prodh (Proteintech)
Structured Review

Prodh, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 19 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/prodh/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 19 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Connexin43 Deficiency Leads to Ventricular Arrhythmias by Reprogramming Proline Metabolism"
Article Title: Connexin43 Deficiency Leads to Ventricular Arrhythmias by Reprogramming Proline Metabolism
Journal: Advanced Science
doi: 10.1002/advs.202516090
Figure Legend Snippet: Downregulation of the Cx43‐interacting protein SNAT2 leads to disorders of proline metabolism and disturbances in redox balance of Cx43‐KO iPSC‐CMs. (A) Bar graph to compare the mRNA expression of the proline transporters ( SLC36A1 , SLC36A2 , SLC38A1 , and SLC38A2 ) between WT and Cx43‐KO iPSC‐CMs. n = 4 independently biological repeats. (B–D) Western blot analysis of the protein expression of SNAT2 (sodium‐coupled neutral amino acid transporter) and PRODH (proline dehydrogenase) in WT and Cx43‐KO iPSC‐CMs. GAPDH is used as the loading control. n = 3 independently biological repeats. (E) Co‐immunoprecipitation (co‐IP) assay showing that SNAT2 was detected in anti‐Cx43 immunoprecipitates in WT iPSC‐CMs. (F) Molecular docking simulation using AutoDockTools and GRAMM. Cx43 and SNAT2 are represented as slate and cyan cartoon models, respectively. (G) Measurement of proline contents through a proline assay kit in Cx43‐KO iPSC‐CMs transfected with green fluorescent protein (GFP) only (negative control, NC) (KO + NC) or SNAT2 protein labeled with GFP (SNAT2‐OE) (KO + SNAT2‐OE). OE, overexpressing. n = 5 independently biological repeats. (H) Bar graph to compare the mitochondrial ROS level among WT, KO + NC, and KO + SNAT2‐OE iPSC‐CMs. n = 4 independently biological repeats. (I) Bar graph to compare the GSH/GSSG among WT, KO + NC, and KO + SNAT2‐OE iPSC‐CMs. n = 3 independently biological repeats. (J) Bar graph to compare the proline content among WT iPSC‐CMs transfected with scrambled siRNA (WT + NC), WT iPSC‐CMs transfected with SNAT2 small interfering RNA (siRNA) (WT + SNAT2‐KD), and KO iPSC‐CMs. KD, knockdown. n = 5 independently biological repeats. (K–N) Bar graphs to compare the calcium amplitude, peak calcium, maximum rising rate, and maximum decay rate among WT + NC1, WT + SNAT2‐KD, KO + NC2, and KO + SNAT2‐OE iPSC‐CMs. n = 21–24 cells. (O) The diagram depicting the traces of OCR on WT and Cx43‐KO iPSC‐CMs treated with PBS (vehicle) or proline (100 n m , 24 h) after sequentially administration of 1.5 µ m oligomycin, 4 µ m FCCP, and 1 µ m antimycin A, respectively. (P–S) Bar graphs to compare a series of fundamental parameters of mitochondrial function among different groups in Panel O, including basal OCR, spare respiratory capacity, maximal respiration, and ATP production. n = 2–4 independently biological repeats. (T) Measurement of mitochondrial ROS levels in WT and Cx43‐KO iPSC‐CMs with or without ISO (100 n m , 2 h) stimulation and/or proline (100 n m , 24 h) supplementation. n = 4 independently biological repeats. (A–D,G–T) “KO” in the figure panels refers to combined data from KO‐1 and KO‐2 analyzed in parallel. (A,C,D,G) p values were calculated using unpaired two‐tailed Student's t ‐test, (H) Brown–Forsythe ANOVA test/Welch ANOVA test followed by Dunnett T3 multiple comparisons test, (I) one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons test, (J) one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons test, (K,M,N) Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparisons test, (L,T) one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test, and (P–S) two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test. Data were shown as mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Control, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Transfection, Negative Control, Labeling, Small Interfering RNA, Knockdown, Two Tailed Test
