Review



perhexiline  (MedChemExpress)


Bioz Verified Symbol MedChemExpress is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol MedChemExpress manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    MedChemExpress perhexiline
    Perhexiline, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 8 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/perhexiline/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 8 article reviews
    perhexiline - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    MedChemExpress perhexiline
    Perhexiline, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/perhexiline/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    perhexiline - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    MedChemExpress pem
    Pem, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/pem/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pem - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cayman Chemical perhexiline (maleate)
    ( A ) Ki67 immunofluorescence (green) and quantification of percentages of Ki67 + primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Etomoxir. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. with n = 6–9 replicates. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; two tailed, unpaired Student’s t test (10 μM vs. control, P = 0.2519; 50 μM vs. control, P = 0.0042; 100 μM vs. control, P = 0.0087; 200 μM vs. control, P = 2.42 × 10 −5 ). n.s. no significance. Scale bar, 50 μm. ( B ) Ki67 immunofluorescence (green) and quantification of percentages of Ki67 + primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Oxfenicine. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. with n = 3 replicates. * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001; two tailed, unpaired Student’s t test. For Ki67 + /Pax7 + percentage, 2.5 mM vs. control, P = 0.13; 10 mM vs. control, P = 0.0187. For cell count (%), 2.5 mM vs. control, P = 0.00016; 10 mM vs. control, P = 7.97 × 10 −7 ; 2.5 mM vs. 10 mM, P = 0.00017; n.s. no significance. Scale bar, 50 μm. ( C ) Ki67 immunofluorescence (green) and quantification of percentages of Ki67 + primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or <t>Perhexiline.</t> Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. with n = 6–9 replicates. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; two tailed, unpaired Student’s t -test. For Ki67 + /Pax7 + percentage, 2.5 μM vs. control, P = 0.00049; 5 μM vs. control, P = 0.00231; For cell count (%), 2.5 μM vs. control, P = 0.00011; 5 μM vs. control, P = 7.43 × 10 −5 ; 2.5 μM vs. 5 μM, P = 0.0037. Scale bar, 50 μm.
    Perhexiline (Maleate), supplied by Cayman Chemical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/perhexiline (maleate)/product/Cayman Chemical
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    perhexiline (maleate) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cambridge Bioscience perhexiline cay16982
    MRD 3D microtumors reveal specific drug responses toward fatty acid oxidation inhibitors. (A,B) Cell viability changes of naïve and MRD 3D microtumors compared to a DMSO control after a 10‐day treatment with (A) 40 µ m etomoxir; (B) 4 µ m <t>perhexiline</t> ( n = 25–93 3D microtumors from 3 to 7 independent experiments). (C,D) Heatmaps of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) upregulated in etomoxir‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of (C) OVCAR5 and (D) OVCAR‐5/RFP. (E) Confocal images of MRD 3D microtumors (3D MT) at D10 stained with the FAO marker CPT1A (yellow), phalloidin (pink), DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm. (F) Heatmap of DEGs upregulated in perhexiline‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of OVCAR5. (G) Confocal images showing the DEGs upregulated in perhexiline‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of OVCAR5 at day 10: AKR1B10 (green, top left panel), AKR1C2 (green, top right panel), FASN (green, bottom left panel), SCD (green, bottom right panel). The cells were also stained with phalloidin (pink), DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm.
    Perhexiline Cay16982, supplied by Cambridge Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/perhexiline cay16982/product/Cambridge Bioscience
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    perhexiline cay16982 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Tocris perhexiline (perhx)
    MRD 3D microtumors reveal specific drug responses toward fatty acid oxidation inhibitors. (A,B) Cell viability changes of naïve and MRD 3D microtumors compared to a DMSO control after a 10‐day treatment with (A) 40 µ m etomoxir; (B) 4 µ m <t>perhexiline</t> ( n = 25–93 3D microtumors from 3 to 7 independent experiments). (C,D) Heatmaps of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) upregulated in etomoxir‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of (C) OVCAR5 and (D) OVCAR‐5/RFP. (E) Confocal images of MRD 3D microtumors (3D MT) at D10 stained with the FAO marker CPT1A (yellow), phalloidin (pink), DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm. (F) Heatmap of DEGs upregulated in perhexiline‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of OVCAR5. (G) Confocal images showing the DEGs upregulated in perhexiline‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of OVCAR5 at day 10: AKR1B10 (green, top left panel), AKR1C2 (green, top right panel), FASN (green, bottom left panel), SCD (green, bottom right panel). The cells were also stained with phalloidin (pink), DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm.
    Perhexiline (Perhx), supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/perhexiline (perhx)/product/Tocris
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    perhexiline (perhx) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    MedChemExpress perhexiline hy b1334a mce
    MRD 3D microtumors reveal specific drug responses toward fatty acid oxidation inhibitors. (A,B) Cell viability changes of naïve and MRD 3D microtumors compared to a DMSO control after a 10‐day treatment with (A) 40 µ m etomoxir; (B) 4 µ m <t>perhexiline</t> ( n = 25–93 3D microtumors from 3 to 7 independent experiments). (C,D) Heatmaps of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) upregulated in etomoxir‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of (C) OVCAR5 and (D) OVCAR‐5/RFP. (E) Confocal images of MRD 3D microtumors (3D MT) at D10 stained with the FAO marker CPT1A (yellow), phalloidin (pink), DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm. (F) Heatmap of DEGs upregulated in perhexiline‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of OVCAR5. (G) Confocal images showing the DEGs upregulated in perhexiline‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of OVCAR5 at day 10: AKR1B10 (green, top left panel), AKR1C2 (green, top right panel), FASN (green, bottom left panel), SCD (green, bottom right panel). The cells were also stained with phalloidin (pink), DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm.
    Perhexiline Hy B1334a Mce, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/perhexiline hy b1334a mce/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    perhexiline hy b1334a mce - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    AK Scientific perhexiline
    IC 50 of a) etomoxir, b) <t>perhexiline,</t> c) chlorpromazine. A series of concentrations of each compound was used accordingly. We used the same amount of human CPT1a pellet solution with a protein concentration of 0.67 μg/μL, adding 2 μL of protein in each group.
    Perhexiline, supplied by AK Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/perhexiline/product/AK Scientific
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    perhexiline - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    MedChemExpress perhexiline maleate in vitro treatments
    IC 50 of a) etomoxir, b) <t>perhexiline,</t> c) chlorpromazine. A series of concentrations of each compound was used accordingly. We used the same amount of human CPT1a pellet solution with a protein concentration of 0.67 μg/μL, adding 2 μL of protein in each group.
    Perhexiline Maleate In Vitro Treatments, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/perhexiline maleate in vitro treatments/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    perhexiline maleate in vitro treatments - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( A ) Ki67 immunofluorescence (green) and quantification of percentages of Ki67 + primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Etomoxir. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. with n = 6–9 replicates. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; two tailed, unpaired Student’s t test (10 μM vs. control, P = 0.2519; 50 μM vs. control, P = 0.0042; 100 μM vs. control, P = 0.0087; 200 μM vs. control, P = 2.42 × 10 −5 ). n.s. no significance. Scale bar, 50 μm. ( B ) Ki67 immunofluorescence (green) and quantification of percentages of Ki67 + primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Oxfenicine. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. with n = 3 replicates. * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001; two tailed, unpaired Student’s t test. For Ki67 + /Pax7 + percentage, 2.5 mM vs. control, P = 0.13; 10 mM vs. control, P = 0.0187. For cell count (%), 2.5 mM vs. control, P = 0.00016; 10 mM vs. control, P = 7.97 × 10 −7 ; 2.5 mM vs. 10 mM, P = 0.00017; n.s. no significance. Scale bar, 50 μm. ( C ) Ki67 immunofluorescence (green) and quantification of percentages of Ki67 + primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Perhexiline. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. with n = 6–9 replicates. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; two tailed, unpaired Student’s t -test. For Ki67 + /Pax7 + percentage, 2.5 μM vs. control, P = 0.00049; 5 μM vs. control, P = 0.00231; For cell count (%), 2.5 μM vs. control, P = 0.00011; 5 μM vs. control, P = 7.43 × 10 −5 ; 2.5 μM vs. 5 μM, P = 0.0037. Scale bar, 50 μm.

    Journal: The EMBO Journal

    Article Title: Mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation regulates adult muscle stem cell function through modulating metabolic flux and protein acetylation

    doi: 10.1038/s44318-025-00397-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Ki67 immunofluorescence (green) and quantification of percentages of Ki67 + primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Etomoxir. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. with n = 6–9 replicates. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; two tailed, unpaired Student’s t test (10 μM vs. control, P = 0.2519; 50 μM vs. control, P = 0.0042; 100 μM vs. control, P = 0.0087; 200 μM vs. control, P = 2.42 × 10 −5 ). n.s. no significance. Scale bar, 50 μm. ( B ) Ki67 immunofluorescence (green) and quantification of percentages of Ki67 + primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Oxfenicine. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. with n = 3 replicates. * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001; two tailed, unpaired Student’s t test. For Ki67 + /Pax7 + percentage, 2.5 mM vs. control, P = 0.13; 10 mM vs. control, P = 0.0187. For cell count (%), 2.5 mM vs. control, P = 0.00016; 10 mM vs. control, P = 7.97 × 10 −7 ; 2.5 mM vs. 10 mM, P = 0.00017; n.s. no significance. Scale bar, 50 μm. ( C ) Ki67 immunofluorescence (green) and quantification of percentages of Ki67 + primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Perhexiline. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. with n = 6–9 replicates. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; two tailed, unpaired Student’s t -test. For Ki67 + /Pax7 + percentage, 2.5 μM vs. control, P = 0.00049; 5 μM vs. control, P = 0.00231; For cell count (%), 2.5 μM vs. control, P = 0.00011; 5 μM vs. control, P = 7.43 × 10 −5 ; 2.5 μM vs. 5 μM, P = 0.0037. Scale bar, 50 μm.

    Article Snippet: Perhexiline (maleate) , Cayman Chemical , Cat# 16982.

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Control, Two Tailed Test, Cell Counting

    ( A ) Immunofluorescence of MyoG (red) and MF20 (green) and quantification of differentiation and fusion index in primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Etomoxir. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. with n = 4–6 replicates. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; two tailed, unpaired Student’s t -test. For differentiation index, 50 μM vs. control, P = 0.0057; 100 μM vs. control, P = 0.0013. For fusion index, 50 μM vs. control, P = 0.0021; 100 μM vs. control, P = 0.00032. Scale bar, 500 μm (top); 100 μm (bottom). ( B ) Immunoblots showing relative levels of MF20 and Cpt2 in primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Etomoxir (50 µM). ( C ) Immunofluorescence of MyoG (red) and MF20 (green) and quantification of differentiation and fusion index in primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Perhexiline (5 µM) and Oxfenicine (2.5 mM). Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. with n = 3–6 replicates. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01; two tailed, unpaired Student’s t test. For differentiation index, Perhexiline vs. control, P = 0.0472; Oxfenicine vs. control, P = 0.012. For fusion index, Perhexiline vs. control, P = 0.0025; Oxfenicine vs. control, P = 0.01052. Scale bar, 200 μm (top); 100 μm (bottom).

    Journal: The EMBO Journal

    Article Title: Mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation regulates adult muscle stem cell function through modulating metabolic flux and protein acetylation

    doi: 10.1038/s44318-025-00397-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Immunofluorescence of MyoG (red) and MF20 (green) and quantification of differentiation and fusion index in primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Etomoxir. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. with n = 4–6 replicates. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; two tailed, unpaired Student’s t -test. For differentiation index, 50 μM vs. control, P = 0.0057; 100 μM vs. control, P = 0.0013. For fusion index, 50 μM vs. control, P = 0.0021; 100 μM vs. control, P = 0.00032. Scale bar, 500 μm (top); 100 μm (bottom). ( B ) Immunoblots showing relative levels of MF20 and Cpt2 in primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Etomoxir (50 µM). ( C ) Immunofluorescence of MyoG (red) and MF20 (green) and quantification of differentiation and fusion index in primary myoblasts treated with vehicle control or Perhexiline (5 µM) and Oxfenicine (2.5 mM). Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. with n = 3–6 replicates. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01; two tailed, unpaired Student’s t test. For differentiation index, Perhexiline vs. control, P = 0.0472; Oxfenicine vs. control, P = 0.012. For fusion index, Perhexiline vs. control, P = 0.0025; Oxfenicine vs. control, P = 0.01052. Scale bar, 200 μm (top); 100 μm (bottom).

    Article Snippet: Perhexiline (maleate) , Cayman Chemical , Cat# 16982.

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Control, Two Tailed Test, Western Blot

    Reagents and tools table

    Journal: The EMBO Journal

    Article Title: Mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation regulates adult muscle stem cell function through modulating metabolic flux and protein acetylation

    doi: 10.1038/s44318-025-00397-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Reagents and tools table

    Article Snippet: Perhexiline (maleate) , Cayman Chemical , Cat# 16982.

    Techniques: Produced, Ex Vivo, In Vitro, Sequencing, Red Blood Cell Lysis, Modification, Saline, Blocking Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Protease Inhibitor, Reverse Transcription, Isolation, Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay, Western Blot, In Situ, Fluorescence, Detection Assay, TUNEL Assay, Software, Microscopy, Mass Spectrometry, Liquid Chromatography

    MRD 3D microtumors reveal specific drug responses toward fatty acid oxidation inhibitors. (A,B) Cell viability changes of naïve and MRD 3D microtumors compared to a DMSO control after a 10‐day treatment with (A) 40 µ m etomoxir; (B) 4 µ m perhexiline ( n = 25–93 3D microtumors from 3 to 7 independent experiments). (C,D) Heatmaps of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) upregulated in etomoxir‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of (C) OVCAR5 and (D) OVCAR‐5/RFP. (E) Confocal images of MRD 3D microtumors (3D MT) at D10 stained with the FAO marker CPT1A (yellow), phalloidin (pink), DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm. (F) Heatmap of DEGs upregulated in perhexiline‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of OVCAR5. (G) Confocal images showing the DEGs upregulated in perhexiline‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of OVCAR5 at day 10: AKR1B10 (green, top left panel), AKR1C2 (green, top right panel), FASN (green, bottom left panel), SCD (green, bottom right panel). The cells were also stained with phalloidin (pink), DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm.

    Journal: Advanced Healthcare Materials

    Article Title: 3D Microtumors Representing Ovarian Cancer Minimal Residual Disease Respond to the Fatty Acid Oxidation Inhibitor Perhexiline

    doi: 10.1002/adhm.202404072

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MRD 3D microtumors reveal specific drug responses toward fatty acid oxidation inhibitors. (A,B) Cell viability changes of naïve and MRD 3D microtumors compared to a DMSO control after a 10‐day treatment with (A) 40 µ m etomoxir; (B) 4 µ m perhexiline ( n = 25–93 3D microtumors from 3 to 7 independent experiments). (C,D) Heatmaps of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) upregulated in etomoxir‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of (C) OVCAR5 and (D) OVCAR‐5/RFP. (E) Confocal images of MRD 3D microtumors (3D MT) at D10 stained with the FAO marker CPT1A (yellow), phalloidin (pink), DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm. (F) Heatmap of DEGs upregulated in perhexiline‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of OVCAR5. (G) Confocal images showing the DEGs upregulated in perhexiline‐resistant MRD 3D microtumors composed of OVCAR5 at day 10: AKR1B10 (green, top left panel), AKR1C2 (green, top right panel), FASN (green, bottom left panel), SCD (green, bottom right panel). The cells were also stained with phalloidin (pink), DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm.

    Article Snippet: Etomoxir sodium salt (Stratech, #S8244‐SEL) was dissolved in DMSO to prepare a 40 m m stock solution, which was diluted in cell medium to a final concentration of 40 μ m . Perhexiline (Cambridge Bioscience, #CAY16982) was dissolved in DMSO to prepare a 4 m m perhexiline stock solution, which was diluted in cell medium to a final concentration of 4 μ m . DMSO was added to cell medium at a 1:1000 volume ratio for the control group.

    Techniques: Control, Staining, Marker

    IC 50 of a) etomoxir, b) perhexiline, c) chlorpromazine. A series of concentrations of each compound was used accordingly. We used the same amount of human CPT1a pellet solution with a protein concentration of 0.67 μg/μL, adding 2 μL of protein in each group.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Direct expression of CPT1a enables a high throughput platform for the discovery of CPT1a modulators

    doi: 10.1101/2024.12.15.628575

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IC 50 of a) etomoxir, b) perhexiline, c) chlorpromazine. A series of concentrations of each compound was used accordingly. We used the same amount of human CPT1a pellet solution with a protein concentration of 0.67 μg/μL, adding 2 μL of protein in each group.

    Article Snippet: Two previously reported CPT1 inhibitors, etomoxir sodium salt (Cayman Chemical, Cat. #11969) and perhexiline (AK Scientific, Cat. #X4611), were used to validate the potential of this assay as a platform to screen for novel CPT1 inhibitors.

    Techniques: Protein Concentration