Review




Structured Review

Bio-Rad rat cd68
Rat Cd68, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 3154 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat cd68/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 3154 article reviews
rat cd68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

96
Bio-Rad rat cd68
Rat Cd68, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat cd68/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat cd68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio-Rad rat anti cd68
Rat Anti Cd68, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat anti cd68/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti cd68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio-Rad cd68
Cd68, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd68/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio-Rad rat monoclonal anti cd68
Rat Monoclonal Anti Cd68, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat monoclonal anti cd68/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat monoclonal anti cd68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio-Rad lysosomal phagocytic marker cd68
A Quantification of Iba1 + cell counts for the total striatum. Data was normalized to area. B. Quantification of Iba1 + intensity per Iba1 + cell. C. Quantification of <t>CD68</t> + intensity per Iba1 + cell D. Quantification of WFA + intensity per Iba1 + cell. E. Linear regression analysis of Ibal + intensity versus CD68 + intensity per cell. F. Linear regression analysis of Ibal + intensity versus UTA + intensity per cell. G. Linear regression analysis of CD68 + intensity versus UTA + intensity per cell. A Data represented as mean ± SENL data was tested for normality prior to statistical analysis. Two-tailed t-tests or Welch’s t-test used when appropriate. Regression analysis: R 2 values of corresponding linear regressions label on graph and t-test comparison of slopes used, p-values: * <0.05, * * <0.01. N - 4-5 mice/group, 3-5 sections/mouse, 13-41 cells/mouse.
Lysosomal Phagocytic Marker Cd68, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lysosomal phagocytic marker cd68/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lysosomal phagocytic marker cd68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio-Rad perineuronal nets pnns
A Quantification of Iba1 + cell counts for the total striatum. Data was normalized to area. B. Quantification of Iba1 + intensity per Iba1 + cell. C. Quantification of <t>CD68</t> + intensity per Iba1 + cell D. Quantification of WFA + intensity per Iba1 + cell. E. Linear regression analysis of Ibal + intensity versus CD68 + intensity per cell. F. Linear regression analysis of Ibal + intensity versus UTA + intensity per cell. G. Linear regression analysis of CD68 + intensity versus UTA + intensity per cell. A Data represented as mean ± SENL data was tested for normality prior to statistical analysis. Two-tailed t-tests or Welch’s t-test used when appropriate. Regression analysis: R 2 values of corresponding linear regressions label on graph and t-test comparison of slopes used, p-values: * <0.05, * * <0.01. N - 4-5 mice/group, 3-5 sections/mouse, 13-41 cells/mouse.
Perineuronal Nets Pnns, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/perineuronal nets pnns/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
perineuronal nets pnns - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio-Rad anti cd68
A Quantification of Iba1 + cell counts for the total striatum. Data was normalized to area. B. Quantification of Iba1 + intensity per Iba1 + cell. C. Quantification of <t>CD68</t> + intensity per Iba1 + cell D. Quantification of WFA + intensity per Iba1 + cell. E. Linear regression analysis of Ibal + intensity versus CD68 + intensity per cell. F. Linear regression analysis of Ibal + intensity versus UTA + intensity per cell. G. Linear regression analysis of CD68 + intensity versus UTA + intensity per cell. A Data represented as mean ± SENL data was tested for normality prior to statistical analysis. Two-tailed t-tests or Welch’s t-test used when appropriate. Regression analysis: R 2 values of corresponding linear regressions label on graph and t-test comparison of slopes used, p-values: * <0.05, * * <0.01. N - 4-5 mice/group, 3-5 sections/mouse, 13-41 cells/mouse.
Anti Cd68, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd68/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A Quantification of Iba1 + cell counts for the total striatum. Data was normalized to area. B. Quantification of Iba1 + intensity per Iba1 + cell. C. Quantification of CD68 + intensity per Iba1 + cell D. Quantification of WFA + intensity per Iba1 + cell. E. Linear regression analysis of Ibal + intensity versus CD68 + intensity per cell. F. Linear regression analysis of Ibal + intensity versus UTA + intensity per cell. G. Linear regression analysis of CD68 + intensity versus UTA + intensity per cell. A Data represented as mean ± SENL data was tested for normality prior to statistical analysis. Two-tailed t-tests or Welch’s t-test used when appropriate. Regression analysis: R 2 values of corresponding linear regressions label on graph and t-test comparison of slopes used, p-values: * <0.05, * * <0.01. N - 4-5 mice/group, 3-5 sections/mouse, 13-41 cells/mouse.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Glial cell and perineuronal net interactions in the dorsal striatum of aged mice

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.25.714174

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Quantification of Iba1 + cell counts for the total striatum. Data was normalized to area. B. Quantification of Iba1 + intensity per Iba1 + cell. C. Quantification of CD68 + intensity per Iba1 + cell D. Quantification of WFA + intensity per Iba1 + cell. E. Linear regression analysis of Ibal + intensity versus CD68 + intensity per cell. F. Linear regression analysis of Ibal + intensity versus UTA + intensity per cell. G. Linear regression analysis of CD68 + intensity versus UTA + intensity per cell. A Data represented as mean ± SENL data was tested for normality prior to statistical analysis. Two-tailed t-tests or Welch’s t-test used when appropriate. Regression analysis: R 2 values of corresponding linear regressions label on graph and t-test comparison of slopes used, p-values: * <0.05, * * <0.01. N - 4-5 mice/group, 3-5 sections/mouse, 13-41 cells/mouse.

Article Snippet: Coronal 30-μm hemisections containing the dorsal striatum were processed in two independent staining/imaging cohorts: ( ) microglia were labeled with Iba1 (rabbit; FUJIFILM Wako, #P3088) in combination with the lysosomal/phagocytic marker CD68 (rat; Bio-Rad, #MCA1957) and perineuronal nets (PNNs) were visualized using fluorescein-conjugated Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA; Vector Laboratories, #FL-1351); ( ) astrocytes were labeled with GFAP (rabbit; Cell Signaling Technology, #12389) together with WFA to visualize PNNs.

Techniques: Two Tailed Test, Comparison