Review



ovcar 3  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    ATCC ovcar 3
    Ovcar 3, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1264 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ovcar/pmc13089033-32-8-9?v=ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1264 article reviews
    ovcar 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    ATCC ovcar 3
    Ovcar 3, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ovcar/pmc13089033-32-8-9?v=ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ovcar 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Korean Cell Line Bank nih ovcar 3 cells
    Nih Ovcar 3 Cells, supplied by Korean Cell Line Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ovcar/pm42121901-71-0-9?v=Korean+Cell+Line+Bank
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nih ovcar 3 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC ovcar3 cells
    A) Quantification of Cetuximab, an IgG1 Ab, binding to <t>OVCAR3</t> cells as compared to patient TBAs by fluorescence. Cetuximab was incorporated at concentrations of 0.01–0.1 µg/mL. B) Quantification of Cetuximab binding to FcγRIIIa as compared to patient TBAs via fluorescence. C) Percent cytotoxicity of unmodified patient TBAs, quantified by an in vitro effector response assay (n=36). All patient TBAs were normalized to the same concentration. Cetuximab was used as a positive control (+). NK cells co-incubated with OVCAR3 cells alone functioned as the negative control (-). A purple bar indicates a patient that was evaluated in A) and B). Data are represented as average ± standard deviation. See also Figure S4.
    Ovcar3 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ovcar/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__04__25__720834-184-0-2?v=ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ovcar3 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC ovcar 8
    A) Quantification of Cetuximab, an IgG1 Ab, binding to <t>OVCAR3</t> cells as compared to patient TBAs by fluorescence. Cetuximab was incorporated at concentrations of 0.01–0.1 µg/mL. B) Quantification of Cetuximab binding to FcγRIIIa as compared to patient TBAs via fluorescence. C) Percent cytotoxicity of unmodified patient TBAs, quantified by an in vitro effector response assay (n=36). All patient TBAs were normalized to the same concentration. Cetuximab was used as a positive control (+). NK cells co-incubated with OVCAR3 cells alone functioned as the negative control (-). A purple bar indicates a patient that was evaluated in A) and B). Data are represented as average ± standard deviation. See also Figure S4.
    Ovcar 8, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ovcar/us12612361-142-109-143?v=ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ovcar 8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC human ovcar3
    HE4 neutralization exerts therapeutic activity in human cancer models (A–C) PMA-differentiated THP-1 macrophages were stimulated with Fc or hHE4-Fc, and PD-L1 expression was assessed by flow cytometry (A), immunoblotting (B), and RT-qPCR (C); a commercial hHE4-Fc was included as an independent control. (D) Binding of hHE4 to PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells assessed by flow cytometry. (E and F) PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells were pretreated with ruxolitinib, fludarabine, or Stattic, followed by hHE4-Fc stimulation; PD-L1 was quantified by RT-qPCR (E) and flow cytometry (F). (G and H) Anti-hHE4 monoclonal antibodies inhibited hHE4-induced PD-L1 upregulation in PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells, assessed by RT-qPCR (G) and flow cytometry (H). (I) Anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 blocked hHE4 binding to PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells. (J) Binding of wild-type or epitope-mutant hHE4-Fc to anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 was quantified by ELISA. (K) Pharmacokinetic analysis of anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 in C57BL/6 mice following intravenous administration. (L–O) Fresh human LUAD tumor cell suspensions were treated with anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10, followed by flow cytometric analysis of PD-L1 and ELISA measurement of IFN-γ and granzyme B. (P) Recombinant HE4 suppressed IFN-γ production in human LUAD tumor cell suspensions. (Q–T) HE4 blockade enhanced PBMC-mediated antitumor activity in humanized C-NKG mice bearing <t>OVCAR3</t> or NCI-H358 tumors, shown by treatment scheme, representative tumors, and tumor weights. Schematics (L and Q) were created using BioRender. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA (C, E, and G), paired t tests (M–P), or unpaired t tests (S and T). Data in (A–J) are representative of three independent experiments; data in (Q–T) are pooled from two independent experiments.
    Human Ovcar3, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ovcar/pmc13130641-135-0-3?v=ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human ovcar3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC human cldn6
    HE4 neutralization exerts therapeutic activity in human cancer models (A–C) PMA-differentiated THP-1 macrophages were stimulated with Fc or hHE4-Fc, and PD-L1 expression was assessed by flow cytometry (A), immunoblotting (B), and RT-qPCR (C); a commercial hHE4-Fc was included as an independent control. (D) Binding of hHE4 to PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells assessed by flow cytometry. (E and F) PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells were pretreated with ruxolitinib, fludarabine, or Stattic, followed by hHE4-Fc stimulation; PD-L1 was quantified by RT-qPCR (E) and flow cytometry (F). (G and H) Anti-hHE4 monoclonal antibodies inhibited hHE4-induced PD-L1 upregulation in PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells, assessed by RT-qPCR (G) and flow cytometry (H). (I) Anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 blocked hHE4 binding to PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells. (J) Binding of wild-type or epitope-mutant hHE4-Fc to anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 was quantified by ELISA. (K) Pharmacokinetic analysis of anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 in C57BL/6 mice following intravenous administration. (L–O) Fresh human LUAD tumor cell suspensions were treated with anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10, followed by flow cytometric analysis of PD-L1 and ELISA measurement of IFN-γ and granzyme B. (P) Recombinant HE4 suppressed IFN-γ production in human LUAD tumor cell suspensions. (Q–T) HE4 blockade enhanced PBMC-mediated antitumor activity in humanized C-NKG mice bearing <t>OVCAR3</t> or NCI-H358 tumors, shown by treatment scheme, representative tumors, and tumor weights. Schematics (L and Q) were created using BioRender. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA (C, E, and G), paired t tests (M–P), or unpaired t tests (S and T). Data in (A–J) are representative of three independent experiments; data in (Q–T) are pooled from two independent experiments.
    Human Cldn6, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ovcar/us12606634-2628-8-12?v=ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human cldn6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    ovcar3  (ATCC)
    99
    ATCC ovcar3
    HE4 neutralization exerts therapeutic activity in human cancer models (A–C) PMA-differentiated THP-1 macrophages were stimulated with Fc or hHE4-Fc, and PD-L1 expression was assessed by flow cytometry (A), immunoblotting (B), and RT-qPCR (C); a commercial hHE4-Fc was included as an independent control. (D) Binding of hHE4 to PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells assessed by flow cytometry. (E and F) PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells were pretreated with ruxolitinib, fludarabine, or Stattic, followed by hHE4-Fc stimulation; PD-L1 was quantified by RT-qPCR (E) and flow cytometry (F). (G and H) Anti-hHE4 monoclonal antibodies inhibited hHE4-induced PD-L1 upregulation in PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells, assessed by RT-qPCR (G) and flow cytometry (H). (I) Anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 blocked hHE4 binding to PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells. (J) Binding of wild-type or epitope-mutant hHE4-Fc to anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 was quantified by ELISA. (K) Pharmacokinetic analysis of anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 in C57BL/6 mice following intravenous administration. (L–O) Fresh human LUAD tumor cell suspensions were treated with anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10, followed by flow cytometric analysis of PD-L1 and ELISA measurement of IFN-γ and granzyme B. (P) Recombinant HE4 suppressed IFN-γ production in human LUAD tumor cell suspensions. (Q–T) HE4 blockade enhanced PBMC-mediated antitumor activity in humanized C-NKG mice bearing <t>OVCAR3</t> or NCI-H358 tumors, shown by treatment scheme, representative tumors, and tumor weights. Schematics (L and Q) were created using BioRender. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA (C, E, and G), paired t tests (M–P), or unpaired t tests (S and T). Data in (A–J) are representative of three independent experiments; data in (Q–T) are pooled from two independent experiments.
    Ovcar3, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ovcar/pmc13130678-70-0-2?v=ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ovcar3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    A) Quantification of Cetuximab, an IgG1 Ab, binding to OVCAR3 cells as compared to patient TBAs by fluorescence. Cetuximab was incorporated at concentrations of 0.01–0.1 µg/mL. B) Quantification of Cetuximab binding to FcγRIIIa as compared to patient TBAs via fluorescence. C) Percent cytotoxicity of unmodified patient TBAs, quantified by an in vitro effector response assay (n=36). All patient TBAs were normalized to the same concentration. Cetuximab was used as a positive control (+). NK cells co-incubated with OVCAR3 cells alone functioned as the negative control (-). A purple bar indicates a patient that was evaluated in A) and B). Data are represented as average ± standard deviation. See also Figure S4.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Systems serology of responses against tumor antigens in ovarian cancer reveal disrupted Fc-mediated immunity

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.25.720834

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Quantification of Cetuximab, an IgG1 Ab, binding to OVCAR3 cells as compared to patient TBAs by fluorescence. Cetuximab was incorporated at concentrations of 0.01–0.1 µg/mL. B) Quantification of Cetuximab binding to FcγRIIIa as compared to patient TBAs via fluorescence. C) Percent cytotoxicity of unmodified patient TBAs, quantified by an in vitro effector response assay (n=36). All patient TBAs were normalized to the same concentration. Cetuximab was used as a positive control (+). NK cells co-incubated with OVCAR3 cells alone functioned as the negative control (-). A purple bar indicates a patient that was evaluated in A) and B). Data are represented as average ± standard deviation. See also Figure S4.

    Article Snippet: OVCAR3 cells (ATCC HTB-161) were grown in complete growth media.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Fluorescence, In Vitro, Concentration Assay, Positive Control, Incubation, Negative Control, Standard Deviation

    HE4 neutralization exerts therapeutic activity in human cancer models (A–C) PMA-differentiated THP-1 macrophages were stimulated with Fc or hHE4-Fc, and PD-L1 expression was assessed by flow cytometry (A), immunoblotting (B), and RT-qPCR (C); a commercial hHE4-Fc was included as an independent control. (D) Binding of hHE4 to PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells assessed by flow cytometry. (E and F) PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells were pretreated with ruxolitinib, fludarabine, or Stattic, followed by hHE4-Fc stimulation; PD-L1 was quantified by RT-qPCR (E) and flow cytometry (F). (G and H) Anti-hHE4 monoclonal antibodies inhibited hHE4-induced PD-L1 upregulation in PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells, assessed by RT-qPCR (G) and flow cytometry (H). (I) Anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 blocked hHE4 binding to PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells. (J) Binding of wild-type or epitope-mutant hHE4-Fc to anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 was quantified by ELISA. (K) Pharmacokinetic analysis of anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 in C57BL/6 mice following intravenous administration. (L–O) Fresh human LUAD tumor cell suspensions were treated with anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10, followed by flow cytometric analysis of PD-L1 and ELISA measurement of IFN-γ and granzyme B. (P) Recombinant HE4 suppressed IFN-γ production in human LUAD tumor cell suspensions. (Q–T) HE4 blockade enhanced PBMC-mediated antitumor activity in humanized C-NKG mice bearing OVCAR3 or NCI-H358 tumors, shown by treatment scheme, representative tumors, and tumor weights. Schematics (L and Q) were created using BioRender. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA (C, E, and G), paired t tests (M–P), or unpaired t tests (S and T). Data in (A–J) are representative of three independent experiments; data in (Q–T) are pooled from two independent experiments.

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: HE4 drives PD-L1 expression in myeloid cells via IFN-γR-JAK-STAT3 signaling to promote tumor immune evasion

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102691

    Figure Lengend Snippet: HE4 neutralization exerts therapeutic activity in human cancer models (A–C) PMA-differentiated THP-1 macrophages were stimulated with Fc or hHE4-Fc, and PD-L1 expression was assessed by flow cytometry (A), immunoblotting (B), and RT-qPCR (C); a commercial hHE4-Fc was included as an independent control. (D) Binding of hHE4 to PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells assessed by flow cytometry. (E and F) PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells were pretreated with ruxolitinib, fludarabine, or Stattic, followed by hHE4-Fc stimulation; PD-L1 was quantified by RT-qPCR (E) and flow cytometry (F). (G and H) Anti-hHE4 monoclonal antibodies inhibited hHE4-induced PD-L1 upregulation in PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells, assessed by RT-qPCR (G) and flow cytometry (H). (I) Anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 blocked hHE4 binding to PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells. (J) Binding of wild-type or epitope-mutant hHE4-Fc to anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 was quantified by ELISA. (K) Pharmacokinetic analysis of anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10 in C57BL/6 mice following intravenous administration. (L–O) Fresh human LUAD tumor cell suspensions were treated with anti-hHE4 mAb clone #10, followed by flow cytometric analysis of PD-L1 and ELISA measurement of IFN-γ and granzyme B. (P) Recombinant HE4 suppressed IFN-γ production in human LUAD tumor cell suspensions. (Q–T) HE4 blockade enhanced PBMC-mediated antitumor activity in humanized C-NKG mice bearing OVCAR3 or NCI-H358 tumors, shown by treatment scheme, representative tumors, and tumor weights. Schematics (L and Q) were created using BioRender. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA (C, E, and G), paired t tests (M–P), or unpaired t tests (S and T). Data in (A–J) are representative of three independent experiments; data in (Q–T) are pooled from two independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: Human: OVCAR3 , ATCC , Cat# HTB161.

    Techniques: Neutralization, Activity Assay, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Binding Assay, Bioprocessing, Mutagenesis, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Recombinant