igg3  (Bethyl)

Journal: Journal of Human Immunity

Article Title: Oncostatin M receptor deficiency as a novel candidate genetic cause of autosomal recessive hyper-IgE syndrome

doi: 10.70962/jhi.20250119

Figure Lengend Snippet: B cell−extrinsic elevation of circulating plasmablasts and increase in IgE isotype switching in the patient. (A) Flow plots of main B cell subsets (top row) and antigen-experienced B cell subsets (bottom row) in one healthy control (left panels) and the patient (right panels). Representative of two independent analyses. (Data shown in rows 1 and 2, column 1 are identical to data in , row 1, column 4 and 5.) (B) Gate frequencies for antigen-experienced B cell subsets of five healthy controls (HCs) and the patient. Representative of two independent analyses. (C) Fraction of IgE class-switched cells among antigen-experienced B cell subsets of three healthy controls and the patient. The individual points for healthy control and patient represent one each of three sampling methods (conventional Ficoll prep, separator tubes, and whole-blood RBC lysis) from one experiment. (D) Schematic overview of iGB culture setup (created with BioRender). (E) Cell counts for one representative of two similar experiments. (F) IgM, IgG1, IgG3, and IgE secretion in cultures, normalized to cell count. Full gating strategies are shown in . Statistics were calculated using the unpaired t test. * = P < 0.05. aMBC_PC, aMBC/plasma cell; DN, double-negative; MBC_only, conventional memory B cell; SWmem, switched memory; T1, T2, T3, transitional 1, 2, 3 subsets.

Article Snippet: Wells of FluoroNunc MaxiSorp 96-well plates were coated with 100 μl capture antibody diluted in PBS, either 0.5 μg/ml goat α-human IgM-Hc (2023-01; Southern Biotech), 5 μg/ml mouse α-human IgG1-Fc (9054-01; Southern Biotech), 1 μg/ml mouse α-human IgG3-hinge (9210-01; Southern Biotech), or 2.5 μg/ml mouse α-human IgE-Fc (9240-01; Southern Biotech).

Techniques: Control, Sampling, Red Blood Cell Lysis, Cell Characterization, Clinical Proteomics

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Membrane localisation and checkpoint blockade enhance xenoantigen delivery to redirect pre-existing immunity against tumours

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.01.708859

Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Experimental timeline of the immunisation (i.e., vaccination) against OVA and subsequent tumour inoculation of the OVA-expressing B16F10 cell lines in mice. B) Titers of anti-OVA IgG per IgG subtypes in the plasma of the mice at d18. C) Percentage of OVA-specific CD8 + T cells against the immunogenic epitope OVA 257-264 (SIINFEKL) in the blood at d18 in pre-immunised mice (vax) or naïve mice (no vax) (n ≥ 3, mean ± SD, unpaired t-test). D, E) B16F10 melanoma cells, either wild-type (WT) or genetically modified to express high ( HI ) or low ( LO ) doses of membrane-bound OVA (B16mOVA) or soluble OVA (B16-OVA), were injected intradermally in C57BL/6 mice. Tumour growth (D) and associated survival (E) of the different OVA-expressing B16 cell lines in pre-immunised mice (n ≥ 5, mean ± SEM, Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s post-test on d10, d14 or d26 for tumour growth, log-rank tests for survival). F) Potential anti-tumour mechanisms engaged by soluble (left) or membrane-bound (right) xenoantigens when expressed by cancer cells.

Article Snippet: Samples were applied to the antigen coated plate and incubated at RT for 2 h. The plates were washed three times with PBST and HRP-conjugated antibodies were used to detect antigen-specific antibodies: anti-mouse IgG1 (#1070-05), anti-mouse IgG2a (#1080-05), anti-mouse IgG2b (#1090-05) and anti-mouse IgG3 (#1100-05) from Southern Biotech (Birmingham, AL, USA).

Techniques: Expressing, Clinical Proteomics, Genetically Modified, Membrane, Injection

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Membrane localisation and checkpoint blockade enhance xenoantigen delivery to redirect pre-existing immunity against tumours

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.01.708859

Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Immunofluorescent staining of B16F10 WT melanoma with the TRP1-targeting TA99 antibody (scale bar = 100 μm). B) B16F10 WT tumour growth upon treatment with TA99 or IgG2a isotype control (n ≥ 4, mean ± SEM, Mann-Whitney test on d11). C) Design of FabTRP-OVA fusion protein and analysis of its production by SDS-PAGE (expected size = 92,3 kDa). D) Illustration of the FabTRP-OVA fusion protein approach for targeting the xenoantigen to the cancer cell membrane. E) Representative flow cytometry plot of FabTRP-OVA, OVA and no OVA (i.e., secondary antibody only) binding to the surface of B16F10 WT cells. F) B16F10 WT tumour growth when treated with FabTRP-OVA in pre-immunised or naïve mice (n ≥ 4, mean ± SEM, Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s post-test on d12). G) B16F10 WT tumour growth when treated with FabTRP-OVA in combination with anti-PD-1 checkpoint blocade therapy (n ≥ 4, mean ± SEM, Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s post-test on d12). H) Experimental treatment timeline of xenoantigen delivery (i.e., FabTRP-OVA, OVA or PBS (vehicle only)) and anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade therapy in B16F10 WT in mice pre-immunised against OVA (Vax) or naïve (No vax). I, J) B16F10 WT tumour growth (I) and associated mouse survival (J) upon treatment with FabTRP-OVA, OVA or PBS in combination with anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade therapy (n ≥ 5, mean ± SEM, Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s post-test on d16, log-rank tests for survival).

Article Snippet: Samples were applied to the antigen coated plate and incubated at RT for 2 h. The plates were washed three times with PBST and HRP-conjugated antibodies were used to detect antigen-specific antibodies: anti-mouse IgG1 (#1070-05), anti-mouse IgG2a (#1080-05), anti-mouse IgG2b (#1090-05) and anti-mouse IgG3 (#1100-05) from Southern Biotech (Birmingham, AL, USA).

Techniques: Staining, Control, MANN-WHITNEY, SDS Page, Membrane, Flow Cytometry, Binding Assay

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Membrane localisation and checkpoint blockade enhance xenoantigen delivery to redirect pre-existing immunity against tumours

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.01.708859

Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Experimental timeline of the immunisation (i.e., vaccination) against varicella VZVO using Varivax or a combination of gE/CpG. B) IFΝγ quantification in the supernatant of gE restimulated (+) or non-restimulated (-) splenocytes, collected from mice immunized with Varivax, gE/CpG or PBS (i.e., naïve). Ionomycin+PMA was used as a positive control. C) Titers of anti-gE total IgG and per IgG subtypes in the plasma of the pre-immunised mice at d55 (before tumour implantation). D) Experimental treatment timeline of xenoantigen delivery (i.e., Varivax, gE or PBS (vehicle only)) and anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade treatment in B16F10 WT in mice pre-immunised with Varivax against varicella VZVO . E, F) B16F10 WT tumour growth (E) and associated mouse survival (F) upon treatment with Varivax, gE or PBS in combination with anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade (n ≥ 7, mean ± SEM, Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s post-test on d16, log-rank tests for survival).

Article Snippet: Samples were applied to the antigen coated plate and incubated at RT for 2 h. The plates were washed three times with PBST and HRP-conjugated antibodies were used to detect antigen-specific antibodies: anti-mouse IgG1 (#1070-05), anti-mouse IgG2a (#1080-05), anti-mouse IgG2b (#1090-05) and anti-mouse IgG3 (#1100-05) from Southern Biotech (Birmingham, AL, USA).

Techniques: Positive Control, Clinical Proteomics