Review



ht1080  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 98

    Structured Review

    ATCC ht1080
    Viperin downregulated STAT1 during IFN stimulation requires UBE4A but not UBR5 . (A, B) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 (A) and Isg15 (B) mRNA in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− MEF cells treated with IFNβ (500 IU/mL) for 4 and 8 h. (C) Western blot analysis of STAT1 and Viperin protein levels in Ubr5 +/+ and Ubr5 −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 , Isg54, Isg15 and Mx1 mRNA in Ubr5 +/+ and Ubr5 −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (E) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in wild type (WT), Ube4a −/− and Ubr5 −/− cells transfected with or without HA-Viperin. (F) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Viperin stable cells transfected with Ctrl, Flag-UBE4A, Flag-UBE3A and Flag-UBE3C. (G) Immunoprecipitation (IP) analysis of the interaction between STAT1 and UBE4A in <t>HT1080</t> cells transfected with or without Myc-Viperin. (H) IP analysis of the interaction between STAT1 and UBE4A in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− MEF cells. (I) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 9, 12 and 15 h. (J) Western blot analysis of PKR and IFIT1 levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 9 and 12 h. (K, L) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Viperin-sufficient cells (K) or Viperin-deficient cells (L) transfected with Flag-UBE4A in dose manner. (M, N) Viral titers in the supernatant of Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (50 IU/mL, 20 h) and then infected with VSV/HSV (MOI = 1.0, 24 h) were determined by 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) assay. (O) Western blot analysis of HA (H1N1) protein levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (50 IU/mL, 20 h) and then infected with H1N1 (MOI = 1.0) for 24 h. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test). Data are shown as means ± SD of at least three biological replicates (A, B, D, M, N), or are representative of three independent experiments (C, E-L, O).
    Ht1080, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 3960 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ht1080/product/ATCC
    Average 98 stars, based on 3960 article reviews
    ht1080 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    98/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Viperin weakens IFN-I-induced immune activity by facilitating STAT1 degradation through E3 ligase UBE4A"

    Article Title: Viperin weakens IFN-I-induced immune activity by facilitating STAT1 degradation through E3 ligase UBE4A

    Journal: Cell Insight

    doi: 10.1016/j.cellin.2026.100322

    Viperin downregulated STAT1 during IFN stimulation requires UBE4A but not UBR5 . (A, B) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 (A) and Isg15 (B) mRNA in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− MEF cells treated with IFNβ (500 IU/mL) for 4 and 8 h. (C) Western blot analysis of STAT1 and Viperin protein levels in Ubr5 +/+ and Ubr5 −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 , Isg54, Isg15 and Mx1 mRNA in Ubr5 +/+ and Ubr5 −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (E) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in wild type (WT), Ube4a −/− and Ubr5 −/− cells transfected with or without HA-Viperin. (F) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Viperin stable cells transfected with Ctrl, Flag-UBE4A, Flag-UBE3A and Flag-UBE3C. (G) Immunoprecipitation (IP) analysis of the interaction between STAT1 and UBE4A in HT1080 cells transfected with or without Myc-Viperin. (H) IP analysis of the interaction between STAT1 and UBE4A in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− MEF cells. (I) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 9, 12 and 15 h. (J) Western blot analysis of PKR and IFIT1 levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 9 and 12 h. (K, L) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Viperin-sufficient cells (K) or Viperin-deficient cells (L) transfected with Flag-UBE4A in dose manner. (M, N) Viral titers in the supernatant of Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (50 IU/mL, 20 h) and then infected with VSV/HSV (MOI = 1.0, 24 h) were determined by 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) assay. (O) Western blot analysis of HA (H1N1) protein levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (50 IU/mL, 20 h) and then infected with H1N1 (MOI = 1.0) for 24 h. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test). Data are shown as means ± SD of at least three biological replicates (A, B, D, M, N), or are representative of three independent experiments (C, E-L, O).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Viperin downregulated STAT1 during IFN stimulation requires UBE4A but not UBR5 . (A, B) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 (A) and Isg15 (B) mRNA in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− MEF cells treated with IFNβ (500 IU/mL) for 4 and 8 h. (C) Western blot analysis of STAT1 and Viperin protein levels in Ubr5 +/+ and Ubr5 −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 , Isg54, Isg15 and Mx1 mRNA in Ubr5 +/+ and Ubr5 −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (E) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in wild type (WT), Ube4a −/− and Ubr5 −/− cells transfected with or without HA-Viperin. (F) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Viperin stable cells transfected with Ctrl, Flag-UBE4A, Flag-UBE3A and Flag-UBE3C. (G) Immunoprecipitation (IP) analysis of the interaction between STAT1 and UBE4A in HT1080 cells transfected with or without Myc-Viperin. (H) IP analysis of the interaction between STAT1 and UBE4A in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− MEF cells. (I) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 9, 12 and 15 h. (J) Western blot analysis of PKR and IFIT1 levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 9 and 12 h. (K, L) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Viperin-sufficient cells (K) or Viperin-deficient cells (L) transfected with Flag-UBE4A in dose manner. (M, N) Viral titers in the supernatant of Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (50 IU/mL, 20 h) and then infected with VSV/HSV (MOI = 1.0, 24 h) were determined by 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) assay. (O) Western blot analysis of HA (H1N1) protein levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (50 IU/mL, 20 h) and then infected with H1N1 (MOI = 1.0) for 24 h. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test). Data are shown as means ± SD of at least three biological replicates (A, B, D, M, N), or are representative of three independent experiments (C, E-L, O).

    Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, Infection, TCID50 Assay, Two Tailed Test

    Viperin-STAT1-UBE4A binding rescues Viperin and promotes STAT1 degradation . (A) Region information of the Viperin deletion mutants. IP analysis of the interaction between Myc-Viperin (WT or deletion mutants) and Flag-UBE4A (left) or STAT1 (right) in HT1080 cells. (B) IP analysis of HA-K6 ubiquitination of Myc-Viperin in HT1080 cells transfected with Myc-Viperin, HA-K6-Ub, and dose of Flag-STAT1. (C) Region information of the STAT1 deletion mutants. IP analysis of the interaction between Flag-HA-Viperin (FH-Viperin) and Myc-STAT1 (WT or deletion mutants) in stable FH-Viperin-expressing HEK293T cells. (D) IP analysis of the interaction between Flag-UBE4A and Myc-STAT1 (WT or deletion mutants) in HT1080 cells. (E) Pattern diagram of interaction between UBE4A, STAT1 and Viperin. Data are representative of three independent experiments.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Viperin-STAT1-UBE4A binding rescues Viperin and promotes STAT1 degradation . (A) Region information of the Viperin deletion mutants. IP analysis of the interaction between Myc-Viperin (WT or deletion mutants) and Flag-UBE4A (left) or STAT1 (right) in HT1080 cells. (B) IP analysis of HA-K6 ubiquitination of Myc-Viperin in HT1080 cells transfected with Myc-Viperin, HA-K6-Ub, and dose of Flag-STAT1. (C) Region information of the STAT1 deletion mutants. IP analysis of the interaction between Flag-HA-Viperin (FH-Viperin) and Myc-STAT1 (WT or deletion mutants) in stable FH-Viperin-expressing HEK293T cells. (D) IP analysis of the interaction between Flag-UBE4A and Myc-STAT1 (WT or deletion mutants) in HT1080 cells. (E) Pattern diagram of interaction between UBE4A, STAT1 and Viperin. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

    Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Transfection, Expressing

    IFN-I promotes ubiquitination and degradation of UBR5 . (A) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 (left) and A549 (right) cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 3, 6, 9 and 12 h. (B, C) RT-qPCR analysis of Ubr5 and Ifit1 mRNA levels in HT1080 (B) and A549 (C) cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 3, 6, 9 and 12 h. (D) Western blot analysis of Flag-UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells treated with IFNα for 6, 9 and 12 h (left) or dose of IFNα (right). (E) Immunoprecipitation-immunoblotting (IP-IB) analysis of the interaction between Viperin and UBE4A or UBR5 in HEK293T cells transfected with Myc-Viperin and then treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (F) Cycloheximide (CHX) chase assay of UBR5 in HT1080 cells treated with CHX (50 μg/mL) for 3 and 6 h. (G) Western blot analysis of Flag-UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells transfected Flag-UBR5 for 36 h, and then treated with or without MG132 (10 μM). (H-J) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells treated with or without MG132 (10 μM) (H), MA (10 μM) (I) or PR619 (10 μM) (J). (K) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (L, M) IP analysis of K48-ubiquitination (48ub) (L) and K63-ubiquitination (63ub) (M) of UBR5 in HT1080 cells treated with or without IFNα (1 000 IU/mL). NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test. Data are shown as means ± SD of four biological replicates (B, C), or are representative of three independent experiments (A, D-M).
    Figure Legend Snippet: IFN-I promotes ubiquitination and degradation of UBR5 . (A) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 (left) and A549 (right) cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 3, 6, 9 and 12 h. (B, C) RT-qPCR analysis of Ubr5 and Ifit1 mRNA levels in HT1080 (B) and A549 (C) cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 3, 6, 9 and 12 h. (D) Western blot analysis of Flag-UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells treated with IFNα for 6, 9 and 12 h (left) or dose of IFNα (right). (E) Immunoprecipitation-immunoblotting (IP-IB) analysis of the interaction between Viperin and UBE4A or UBR5 in HEK293T cells transfected with Myc-Viperin and then treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (F) Cycloheximide (CHX) chase assay of UBR5 in HT1080 cells treated with CHX (50 μg/mL) for 3 and 6 h. (G) Western blot analysis of Flag-UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells transfected Flag-UBR5 for 36 h, and then treated with or without MG132 (10 μM). (H-J) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells treated with or without MG132 (10 μM) (H), MA (10 μM) (I) or PR619 (10 μM) (J). (K) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (L, M) IP analysis of K48-ubiquitination (48ub) (L) and K63-ubiquitination (63ub) (M) of UBR5 in HT1080 cells treated with or without IFNα (1 000 IU/mL). NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test. Data are shown as means ± SD of four biological replicates (B, C), or are representative of three independent experiments (A, D-M).

    Techniques Used: Ubiquitin Proteomics, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Immunoprecipitation, Transfection, Two Tailed Test

    IFN-I promotes UBR5 degradation by up-regulating ITCH expression . (A) Potential interacting protein of UBR5 obtained from the PINA database. (B, C) RT-qPCR analysis of Itch mRNA levels in HT1080 (B), A549 and RAW264.7 (C) cells treated with IFN for 3, 6 and 9 h. (D) Western blot analysis of ITCH protein levels in HT1080 and A549 cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (E, F) IP analysis of the interaction between endogenous UBR5 and ITCH in HT1080 cells (E) or primary mouse heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney tissues (F). (G) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells. (H) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells transfected with doses of Flag-ITCH. (I) RT-qPCR analysis of UBR5 mRNA levels in HT1080 cells transfected with doses of Flag-ITCH. (J) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells transfected with or without Flag-ITCH, and then treated with MA (10 μM). (K) CHX chase assay of Flag-UBR5 in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells transfected with Flag-UBR5 for 36 h, and then treated with CHX (50 μg/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (L) CHX chase assay of UBR5 in HT1080 cells transfected with Flag-ITCH. (M) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells treated with IFNα for 6 and 12 h. (N) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells. (O) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in HT1080 cells transfected with doses of Flag-ITCH. (P) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells treated with or without IFNα. (Q) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 and Isg1 5 mRNA levels in cells as indicated, treated with IFNα for 6 and 12 h. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (B, C, I), two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test (Q). Data are shown as means ± SD of four biological replicates (B, C, I, Q) or are representative of three independent experiments (D-H, J-P).
    Figure Legend Snippet: IFN-I promotes UBR5 degradation by up-regulating ITCH expression . (A) Potential interacting protein of UBR5 obtained from the PINA database. (B, C) RT-qPCR analysis of Itch mRNA levels in HT1080 (B), A549 and RAW264.7 (C) cells treated with IFN for 3, 6 and 9 h. (D) Western blot analysis of ITCH protein levels in HT1080 and A549 cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (E, F) IP analysis of the interaction between endogenous UBR5 and ITCH in HT1080 cells (E) or primary mouse heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney tissues (F). (G) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells. (H) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells transfected with doses of Flag-ITCH. (I) RT-qPCR analysis of UBR5 mRNA levels in HT1080 cells transfected with doses of Flag-ITCH. (J) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells transfected with or without Flag-ITCH, and then treated with MA (10 μM). (K) CHX chase assay of Flag-UBR5 in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells transfected with Flag-UBR5 for 36 h, and then treated with CHX (50 μg/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (L) CHX chase assay of UBR5 in HT1080 cells transfected with Flag-ITCH. (M) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells treated with IFNα for 6 and 12 h. (N) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells. (O) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in HT1080 cells transfected with doses of Flag-ITCH. (P) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells treated with or without IFNα. (Q) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 and Isg1 5 mRNA levels in cells as indicated, treated with IFNα for 6 and 12 h. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (B, C, I), two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test (Q). Data are shown as means ± SD of four biological replicates (B, C, I, Q) or are representative of three independent experiments (D-H, J-P).

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Transfection, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Two Tailed Test

    The multifunctional interfering peptide VS-IP1 enhances IFN-I-induced antiviral immune activity . (A) Western blot analysis of STAT1 protein levels in HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and followed with IFNα for 9, 12 and 15 h. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 and Isg1 5 mRNA levels in HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 mRNA levels in A549 cells treated with IFNα and dose of VS-IP1. (D) Viral titers in supernatants from HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα followed by VSV infection (MOI = 1.0), determined by TCID50 assay. (E) RT-qPCR analysis of VSV, H1N1, SeV and HSV viral RNA in HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα, followed by viral infection. (F) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 , Isg15 and Isg5 4 mRNA levels in Stat1 +/+ and Stat1 −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα. (G) Viral titers in supernatants from Stat1 +/+ and Stat1 −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 followed by VSV infection (MOI = 1.0), determined by TCID50 assay. (H-K) RT-qPCR analysis of VSV (H), H1N1 (I), SeV (J) and HSV (K) viral RNA in Stat1 +/+ and Stat1 −/− cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα, followed by viral infection. (L) Viral titers in supernatants from Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 followed by VSV infection (MOI = 1.0), determined by TCID50 assay. (M) RT-qPCR analysis of VSV RNA in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα, followed by VSV infection. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test (B-M). Data are shown as means ± SD of at least three biological replicates (B-M) or are representative of three independent experiments (A).
    Figure Legend Snippet: The multifunctional interfering peptide VS-IP1 enhances IFN-I-induced antiviral immune activity . (A) Western blot analysis of STAT1 protein levels in HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and followed with IFNα for 9, 12 and 15 h. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 and Isg1 5 mRNA levels in HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 mRNA levels in A549 cells treated with IFNα and dose of VS-IP1. (D) Viral titers in supernatants from HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα followed by VSV infection (MOI = 1.0), determined by TCID50 assay. (E) RT-qPCR analysis of VSV, H1N1, SeV and HSV viral RNA in HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα, followed by viral infection. (F) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 , Isg15 and Isg5 4 mRNA levels in Stat1 +/+ and Stat1 −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα. (G) Viral titers in supernatants from Stat1 +/+ and Stat1 −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 followed by VSV infection (MOI = 1.0), determined by TCID50 assay. (H-K) RT-qPCR analysis of VSV (H), H1N1 (I), SeV (J) and HSV (K) viral RNA in Stat1 +/+ and Stat1 −/− cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα, followed by viral infection. (L) Viral titers in supernatants from Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 followed by VSV infection (MOI = 1.0), determined by TCID50 assay. (M) RT-qPCR analysis of VSV RNA in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα, followed by VSV infection. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test (B-M). Data are shown as means ± SD of at least three biological replicates (B-M) or are representative of three independent experiments (A).

    Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Infection, TCID50 Assay, Two Tailed Test



    Similar Products

    ht1080  (ATCC)
    98
    ATCC ht1080
    Viperin downregulated STAT1 during IFN stimulation requires UBE4A but not UBR5 . (A, B) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 (A) and Isg15 (B) mRNA in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− MEF cells treated with IFNβ (500 IU/mL) for 4 and 8 h. (C) Western blot analysis of STAT1 and Viperin protein levels in Ubr5 +/+ and Ubr5 −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 , Isg54, Isg15 and Mx1 mRNA in Ubr5 +/+ and Ubr5 −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (E) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in wild type (WT), Ube4a −/− and Ubr5 −/− cells transfected with or without HA-Viperin. (F) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Viperin stable cells transfected with Ctrl, Flag-UBE4A, Flag-UBE3A and Flag-UBE3C. (G) Immunoprecipitation (IP) analysis of the interaction between STAT1 and UBE4A in <t>HT1080</t> cells transfected with or without Myc-Viperin. (H) IP analysis of the interaction between STAT1 and UBE4A in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− MEF cells. (I) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 9, 12 and 15 h. (J) Western blot analysis of PKR and IFIT1 levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 9 and 12 h. (K, L) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Viperin-sufficient cells (K) or Viperin-deficient cells (L) transfected with Flag-UBE4A in dose manner. (M, N) Viral titers in the supernatant of Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (50 IU/mL, 20 h) and then infected with VSV/HSV (MOI = 1.0, 24 h) were determined by 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) assay. (O) Western blot analysis of HA (H1N1) protein levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (50 IU/mL, 20 h) and then infected with H1N1 (MOI = 1.0) for 24 h. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test). Data are shown as means ± SD of at least three biological replicates (A, B, D, M, N), or are representative of three independent experiments (C, E-L, O).
    Ht1080, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ht1080/product/ATCC
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ht1080 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    ATCC ht1080 cells
    HT enables continuous, label-free monitoring of collagen dynamics through volumetric refractive-index (RI) mapping. a , Time-resolved HT MIPs of type I collagen polymerization showing progressive fibrillar assembly over time. Insets highlight early fibril emergence. Quantification of mean RI change (Δ n ) demonstrates a monotonic increase during gelation, providing a physically calibrated readout of assembly kinetics. b, c , Time-lapse HT imaging of <t>HT1080</t> cells embedded in collagen under pharmacological perturbation (5-min intervals). b , Type I collagen with ROCK inhibitor (Y-27632). c , Type III collagen with MMP inhibitor (GM6001). For each condition, panels show full-field views at representative time points (0, 1, and 2 h), temporally encoded composite images, and zoomed regions highlighting cell-associated matrix remodeling (dashed circles). Drug treatments alter local collagen organization and remodeling dynamics at the single-fiber level compared to controls.
    Ht1080 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ht1080 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ht1080 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    ATCC ht1080 ccl 121 cell lines
    Functional characterisation of PRL‐mediated proliferation and chemoresistance in sarcoma models. (A and B) Secretory PRL quantification by ELISA confirming knockdown efficiency in the culture medium, n = 3. (C–F) Growth suppression following PRL depletion: CCK‐8 time‐course assay ( n = 5) and colony formation capacity ( n = 3) in PRL‐knockdown models. (G–J) Recombinant PRL (50 ng/mL)‐induced proliferative enhancement: (G and H) CCK‐8 ( n = 5) and (I and J) colony formation ( n = 3) in <t>HT1080</t> and SW872 lines. (K–P) PRLR‐dependent proliferation modulation: (K–N) CCK‐8 dose‐response ( n = 5) and (O‐P) colony formation ( n = 3) analysis post‐PRLR perturbation. (Q and R) After treating SW872 and HT1080 cells with PRLR antibody rolinsatamab talirine (20 µg/mL), the effect on cell proliferation was detected by the CCK8 method, with n = 5. (S and T) Xenograft tumourigenesis assay demonstrating impaired SW872 growth with PRL knockdown ( n = 9). (U) A single SW872 clone exhibiting the lowest PRL expression among the pooled PRL‐knockout cells was isolated by limiting dilution cloning, expanded in culture and validated for PRL protein levels via ELISA. (V) Cell proliferation was assessed using the CCK‐8 assay following stable PRL knockout ( n = 5 biological replicates). (W) Bromocriptine‐mediated antiproliferative effects were evaluated in parallel in wild‐type and PRL‐knockout SW872 cell lines using the CCK‐8 assay ( n = 5). (X) In vivo efficacy was determined in a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model, wherein tumour growth derived from wild‐type or PRL‐knockout SW872 cells was monitored following bromocriptine treatment, n = 7. (Y and Z) Chemosensitisation effects: PRL pretreatment (50 ng/mL) enhances cytotoxicity of RG7112/abemaciclib/doxorubicin/gemcitabine, n = 5, RG7112 (10 µM), abemaciclib (5 µM), doxorubicin (2 µM), gemcitabine (10 µM). (a) Western blot analysis was performed to detect MDM2 expression in human adipocytes, liposarcoma cell lines (SW872, 93T449, 94T778), fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080 and clinically isolated liposarcoma cell lines established in our laboratory. (b) Western blot analysis was performed to detect MDM2 in 12 clinical retroperitoneal liposarcoma tissues and its corresponding paracancerous tissues, 6 clinical retroperitoneal fibrosarcoma tissues and corresponding paracancerous tissues. (c) Therapeutic synergy evaluation: bromocriptine combined with RG7112 in WEHI164 fibrosarcoma murine model, RG7112: 100 mg/kg per day, bromocriptine: 10 mg/kg, twice daily, ( n = 6). Data expressed as mean ± SD unless specified; * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001 by two‐tailed Student's t ‐test; ns: not significant.
    Ht1080 Ccl 121 Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ht1080 ccl 121 cell lines/product/ATCC
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ht1080 ccl 121 cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    ATCC ht1080 cell lines
    Functional characterisation of PRL‐mediated proliferation and chemoresistance in sarcoma models. (A and B) Secretory PRL quantification by ELISA confirming knockdown efficiency in the culture medium, n = 3. (C–F) Growth suppression following PRL depletion: CCK‐8 time‐course assay ( n = 5) and colony formation capacity ( n = 3) in PRL‐knockdown models. (G–J) Recombinant PRL (50 ng/mL)‐induced proliferative enhancement: (G and H) CCK‐8 ( n = 5) and (I and J) colony formation ( n = 3) in <t>HT1080</t> and SW872 lines. (K–P) PRLR‐dependent proliferation modulation: (K–N) CCK‐8 dose‐response ( n = 5) and (O‐P) colony formation ( n = 3) analysis post‐PRLR perturbation. (Q and R) After treating SW872 and HT1080 cells with PRLR antibody rolinsatamab talirine (20 µg/mL), the effect on cell proliferation was detected by the CCK8 method, with n = 5. (S and T) Xenograft tumourigenesis assay demonstrating impaired SW872 growth with PRL knockdown ( n = 9). (U) A single SW872 clone exhibiting the lowest PRL expression among the pooled PRL‐knockout cells was isolated by limiting dilution cloning, expanded in culture and validated for PRL protein levels via ELISA. (V) Cell proliferation was assessed using the CCK‐8 assay following stable PRL knockout ( n = 5 biological replicates). (W) Bromocriptine‐mediated antiproliferative effects were evaluated in parallel in wild‐type and PRL‐knockout SW872 cell lines using the CCK‐8 assay ( n = 5). (X) In vivo efficacy was determined in a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model, wherein tumour growth derived from wild‐type or PRL‐knockout SW872 cells was monitored following bromocriptine treatment, n = 7. (Y and Z) Chemosensitisation effects: PRL pretreatment (50 ng/mL) enhances cytotoxicity of RG7112/abemaciclib/doxorubicin/gemcitabine, n = 5, RG7112 (10 µM), abemaciclib (5 µM), doxorubicin (2 µM), gemcitabine (10 µM). (a) Western blot analysis was performed to detect MDM2 expression in human adipocytes, liposarcoma cell lines (SW872, 93T449, 94T778), fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080 and clinically isolated liposarcoma cell lines established in our laboratory. (b) Western blot analysis was performed to detect MDM2 in 12 clinical retroperitoneal liposarcoma tissues and its corresponding paracancerous tissues, 6 clinical retroperitoneal fibrosarcoma tissues and corresponding paracancerous tissues. (c) Therapeutic synergy evaluation: bromocriptine combined with RG7112 in WEHI164 fibrosarcoma murine model, RG7112: 100 mg/kg per day, bromocriptine: 10 mg/kg, twice daily, ( n = 6). Data expressed as mean ± SD unless specified; * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001 by two‐tailed Student's t ‐test; ns: not significant.
    Ht1080 Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ht1080 cell lines/product/ATCC
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ht1080 cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Viperin downregulated STAT1 during IFN stimulation requires UBE4A but not UBR5 . (A, B) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 (A) and Isg15 (B) mRNA in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− MEF cells treated with IFNβ (500 IU/mL) for 4 and 8 h. (C) Western blot analysis of STAT1 and Viperin protein levels in Ubr5 +/+ and Ubr5 −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 , Isg54, Isg15 and Mx1 mRNA in Ubr5 +/+ and Ubr5 −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (E) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in wild type (WT), Ube4a −/− and Ubr5 −/− cells transfected with or without HA-Viperin. (F) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Viperin stable cells transfected with Ctrl, Flag-UBE4A, Flag-UBE3A and Flag-UBE3C. (G) Immunoprecipitation (IP) analysis of the interaction between STAT1 and UBE4A in HT1080 cells transfected with or without Myc-Viperin. (H) IP analysis of the interaction between STAT1 and UBE4A in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− MEF cells. (I) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 9, 12 and 15 h. (J) Western blot analysis of PKR and IFIT1 levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 9 and 12 h. (K, L) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Viperin-sufficient cells (K) or Viperin-deficient cells (L) transfected with Flag-UBE4A in dose manner. (M, N) Viral titers in the supernatant of Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (50 IU/mL, 20 h) and then infected with VSV/HSV (MOI = 1.0, 24 h) were determined by 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) assay. (O) Western blot analysis of HA (H1N1) protein levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (50 IU/mL, 20 h) and then infected with H1N1 (MOI = 1.0) for 24 h. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test). Data are shown as means ± SD of at least three biological replicates (A, B, D, M, N), or are representative of three independent experiments (C, E-L, O).

    Journal: Cell Insight

    Article Title: Viperin weakens IFN-I-induced immune activity by facilitating STAT1 degradation through E3 ligase UBE4A

    doi: 10.1016/j.cellin.2026.100322

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Viperin downregulated STAT1 during IFN stimulation requires UBE4A but not UBR5 . (A, B) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 (A) and Isg15 (B) mRNA in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− MEF cells treated with IFNβ (500 IU/mL) for 4 and 8 h. (C) Western blot analysis of STAT1 and Viperin protein levels in Ubr5 +/+ and Ubr5 −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 , Isg54, Isg15 and Mx1 mRNA in Ubr5 +/+ and Ubr5 −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (E) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in wild type (WT), Ube4a −/− and Ubr5 −/− cells transfected with or without HA-Viperin. (F) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Viperin stable cells transfected with Ctrl, Flag-UBE4A, Flag-UBE3A and Flag-UBE3C. (G) Immunoprecipitation (IP) analysis of the interaction between STAT1 and UBE4A in HT1080 cells transfected with or without Myc-Viperin. (H) IP analysis of the interaction between STAT1 and UBE4A in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− MEF cells. (I) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 9, 12 and 15 h. (J) Western blot analysis of PKR and IFIT1 levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 9 and 12 h. (K, L) Western blot analysis of STAT1 levels in Viperin-sufficient cells (K) or Viperin-deficient cells (L) transfected with Flag-UBE4A in dose manner. (M, N) Viral titers in the supernatant of Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (50 IU/mL, 20 h) and then infected with VSV/HSV (MOI = 1.0, 24 h) were determined by 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) assay. (O) Western blot analysis of HA (H1N1) protein levels in Ube4a +/+ and Ube4a −/− HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (50 IU/mL, 20 h) and then infected with H1N1 (MOI = 1.0) for 24 h. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 (two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test). Data are shown as means ± SD of at least three biological replicates (A, B, D, M, N), or are representative of three independent experiments (C, E-L, O).

    Article Snippet: HEK293T, A549, HT1080, Vero, and RAW264.7 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, Infection, TCID50 Assay, Two Tailed Test

    Viperin-STAT1-UBE4A binding rescues Viperin and promotes STAT1 degradation . (A) Region information of the Viperin deletion mutants. IP analysis of the interaction between Myc-Viperin (WT or deletion mutants) and Flag-UBE4A (left) or STAT1 (right) in HT1080 cells. (B) IP analysis of HA-K6 ubiquitination of Myc-Viperin in HT1080 cells transfected with Myc-Viperin, HA-K6-Ub, and dose of Flag-STAT1. (C) Region information of the STAT1 deletion mutants. IP analysis of the interaction between Flag-HA-Viperin (FH-Viperin) and Myc-STAT1 (WT or deletion mutants) in stable FH-Viperin-expressing HEK293T cells. (D) IP analysis of the interaction between Flag-UBE4A and Myc-STAT1 (WT or deletion mutants) in HT1080 cells. (E) Pattern diagram of interaction between UBE4A, STAT1 and Viperin. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

    Journal: Cell Insight

    Article Title: Viperin weakens IFN-I-induced immune activity by facilitating STAT1 degradation through E3 ligase UBE4A

    doi: 10.1016/j.cellin.2026.100322

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Viperin-STAT1-UBE4A binding rescues Viperin and promotes STAT1 degradation . (A) Region information of the Viperin deletion mutants. IP analysis of the interaction between Myc-Viperin (WT or deletion mutants) and Flag-UBE4A (left) or STAT1 (right) in HT1080 cells. (B) IP analysis of HA-K6 ubiquitination of Myc-Viperin in HT1080 cells transfected with Myc-Viperin, HA-K6-Ub, and dose of Flag-STAT1. (C) Region information of the STAT1 deletion mutants. IP analysis of the interaction between Flag-HA-Viperin (FH-Viperin) and Myc-STAT1 (WT or deletion mutants) in stable FH-Viperin-expressing HEK293T cells. (D) IP analysis of the interaction between Flag-UBE4A and Myc-STAT1 (WT or deletion mutants) in HT1080 cells. (E) Pattern diagram of interaction between UBE4A, STAT1 and Viperin. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: HEK293T, A549, HT1080, Vero, and RAW264.7 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Transfection, Expressing

    IFN-I promotes ubiquitination and degradation of UBR5 . (A) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 (left) and A549 (right) cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 3, 6, 9 and 12 h. (B, C) RT-qPCR analysis of Ubr5 and Ifit1 mRNA levels in HT1080 (B) and A549 (C) cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 3, 6, 9 and 12 h. (D) Western blot analysis of Flag-UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells treated with IFNα for 6, 9 and 12 h (left) or dose of IFNα (right). (E) Immunoprecipitation-immunoblotting (IP-IB) analysis of the interaction between Viperin and UBE4A or UBR5 in HEK293T cells transfected with Myc-Viperin and then treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (F) Cycloheximide (CHX) chase assay of UBR5 in HT1080 cells treated with CHX (50 μg/mL) for 3 and 6 h. (G) Western blot analysis of Flag-UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells transfected Flag-UBR5 for 36 h, and then treated with or without MG132 (10 μM). (H-J) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells treated with or without MG132 (10 μM) (H), MA (10 μM) (I) or PR619 (10 μM) (J). (K) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (L, M) IP analysis of K48-ubiquitination (48ub) (L) and K63-ubiquitination (63ub) (M) of UBR5 in HT1080 cells treated with or without IFNα (1 000 IU/mL). NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test. Data are shown as means ± SD of four biological replicates (B, C), or are representative of three independent experiments (A, D-M).

    Journal: Cell Insight

    Article Title: Viperin weakens IFN-I-induced immune activity by facilitating STAT1 degradation through E3 ligase UBE4A

    doi: 10.1016/j.cellin.2026.100322

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IFN-I promotes ubiquitination and degradation of UBR5 . (A) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 (left) and A549 (right) cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 3, 6, 9 and 12 h. (B, C) RT-qPCR analysis of Ubr5 and Ifit1 mRNA levels in HT1080 (B) and A549 (C) cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 3, 6, 9 and 12 h. (D) Western blot analysis of Flag-UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells treated with IFNα for 6, 9 and 12 h (left) or dose of IFNα (right). (E) Immunoprecipitation-immunoblotting (IP-IB) analysis of the interaction between Viperin and UBE4A or UBR5 in HEK293T cells transfected with Myc-Viperin and then treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (F) Cycloheximide (CHX) chase assay of UBR5 in HT1080 cells treated with CHX (50 μg/mL) for 3 and 6 h. (G) Western blot analysis of Flag-UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells transfected Flag-UBR5 for 36 h, and then treated with or without MG132 (10 μM). (H-J) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells treated with or without MG132 (10 μM) (H), MA (10 μM) (I) or PR619 (10 μM) (J). (K) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in HT1080 cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (L, M) IP analysis of K48-ubiquitination (48ub) (L) and K63-ubiquitination (63ub) (M) of UBR5 in HT1080 cells treated with or without IFNα (1 000 IU/mL). NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test. Data are shown as means ± SD of four biological replicates (B, C), or are representative of three independent experiments (A, D-M).

    Article Snippet: HEK293T, A549, HT1080, Vero, and RAW264.7 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: Ubiquitin Proteomics, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Immunoprecipitation, Transfection, Two Tailed Test

    IFN-I promotes UBR5 degradation by up-regulating ITCH expression . (A) Potential interacting protein of UBR5 obtained from the PINA database. (B, C) RT-qPCR analysis of Itch mRNA levels in HT1080 (B), A549 and RAW264.7 (C) cells treated with IFN for 3, 6 and 9 h. (D) Western blot analysis of ITCH protein levels in HT1080 and A549 cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (E, F) IP analysis of the interaction between endogenous UBR5 and ITCH in HT1080 cells (E) or primary mouse heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney tissues (F). (G) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells. (H) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells transfected with doses of Flag-ITCH. (I) RT-qPCR analysis of UBR5 mRNA levels in HT1080 cells transfected with doses of Flag-ITCH. (J) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells transfected with or without Flag-ITCH, and then treated with MA (10 μM). (K) CHX chase assay of Flag-UBR5 in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells transfected with Flag-UBR5 for 36 h, and then treated with CHX (50 μg/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (L) CHX chase assay of UBR5 in HT1080 cells transfected with Flag-ITCH. (M) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells treated with IFNα for 6 and 12 h. (N) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells. (O) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in HT1080 cells transfected with doses of Flag-ITCH. (P) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells treated with or without IFNα. (Q) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 and Isg1 5 mRNA levels in cells as indicated, treated with IFNα for 6 and 12 h. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (B, C, I), two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test (Q). Data are shown as means ± SD of four biological replicates (B, C, I, Q) or are representative of three independent experiments (D-H, J-P).

    Journal: Cell Insight

    Article Title: Viperin weakens IFN-I-induced immune activity by facilitating STAT1 degradation through E3 ligase UBE4A

    doi: 10.1016/j.cellin.2026.100322

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IFN-I promotes UBR5 degradation by up-regulating ITCH expression . (A) Potential interacting protein of UBR5 obtained from the PINA database. (B, C) RT-qPCR analysis of Itch mRNA levels in HT1080 (B), A549 and RAW264.7 (C) cells treated with IFN for 3, 6 and 9 h. (D) Western blot analysis of ITCH protein levels in HT1080 and A549 cells treated with IFNα (1 000 IU/mL) for 6, 9 and 12 h. (E, F) IP analysis of the interaction between endogenous UBR5 and ITCH in HT1080 cells (E) or primary mouse heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney tissues (F). (G) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells. (H) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells transfected with doses of Flag-ITCH. (I) RT-qPCR analysis of UBR5 mRNA levels in HT1080 cells transfected with doses of Flag-ITCH. (J) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in HT1080 cells transfected with or without Flag-ITCH, and then treated with MA (10 μM). (K) CHX chase assay of Flag-UBR5 in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells transfected with Flag-UBR5 for 36 h, and then treated with CHX (50 μg/mL) for 6 and 12 h. (L) CHX chase assay of UBR5 in HT1080 cells transfected with Flag-ITCH. (M) Western blot analysis of UBR5 protein levels in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells treated with IFNα for 6 and 12 h. (N) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells. (O) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in HT1080 cells transfected with doses of Flag-ITCH. (P) IP analysis of ubiquitination of UBR5 in Itch +/+ and Itch −/− cells treated with or without IFNα. (Q) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 and Isg1 5 mRNA levels in cells as indicated, treated with IFNα for 6 and 12 h. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (B, C, I), two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test (Q). Data are shown as means ± SD of four biological replicates (B, C, I, Q) or are representative of three independent experiments (D-H, J-P).

    Article Snippet: HEK293T, A549, HT1080, Vero, and RAW264.7 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Transfection, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Two Tailed Test

    The multifunctional interfering peptide VS-IP1 enhances IFN-I-induced antiviral immune activity . (A) Western blot analysis of STAT1 protein levels in HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and followed with IFNα for 9, 12 and 15 h. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 and Isg1 5 mRNA levels in HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 mRNA levels in A549 cells treated with IFNα and dose of VS-IP1. (D) Viral titers in supernatants from HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα followed by VSV infection (MOI = 1.0), determined by TCID50 assay. (E) RT-qPCR analysis of VSV, H1N1, SeV and HSV viral RNA in HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα, followed by viral infection. (F) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 , Isg15 and Isg5 4 mRNA levels in Stat1 +/+ and Stat1 −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα. (G) Viral titers in supernatants from Stat1 +/+ and Stat1 −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 followed by VSV infection (MOI = 1.0), determined by TCID50 assay. (H-K) RT-qPCR analysis of VSV (H), H1N1 (I), SeV (J) and HSV (K) viral RNA in Stat1 +/+ and Stat1 −/− cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα, followed by viral infection. (L) Viral titers in supernatants from Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 followed by VSV infection (MOI = 1.0), determined by TCID50 assay. (M) RT-qPCR analysis of VSV RNA in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα, followed by VSV infection. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test (B-M). Data are shown as means ± SD of at least three biological replicates (B-M) or are representative of three independent experiments (A).

    Journal: Cell Insight

    Article Title: Viperin weakens IFN-I-induced immune activity by facilitating STAT1 degradation through E3 ligase UBE4A

    doi: 10.1016/j.cellin.2026.100322

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The multifunctional interfering peptide VS-IP1 enhances IFN-I-induced antiviral immune activity . (A) Western blot analysis of STAT1 protein levels in HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and followed with IFNα for 9, 12 and 15 h. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 and Isg1 5 mRNA levels in HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 mRNA levels in A549 cells treated with IFNα and dose of VS-IP1. (D) Viral titers in supernatants from HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα followed by VSV infection (MOI = 1.0), determined by TCID50 assay. (E) RT-qPCR analysis of VSV, H1N1, SeV and HSV viral RNA in HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα, followed by viral infection. (F) RT-qPCR analysis of Ifit1 , Isg15 and Isg5 4 mRNA levels in Stat1 +/+ and Stat1 −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα. (G) Viral titers in supernatants from Stat1 +/+ and Stat1 −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 followed by VSV infection (MOI = 1.0), determined by TCID50 assay. (H-K) RT-qPCR analysis of VSV (H), H1N1 (I), SeV (J) and HSV (K) viral RNA in Stat1 +/+ and Stat1 −/− cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα, followed by viral infection. (L) Viral titers in supernatants from Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 followed by VSV infection (MOI = 1.0), determined by TCID50 assay. (M) RT-qPCR analysis of VSV RNA in Viperin +/+ and Viperin −/− HT1080 cells treated with VS-IP1 and IFNα, followed by VSV infection. NS, not significant ( p > 0.05), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test (B-M). Data are shown as means ± SD of at least three biological replicates (B-M) or are representative of three independent experiments (A).

    Article Snippet: HEK293T, A549, HT1080, Vero, and RAW264.7 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Infection, TCID50 Assay, Two Tailed Test

    HT enables continuous, label-free monitoring of collagen dynamics through volumetric refractive-index (RI) mapping. a , Time-resolved HT MIPs of type I collagen polymerization showing progressive fibrillar assembly over time. Insets highlight early fibril emergence. Quantification of mean RI change (Δ n ) demonstrates a monotonic increase during gelation, providing a physically calibrated readout of assembly kinetics. b, c , Time-lapse HT imaging of HT1080 cells embedded in collagen under pharmacological perturbation (5-min intervals). b , Type I collagen with ROCK inhibitor (Y-27632). c , Type III collagen with MMP inhibitor (GM6001). For each condition, panels show full-field views at representative time points (0, 1, and 2 h), temporally encoded composite images, and zoomed regions highlighting cell-associated matrix remodeling (dashed circles). Drug treatments alter local collagen organization and remodeling dynamics at the single-fiber level compared to controls.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Label-free quantitative 3D mapping of collagen architecture by holotomography

    doi: 10.64898/2026.05.05.722893

    Figure Lengend Snippet: HT enables continuous, label-free monitoring of collagen dynamics through volumetric refractive-index (RI) mapping. a , Time-resolved HT MIPs of type I collagen polymerization showing progressive fibrillar assembly over time. Insets highlight early fibril emergence. Quantification of mean RI change (Δ n ) demonstrates a monotonic increase during gelation, providing a physically calibrated readout of assembly kinetics. b, c , Time-lapse HT imaging of HT1080 cells embedded in collagen under pharmacological perturbation (5-min intervals). b , Type I collagen with ROCK inhibitor (Y-27632). c , Type III collagen with MMP inhibitor (GM6001). For each condition, panels show full-field views at representative time points (0, 1, and 2 h), temporally encoded composite images, and zoomed regions highlighting cell-associated matrix remodeling (dashed circles). Drug treatments alter local collagen organization and remodeling dynamics at the single-fiber level compared to controls.

    Article Snippet: HT1080 cells (ATCC, CCL-121) were prepared as a single-cell suspension and mixed with neutralized collagen at 8,000 cells per 60 μL (1.3 × 10 cells/mL) before casting.

    Techniques: Refractive Index, Imaging

    Functional characterisation of PRL‐mediated proliferation and chemoresistance in sarcoma models. (A and B) Secretory PRL quantification by ELISA confirming knockdown efficiency in the culture medium, n = 3. (C–F) Growth suppression following PRL depletion: CCK‐8 time‐course assay ( n = 5) and colony formation capacity ( n = 3) in PRL‐knockdown models. (G–J) Recombinant PRL (50 ng/mL)‐induced proliferative enhancement: (G and H) CCK‐8 ( n = 5) and (I and J) colony formation ( n = 3) in HT1080 and SW872 lines. (K–P) PRLR‐dependent proliferation modulation: (K–N) CCK‐8 dose‐response ( n = 5) and (O‐P) colony formation ( n = 3) analysis post‐PRLR perturbation. (Q and R) After treating SW872 and HT1080 cells with PRLR antibody rolinsatamab talirine (20 µg/mL), the effect on cell proliferation was detected by the CCK8 method, with n = 5. (S and T) Xenograft tumourigenesis assay demonstrating impaired SW872 growth with PRL knockdown ( n = 9). (U) A single SW872 clone exhibiting the lowest PRL expression among the pooled PRL‐knockout cells was isolated by limiting dilution cloning, expanded in culture and validated for PRL protein levels via ELISA. (V) Cell proliferation was assessed using the CCK‐8 assay following stable PRL knockout ( n = 5 biological replicates). (W) Bromocriptine‐mediated antiproliferative effects were evaluated in parallel in wild‐type and PRL‐knockout SW872 cell lines using the CCK‐8 assay ( n = 5). (X) In vivo efficacy was determined in a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model, wherein tumour growth derived from wild‐type or PRL‐knockout SW872 cells was monitored following bromocriptine treatment, n = 7. (Y and Z) Chemosensitisation effects: PRL pretreatment (50 ng/mL) enhances cytotoxicity of RG7112/abemaciclib/doxorubicin/gemcitabine, n = 5, RG7112 (10 µM), abemaciclib (5 µM), doxorubicin (2 µM), gemcitabine (10 µM). (a) Western blot analysis was performed to detect MDM2 expression in human adipocytes, liposarcoma cell lines (SW872, 93T449, 94T778), fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080 and clinically isolated liposarcoma cell lines established in our laboratory. (b) Western blot analysis was performed to detect MDM2 in 12 clinical retroperitoneal liposarcoma tissues and its corresponding paracancerous tissues, 6 clinical retroperitoneal fibrosarcoma tissues and corresponding paracancerous tissues. (c) Therapeutic synergy evaluation: bromocriptine combined with RG7112 in WEHI164 fibrosarcoma murine model, RG7112: 100 mg/kg per day, bromocriptine: 10 mg/kg, twice daily, ( n = 6). Data expressed as mean ± SD unless specified; * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001 by two‐tailed Student's t ‐test; ns: not significant.

    Journal: Clinical and Translational Medicine

    Article Title: Oncogenic driver and therapeutic target: Prolactin signalling axis in retroperitoneal sarcoma

    doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70669

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional characterisation of PRL‐mediated proliferation and chemoresistance in sarcoma models. (A and B) Secretory PRL quantification by ELISA confirming knockdown efficiency in the culture medium, n = 3. (C–F) Growth suppression following PRL depletion: CCK‐8 time‐course assay ( n = 5) and colony formation capacity ( n = 3) in PRL‐knockdown models. (G–J) Recombinant PRL (50 ng/mL)‐induced proliferative enhancement: (G and H) CCK‐8 ( n = 5) and (I and J) colony formation ( n = 3) in HT1080 and SW872 lines. (K–P) PRLR‐dependent proliferation modulation: (K–N) CCK‐8 dose‐response ( n = 5) and (O‐P) colony formation ( n = 3) analysis post‐PRLR perturbation. (Q and R) After treating SW872 and HT1080 cells with PRLR antibody rolinsatamab talirine (20 µg/mL), the effect on cell proliferation was detected by the CCK8 method, with n = 5. (S and T) Xenograft tumourigenesis assay demonstrating impaired SW872 growth with PRL knockdown ( n = 9). (U) A single SW872 clone exhibiting the lowest PRL expression among the pooled PRL‐knockout cells was isolated by limiting dilution cloning, expanded in culture and validated for PRL protein levels via ELISA. (V) Cell proliferation was assessed using the CCK‐8 assay following stable PRL knockout ( n = 5 biological replicates). (W) Bromocriptine‐mediated antiproliferative effects were evaluated in parallel in wild‐type and PRL‐knockout SW872 cell lines using the CCK‐8 assay ( n = 5). (X) In vivo efficacy was determined in a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model, wherein tumour growth derived from wild‐type or PRL‐knockout SW872 cells was monitored following bromocriptine treatment, n = 7. (Y and Z) Chemosensitisation effects: PRL pretreatment (50 ng/mL) enhances cytotoxicity of RG7112/abemaciclib/doxorubicin/gemcitabine, n = 5, RG7112 (10 µM), abemaciclib (5 µM), doxorubicin (2 µM), gemcitabine (10 µM). (a) Western blot analysis was performed to detect MDM2 expression in human adipocytes, liposarcoma cell lines (SW872, 93T449, 94T778), fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080 and clinically isolated liposarcoma cell lines established in our laboratory. (b) Western blot analysis was performed to detect MDM2 in 12 clinical retroperitoneal liposarcoma tissues and its corresponding paracancerous tissues, 6 clinical retroperitoneal fibrosarcoma tissues and corresponding paracancerous tissues. (c) Therapeutic synergy evaluation: bromocriptine combined with RG7112 in WEHI164 fibrosarcoma murine model, RG7112: 100 mg/kg per day, bromocriptine: 10 mg/kg, twice daily, ( n = 6). Data expressed as mean ± SD unless specified; * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001 by two‐tailed Student's t ‐test; ns: not significant.

    Article Snippet: The SW872 (HTB‐92) and HT1080 (CCL‐121) cell lines were purchased from ATCC.

    Techniques: Functional Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Knockdown, CCK-8 Assay, Recombinant, Expressing, Knock-Out, Isolation, Cloning, In Vivo, Derivative Assay, Western Blot, Two Tailed Test