rap1 (Proteintech)
Structured Review

Rap1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 20 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rap1/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 20 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Fu-Fang-Qi-Di-Hua-Yu-Tang Improves Diabetic Macrovascular Disease via PI3K/AKT Pathway Regulation"
Article Title: Fu-Fang-Qi-Di-Hua-Yu-Tang Improves Diabetic Macrovascular Disease via PI3K/AKT Pathway Regulation
Journal: Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity
doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S515521
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of mRNA expression via the RAP1/PI3K/AKT pathway among different groups. ( a ) Relative expression of RAP 1; ( b ) Relative expression of PI3K; ( c ) Relative expression of AKT; ( d ) Relative expression of mTOR. Compared with the control (** P< 0.01), model ( # P< 0.05, ## P< 0.01), L-FFQD ( ◆ P< 0.05, ◆◆ P< 0.01), M-FFQD ( Δ P< 0.05, ΔΔ P< 0.01), and H-FFQD ( ★ P< 0.05, ★★ P< 0.01) groups, significant differences were observed.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Expressing, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of protein expression via the RAP1/PI3K/AKT pathway among different groups. ( a ) Electrophoresis of protein expression (A. Control group; B. Model group; C. L-FFQD group; D. M-FFQD group; E. H-FFQD group; F. ATOR-MAT group); ( b ) Relative value of RAP1; ( c ) Relative value of P-PI3K/PI3K; ( d ) Relative value of P-AKT/AKT; ( e ) Relative value of P-mTOR/mTOR; ( f ) Relative value of FOX01. Compared with the control (** P< 0.01), model ( # P< 0.05, ## P< 0.01), L-FFQD ( ◆ P< 0.05, ◆◆ P< 0.01), M-FFQD ( ΔΔ P< 0.01), and H-FFQD ( ★★ P< 0.01) groups, significant differences were observed.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Expressing, Electrophoresis, Control


![( A ) Experimental procedure for mice subjected to CRS. D, day. ( B and C ) Representative activity tracking and statistical analysis of time in the center and total distance traveled during OFT ( n = 12 to 13 mice per group). ( D and E ) Representative activity tracking and statistical analysis of time in open arms and open arm entries during EPMT. Same sample size as in (C). ( F ) Scheme for the analysis of total <t>Rap1</t> and active Rap1. ( G ) Representative Western blots from the Con and CRS mice. ( H ) Quantification analysis of relative total Rap1 and active Rap1 expression ( n = 5 per group). ( I ) Scheme for delivering vehicle or GGTI-298 into the dHPC and vHPC. ( J ) Representative images of cannula implantation in dHPC and vHPC. ( K and L ) Representative activity tracking and statistical analysis of time in the center and total distance traveled during OFT of mice after administering vehicle and GGTI-298 in dHPC ( n = 8 to 10 mice per group). ( M and N ) Representative activity tracking and statistical analysis of time in open arms and open arm entries during EPMT. Same sample size as in (L). ( O to R ) Same as in [(K) to (N)] except that the data were from mice receiving vehicle and GGTI-298 in vHPC ( n = 9 to 11 mice per group). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01. Two-way ANOVA [(L), (N), (P), and (R)]; Mann-Whitney U test [(C), left]; two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test [(C) right, (E), and (H)].](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_1498/pmc12101498/pmc12101498__sciadv.adt3163-f1.jpg)