anti p62 parkin pink1 (Proteintech)
Structured Review

Anti P62 Parkin Pink1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 674 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/parkin/pmc12969342-124-10-15?v=Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 674 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Near infrared enhanced palladium loaded siraitia grosvenorii carbon dots amplify mitophagy for acute lung injury immunotherapy"
Article Title: Near infrared enhanced palladium loaded siraitia grosvenorii carbon dots amplify mitophagy for acute lung injury immunotherapy
Journal: Bioactive Materials
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.040
Figure Legend Snippet: ALI therapeutic mechanism. A) Co-immunofluorescent staining images of cells incubated with Cy5-CPs or Cy5-CPs@SS31 by confocal staining microscope: DAPI (blue), Mito-tracker green (green), and Cy5-CPs or Cy5-CPs@SS31 (red). (Scale bar = 10 μm) B) MMP of treated cells by flow cytometry. C) Heatmap of DEGs between control group and CPs@SS31+NIR: genes with relatively high (red) and low (blue) expression levels. D) Volcano plot of DEGs: 542 upregulated and 499 downregulated genes between control group and CPs@SS31+NIR. E) Anti-inflammation pathways related DEGs by KEGG enrichment analysis (red). F) Anti-inflammation pathways related differential biological functions by GO enrichment analysis (red): molecular function (MF), biological process (BP) and cell component (CC). G) Protein-protein interaction network of mitophagy related proteins. H) P62, Parkin and PINK1 expression levels of treated cells by WB. I) P62, Parkin and PINK1 expression levels in the lung tissue of treated rats. (Scale bar = 100 μm).
Techniques Used: Staining, Incubation, Microscopy, Flow Cytometry, Control, Expressing
![( a ) Effects of ULK1 activators (2, 4 µM of LYN-1604 dihydrochloride; 0.5, 5 µM of (Rac)-BL-918) and inhibitors (5, 10 µM of SBI-0206965; 2.5, 5 µM of XST-14) on Tau seed-induced formation of Tau puncta in HEK293 cells expressing 0N4R P301S Tau-Venus. Data are pooled from 3 biological replicates. (b) Effects of ULK1 activators (2, 4 µM of LYN-1604 dihydrochloride; 0.5, 5 µM of (Rac)-BL-918) and inhibitors (5, 10 µM of SBI-0206965; 2.5, 5 µM of XST-14) on degradation of preformed Tau puncta in the HEK293 cells expression 0N4R P301S Tau-Venus. Data are pooled from 3 biological replicates. ( c ) mt-Keima and YPH-Parkin expressing HeLa cells were used to evaluate the effects on mitophagy induction by treating a positive control CCCP. Representative images are shown. ( d-f ) Quantification of mitophagy events by treating ULK1 activators, Rac-BL-918 (0.5, 5 µM) and LYN-1604 (2, 4 µM), as well as ULK1 inhibitors SBI-0206965 (5, 10 µM) and XST-14 (2.5, 5 µM). One dot represents the average value of one image. Data were pooled from 3 biological replicates. ( g-h ) Representative images ( g ) and quantification ( h ) of mitophagy induction from primary cortical neurons by treating ULK1 activators, Rac-BL-918 (5 µM) and LYN-1604 (4 µM), as well as ULK1 inhibitors SBI-0206965 (5 µM) and XST-14 (5 µM). Mitophagy was detected using a mitophagy detection dye kit. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 20 μm. ( i ) Representative blots of target proteins (ULK1, ULK2, PINK1, GSK3β, Parkin, Atg5, FUNDC1, AMBRA1, <t>BNIP3,</t> Nix, Beclin1) and loading control (GAPDH or β-tubulin) in HEK293 cells expressing 0N4R P301S Tau-Venus transfected with siRNAs (100 nM, 48 h) or scrambled siRNA. ( j ) Associative memory tests were administered to adult day 2 transgenic C. elegans expressing hTau[P301L]n-sid-1 OV in the presence of ULK1 inhibitors (10, 100 µM of SBI-0206965; 5, 50 µM of XST-14). Attraction to odorant is quantified as Chemotaxis Index (% CI), where lower score corresponds to greater response to odorant/better memory function. Unless specified elsewhere, data are mean ± S.E.M. Statistical analyses performed were one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test ( a , b , d-f , h ); two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test ( j ).](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_0337/pmc13190337/pmc13190337__43587_2026_1108_Fig17_ESM.jpg)
