Review



ras related c3 botulinum toxin substrate 2 rac2  (Proteintech)


Bioz Verified Symbol Proteintech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Proteintech ras related c3 botulinum toxin substrate 2 rac2
    Ras Related C3 Botulinum Toxin Substrate 2 Rac2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 29 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rac2/RAC2+Antibody/pm41912523-227-22-36
    Average 94 stars, based on 29 article reviews
    ras related c3 botulinum toxin substrate 2 rac2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    MedChemExpress rac2 inhibition assays
    Ubiquitination‐mediated degradation of <t>RAC2</t> impairs macrophage differentiation in the Sirt5 ‐deficient ovarian environment. (A) Identification of SIRT5‐interacting proteins in M‐CSF‐stimulated monocytes by immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by mass spectrometry (MS), showing the number of peptides detected for interacting proteins. (B) Reciprocal co‐IP in RAW264.7 cells co‐expressing HA‐tagged RAC2 and Myc‐tagged SIRT5 showing their direct interaction. (C) Endogenous interaction between SIRT5 and RAC2 confirmed by reciprocal co‐IP in mouse ovarian tissues. (D) SIRT5 deficiency increases RAC2 succinylation, as shown by elevated succinylation levels in SIRT5‐knockdown RAW264.7 cells (left) and Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right). (E) RAC2 was immunoprecipitated from mouse ovarian lysates, followed by a western blot to assess lysine succinylation. (F) Western blot analysis showing decreased RAC2 protein levels and increased global succinylation in RAW264.7 cells (left) with pharmacological SIRT5 inhibition (MC3482) or in Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right) compared to controls. (G) Co‐IF staining for RAC2 (red) and F4/80 (green) in ovarian sections reveals diminished RAC2 expression in F4/80⁺ macrophages from Sirt5 −/− mice compared to wild‐type controls. (H) RAC2 ubiquitination is elevated under SIRT5‐deficient conditions, as shown by increased ubiquitination in SIRT5‐knockdown or MC3482‐treated RAW264.7 cells. (I) Both ubiquitination and succinylation of RAC2 are elevated in monocytes from Sirt5 −/− mice compared with those from wild‐type controls. (J,K) Impaired monocyte‐to‐macrophage differentiation upon RAC2 inhibition. (J) qRT–PCR analysis shows reduced expression of macrophage markers ( Adgre1 , Fcgr1 , Cd68 ) in negatively selected monocytes following NSC23766 (RAC2 inhibitor) treatment ( n = 3 per group; one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test). Data are normalized to β‐actin and presented as Mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001. (K) IF staining for F4/80 (green) confirms impaired macrophage differentiation in the NSC23766‐treated group. Scale bar: 20 µm.
    Rac2 Inhibition Assays, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rac2/RAC1%2F2%2F3+Antibody/pmc12970288-345-1-22
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rac2 inhibition assays - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech ras related c3 botulinum toxin substrate 2 rac2
    Ubiquitination‐mediated degradation of <t>RAC2</t> impairs macrophage differentiation in the Sirt5 ‐deficient ovarian environment. (A) Identification of SIRT5‐interacting proteins in M‐CSF‐stimulated monocytes by immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by mass spectrometry (MS), showing the number of peptides detected for interacting proteins. (B) Reciprocal co‐IP in RAW264.7 cells co‐expressing HA‐tagged RAC2 and Myc‐tagged SIRT5 showing their direct interaction. (C) Endogenous interaction between SIRT5 and RAC2 confirmed by reciprocal co‐IP in mouse ovarian tissues. (D) SIRT5 deficiency increases RAC2 succinylation, as shown by elevated succinylation levels in SIRT5‐knockdown RAW264.7 cells (left) and Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right). (E) RAC2 was immunoprecipitated from mouse ovarian lysates, followed by a western blot to assess lysine succinylation. (F) Western blot analysis showing decreased RAC2 protein levels and increased global succinylation in RAW264.7 cells (left) with pharmacological SIRT5 inhibition (MC3482) or in Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right) compared to controls. (G) Co‐IF staining for RAC2 (red) and F4/80 (green) in ovarian sections reveals diminished RAC2 expression in F4/80⁺ macrophages from Sirt5 −/− mice compared to wild‐type controls. (H) RAC2 ubiquitination is elevated under SIRT5‐deficient conditions, as shown by increased ubiquitination in SIRT5‐knockdown or MC3482‐treated RAW264.7 cells. (I) Both ubiquitination and succinylation of RAC2 are elevated in monocytes from Sirt5 −/− mice compared with those from wild‐type controls. (J,K) Impaired monocyte‐to‐macrophage differentiation upon RAC2 inhibition. (J) qRT–PCR analysis shows reduced expression of macrophage markers ( Adgre1 , Fcgr1 , Cd68 ) in negatively selected monocytes following NSC23766 (RAC2 inhibitor) treatment ( n = 3 per group; one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test). Data are normalized to β‐actin and presented as Mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001. (K) IF staining for F4/80 (green) confirms impaired macrophage differentiation in the NSC23766‐treated group. Scale bar: 20 µm.
    Ras Related C3 Botulinum Toxin Substrate 2 Rac2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rac2/RAC2+Antibody/pm41912523-227-22-36
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ras related c3 botulinum toxin substrate 2 rac2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech rac2 antibody
    Ubiquitination‐mediated degradation of <t>RAC2</t> impairs macrophage differentiation in the Sirt5 ‐deficient ovarian environment. (A) Identification of SIRT5‐interacting proteins in M‐CSF‐stimulated monocytes by immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by mass spectrometry (MS), showing the number of peptides detected for interacting proteins. (B) Reciprocal co‐IP in RAW264.7 cells co‐expressing HA‐tagged RAC2 and Myc‐tagged SIRT5 showing their direct interaction. (C) Endogenous interaction between SIRT5 and RAC2 confirmed by reciprocal co‐IP in mouse ovarian tissues. (D) SIRT5 deficiency increases RAC2 succinylation, as shown by elevated succinylation levels in SIRT5‐knockdown RAW264.7 cells (left) and Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right). (E) RAC2 was immunoprecipitated from mouse ovarian lysates, followed by a western blot to assess lysine succinylation. (F) Western blot analysis showing decreased RAC2 protein levels and increased global succinylation in RAW264.7 cells (left) with pharmacological SIRT5 inhibition (MC3482) or in Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right) compared to controls. (G) Co‐IF staining for RAC2 (red) and F4/80 (green) in ovarian sections reveals diminished RAC2 expression in F4/80⁺ macrophages from Sirt5 −/− mice compared to wild‐type controls. (H) RAC2 ubiquitination is elevated under SIRT5‐deficient conditions, as shown by increased ubiquitination in SIRT5‐knockdown or MC3482‐treated RAW264.7 cells. (I) Both ubiquitination and succinylation of RAC2 are elevated in monocytes from Sirt5 −/− mice compared with those from wild‐type controls. (J,K) Impaired monocyte‐to‐macrophage differentiation upon RAC2 inhibition. (J) qRT–PCR analysis shows reduced expression of macrophage markers ( Adgre1 , Fcgr1 , Cd68 ) in negatively selected monocytes following NSC23766 (RAC2 inhibitor) treatment ( n = 3 per group; one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test). Data are normalized to β‐actin and presented as Mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001. (K) IF staining for F4/80 (green) confirms impaired macrophage differentiation in the NSC23766‐treated group. Scale bar: 20 µm.
    Rac2 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rac2/RAC2+Antibody/10__3390_slash_ph19030452-241-0-5
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rac2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech anti rac2430
    Ubiquitination‐mediated degradation of <t>RAC2</t> impairs macrophage differentiation in the Sirt5 ‐deficient ovarian environment. (A) Identification of SIRT5‐interacting proteins in M‐CSF‐stimulated monocytes by immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by mass spectrometry (MS), showing the number of peptides detected for interacting proteins. (B) Reciprocal co‐IP in RAW264.7 cells co‐expressing HA‐tagged RAC2 and Myc‐tagged SIRT5 showing their direct interaction. (C) Endogenous interaction between SIRT5 and RAC2 confirmed by reciprocal co‐IP in mouse ovarian tissues. (D) SIRT5 deficiency increases RAC2 succinylation, as shown by elevated succinylation levels in SIRT5‐knockdown RAW264.7 cells (left) and Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right). (E) RAC2 was immunoprecipitated from mouse ovarian lysates, followed by a western blot to assess lysine succinylation. (F) Western blot analysis showing decreased RAC2 protein levels and increased global succinylation in RAW264.7 cells (left) with pharmacological SIRT5 inhibition (MC3482) or in Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right) compared to controls. (G) Co‐IF staining for RAC2 (red) and F4/80 (green) in ovarian sections reveals diminished RAC2 expression in F4/80⁺ macrophages from Sirt5 −/− mice compared to wild‐type controls. (H) RAC2 ubiquitination is elevated under SIRT5‐deficient conditions, as shown by increased ubiquitination in SIRT5‐knockdown or MC3482‐treated RAW264.7 cells. (I) Both ubiquitination and succinylation of RAC2 are elevated in monocytes from Sirt5 −/− mice compared with those from wild‐type controls. (J,K) Impaired monocyte‐to‐macrophage differentiation upon RAC2 inhibition. (J) qRT–PCR analysis shows reduced expression of macrophage markers ( Adgre1 , Fcgr1 , Cd68 ) in negatively selected monocytes following NSC23766 (RAC2 inhibitor) treatment ( n = 3 per group; one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test). Data are normalized to β‐actin and presented as Mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001. (K) IF staining for F4/80 (green) confirms impaired macrophage differentiation in the NSC23766‐treated group. Scale bar: 20 µm.
    Anti Rac2430, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rac2/RAC2+Antibody/pm41734032-139-14-16
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti rac2430 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech anti trim21
    Ubiquitination‐mediated degradation of <t>RAC2</t> impairs macrophage differentiation in the Sirt5 ‐deficient ovarian environment. (A) Identification of SIRT5‐interacting proteins in M‐CSF‐stimulated monocytes by immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by mass spectrometry (MS), showing the number of peptides detected for interacting proteins. (B) Reciprocal co‐IP in RAW264.7 cells co‐expressing HA‐tagged RAC2 and Myc‐tagged SIRT5 showing their direct interaction. (C) Endogenous interaction between SIRT5 and RAC2 confirmed by reciprocal co‐IP in mouse ovarian tissues. (D) SIRT5 deficiency increases RAC2 succinylation, as shown by elevated succinylation levels in SIRT5‐knockdown RAW264.7 cells (left) and Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right). (E) RAC2 was immunoprecipitated from mouse ovarian lysates, followed by a western blot to assess lysine succinylation. (F) Western blot analysis showing decreased RAC2 protein levels and increased global succinylation in RAW264.7 cells (left) with pharmacological SIRT5 inhibition (MC3482) or in Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right) compared to controls. (G) Co‐IF staining for RAC2 (red) and F4/80 (green) in ovarian sections reveals diminished RAC2 expression in F4/80⁺ macrophages from Sirt5 −/− mice compared to wild‐type controls. (H) RAC2 ubiquitination is elevated under SIRT5‐deficient conditions, as shown by increased ubiquitination in SIRT5‐knockdown or MC3482‐treated RAW264.7 cells. (I) Both ubiquitination and succinylation of RAC2 are elevated in monocytes from Sirt5 −/− mice compared with those from wild‐type controls. (J,K) Impaired monocyte‐to‐macrophage differentiation upon RAC2 inhibition. (J) qRT–PCR analysis shows reduced expression of macrophage markers ( Adgre1 , Fcgr1 , Cd68 ) in negatively selected monocytes following NSC23766 (RAC2 inhibitor) treatment ( n = 3 per group; one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test). Data are normalized to β‐actin and presented as Mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001. (K) IF staining for F4/80 (green) confirms impaired macrophage differentiation in the NSC23766‐treated group. Scale bar: 20 µm.
    Anti Trim21, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rac2/RAC2+Antibody/pm41734032-139-18-20
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti trim21 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech 60077 1 ig
    Ubiquitination‐mediated degradation of <t>RAC2</t> impairs macrophage differentiation in the Sirt5 ‐deficient ovarian environment. (A) Identification of SIRT5‐interacting proteins in M‐CSF‐stimulated monocytes by immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by mass spectrometry (MS), showing the number of peptides detected for interacting proteins. (B) Reciprocal co‐IP in RAW264.7 cells co‐expressing HA‐tagged RAC2 and Myc‐tagged SIRT5 showing their direct interaction. (C) Endogenous interaction between SIRT5 and RAC2 confirmed by reciprocal co‐IP in mouse ovarian tissues. (D) SIRT5 deficiency increases RAC2 succinylation, as shown by elevated succinylation levels in SIRT5‐knockdown RAW264.7 cells (left) and Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right). (E) RAC2 was immunoprecipitated from mouse ovarian lysates, followed by a western blot to assess lysine succinylation. (F) Western blot analysis showing decreased RAC2 protein levels and increased global succinylation in RAW264.7 cells (left) with pharmacological SIRT5 inhibition (MC3482) or in Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right) compared to controls. (G) Co‐IF staining for RAC2 (red) and F4/80 (green) in ovarian sections reveals diminished RAC2 expression in F4/80⁺ macrophages from Sirt5 −/− mice compared to wild‐type controls. (H) RAC2 ubiquitination is elevated under SIRT5‐deficient conditions, as shown by increased ubiquitination in SIRT5‐knockdown or MC3482‐treated RAW264.7 cells. (I) Both ubiquitination and succinylation of RAC2 are elevated in monocytes from Sirt5 −/− mice compared with those from wild‐type controls. (J,K) Impaired monocyte‐to‐macrophage differentiation upon RAC2 inhibition. (J) qRT–PCR analysis shows reduced expression of macrophage markers ( Adgre1 , Fcgr1 , Cd68 ) in negatively selected monocytes following NSC23766 (RAC2 inhibitor) treatment ( n = 3 per group; one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test). Data are normalized to β‐actin and presented as Mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001. (K) IF staining for F4/80 (green) confirms impaired macrophage differentiation in the NSC23766‐treated group. Scale bar: 20 µm.
    60077 1 Ig, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rac2/RAC2+Antibody/pmc12866140-4-8-5
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    60077 1 ig - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech rac2
    Efferocytosis and polarization of macrophages were analyzed in vitro (A) Western blotting verifies the differences in TP63 and <t>RAC2</t> protein expression levels in the shTP63 and shTP63+RAC2 groups compared with the control group. (B) Differences in the fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green among groups of human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗ p < 0.05. (C) Differences in the fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green among groups in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01. (D) The fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green in human primary macrophages treated with EC9706 was determined by flow cytometry. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (E) The fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green in THP-1-induced macrophages treated with EC9706 was determined by flow cytometry. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (F) The CD163 + cell level of each group in human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (G) The CD163 + cell level of each group in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (H) The CD86 + cells in each group of human primary macrophages treated with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (I) The CD86 + cells in each group of THP-1-induced macrophages treated with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (J) Differences in IL-10, TGF-β, and TNF-α levels among the groups in human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (K) Differences in IL-10, TGF-β, and TNF-α levels among the groups in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of five independent experiments. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
    Rac2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rac2/RAC2+Antibody/pmc12866140-473-43-44
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rac2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech ab154711
    Efferocytosis and polarization of macrophages were analyzed in vitro (A) Western blotting verifies the differences in TP63 and <t>RAC2</t> protein expression levels in the shTP63 and shTP63+RAC2 groups compared with the control group. (B) Differences in the fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green among groups of human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗ p < 0.05. (C) Differences in the fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green among groups in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01. (D) The fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green in human primary macrophages treated with EC9706 was determined by flow cytometry. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (E) The fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green in THP-1-induced macrophages treated with EC9706 was determined by flow cytometry. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (F) The CD163 + cell level of each group in human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (G) The CD163 + cell level of each group in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (H) The CD86 + cells in each group of human primary macrophages treated with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (I) The CD86 + cells in each group of THP-1-induced macrophages treated with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (J) Differences in IL-10, TGF-β, and TNF-α levels among the groups in human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (K) Differences in IL-10, TGF-β, and TNF-α levels among the groups in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of five independent experiments. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
    Ab154711, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rac2/RAC2+Antibody/pmc12866140-4-7-5
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ab154711 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech anti rac2 antibody
    Efferocytosis and polarization of macrophages were analyzed in vitro (A) Western blotting verifies the differences in TP63 and <t>RAC2</t> protein expression levels in the shTP63 and shTP63+RAC2 groups compared with the control group. (B) Differences in the fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green among groups of human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗ p < 0.05. (C) Differences in the fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green among groups in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01. (D) The fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green in human primary macrophages treated with EC9706 was determined by flow cytometry. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (E) The fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green in THP-1-induced macrophages treated with EC9706 was determined by flow cytometry. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (F) The CD163 + cell level of each group in human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (G) The CD163 + cell level of each group in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (H) The CD86 + cells in each group of human primary macrophages treated with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (I) The CD86 + cells in each group of THP-1-induced macrophages treated with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (J) Differences in IL-10, TGF-β, and TNF-α levels among the groups in human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (K) Differences in IL-10, TGF-β, and TNF-α levels among the groups in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of five independent experiments. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
    Anti Rac2 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rac2/RAC2+Antibody/pm41498691-401-26-28
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti rac2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Ubiquitination‐mediated degradation of RAC2 impairs macrophage differentiation in the Sirt5 ‐deficient ovarian environment. (A) Identification of SIRT5‐interacting proteins in M‐CSF‐stimulated monocytes by immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by mass spectrometry (MS), showing the number of peptides detected for interacting proteins. (B) Reciprocal co‐IP in RAW264.7 cells co‐expressing HA‐tagged RAC2 and Myc‐tagged SIRT5 showing their direct interaction. (C) Endogenous interaction between SIRT5 and RAC2 confirmed by reciprocal co‐IP in mouse ovarian tissues. (D) SIRT5 deficiency increases RAC2 succinylation, as shown by elevated succinylation levels in SIRT5‐knockdown RAW264.7 cells (left) and Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right). (E) RAC2 was immunoprecipitated from mouse ovarian lysates, followed by a western blot to assess lysine succinylation. (F) Western blot analysis showing decreased RAC2 protein levels and increased global succinylation in RAW264.7 cells (left) with pharmacological SIRT5 inhibition (MC3482) or in Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right) compared to controls. (G) Co‐IF staining for RAC2 (red) and F4/80 (green) in ovarian sections reveals diminished RAC2 expression in F4/80⁺ macrophages from Sirt5 −/− mice compared to wild‐type controls. (H) RAC2 ubiquitination is elevated under SIRT5‐deficient conditions, as shown by increased ubiquitination in SIRT5‐knockdown or MC3482‐treated RAW264.7 cells. (I) Both ubiquitination and succinylation of RAC2 are elevated in monocytes from Sirt5 −/− mice compared with those from wild‐type controls. (J,K) Impaired monocyte‐to‐macrophage differentiation upon RAC2 inhibition. (J) qRT–PCR analysis shows reduced expression of macrophage markers ( Adgre1 , Fcgr1 , Cd68 ) in negatively selected monocytes following NSC23766 (RAC2 inhibitor) treatment ( n = 3 per group; one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test). Data are normalized to β‐actin and presented as Mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001. (K) IF staining for F4/80 (green) confirms impaired macrophage differentiation in the NSC23766‐treated group. Scale bar: 20 µm.

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: SIRT5–RAC2 Axis Drives Monocyte‐to‐Macrophage Differentiation to Promote Inflammatory Injury in Premature Ovarian Insufficiency

    doi: 10.1002/advs.202518417

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Ubiquitination‐mediated degradation of RAC2 impairs macrophage differentiation in the Sirt5 ‐deficient ovarian environment. (A) Identification of SIRT5‐interacting proteins in M‐CSF‐stimulated monocytes by immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by mass spectrometry (MS), showing the number of peptides detected for interacting proteins. (B) Reciprocal co‐IP in RAW264.7 cells co‐expressing HA‐tagged RAC2 and Myc‐tagged SIRT5 showing their direct interaction. (C) Endogenous interaction between SIRT5 and RAC2 confirmed by reciprocal co‐IP in mouse ovarian tissues. (D) SIRT5 deficiency increases RAC2 succinylation, as shown by elevated succinylation levels in SIRT5‐knockdown RAW264.7 cells (left) and Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right). (E) RAC2 was immunoprecipitated from mouse ovarian lysates, followed by a western blot to assess lysine succinylation. (F) Western blot analysis showing decreased RAC2 protein levels and increased global succinylation in RAW264.7 cells (left) with pharmacological SIRT5 inhibition (MC3482) or in Sirt5 −/− monocytes (right) compared to controls. (G) Co‐IF staining for RAC2 (red) and F4/80 (green) in ovarian sections reveals diminished RAC2 expression in F4/80⁺ macrophages from Sirt5 −/− mice compared to wild‐type controls. (H) RAC2 ubiquitination is elevated under SIRT5‐deficient conditions, as shown by increased ubiquitination in SIRT5‐knockdown or MC3482‐treated RAW264.7 cells. (I) Both ubiquitination and succinylation of RAC2 are elevated in monocytes from Sirt5 −/− mice compared with those from wild‐type controls. (J,K) Impaired monocyte‐to‐macrophage differentiation upon RAC2 inhibition. (J) qRT–PCR analysis shows reduced expression of macrophage markers ( Adgre1 , Fcgr1 , Cd68 ) in negatively selected monocytes following NSC23766 (RAC2 inhibitor) treatment ( n = 3 per group; one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test). Data are normalized to β‐actin and presented as Mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001. (K) IF staining for F4/80 (green) confirms impaired macrophage differentiation in the NSC23766‐treated group. Scale bar: 20 µm.

    Article Snippet: For RAC2 inhibition assays, monocytes were treated from day 0 of differentiation with either DMSO (vehicle control) or 100 μ m NSC23766 (MedChemExpress, China) dissolved in DMSO.

    Techniques: Ubiquitin Proteomics, Immunoprecipitation, Mass Spectrometry, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Expressing, Knockdown, Western Blot, Inhibition, Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR

    Efferocytosis and polarization of macrophages were analyzed in vitro (A) Western blotting verifies the differences in TP63 and RAC2 protein expression levels in the shTP63 and shTP63+RAC2 groups compared with the control group. (B) Differences in the fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green among groups of human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗ p < 0.05. (C) Differences in the fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green among groups in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01. (D) The fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green in human primary macrophages treated with EC9706 was determined by flow cytometry. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (E) The fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green in THP-1-induced macrophages treated with EC9706 was determined by flow cytometry. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (F) The CD163 + cell level of each group in human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (G) The CD163 + cell level of each group in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (H) The CD86 + cells in each group of human primary macrophages treated with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (I) The CD86 + cells in each group of THP-1-induced macrophages treated with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (J) Differences in IL-10, TGF-β, and TNF-α levels among the groups in human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (K) Differences in IL-10, TGF-β, and TNF-α levels among the groups in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of five independent experiments. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Macrophage efferocytosis mediated by the TP63-RAC2 pathway promotes immunosuppressive remodeling in esophageal cancer

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102529

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Efferocytosis and polarization of macrophages were analyzed in vitro (A) Western blotting verifies the differences in TP63 and RAC2 protein expression levels in the shTP63 and shTP63+RAC2 groups compared with the control group. (B) Differences in the fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green among groups of human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗ p < 0.05. (C) Differences in the fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green among groups in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01. (D) The fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green in human primary macrophages treated with EC9706 was determined by flow cytometry. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (E) The fluorescence signal intensity of CMFDA green in THP-1-induced macrophages treated with EC9706 was determined by flow cytometry. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (F) The CD163 + cell level of each group in human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (G) The CD163 + cell level of each group in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (H) The CD86 + cells in each group of human primary macrophages treated with EC9706. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (I) The CD86 + cells in each group of THP-1-induced macrophages treated with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (J) Differences in IL-10, TGF-β, and TNF-α levels among the groups in human primary macrophages with EC9706. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (K) Differences in IL-10, TGF-β, and TNF-α levels among the groups in THP-1-induced macrophages with EC9706. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of five independent experiments. ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Then, slides were treated by microwave to induce antigen retrieval using citric acid solution for 15 min. For mIHC analysis of human samples, a panel of primary antibodies were used, including CD68 (1:100, ab283654, Abcam), Annexin A1 (1:1000, ab214486, Abcam), TP63(1:200, ab124762, Abcam), RAC2(1:2000,60077-1-Ig, Proteintech).

    Techniques: In Vitro, Western Blot, Expressing, Control, Fluorescence, Flow Cytometry

    Experimental study of shTP63 and shTP63+RAC2 in apoptotic AKR (apoptotic esophageal carcinoma) cells-C57BL/6 efferocytosis mouse model (A) Western blot verifies the difference in TP63 and RAC2 protein expression levels in shTP63 and shTP63+RAC2 groups compared with the control group. (B) The efferocytosis index level of each group was detected ( n = 5 per group). ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (C) The CD163 + cells in each group were detected ( n = 5 per group). ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01. (D) The CD86 + cells in each group ( n = 5 per group). ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Macrophage efferocytosis mediated by the TP63-RAC2 pathway promotes immunosuppressive remodeling in esophageal cancer

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102529

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Experimental study of shTP63 and shTP63+RAC2 in apoptotic AKR (apoptotic esophageal carcinoma) cells-C57BL/6 efferocytosis mouse model (A) Western blot verifies the difference in TP63 and RAC2 protein expression levels in shTP63 and shTP63+RAC2 groups compared with the control group. (B) The efferocytosis index level of each group was detected ( n = 5 per group). ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (C) The CD163 + cells in each group were detected ( n = 5 per group). ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01. (D) The CD86 + cells in each group ( n = 5 per group). ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Then, slides were treated by microwave to induce antigen retrieval using citric acid solution for 15 min. For mIHC analysis of human samples, a panel of primary antibodies were used, including CD68 (1:100, ab283654, Abcam), Annexin A1 (1:1000, ab214486, Abcam), TP63(1:200, ab124762, Abcam), RAC2(1:2000,60077-1-Ig, Proteintech).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Control