adhesion marker (ECAD), and a proliferation marker (Ki67) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 12 days. g) Quantification of CK14 and CK13 positive area in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 12 days, based on immunofluorescence-stained images ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗ p < 0.05 versus MAT; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). h) Live/Dead staining to assess the viability of organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 11 days. i) Representative brightfield images at passage 0, 2, 4, and 6 of esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT. Total culture days are given in parentheses. j) Comparison of gene expression of a basal layer marker ( Krt14 ) and a suprabasal layer marker ( Krt13 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT at passage 0 and 6 ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT at each passage).
    Gene Exp Sox2 Mm03053810 S1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp sox2 mm03053810 s1/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gene exp sox2 mm03053810 s1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bioss anti sox2
    The 3D culture of esophageal organoids in EEM hydrogel. a) Brightfield images of esophageal organoids cultured in various concentrations of EEM hydrogels and MAT at day 9. b) Quantification of organoid formation efficiency in EEM hydrogels, relative to MAT ( n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). c) qRT-PCR analysis to compare gene expression of a basal layer marker ( Krt14 ) and a suprabasal layer marker ( Krt13 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogels and MAT at day 9 ( n = 4, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). d) Relative gene expression of basal layer markers ( <t>Sox2</t> and Krt14 ) and suprabasal layer markers ( Krt13 and Krt4 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT at day 9 ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT). e) Morphology of esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 9 days. f) Immunofluorescent staining for basal layer markers (CK14, SOX2, and p63), suprabasal layer markers (CK13 and CK4), F-actin, a cell-cell adhesion marker (ECAD), and a proliferation marker (Ki67) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 12 days. g) Quantification of CK14 and CK13 positive area in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 12 days, based on immunofluorescence-stained images ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗ p < 0.05 versus MAT; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). h) Live/Dead staining to assess the viability of organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 11 days. i) Representative brightfield images at passage 0, 2, 4, and 6 of esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT. Total culture days are given in parentheses. j) Comparison of gene expression of a basal layer marker ( Krt14 ) and a suprabasal layer marker ( Krt13 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT at passage 0 and 6 ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT at each passage).
    Anti Sox2, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti sox2/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti sox2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    85
    Thermo Fisher gene exp sox2 rn01286286 g1
    The 3D culture of esophageal organoids in EEM hydrogel. a) Brightfield images of esophageal organoids cultured in various concentrations of EEM hydrogels and MAT at day 9. b) Quantification of organoid formation efficiency in EEM hydrogels, relative to MAT ( n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). c) qRT-PCR analysis to compare gene expression of a basal layer marker ( Krt14 ) and a suprabasal layer marker ( Krt13 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogels and MAT at day 9 ( n = 4, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). d) Relative gene expression of basal layer markers ( <t>Sox2</t> and Krt14 ) and suprabasal layer markers ( Krt13 and Krt4 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT at day 9 ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT). e) Morphology of esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 9 days. f) Immunofluorescent staining for basal layer markers (CK14, SOX2, and p63), suprabasal layer markers (CK13 and CK4), F-actin, a cell-cell adhesion marker (ECAD), and a proliferation marker (Ki67) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 12 days. g) Quantification of CK14 and CK13 positive area in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 12 days, based on immunofluorescence-stained images ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗ p < 0.05 versus MAT; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). h) Live/Dead staining to assess the viability of organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 11 days. i) Representative brightfield images at passage 0, 2, 4, and 6 of esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT. Total culture days are given in parentheses. j) Comparison of gene expression of a basal layer marker ( Krt14 ) and a suprabasal layer marker ( Krt13 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT at passage 0 and 6 ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT at each passage).
    Gene Exp Sox2 Rn01286286 G1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 85/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp sox2 rn01286286 g1/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 85 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gene exp sox2 rn01286286 g1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    85/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank pcrp sox2 1b3
    The 3D culture of esophageal organoids in EEM hydrogel. a) Brightfield images of esophageal organoids cultured in various concentrations of EEM hydrogels and MAT at day 9. b) Quantification of organoid formation efficiency in EEM hydrogels, relative to MAT ( n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). c) qRT-PCR analysis to compare gene expression of a basal layer marker ( Krt14 ) and a suprabasal layer marker ( Krt13 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogels and MAT at day 9 ( n = 4, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). d) Relative gene expression of basal layer markers ( <t>Sox2</t> and Krt14 ) and suprabasal layer markers ( Krt13 and Krt4 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT at day 9 ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT). e) Morphology of esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 9 days. f) Immunofluorescent staining for basal layer markers (CK14, SOX2, and p63), suprabasal layer markers (CK13 and CK4), F-actin, a cell-cell adhesion marker (ECAD), and a proliferation marker (Ki67) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 12 days. g) Quantification of CK14 and CK13 positive area in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 12 days, based on immunofluorescence-stained images ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗ p < 0.05 versus MAT; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). h) Live/Dead staining to assess the viability of organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 11 days. i) Representative brightfield images at passage 0, 2, 4, and 6 of esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT. Total culture days are given in parentheses. j) Comparison of gene expression of a basal layer marker ( Krt14 ) and a suprabasal layer marker ( Krt13 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT at passage 0 and 6 ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT at each passage).
    Pcrp Sox2 1b3, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/pcrp sox2 1b3/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pcrp sox2 1b3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Thermo Fisher gene exp sox2 hs04234836 s1
    The feasibility of the simulated microgravity in Optiprep with a neutral buoyancy regarding the stemness maintenance and trilineage differentiation of h BMSCs was evaluated. A qRT-PCR analysis and B western blotting determined the expression of OCT4, <t>SOX2,</t> and NANOG (stemness markers) in h BMSCs cultured at 3D-sim-μg (in Optiprep ), 3D-1 g (in CCM), and 2D-1 g (in CCM). C qRT-PCR analysis, D immunofluorescence staining, E histological analysis, and F quantitative analysis of osteogenic differentiation markers (RUNX2, OCN, and alizarin red S), adipogenic differentiation markers (PPARγ, CEBP/α, and Oil red O), and chondrogenic differentiation markers (SOX9, ACN, and Alcian blue) of h BMSCs cultured at 3D-sim-μg and 3D-1 g (n = 3; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01)
    Gene Exp Sox2 Hs04234836 S1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp sox2 hs04234836 s1/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gene exp sox2 hs04234836 s1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech sox2
    The feasibility of the simulated microgravity in Optiprep with a neutral buoyancy regarding the stemness maintenance and trilineage differentiation of h BMSCs was evaluated. A qRT-PCR analysis and B western blotting determined the expression of OCT4, <t>SOX2,</t> and NANOG (stemness markers) in h BMSCs cultured at 3D-sim-μg (in Optiprep ), 3D-1 g (in CCM), and 2D-1 g (in CCM). C qRT-PCR analysis, D immunofluorescence staining, E histological analysis, and F quantitative analysis of osteogenic differentiation markers (RUNX2, OCN, and alizarin red S), adipogenic differentiation markers (PPARγ, CEBP/α, and Oil red O), and chondrogenic differentiation markers (SOX9, ACN, and Alcian blue) of h BMSCs cultured at 3D-sim-μg and 3D-1 g (n = 3; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01)
    Sox2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/sox2/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sox2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The 3D culture of esophageal organoids in EEM hydrogel. a) Brightfield images of esophageal organoids cultured in various concentrations of EEM hydrogels and MAT at day 9. b) Quantification of organoid formation efficiency in EEM hydrogels, relative to MAT ( n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). c) qRT-PCR analysis to compare gene expression of a basal layer marker ( Krt14 ) and a suprabasal layer marker ( Krt13 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogels and MAT at day 9 ( n = 4, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). d) Relative gene expression of basal layer markers ( Sox2 and Krt14 ) and suprabasal layer markers ( Krt13 and Krt4 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT at day 9 ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT). e) Morphology of esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 9 days. f) Immunofluorescent staining for basal layer markers (CK14, SOX2, and p63), suprabasal layer markers (CK13 and CK4), F-actin, a cell-cell adhesion marker (ECAD), and a proliferation marker (Ki67) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 12 days. g) Quantification of CK14 and CK13 positive area in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 12 days, based on immunofluorescence-stained images ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗ p < 0.05 versus MAT; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). h) Live/Dead staining to assess the viability of organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 11 days. i) Representative brightfield images at passage 0, 2, 4, and 6 of esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT. Total culture days are given in parentheses. j) Comparison of gene expression of a basal layer marker ( Krt14 ) and a suprabasal layer marker ( Krt13 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT at passage 0 and 6 ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT at each passage).

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Esophagus extracellular matrix with microenvironmental complexity for esophageal organoids

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.12.046

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The 3D culture of esophageal organoids in EEM hydrogel. a) Brightfield images of esophageal organoids cultured in various concentrations of EEM hydrogels and MAT at day 9. b) Quantification of organoid formation efficiency in EEM hydrogels, relative to MAT ( n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). c) qRT-PCR analysis to compare gene expression of a basal layer marker ( Krt14 ) and a suprabasal layer marker ( Krt13 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogels and MAT at day 9 ( n = 4, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). d) Relative gene expression of basal layer markers ( Sox2 and Krt14 ) and suprabasal layer markers ( Krt13 and Krt4 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT at day 9 ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT). e) Morphology of esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 9 days. f) Immunofluorescent staining for basal layer markers (CK14, SOX2, and p63), suprabasal layer markers (CK13 and CK4), F-actin, a cell-cell adhesion marker (ECAD), and a proliferation marker (Ki67) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 12 days. g) Quantification of CK14 and CK13 positive area in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 12 days, based on immunofluorescence-stained images ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗ p < 0.05 versus MAT; ns, non-significant difference with p > 0.05). h) Live/Dead staining to assess the viability of organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT for 11 days. i) Representative brightfield images at passage 0, 2, 4, and 6 of esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT. Total culture days are given in parentheses. j) Comparison of gene expression of a basal layer marker ( Krt14 ) and a suprabasal layer marker ( Krt13 ) in esophageal organoids cultured in EEM hydrogel (5 mg mL −1 ) and MAT at passage 0 and 6 ( n = 4; unpaired two-tailed t -test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 versus MAT at each passage).

    Article Snippet: The relative gene expression was evaluated using the primers for the following genes (all from Thermo Fisher Scientific): sex-determining region Y-box 2 ( Sox2 ; Mm03053810_s1), keratin 14 ( Krt14 ; Mm00516876_m1), keratin 13 ( Krt13 ; Mm00495199_m1), keratin 4 ( Krt4 ; Mm01296260_m1), keratin 18 ( Krt18 ; Mm01601704_g1), keratin 19 ( Krt19 ; Mm00492980_m1), alpha fetoprotein ( Afp ; Mm00431715_m1), keratin 5 ( Krt5 ; Mm01305291_g1), secretoglobin family 1A member 1 ( Scgb1a1 ; Mm00442046_m1), and forkhead box J1 ( Foxj1 ; Mm01267279_m1).

    Techniques: Cell Culture, Quantitative RT-PCR, Gene Expression, Marker, Two Tailed Test, Staining, Immunofluorescence, Comparison

    The feasibility of the simulated microgravity in Optiprep with a neutral buoyancy regarding the stemness maintenance and trilineage differentiation of h BMSCs was evaluated. A qRT-PCR analysis and B western blotting determined the expression of OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG (stemness markers) in h BMSCs cultured at 3D-sim-μg (in Optiprep ), 3D-1 g (in CCM), and 2D-1 g (in CCM). C qRT-PCR analysis, D immunofluorescence staining, E histological analysis, and F quantitative analysis of osteogenic differentiation markers (RUNX2, OCN, and alizarin red S), adipogenic differentiation markers (PPARγ, CEBP/α, and Oil red O), and chondrogenic differentiation markers (SOX9, ACN, and Alcian blue) of h BMSCs cultured at 3D-sim-μg and 3D-1 g (n = 3; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01)

    Journal: Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

    Article Title: Neutral Buoyancy as a Simple Approach to Simulated Microgravity

    doi: 10.1007/s13770-025-00781-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The feasibility of the simulated microgravity in Optiprep with a neutral buoyancy regarding the stemness maintenance and trilineage differentiation of h BMSCs was evaluated. A qRT-PCR analysis and B western blotting determined the expression of OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG (stemness markers) in h BMSCs cultured at 3D-sim-μg (in Optiprep ), 3D-1 g (in CCM), and 2D-1 g (in CCM). C qRT-PCR analysis, D immunofluorescence staining, E histological analysis, and F quantitative analysis of osteogenic differentiation markers (RUNX2, OCN, and alizarin red S), adipogenic differentiation markers (PPARγ, CEBP/α, and Oil red O), and chondrogenic differentiation markers (SOX9, ACN, and Alcian blue) of h BMSCs cultured at 3D-sim-μg and 3D-1 g (n = 3; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01)

    Article Snippet: The specific TaqMan Primers (Thermo Fisher Scientific) used were: OCT4 (Hs04260367_gH), SOX2 (Hs04234836_s1), NANOG (Hs02387400_g1), RUNX2 (Hs00231692_ml), osteocalcin (OCN; Hs00609452_gl), PPARγ (Hs01115513_m1), CEBP/α (Hs00269972_s1), SOX9 (Hs00165814_m1), aggrecan (ACN; Hs00153936_m1), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; Hs02786624_g1), with GAPDH serving as the housekeeping gene.

    Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Expressing, Cell Culture, Immunofluorescence, Staining