Review



fasl cdna  (OriGene)


Bioz Verified Symbol OriGene is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol OriGene manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    OriGene fasl cdna
    a Immunoblot analysis of <t>FasL</t> and ZNRF1 in control ( sgCtrl ) and Znrf1 -targeted RAW264.7 macrophage clones ( sgZnrf1 #1 and #2) stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/mL) for the indicated times (0, 16, and 24 h). β-Actin served as a loading control. Numbers beneath the ZNRF1 blot indicate densitometric quantification after lane-specific background subtraction (ZNRF1/β-actin), normalized to sgCtrl 0 h (= 1). b Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in sgCtrl and sgZnrf1 macrophages under vehicle control conditions or after LPS stimulation for 16 or 24 h. c Quantification of surface FasL mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) from ( b ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of three independent experiments). d Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ mice stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated times. e Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs following LPS stimulation. f Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( e ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). g Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs stimulated with live E. coli at the indicated multiplicities of infection (MOI). h Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( g ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). Data are shown as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant (unpaired two-tailed t-test).
    Fasl Cdna, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 8 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fasl/Fasl/pmc13149863-45-0-4
    Average 94 stars, based on 8 article reviews
    fasl cdna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "ZNRF1 deficiency disrupts Fas ligand trafficking and immune balance"

    Article Title: ZNRF1 deficiency disrupts Fas ligand trafficking and immune balance

    Journal: Cell Death & Disease

    doi: 10.1038/s41419-026-08566-8

    a Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in control ( sgCtrl ) and Znrf1 -targeted RAW264.7 macrophage clones ( sgZnrf1 #1 and #2) stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/mL) for the indicated times (0, 16, and 24 h). β-Actin served as a loading control. Numbers beneath the ZNRF1 blot indicate densitometric quantification after lane-specific background subtraction (ZNRF1/β-actin), normalized to sgCtrl 0 h (= 1). b Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in sgCtrl and sgZnrf1 macrophages under vehicle control conditions or after LPS stimulation for 16 or 24 h. c Quantification of surface FasL mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) from ( b ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of three independent experiments). d Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ mice stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated times. e Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs following LPS stimulation. f Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( e ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). g Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs stimulated with live E. coli at the indicated multiplicities of infection (MOI). h Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( g ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). Data are shown as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant (unpaired two-tailed t-test).
    Figure Legend Snippet: a Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in control ( sgCtrl ) and Znrf1 -targeted RAW264.7 macrophage clones ( sgZnrf1 #1 and #2) stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/mL) for the indicated times (0, 16, and 24 h). β-Actin served as a loading control. Numbers beneath the ZNRF1 blot indicate densitometric quantification after lane-specific background subtraction (ZNRF1/β-actin), normalized to sgCtrl 0 h (= 1). b Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in sgCtrl and sgZnrf1 macrophages under vehicle control conditions or after LPS stimulation for 16 or 24 h. c Quantification of surface FasL mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) from ( b ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of three independent experiments). d Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ mice stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated times. e Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs following LPS stimulation. f Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( e ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). g Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs stimulated with live E. coli at the indicated multiplicities of infection (MOI). h Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( g ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). Data are shown as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant (unpaired two-tailed t-test).

    Techniques Used: Western Blot, Control, Clone Assay, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Derivative Assay, Infection, Two Tailed Test

    a Co-immunoprecipitation of Munc18-2 and Syntaxin-3 in control ( sgControl ) and Znrf1 -deficient ( sgZnrf1 , two sgRNAs) murine macrophages after LPS (100 ng/mL, 24 h) stimulation. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Munc18-2 or IgG (control), followed by immunoblot analysis with specified antibodies. b Confocal microscopy of murine macrophages stained for FasL (green), Munc18-2 (blue), and Syntaxin-3 (red) under vehicle or LPS (20 h) conditions. Right panels: Signal profiles along the indicated dashed lines in each cell, showing fluorescence intensity for FasL (green), Munc18-2 (blue), and Syntaxin 3 (red). Scale bars, 5 µm. c In RAW264.7 macrophages, knockdown of Munc18-2 ( Stxbp2 ) and Stx3 ( Syntaxin 3 ) was achieved using siRNA targeting two distinct sequences. Following this genetic manipulation, the cells were harvested and analyzed for surface expression of FasL by using flow cytometry. d Znrf1 -deficient macrophages were reconstituted with doxycycline-inducible wild-type ZNRF1, ZNRF1(C184A) mutant, or vector control. Following LPS stimulation (100 ng/mL, 24 h), co-immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-Munc18-2 and immunoblotting for Syntaxin-3 and Munc18-2. Syntaxin-3/Munc18-2 binding ratios are indicated. e Surface FasL expression was analyzed by flow cytometry in reconstituted macrophages from ( d ) under vehicle and LPS-treated conditions.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a Co-immunoprecipitation of Munc18-2 and Syntaxin-3 in control ( sgControl ) and Znrf1 -deficient ( sgZnrf1 , two sgRNAs) murine macrophages after LPS (100 ng/mL, 24 h) stimulation. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Munc18-2 or IgG (control), followed by immunoblot analysis with specified antibodies. b Confocal microscopy of murine macrophages stained for FasL (green), Munc18-2 (blue), and Syntaxin-3 (red) under vehicle or LPS (20 h) conditions. Right panels: Signal profiles along the indicated dashed lines in each cell, showing fluorescence intensity for FasL (green), Munc18-2 (blue), and Syntaxin 3 (red). Scale bars, 5 µm. c In RAW264.7 macrophages, knockdown of Munc18-2 ( Stxbp2 ) and Stx3 ( Syntaxin 3 ) was achieved using siRNA targeting two distinct sequences. Following this genetic manipulation, the cells were harvested and analyzed for surface expression of FasL by using flow cytometry. d Znrf1 -deficient macrophages were reconstituted with doxycycline-inducible wild-type ZNRF1, ZNRF1(C184A) mutant, or vector control. Following LPS stimulation (100 ng/mL, 24 h), co-immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-Munc18-2 and immunoblotting for Syntaxin-3 and Munc18-2. Syntaxin-3/Munc18-2 binding ratios are indicated. e Surface FasL expression was analyzed by flow cytometry in reconstituted macrophages from ( d ) under vehicle and LPS-treated conditions.

    Techniques Used: Immunoprecipitation, Control, Western Blot, Confocal Microscopy, Staining, Fluorescence, Knockdown, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Mutagenesis, Plasmid Preparation, Binding Assay

    Schematic illustration of FasL trafficking and T cell apoptosis in wild-type (WT, left) versus Znrf1 -deficient (right) macrophages. In WT macrophages, ZNRF1 promotes the interaction between Munc18-2 and Syntaxin-3 (Stx3), enabling efficient delivery of FasL-containing vesicles to the plasma membrane and triggering FasL-mediated apoptosis of activated T lymphocytes. In Znrf1 -deficient macrophages, disruption of the Munc18-2/Syntaxin-3 interaction impairs FasL vesicle trafficking and surface expression, resulting in defective Fas-mediated T cell apoptosis and immune dysregulation. The lower panel depicts the in vivo allogeneic transfusion model, in which C57BL/6 Znrf1 f/f or Znrf1 myeΔ recipients received BALB/c whole blood via intravenous injection.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Schematic illustration of FasL trafficking and T cell apoptosis in wild-type (WT, left) versus Znrf1 -deficient (right) macrophages. In WT macrophages, ZNRF1 promotes the interaction between Munc18-2 and Syntaxin-3 (Stx3), enabling efficient delivery of FasL-containing vesicles to the plasma membrane and triggering FasL-mediated apoptosis of activated T lymphocytes. In Znrf1 -deficient macrophages, disruption of the Munc18-2/Syntaxin-3 interaction impairs FasL vesicle trafficking and surface expression, resulting in defective Fas-mediated T cell apoptosis and immune dysregulation. The lower panel depicts the in vivo allogeneic transfusion model, in which C57BL/6 Znrf1 f/f or Znrf1 myeΔ recipients received BALB/c whole blood via intravenous injection.

    Techniques Used: Clinical Proteomics, Membrane, Disruption, Expressing, In Vivo, Injection

    Related Articles

    Incubation:

    Article Title: Endoplasmic reticulum stress and death receptor-mediated apoptosis in the neuronal differentiation of adult adipose-derived stromal cells
    Article Snippet: .. The primary antibody solutions: NSE (1:1000; EPITOMICS, USA), GRP94 (1:100; Affinity, USA), GHOP, Fas, FasL, TNFR1, TNF-α, DR5, TRAIL and Caspase8 (all 1:1000; Affinity, USA), Caspase3 (1:100; Beijing Zhongshan, China) and β-actin (1:5000; rabbit monoclonal antibody, China) were added and incubated overnight at 4 °C, and the membranes were washed with TBST. .. Corresponding goat anti-rabbit/mouse secondary antibody (1:5000; Beijing Zhongshan Golden Bridge, China) was added and incubated, followed by washing with TBST.



    Similar Products

    94
    Thermo Fisher gene exp fasl mm01292782 m1
    Gene Exp Fasl Mm01292782 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fasl/Gene+Exp%2E+Fasl%2C+Mm01292782_m1/pmc12985218-4-2--1
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gene exp fasl mm01292782 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Biocell Technology anti mouse fasl antibody
    Anti Mouse Fasl Antibody, supplied by Biocell Technology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fasl/anti+cd16+cd32+invivomab+mouse/pmc13201152-199-8-13
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse fasl antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Biocell Technology antimouse fasl antibody
    Antimouse Fasl Antibody, supplied by Biocell Technology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fasl/antimouse+fasl/10__3389_slash_fimmu__2026__1816695-227-8-13
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antimouse fasl antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Galectin Therapeutics fasl galectin 9
    Accuracy of CSF diagnostic markers for PCNSL. Boxplots depicted the distribution of CSF IL-10 ( A ), CXCL13 ( B ), IL-2RA ( C ), FasL ( D ), TIM-3 ( E ), <t>and</t> <t>galectin-9</t> ( F ) levels in PCNSL, neuroimmunological diseases, other brain tumors, and iNPH patients. Median values were represented by the horizontal bar, IQR by boxes, 1.5 × IQR by whiskers, and individual values by dots. IL-10 and IL-2RA are shown on a logarithmic scale due to the highly skewed distribution with a large proportion of zero or low values and a small number of extremely high values. The y -axis is displayed on a logarithmic scale after log10 transformation of IL-10 and IL-2RA concentrations with the addition of a constant of 1, while tick labels indicate the original values in pg/mL. **, adjusted p < 0.01. ***, adjusted p < 0.001. n.s., not significant. Holm-adjusted Dunn’s tests were used to compare PCNSL with the other groups. G–I ROC curves showed the diagnostic performance of CSF IL-10, CXCL13, IL-2RA, FasL, TIM-3, and galectin-9 for distinguishing PCNSL from different disease groups. The corresponding AUC values were shown. G PCNSL versus all other diseases. H PCNSL versus neuroimmunological diseases. (I) PCNSL versus other brain tumors. AUC values were shown in the legends of each panel AUC, area under the curve; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CXCL13, C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 13; FasL, Fas ligand; IL-2RA, interleukin-2 receptor chain alpha; IL-10, interleukin-10; iNPH, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; IQR, interquartile range; PCNSL, primary central nervous system lymphoma; ROC, Receiver operating characteristic; TIM-3, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3
    Fasl Galectin 9, supplied by Galectin Therapeutics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fasl/pmc13046686-24-0-2
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fasl galectin 9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    OriGene fasl cdna
    a Immunoblot analysis of <t>FasL</t> and ZNRF1 in control ( sgCtrl ) and Znrf1 -targeted RAW264.7 macrophage clones ( sgZnrf1 #1 and #2) stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/mL) for the indicated times (0, 16, and 24 h). β-Actin served as a loading control. Numbers beneath the ZNRF1 blot indicate densitometric quantification after lane-specific background subtraction (ZNRF1/β-actin), normalized to sgCtrl 0 h (= 1). b Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in sgCtrl and sgZnrf1 macrophages under vehicle control conditions or after LPS stimulation for 16 or 24 h. c Quantification of surface FasL mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) from ( b ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of three independent experiments). d Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ mice stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated times. e Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs following LPS stimulation. f Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( e ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). g Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs stimulated with live E. coli at the indicated multiplicities of infection (MOI). h Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( g ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). Data are shown as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant (unpaired two-tailed t-test).
    Fasl Cdna, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fasl/Fasl/pmc13149863-45-0-4
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fasl cdna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc cell signaling cat
    a Immunoblot analysis of <t>FasL</t> and ZNRF1 in control ( sgCtrl ) and Znrf1 -targeted RAW264.7 macrophage clones ( sgZnrf1 #1 and #2) stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/mL) for the indicated times (0, 16, and 24 h). β-Actin served as a loading control. Numbers beneath the ZNRF1 blot indicate densitometric quantification after lane-specific background subtraction (ZNRF1/β-actin), normalized to sgCtrl 0 h (= 1). b Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in sgCtrl and sgZnrf1 macrophages under vehicle control conditions or after LPS stimulation for 16 or 24 h. c Quantification of surface FasL mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) from ( b ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of three independent experiments). d Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ mice stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated times. e Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs following LPS stimulation. f Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( e ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). g Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs stimulated with live E. coli at the indicated multiplicities of infection (MOI). h Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( g ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). Data are shown as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant (unpaired two-tailed t-test).
    Cell Signaling Cat, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fasl/FasL+Rabbit+mAb/pmc12859412-238-35-35
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cell signaling cat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti fasl
    a Immunoblot analysis of <t>FasL</t> and ZNRF1 in control ( sgCtrl ) and Znrf1 -targeted RAW264.7 macrophage clones ( sgZnrf1 #1 and #2) stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/mL) for the indicated times (0, 16, and 24 h). β-Actin served as a loading control. Numbers beneath the ZNRF1 blot indicate densitometric quantification after lane-specific background subtraction (ZNRF1/β-actin), normalized to sgCtrl 0 h (= 1). b Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in sgCtrl and sgZnrf1 macrophages under vehicle control conditions or after LPS stimulation for 16 or 24 h. c Quantification of surface FasL mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) from ( b ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of three independent experiments). d Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ mice stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated times. e Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs following LPS stimulation. f Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( e ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). g Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs stimulated with live E. coli at the indicated multiplicities of infection (MOI). h Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( g ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). Data are shown as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant (unpaired two-tailed t-test).
    Anti Fasl, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fasl/FAS-L+Antibody/pm41796629-94-16-18
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti fasl - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Adipogen recombinant human hex fasl
    a Immunoblot analysis of <t>FasL</t> and ZNRF1 in control ( sgCtrl ) and Znrf1 -targeted RAW264.7 macrophage clones ( sgZnrf1 #1 and #2) stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/mL) for the indicated times (0, 16, and 24 h). β-Actin served as a loading control. Numbers beneath the ZNRF1 blot indicate densitometric quantification after lane-specific background subtraction (ZNRF1/β-actin), normalized to sgCtrl 0 h (= 1). b Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in sgCtrl and sgZnrf1 macrophages under vehicle control conditions or after LPS stimulation for 16 or 24 h. c Quantification of surface FasL mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) from ( b ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of three independent experiments). d Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ mice stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated times. e Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs following LPS stimulation. f Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( e ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). g Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs stimulated with live E. coli at the indicated multiplicities of infection (MOI). h Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( g ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). Data are shown as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant (unpaired two-tailed t-test).
    Recombinant Human Hex Fasl, supplied by Adipogen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fasl/fasl+hex+human+recombinant/pm41634378-233-0-6
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human hex fasl - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    fasl  (Takeda)
    86
    Takeda fasl
    a Immunoblot analysis of <t>FasL</t> and ZNRF1 in control ( sgCtrl ) and Znrf1 -targeted RAW264.7 macrophage clones ( sgZnrf1 #1 and #2) stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/mL) for the indicated times (0, 16, and 24 h). β-Actin served as a loading control. Numbers beneath the ZNRF1 blot indicate densitometric quantification after lane-specific background subtraction (ZNRF1/β-actin), normalized to sgCtrl 0 h (= 1). b Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in sgCtrl and sgZnrf1 macrophages under vehicle control conditions or after LPS stimulation for 16 or 24 h. c Quantification of surface FasL mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) from ( b ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of three independent experiments). d Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ mice stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated times. e Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs following LPS stimulation. f Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( e ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). g Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs stimulated with live E. coli at the indicated multiplicities of infection (MOI). h Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( g ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). Data are shown as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant (unpaired two-tailed t-test).
    Fasl, supplied by Takeda, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fasl/fasl/pm41618610-19-1-50
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fasl - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Accuracy of CSF diagnostic markers for PCNSL. Boxplots depicted the distribution of CSF IL-10 ( A ), CXCL13 ( B ), IL-2RA ( C ), FasL ( D ), TIM-3 ( E ), and galectin-9 ( F ) levels in PCNSL, neuroimmunological diseases, other brain tumors, and iNPH patients. Median values were represented by the horizontal bar, IQR by boxes, 1.5 × IQR by whiskers, and individual values by dots. IL-10 and IL-2RA are shown on a logarithmic scale due to the highly skewed distribution with a large proportion of zero or low values and a small number of extremely high values. The y -axis is displayed on a logarithmic scale after log10 transformation of IL-10 and IL-2RA concentrations with the addition of a constant of 1, while tick labels indicate the original values in pg/mL. **, adjusted p < 0.01. ***, adjusted p < 0.001. n.s., not significant. Holm-adjusted Dunn’s tests were used to compare PCNSL with the other groups. G–I ROC curves showed the diagnostic performance of CSF IL-10, CXCL13, IL-2RA, FasL, TIM-3, and galectin-9 for distinguishing PCNSL from different disease groups. The corresponding AUC values were shown. G PCNSL versus all other diseases. H PCNSL versus neuroimmunological diseases. (I) PCNSL versus other brain tumors. AUC values were shown in the legends of each panel AUC, area under the curve; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CXCL13, C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 13; FasL, Fas ligand; IL-2RA, interleukin-2 receptor chain alpha; IL-10, interleukin-10; iNPH, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; IQR, interquartile range; PCNSL, primary central nervous system lymphoma; ROC, Receiver operating characteristic; TIM-3, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3

    Journal: Journal of Neurology

    Article Title: Soluble TIM-3 and galectin-9 serve as additional diagnostic biomarkers in primary central nervous system lymphoma

    doi: 10.1007/s00415-026-13791-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Accuracy of CSF diagnostic markers for PCNSL. Boxplots depicted the distribution of CSF IL-10 ( A ), CXCL13 ( B ), IL-2RA ( C ), FasL ( D ), TIM-3 ( E ), and galectin-9 ( F ) levels in PCNSL, neuroimmunological diseases, other brain tumors, and iNPH patients. Median values were represented by the horizontal bar, IQR by boxes, 1.5 × IQR by whiskers, and individual values by dots. IL-10 and IL-2RA are shown on a logarithmic scale due to the highly skewed distribution with a large proportion of zero or low values and a small number of extremely high values. The y -axis is displayed on a logarithmic scale after log10 transformation of IL-10 and IL-2RA concentrations with the addition of a constant of 1, while tick labels indicate the original values in pg/mL. **, adjusted p < 0.01. ***, adjusted p < 0.001. n.s., not significant. Holm-adjusted Dunn’s tests were used to compare PCNSL with the other groups. G–I ROC curves showed the diagnostic performance of CSF IL-10, CXCL13, IL-2RA, FasL, TIM-3, and galectin-9 for distinguishing PCNSL from different disease groups. The corresponding AUC values were shown. G PCNSL versus all other diseases. H PCNSL versus neuroimmunological diseases. (I) PCNSL versus other brain tumors. AUC values were shown in the legends of each panel AUC, area under the curve; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CXCL13, C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 13; FasL, Fas ligand; IL-2RA, interleukin-2 receptor chain alpha; IL-10, interleukin-10; iNPH, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; IQR, interquartile range; PCNSL, primary central nervous system lymphoma; ROC, Receiver operating characteristic; TIM-3, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3

    Article Snippet: FasL + Galectin-9 , 68.5 , 76.8 , 0.961 , 0.269 , 0.631 , .

    Techniques: Diagnostic Assay, Transformation Assay

    Correlations and clustering of diagnostic markers in PCNSL. Scatter plots and correlation analyses showed correlations between IL-10 and CXCL13 ( A ), IL-10 and IL-2RA ( B ), IL-10 and FasL ( C ), IL-10 and TIM-3 ( D ), IL-10 and galectin-9 ( E ), CXCL13 and IL-2RA ( F ), CXCL13 and FasL ( G ), CXCL13 and TIM-3 ( H ), CXCL13 and galectin-9 ( I ), IL-2RA and FasL ( J ), IL-2RA and TIM-3 ( K ), IL-2RA and galectin-9 (L), FasL and TIM-3 ( M ), FasL and galectin-9 ( N ), and TIM-3 and galectin-9 ( O ). Spearman’s rank correlation was used to measure the degree of correlation between CSF diagnostic markers. P Correlation matrix showed Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between CSF diagnostic markers in PCNSL patients. Q Hierarchical clustering of CSF diagnostic markers in PCNSL patients based on Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Clustering was performed using 1 − Spearman’s correlation coefficient as the distance metric with the complete linkage method. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CXCL13, C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 13; FasL, Fas ligand; IL-2RA, interleukin-2 receptor chain alpha; IL-10, interleukin-10; PCNSL, primary central nervous system lymphoma; TIM-3, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3

    Journal: Journal of Neurology

    Article Title: Soluble TIM-3 and galectin-9 serve as additional diagnostic biomarkers in primary central nervous system lymphoma

    doi: 10.1007/s00415-026-13791-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Correlations and clustering of diagnostic markers in PCNSL. Scatter plots and correlation analyses showed correlations between IL-10 and CXCL13 ( A ), IL-10 and IL-2RA ( B ), IL-10 and FasL ( C ), IL-10 and TIM-3 ( D ), IL-10 and galectin-9 ( E ), CXCL13 and IL-2RA ( F ), CXCL13 and FasL ( G ), CXCL13 and TIM-3 ( H ), CXCL13 and galectin-9 ( I ), IL-2RA and FasL ( J ), IL-2RA and TIM-3 ( K ), IL-2RA and galectin-9 (L), FasL and TIM-3 ( M ), FasL and galectin-9 ( N ), and TIM-3 and galectin-9 ( O ). Spearman’s rank correlation was used to measure the degree of correlation between CSF diagnostic markers. P Correlation matrix showed Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between CSF diagnostic markers in PCNSL patients. Q Hierarchical clustering of CSF diagnostic markers in PCNSL patients based on Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Clustering was performed using 1 − Spearman’s correlation coefficient as the distance metric with the complete linkage method. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CXCL13, C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 13; FasL, Fas ligand; IL-2RA, interleukin-2 receptor chain alpha; IL-10, interleukin-10; PCNSL, primary central nervous system lymphoma; TIM-3, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3

    Article Snippet: FasL + Galectin-9 , 68.5 , 76.8 , 0.961 , 0.269 , 0.631 , .

    Techniques: Diagnostic Assay

    Comparison of PFS in PCNSL according to diagnostic marker levels. Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS in PCNSL patients were compared according to CSF IL-10 ( A ), CXCL13 ( B ), IL-2RA ( C ), FasL ( D ), TIM-3 ( E ), and galectin-9 ( F ) levels. PFS was compared using the log-rank test. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CXCL13, C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 13; FasL, Fas ligand; IL-2RA, interleukin-2 receptor chain alpha; IL-10, interleukin-10; PCNSL, primary central nervous system lymphoma; PFS, progression-free survival; TIM-3, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3

    Journal: Journal of Neurology

    Article Title: Soluble TIM-3 and galectin-9 serve as additional diagnostic biomarkers in primary central nervous system lymphoma

    doi: 10.1007/s00415-026-13791-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of PFS in PCNSL according to diagnostic marker levels. Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS in PCNSL patients were compared according to CSF IL-10 ( A ), CXCL13 ( B ), IL-2RA ( C ), FasL ( D ), TIM-3 ( E ), and galectin-9 ( F ) levels. PFS was compared using the log-rank test. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CXCL13, C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 13; FasL, Fas ligand; IL-2RA, interleukin-2 receptor chain alpha; IL-10, interleukin-10; PCNSL, primary central nervous system lymphoma; PFS, progression-free survival; TIM-3, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3

    Article Snippet: FasL + Galectin-9 , 68.5 , 76.8 , 0.961 , 0.269 , 0.631 , .

    Techniques: Comparison, Diagnostic Assay, Marker

    a Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in control ( sgCtrl ) and Znrf1 -targeted RAW264.7 macrophage clones ( sgZnrf1 #1 and #2) stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/mL) for the indicated times (0, 16, and 24 h). β-Actin served as a loading control. Numbers beneath the ZNRF1 blot indicate densitometric quantification after lane-specific background subtraction (ZNRF1/β-actin), normalized to sgCtrl 0 h (= 1). b Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in sgCtrl and sgZnrf1 macrophages under vehicle control conditions or after LPS stimulation for 16 or 24 h. c Quantification of surface FasL mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) from ( b ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of three independent experiments). d Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ mice stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated times. e Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs following LPS stimulation. f Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( e ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). g Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs stimulated with live E. coli at the indicated multiplicities of infection (MOI). h Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( g ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). Data are shown as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant (unpaired two-tailed t-test).

    Journal: Cell Death & Disease

    Article Title: ZNRF1 deficiency disrupts Fas ligand trafficking and immune balance

    doi: 10.1038/s41419-026-08566-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in control ( sgCtrl ) and Znrf1 -targeted RAW264.7 macrophage clones ( sgZnrf1 #1 and #2) stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/mL) for the indicated times (0, 16, and 24 h). β-Actin served as a loading control. Numbers beneath the ZNRF1 blot indicate densitometric quantification after lane-specific background subtraction (ZNRF1/β-actin), normalized to sgCtrl 0 h (= 1). b Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in sgCtrl and sgZnrf1 macrophages under vehicle control conditions or after LPS stimulation for 16 or 24 h. c Quantification of surface FasL mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) from ( b ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of three independent experiments). d Immunoblot analysis of FasL and ZNRF1 in bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ mice stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for the indicated times. e Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs following LPS stimulation. f Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( e ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). g Representative flow-cytometry histograms of surface FasL in Znrf1 f/f and Znrf1 Δ BMDMs stimulated with live E. coli at the indicated multiplicities of infection (MOI). h Quantification of surface FasL MFI from ( g ) ( n = 3 biological replicates per group; representative of two independent experiments). Data are shown as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant (unpaired two-tailed t-test).

    Article Snippet: FasL cDNA, obtained from Origene (Rockville, MD), was polymerase chain reaction–amplified and cloned into a C-terminally FLAG-tagged pLKO-AS2 lentiviral vector.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Control, Clone Assay, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Derivative Assay, Infection, Two Tailed Test

    a Co-immunoprecipitation of Munc18-2 and Syntaxin-3 in control ( sgControl ) and Znrf1 -deficient ( sgZnrf1 , two sgRNAs) murine macrophages after LPS (100 ng/mL, 24 h) stimulation. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Munc18-2 or IgG (control), followed by immunoblot analysis with specified antibodies. b Confocal microscopy of murine macrophages stained for FasL (green), Munc18-2 (blue), and Syntaxin-3 (red) under vehicle or LPS (20 h) conditions. Right panels: Signal profiles along the indicated dashed lines in each cell, showing fluorescence intensity for FasL (green), Munc18-2 (blue), and Syntaxin 3 (red). Scale bars, 5 µm. c In RAW264.7 macrophages, knockdown of Munc18-2 ( Stxbp2 ) and Stx3 ( Syntaxin 3 ) was achieved using siRNA targeting two distinct sequences. Following this genetic manipulation, the cells were harvested and analyzed for surface expression of FasL by using flow cytometry. d Znrf1 -deficient macrophages were reconstituted with doxycycline-inducible wild-type ZNRF1, ZNRF1(C184A) mutant, or vector control. Following LPS stimulation (100 ng/mL, 24 h), co-immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-Munc18-2 and immunoblotting for Syntaxin-3 and Munc18-2. Syntaxin-3/Munc18-2 binding ratios are indicated. e Surface FasL expression was analyzed by flow cytometry in reconstituted macrophages from ( d ) under vehicle and LPS-treated conditions.

    Journal: Cell Death & Disease

    Article Title: ZNRF1 deficiency disrupts Fas ligand trafficking and immune balance

    doi: 10.1038/s41419-026-08566-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Co-immunoprecipitation of Munc18-2 and Syntaxin-3 in control ( sgControl ) and Znrf1 -deficient ( sgZnrf1 , two sgRNAs) murine macrophages after LPS (100 ng/mL, 24 h) stimulation. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Munc18-2 or IgG (control), followed by immunoblot analysis with specified antibodies. b Confocal microscopy of murine macrophages stained for FasL (green), Munc18-2 (blue), and Syntaxin-3 (red) under vehicle or LPS (20 h) conditions. Right panels: Signal profiles along the indicated dashed lines in each cell, showing fluorescence intensity for FasL (green), Munc18-2 (blue), and Syntaxin 3 (red). Scale bars, 5 µm. c In RAW264.7 macrophages, knockdown of Munc18-2 ( Stxbp2 ) and Stx3 ( Syntaxin 3 ) was achieved using siRNA targeting two distinct sequences. Following this genetic manipulation, the cells were harvested and analyzed for surface expression of FasL by using flow cytometry. d Znrf1 -deficient macrophages were reconstituted with doxycycline-inducible wild-type ZNRF1, ZNRF1(C184A) mutant, or vector control. Following LPS stimulation (100 ng/mL, 24 h), co-immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-Munc18-2 and immunoblotting for Syntaxin-3 and Munc18-2. Syntaxin-3/Munc18-2 binding ratios are indicated. e Surface FasL expression was analyzed by flow cytometry in reconstituted macrophages from ( d ) under vehicle and LPS-treated conditions.

    Article Snippet: FasL cDNA, obtained from Origene (Rockville, MD), was polymerase chain reaction–amplified and cloned into a C-terminally FLAG-tagged pLKO-AS2 lentiviral vector.

    Techniques: Immunoprecipitation, Control, Western Blot, Confocal Microscopy, Staining, Fluorescence, Knockdown, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Mutagenesis, Plasmid Preparation, Binding Assay

    Schematic illustration of FasL trafficking and T cell apoptosis in wild-type (WT, left) versus Znrf1 -deficient (right) macrophages. In WT macrophages, ZNRF1 promotes the interaction between Munc18-2 and Syntaxin-3 (Stx3), enabling efficient delivery of FasL-containing vesicles to the plasma membrane and triggering FasL-mediated apoptosis of activated T lymphocytes. In Znrf1 -deficient macrophages, disruption of the Munc18-2/Syntaxin-3 interaction impairs FasL vesicle trafficking and surface expression, resulting in defective Fas-mediated T cell apoptosis and immune dysregulation. The lower panel depicts the in vivo allogeneic transfusion model, in which C57BL/6 Znrf1 f/f or Znrf1 myeΔ recipients received BALB/c whole blood via intravenous injection.

    Journal: Cell Death & Disease

    Article Title: ZNRF1 deficiency disrupts Fas ligand trafficking and immune balance

    doi: 10.1038/s41419-026-08566-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic illustration of FasL trafficking and T cell apoptosis in wild-type (WT, left) versus Znrf1 -deficient (right) macrophages. In WT macrophages, ZNRF1 promotes the interaction between Munc18-2 and Syntaxin-3 (Stx3), enabling efficient delivery of FasL-containing vesicles to the plasma membrane and triggering FasL-mediated apoptosis of activated T lymphocytes. In Znrf1 -deficient macrophages, disruption of the Munc18-2/Syntaxin-3 interaction impairs FasL vesicle trafficking and surface expression, resulting in defective Fas-mediated T cell apoptosis and immune dysregulation. The lower panel depicts the in vivo allogeneic transfusion model, in which C57BL/6 Znrf1 f/f or Znrf1 myeΔ recipients received BALB/c whole blood via intravenous injection.

    Article Snippet: FasL cDNA, obtained from Origene (Rockville, MD), was polymerase chain reaction–amplified and cloned into a C-terminally FLAG-tagged pLKO-AS2 lentiviral vector.

    Techniques: Clinical Proteomics, Membrane, Disruption, Expressing, In Vivo, Injection