smad3 inhibitor sis3 (MedChemExpress)
Structured Review

Smad3 Inhibitor Sis3, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 89 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/smad3 inhibitor sis3/product/MedChemExpress
Average 95 stars, based on 89 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Targeting ENO1 reprograms macrophage polarization to trigger antitumor immunity and improves the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy"
Article Title: Targeting ENO1 reprograms macrophage polarization to trigger antitumor immunity and improves the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy
Journal: Cell Death & Disease
doi: 10.1038/s41419-026-08416-7
Figure Legend Snippet: A The expression of total and surface ENO1 in human CRC cell lines was evaluated by immunoblotting and flow cytometry. B The expression of total and surface ENO1 in human BRCA cell lines was evaluated by immunoblotting and flow cytometry. C HT29 and LoVo cells were treated with different doses of recombinant human TGFβ1 protein (rhTGFβ1) for 24 hr, after which surface ENO1 expression was analyzed via flow cytometry. D HS578T and MDA-MB-468 cells were treated with different doses of the rhTGFβ1 protein for 24 hr, after which the surface ENO1 level was analyzed via flow cytometry. E LoVo cells were treated with LPS (1 μg/mL), rhTGFβ1 protein (10 ng/mL) or H 2 O 2 (50 μM) in combination with a PRMT5 inhibitor (AMG-193, 1 μM) or a PRMT6 inhibitor (EPZ020411 hydrochloride, 1 μM) for 24 hr. The surface ENO1 level was analyzed via flow cytometry. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). F HT29 cells were treated with rhTGFβ1 protein in combination with a PRMT5 inhibitor (1 μM) for 24 hr. The surface ENO1 expression was analyzed via flow cytometry. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). G LoVo shNC and LoVo shPRMT5 cells were treated with LPS (1 μg/mL), rhTGFβ1 protein (10 ng/mL) or H 2 O 2 (50 μM) for 24 hr. The surface level of ENO1 was examined by flow cytometry. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). H HT29 and LoVo cells were treated with LPS (1 μg/mL) and RT (5 Gy) for 24 hr. The surface level of ENO1 was examined by flow cytometry. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). I HT29 cells were treated with RT (5 Gy) in combination with a TGFβR1 inhibitor (1 μM), a Smad3 inhibitor (1 μM), or a PRMT5 inhibitor (1 μM) for 24 hr. The surface level of ENO1 was examined by flow cytometry. *** p < 0.001. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). J HT29 cells were treated with RT (5 Gy) in combination with a TGFβR1 inhibitor (1 μM), a Smad3 inhibitor (1 μM), or a PRMT5 inhibitor (1 μM) for 24 hr. The level of plasmin activity was examined via an ELISA kit. * p < 0.05. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). K MDA-MB-468 cells were treated with RT (5 Gy) in combination with a TGFβR1 inhibitor (1 μM), a Smad3 inhibitor (1 μM), or a PRMT5 inhibitor (1 μM) for 24 hr. The surface level of ENO1 was examined by flow cytometry. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). L MDA-MB-468 cells were treated with RT (5 Gy) in combination with a TGFβR1 inhibitor (1 μM), a Smad3 inhibitor (1 μM), or a PRMT5 inhibitor (1 μM) for 24 hr. The level of plasmin activity was examined via an ELISA kit. * p < 0.05, and ** p < 0.01. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). M HT29 cells were treated with RT (5 Gy) in combination with a PRMT5 inhibitor (1 μM) for 24 hr. The level of surface-methylated ENO1 was evaluated by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Flow Cytometry, Recombinant, Activity Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Methylation, Immunoprecipitation
Figure Legend Snippet: A A total of 5 × 10 5 CT26 cells were subcutaneously injected into the left legs of BALB/c mice for 5 days and then intraperitoneally administered with anti-ENO1 antibodies (HuL001, 40 mg/kg) or clodronate liposomes (50 μL/mouse) on the indicated days ( n = 5). Local radiotherapy was given on Day 10. The tumor volume was recorded every three days. * p < 0.05. Two-Way ANOVA test ( n = 4). B The densities of M1 (CD80 + ) and M2 (CD206 + ) macrophages in resected tumors were analyzed by immunofluorescence staining. The quantification of M1 (CD80 + ) and M2 (CD206 + ) macrophages in resected tumors. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). C 4T1 cells (5 ×10 4 ) were subcutaneously injected into the left legs of BALB/c mice for 4 days and then intraperitoneally administered anti-ENO1 antibodies (HuL001, 20 mg/kg) six times on the indicated days ( n = 5). Local radiotherapy was given on Days 10 and 12. The tumor volume was recorded every three days. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001. Two-Way ANOVA test ( n = 4). D The resected tumors were weighed on Day 40. * p < 0.05. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 4). E The densities of M1 (CD80 + ) and M2 (CD206 + ) macrophages in resected tumors were analyzed by immunofluorescence staining. F The quantification of M1 (CD80 + ) and M2 (CD206 + ) macrophages in resected tumors. * p < 0.05. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). G The frequencies of M1 (CD11c + CD11b + F4/80 + CD45 + 7AAD - CD3 - CD19 - ) and M2 (CD1206 + CD11b + F4/80 + CD45 + 7AAD - CD3 - CD19 - ) tumor-infiltrating macrophages were analyzed by flow cytometry. * p < 0.05. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3-4). H The quantification of the M1/M2 ratio is shown. * p < 0.05. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). I A representative image of flow cytometric analysis of GzmB + (GzmB hi CD8 + CD3 + CD45 + 7AAD - ) T cells. J The frequency of GzmB + (GzmB hi CD8 + CD3 + CD45 + 7AAD - ) T cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. * p < 0.05. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3-4). K The density of GzmB + (GzmB hi CD8 + CD3 + CD45 + 7AAD - ) T cells is shown. * p < 0.05. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3-4). L The density of IFNγ + (IFNγ hi CD8 + CD3 + CD45 + 7AAD - ) T cells is shown ( n = 3-4). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3-4). M The proposed mechanism of TGFβ1/TGFβR/Smad3/PRMT5-mediated ENO1 translocation for lactate release via MCT4.
Techniques Used: Injection, Liposomes, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Translocation Assay


