mat2a (Proteintech)
Structured Review
![(A) Western blot analysis of histone methylation (H3K4me1 and H3K4me4) in SEM and Lin− MLL-Af4 cells, control or depleted for IGF2BP3; n = 3. (B) Dot blot analysis of m 6 A modification (left) and methylene blue staining in SEM cells, control or depleted for IGF2BP3. (C) ELISA measurement of m 6 A modification on RNA isolated from SEM, Lin− MLL-Af4, and NALM6 cells ( n = 4 for SEM and Lin− MLL-Af4, n = 5 [sg5 = 3] for NALM6). (D) Bar plot (left) and pie chart (right) depicting the m 6 A peak distribution across genomic locations from the m 6 A-eCLIP data in SEM control and IGF2BP3-depleted cells. (E) Metagene plots depicting the changes in the m 6 A peak coverage across the transcriptome in SEM control and IGF2BP3-depleted cells. (F) Volcano plot (top) for genes showing differential m 6 A RNA methylation after IGF2BP3 depletion and IGF2BP3 targets defined by eCLIP analysis. Gray dashed lines indicate the significant cutoffs for differential expression (±1) and the adjusted p value (0.05). Hypomethylated genes are highlighted in blue, while hypermethylated genes are highlighted in red. IGV browser snapshots (bottom) of m 6 A-eCLIP depicting the coverage and change in the peak height between the NT and IGF2BP3-depleted cells for <t>MAT2A</t> 3′ UTR are shown. All data are n ≥ 3 replicates represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), compared by two-sided unpaired t test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. In case of missing or outlier values, the replicate was not reported. All experiments were repeated at least twice for consistency. All the western blots were repeated at least three times to report the changes, if any. Refer also to .](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_3248/pmc12593248/pmc12593248__nihms-2120101-f0004.jpg)
Mat2a, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 26 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mat2a/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 26 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "IGF2BP3 redirects glycolytic flux to promote one-carbon metabolism and RNA methylation"
Article Title: IGF2BP3 redirects glycolytic flux to promote one-carbon metabolism and RNA methylation
Journal: Cell reports
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116330
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Western blot analysis of histone methylation (H3K4me1 and H3K4me4) in SEM and Lin− MLL-Af4 cells, control or depleted for IGF2BP3; n = 3. (B) Dot blot analysis of m 6 A modification (left) and methylene blue staining in SEM cells, control or depleted for IGF2BP3. (C) ELISA measurement of m 6 A modification on RNA isolated from SEM, Lin− MLL-Af4, and NALM6 cells ( n = 4 for SEM and Lin− MLL-Af4, n = 5 [sg5 = 3] for NALM6). (D) Bar plot (left) and pie chart (right) depicting the m 6 A peak distribution across genomic locations from the m 6 A-eCLIP data in SEM control and IGF2BP3-depleted cells. (E) Metagene plots depicting the changes in the m 6 A peak coverage across the transcriptome in SEM control and IGF2BP3-depleted cells. (F) Volcano plot (top) for genes showing differential m 6 A RNA methylation after IGF2BP3 depletion and IGF2BP3 targets defined by eCLIP analysis. Gray dashed lines indicate the significant cutoffs for differential expression (±1) and the adjusted p value (0.05). Hypomethylated genes are highlighted in blue, while hypermethylated genes are highlighted in red. IGV browser snapshots (bottom) of m 6 A-eCLIP depicting the coverage and change in the peak height between the NT and IGF2BP3-depleted cells for MAT2A 3′ UTR are shown. All data are n ≥ 3 replicates represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), compared by two-sided unpaired t test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. In case of missing or outlier values, the replicate was not reported. All experiments were repeated at least twice for consistency. All the western blots were repeated at least three times to report the changes, if any. Refer also to .
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Methylation, Control, Dot Blot, Modification, Staining, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Isolation, Quantitative Proteomics, Standard Deviation
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Western blot analysis of Lin− cells from Igf2bp3 del/del mice. Briefly, cells were isolated from mice with a germline deletion of Igf2bp3, transformed with MLL-Af4, and then subjected to transduction with MSCV-based constructs carrying the wild-type murine Igf2bp3. Proteins that were analyzed are Igf2bp3, Mat2a, Mat2b, and actin. (B) Cell growth, measured by CellTiter-Glo, over 4 days in Igf2bp3 del/del Lin− MLL-Af4 cells with enforced IGF2BP3 expression as above. Viability has been normalized to control cells; mean ± standard deviation (SD) ( n = 5); one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test; **** p < 0.0001. (C) Representative Seahorse XF extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) kinetic trace in cells described above ( n = 4). (D) Aggregate lactate efflux rates from Seahorse XF analysis in cells described above; two-sided unpaired t test; * p < 0.05 ( n = 4). (E) Colony formation assays from Lin− MLL-Af4 cells as described above; two-sided unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01 ( n = 2). (F) ELISA measurement of m 6 A modification on RNA isolated from Igf2bp3 del/del Lin− MLL-Af4 cells with enforced IGF2BP3 expression as above; two-sided unpaired t test; * p < 0.05 ( n = 3). (G) Percentage engraftment of CD45.2 Lin− cells in bone marrow from Igf2bp3 del/del mice transduced with MLL-Af4 re-expressing empty vector (Ctrl) or IGF2BP3 in the two groups at 6 weeks. (H) Quantitation of bone marrow count in mice transplanted with MLL-Af4 re-expressing empty vector (Ctrl) or IGF2BP3 in the two groups at 6 weeks. (I) Spleen weights of mice transplanted with MLL-Af4 re-expressing empty vector (Ctrl) or IGF2BP3 in the two groups at 6 weeks. (J) Quantitation of spleen cell count in mice transplanted with MLL-Af4 re-expressing empty vector (Ctrl) or IGF2BP3 in the two groups at 6 weeks. (K) Quantitation of bone marrow CD11b+ cell count in mice transplanted with MLL-Af4 re-expressing empty vector (Ctrl) or IGF2BP3 in the two groups at 6 weeks. (L) Quantitation of bone marrow Lin− cell count along with representative fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) plots in mice transplanted with MLL-Af4 re-expressing empty vector (Ctrl) or IGF2BP3 in the two groups at 6 weeks. (M) Quantitation of bone marrow CD11b+cKit+ cell count in mice transplanted with MLL-Af4 re-expressing empty vector (Ctrl) or IGF2BP3 in the two groups at 6 weeks. (N) Quantitation of bone marrow LSK (Lin− cKit+Sca1−) cell count in mice transplanted with MLL-Af4 re-expressing empty vector (Ctrl) or IGF2BP3 in the two groups at 6 weeks. (O) Quantitation of bone marrow CD11b+Sca1− (potential LIC ) cell count in mice transplanted with MLL-Af4 re-expressing empty vector (Ctrl) or IGF2BP3 in the two groups at 6 weeks. (P) Seahorse XF ECAR kinetic trace for bone marrow cells isolated from the empty vector (Ctrl) or IGF2BP3 re-expression group at 6 weeks ( n = 4, each group; for representation n = 2). (Q) Aggregate lactate efflux rates from Seahorse XF analysis in cells described above; reported as mean ± SD ( n = 4). (R) ELISA measurement of m 6 A RNA modifications in splenic tumors isolated from mice transplanted with MLL-Af4 re-expressing empty vector (Ctrl) or IGF2BP3 in the two groups at 6 weeks; reported as mean ± SD; 8 mice/group. (S) H&E staining of spleen of mice transplanted with mice transplanted with MLL-Af4 re-expressing empty vector (Ctrl) or IGF2BP3 in the two groups at 6 weeks. Scale bar: 100 μm. (T) Overall survival of mice transplanted with MLL-Af4 re-expressing empty vector (Ctrl) or IGF2BP3 in the two groups (representative graph cumulative of two experiments, 8 mice/group; the experiment was terminated after 12 weeks; Kaplan-Meier method with log rank test was used to report the results). The animal experiments were repeated twice. All the western blots were repeated at least three times to report the changes, if any. Data in this figure are represented as mean ± SD with n = 8 mice per group. Statistical tests were performed using two-sided unpaired t test with significance levels as indicated; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. Refer also to and .
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Isolation, Transformation Assay, Transduction, Construct, Expressing, Control, Standard Deviation, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Modification, Plasmid Preparation, Quantitation Assay, Cell Counting, Fluorescence, FACS, Staining

