Review



proteome  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 97
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    ATCC proteome
    A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
    Proteome, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1339 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/proteome/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1339 article reviews
    proteome - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Systematic Infectome–Phenome Profiling Reveals Cryptococcal Infection-Associated Proteins Driving Immune System Remodeling and Immunization Potential"

    Article Title: Systematic Infectome–Phenome Profiling Reveals Cryptococcal Infection-Associated Proteins Driving Immune System Remodeling and Immunization Potential

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.30.702846

    A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular proteome (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, Cryptococcus neoformans (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
    Figure Legend Snippet: A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular proteome (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, Cryptococcus neoformans (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.

    Techniques Used: In Vitro, Comparison, Infection, Quantitative Proteomics



    Similar Products

    proteome  (ATCC)
    97
    ATCC proteome
    A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
    Proteome, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/proteome/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proteome - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    atcc 367 reference proteome  (ATCC)
    97
    ATCC atcc 367 reference proteome
    A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
    Atcc 367 Reference Proteome, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/atcc 367 reference proteome/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    atcc 367 reference proteome - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    proteome discoverer 1.4  (Thermo Fisher)
    90
    Thermo Fisher proteome discoverer 1.4
    A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
    Proteome Discoverer 1.4, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/proteome discoverer 1.4/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proteome discoverer 1.4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    proteome profiler human xl cytokine array kit  (R&D Systems)
    96
    R&D Systems proteome profiler human xl cytokine array kit
    A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
    Proteome Profiler Human Xl Cytokine Array Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/proteome profiler human xl cytokine array kit/product/R&D Systems
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proteome profiler human xl cytokine array kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    yeast proteome reference  (ATCC)
    96
    ATCC yeast proteome reference
    A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
    Yeast Proteome Reference, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/yeast proteome reference/product/ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    yeast proteome reference - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    proteome sequence fasta files  (ATCC)
    97
    ATCC proteome sequence fasta files
    A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
    Proteome Sequence Fasta Files, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/proteome sequence fasta files/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proteome sequence fasta files - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    clinical proteomics technologies for cancer  (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank)
    94
    Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank clinical proteomics technologies for cancer
    A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
    Clinical Proteomics Technologies For Cancer, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/clinical proteomics technologies for cancer/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    clinical proteomics technologies for cancer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    proteomic grade trypsin  (Thermo Fisher)
    99
    Thermo Fisher proteomic grade trypsin
    A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular <t>proteome</t> (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, <t>Cryptococcus</t> <t>neoformans</t> (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.
    Proteomic Grade Trypsin, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/proteomic grade trypsin/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proteomic grade trypsin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular proteome (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, Cryptococcus neoformans (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Systematic Infectome–Phenome Profiling Reveals Cryptococcal Infection-Associated Proteins Driving Immune System Remodeling and Immunization Potential

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.30.702846

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A ) Venn diagram of unique proteins identified in the in vitro cellular proteome (purple; 2767 proteins) and secretome (blue; 18 proteins) with 25 proteins commonly detected. B) Egg diagram of proteins identified from the host, Mus musculus (4,952 after valid value filtering), and pathogen, Cryptococcus neoformans (874 after valid value filtering) from infectome analysis. C) Principal component analysis of infectome experiment. D) Volcano plot for comparison of host proteins with significant differences in abundance between infected (teal) and uninfected (grey) conditions. Student’s t test, P < 0.05; FDR = 0.05; S 0 = 1. E) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro cellular proteome compared to the infectome. F) Comparison of significantly different fungal proteins identified from the in vitro secretome compared to the infectome. Red lines represent 0-, 4-, and 16-fold change in protein abundance. G) Pie chart based on GOBP for 53 fungal infection-associated protein (percentage of each category represented). Experiment completed in biological triplicate.

    Article Snippet: The derived peak list was incorporated with the Andromeda search engine against the reference C. neoformans var. grubii serotype A (strain H99/ATCC 208821) proteome (7430 sequences; Oct. 2018) and Mus musculus (55,462 sequences; Oct 2018) from Uniprot .

    Techniques: In Vitro, Comparison, Infection, Quantitative Proteomics