Review




Structured Review

Proteintech eif4e
Eif4e, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 20 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/eif4e/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 20 article reviews
eif4e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

94
Novus Biologicals rabbit eif4e
Rabbit Eif4e, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit eif4e/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit eif4e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti eif4e
Anti Eif4e, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti eif4e/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti eif4e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Santa Cruz Biotechnology eif4e
A , GSEA analysis showing a set of genes significantly dysregulated in ICI-resistant cells (YUMM1.1) compared to ICI sensitive cells (YUMM2.1). B , Western blot showing indicated proteins expression levels in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells. HSP90 serves as a loading control. C , Representation of the bicistronic plasmid used to compare cap-dependent and independent translation initiation (upper panel). Renilla over Firefly luminescent ratio quantification in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells (n=3; mean ± SEM) (lower panel). D , Proximity Ligation Assay showing <t>eiF4E/eiF4G</t> interactions in YUMM2.1 and YUMM1.1 cells. Representative images are presented in the left panel, and quantifications are presented in the right panel. E-F . Representation of enriched sets of genes, obtained after GSEA analysis, in patients that progress under ICI treatment compared to patients that respond.
Eif4e, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/eif4e/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
eif4e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc eif4e
A , GSEA analysis showing a set of genes significantly dysregulated in ICI-resistant cells (YUMM1.1) compared to ICI sensitive cells (YUMM2.1). B , Western blot showing indicated proteins expression levels in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells. HSP90 serves as a loading control. C , Representation of the bicistronic plasmid used to compare cap-dependent and independent translation initiation (upper panel). Renilla over Firefly luminescent ratio quantification in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells (n=3; mean ± SEM) (lower panel). D , Proximity Ligation Assay showing <t>eiF4E/eiF4G</t> interactions in YUMM2.1 and YUMM1.1 cells. Representative images are presented in the left panel, and quantifications are presented in the right panel. E-F . Representation of enriched sets of genes, obtained after GSEA analysis, in patients that progress under ICI treatment compared to patients that respond.
Eif4e, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/eif4e/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
eif4e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Cell Signaling Technology Inc p eif4e
A , GSEA analysis showing a set of genes significantly dysregulated in ICI-resistant cells (YUMM1.1) compared to ICI sensitive cells (YUMM2.1). B , Western blot showing indicated proteins expression levels in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells. HSP90 serves as a loading control. C , Representation of the bicistronic plasmid used to compare cap-dependent and independent translation initiation (upper panel). Renilla over Firefly luminescent ratio quantification in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells (n=3; mean ± SEM) (lower panel). D , Proximity Ligation Assay showing <t>eiF4E/eiF4G</t> interactions in YUMM2.1 and YUMM1.1 cells. Representative images are presented in the left panel, and quantifications are presented in the right panel. E-F . Representation of enriched sets of genes, obtained after GSEA analysis, in patients that progress under ICI treatment compared to patients that respond.
P Eif4e, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/p eif4e/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p eif4e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibody to eif4e
A , GSEA analysis showing a set of genes significantly dysregulated in ICI-resistant cells (YUMM1.1) compared to ICI sensitive cells (YUMM2.1). B , Western blot showing indicated proteins expression levels in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells. HSP90 serves as a loading control. C , Representation of the bicistronic plasmid used to compare cap-dependent and independent translation initiation (upper panel). Renilla over Firefly luminescent ratio quantification in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells (n=3; mean ± SEM) (lower panel). D , Proximity Ligation Assay showing <t>eiF4E/eiF4G</t> interactions in YUMM2.1 and YUMM1.1 cells. Representative images are presented in the left panel, and quantifications are presented in the right panel. E-F . Representation of enriched sets of genes, obtained after GSEA analysis, in patients that progress under ICI treatment compared to patients that respond.
Antibody To Eif4e, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibody to eif4e/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibody to eif4e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech eif4e
A , GSEA analysis showing a set of genes significantly dysregulated in ICI-resistant cells (YUMM1.1) compared to ICI sensitive cells (YUMM2.1). B , Western blot showing indicated proteins expression levels in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells. HSP90 serves as a loading control. C , Representation of the bicistronic plasmid used to compare cap-dependent and independent translation initiation (upper panel). Renilla over Firefly luminescent ratio quantification in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells (n=3; mean ± SEM) (lower panel). D , Proximity Ligation Assay showing <t>eiF4E/eiF4G</t> interactions in YUMM2.1 and YUMM1.1 cells. Representative images are presented in the left panel, and quantifications are presented in the right panel. E-F . Representation of enriched sets of genes, obtained after GSEA analysis, in patients that progress under ICI treatment compared to patients that respond.
Eif4e, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/eif4e/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
eif4e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Santa Cruz Biotechnology immunoblotting mouse monoclonal anti eif4e
A. Western blot of total cell lysates from MM6 cells grown in suspension demonstrated knockdown of Ezrin (siEZR) or <t>eIF4E</t> (siEIF4E) compared to RNAi to luciferase (siLUC) used as a negative control. b-Actin is provided as a loading control. Other proteins of the Ezrin-CD44-HA axis are also shown. Quantification for these is shown in with 3-6 biological replicates for each protein. B. Adhesion and invasion capacity of MM6 cells onto/through HS-5 bone marrow stroma. Fold change relative to siLUC is shown. Each symbol represents a biological replicate performed independently with replicates. Bars represent the mean, shown with standard deviations and p-values (one-way ANOVA). C. Western blot of eIF4E and Ezrin immunoprecipitations (IPs) using total cell lysates from MM6 cells in suspension. SN, supernatant after immunoprecipitation, IgG, negative control. Representative of three biological replicates. IPs of total cell lysates from THP-1 cells in suspension are provided in . D. IPs from MM6 cells in suspension using the rRNA antibody Y10b. LC indicates antibody light chain. Representative of three biological replicates. E. RNA immunoprecipitations (RIPs) from MM6 total cell lysates grown in suspension using anti-Ezrin (Ezrin RIP) <t>or</t> <t>anti-eIF4E</t> (eIF4E RIP) antibodies. Data are from RT-qPCR and represented relative to input. Each symbol represents a biological replicate performed independently with triplicates. Bars represent the mean, shown with standard deviations and p-values (two tailed Welch’s t test). F. Western blots of eIF4E and Ezrin IPs from the cytoplasmic fractions of MM6 cells in suspension or G . After invasion through HS-5 bone marrow stroma (invaded). Fractionation controls are provided in . H. RIPs from MM6 cytoplasmic fraction from invaded cells using anti-eIF4E (eIF4E RIP) or anti-Ezrin (Ezrin RIP) antibodies. Data are from RT-qPCR represented relative to input. Each symbol represents a biological replicate performed independently with triplicates. Bars represent the mean, shown with standard deviations and p-values (two tailed Welch’s t test). I. Count of the number of pseudopods observed in suspension and invaded MM6 cells represented as a fraction relative to the total cells counted. Each symbol represents a biological replicate. Bars represent the mean, shown with standard deviations and p-values (two-way ANOVA). J . Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy demonstrating eIF4E, Ezrin, CD44 and rRNA are localized to the same pseudopods (white arrows). All confocal micrographs represent a single section through the plane of the cell. Scale bar = 10 µm
Immunoblotting Mouse Monoclonal Anti Eif4e, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/immunoblotting mouse monoclonal anti eif4e/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunoblotting mouse monoclonal anti eif4e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti eif4e antibody
12/15-LOX is required for TXA2-induced platelet activation and hemostasis (A–C) Eight-weeks-old WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were subjected to measurement of body weight (A), tail bleeding time (B), and whole blood clotting time (C) ( n = 10). (D) Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 (1 μM) for the indicated periods at RT and photographed. The percentage of clot retraction and extruded serum volume were calculated as described in the methods ( n = 3). (E) Wahed platelets were plated onto fibrinogen-coated coverslips and after 1 h stained with phalloidin and DAPI and observed under a Zeiss inverted microscope (Axiovision Observer.z1; 40×/NA 0.6). The pictures were captured by a Zeiss AxioCam MRm camera using the microscope operating and image analysis software ZEN 2.6. (F) Washed platelets from WT mice were labeled with calcein acetoxymethyl ester (10 μM) for 30 min and placed onto fibrinogen-coated wells in a 96-well plate. Platelets were then incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 at the indicated concentrations for 30 min, washed with PBS and the bound platelets were lysed with lysis buffer and the fluorescence intensity was measured at 494 excitation and 517 emission ( n = 3). (G) PRP from WT mice treated with and without F 2 -TXA2 at the indicated concentrations was subjected to aggregation assay in an aggregometer ( n = 3). (H) Washed platelets from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were subjected adhesion assay as shown in panel F ( n = 3). (I) PRP from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice with and without the indicated treatments were subjected to aggregation assay in an aggregometer ( n = 3). (J) Washed platelets from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 for 30 min and plated onto fibrinogen-coated coverslips for 1 h. Platelets were then fixed, permeabilized, and stained with phalloidin to visualize F-actin, and pictures were captured. (K and L) Platelets from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 (1 μM) for indicated time periods, and RNA and protein extracts were prepared and analyzed by qRT-PCR (K) and western blotting (L) for 12-LOX, 12/15-LOX and β-actin mRNA and protein levels using their specific primers or antibodies, respectively ( n = 3). (M) Platelets from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were treated with and without F 2 -TXA2 for 30 min, and protein extracts were prepared and analyzed by western blotting for the levels of phospho and total <t>eIF4E</t> and 4EBP1 using their specific antibodies ( n = 3). (N) All the conditions were the same as in panel M except that the extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-4EBP1 antibody, and the immunocomplexes were analyzed by western blotting for eIF4E and normalized for 4EBP1. The input protein was analyzed for β-actin levels. (O and P) Platelets from WT mice were incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 in the presence and absence of rapamycin (100 nM) or torin1 (100 nM) for 30 min, and protein extracts were analyzed by western blotting for p4EBP1, 4EBP1, 12/15-LOX, and β-actin levels using their specific antibodies ( n = 3). (Q) Platelets from WT mice and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were assessed for 12(S)-HETE levels using a kit from Cayman ( n = 7). (R–W) Platelets from WT mice and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were treated with and without U46619 (1 μM) or ADP (40 μM) for 30 min and 12(S)-HETE levels were measured (R and U) ( n = 7) or subjected to adhesion assay (S and V) ( n = 3) or aggregation assay (T and W) ( n = 3). All data are presented as mean ± SD and analyzed by paired Student’s t test. ∗ p < 0.01 versus WT mice or control; # p < 0.01 versus F 2 -TXA2 or WT + F 2 -TXA2 or U46619. Scale bars: 10 μm in (E) and (J).
Anti Eif4e Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti eif4e antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti eif4e antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A , GSEA analysis showing a set of genes significantly dysregulated in ICI-resistant cells (YUMM1.1) compared to ICI sensitive cells (YUMM2.1). B , Western blot showing indicated proteins expression levels in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells. HSP90 serves as a loading control. C , Representation of the bicistronic plasmid used to compare cap-dependent and independent translation initiation (upper panel). Renilla over Firefly luminescent ratio quantification in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells (n=3; mean ± SEM) (lower panel). D , Proximity Ligation Assay showing eiF4E/eiF4G interactions in YUMM2.1 and YUMM1.1 cells. Representative images are presented in the left panel, and quantifications are presented in the right panel. E-F . Representation of enriched sets of genes, obtained after GSEA analysis, in patients that progress under ICI treatment compared to patients that respond.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Arginine synthesis pathway and ASS1 play a critical role in mRNA translation reprogramming and ICI resistance in cutaneous melanoma

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.17.712479

Figure Lengend Snippet: A , GSEA analysis showing a set of genes significantly dysregulated in ICI-resistant cells (YUMM1.1) compared to ICI sensitive cells (YUMM2.1). B , Western blot showing indicated proteins expression levels in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells. HSP90 serves as a loading control. C , Representation of the bicistronic plasmid used to compare cap-dependent and independent translation initiation (upper panel). Renilla over Firefly luminescent ratio quantification in ICI-sensitive YUMM2.1 cells versus ICI-resistant YUMM1.1 cells (n=3; mean ± SEM) (lower panel). D , Proximity Ligation Assay showing eiF4E/eiF4G interactions in YUMM2.1 and YUMM1.1 cells. Representative images are presented in the left panel, and quantifications are presented in the right panel. E-F . Representation of enriched sets of genes, obtained after GSEA analysis, in patients that progress under ICI treatment compared to patients that respond.

Article Snippet: After blocking, the antibodies were used at the following concentrations: eIF4E (mouse, clone A-10, 1:200; SantaCruz Biotechnology, sc-271480) and eIF4G (rabbit, 1:200; Cell Signaling Technology, 2498) and incubated overnight with the primary antibodies at 4 °C.

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Control, Plasmid Preparation, Proximity Ligation Assay

A , Western blot showing indicated proteins expression levels in YUMM1.1 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1. HSP90 serves as a loading control. B , Western blot showing indicated proteins expression levels in YUMM1.7 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1. HSP90 serves as a loading control. C , Western blot showing indicated proteins expression levels in YUMM2.1 cells expressing an ectopic empty vector or containing the open reading frame of ASS1. HSP90 serves as a loading control. D , Renilla over Firefly luminescent ratio quantification in YUMM1.1 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1 (n=4; mean ± SEM). E , Renilla over Firefly luminescent ratio quantification in YUMM1.7 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1 (n=3; mean ± SEM). F , Renilla over Firefly luminescent ratio quantification in YUMM2.1 cells expressing an ectopic empty vector or containing the open reading frame of ASS1 (n=3; mean ± SEM). G , Protein synthesis rates were determined in YUMM1.1 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1. Cells were then pulsed for 30 min with [ 35 S]Cys/Met, and the incorporation of 35 S into proteins was quantified and normalized to the total protein amount. Cells treated 30 minutes with 100µg/mL of cycloheximide (CHX) are used as a positive control. The data are presented as the mean (n = 4). H , Protein synthesis rates were determined in YUMM1.7 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1. Cells were then pulsed for 30 min with [ 35 S]Cys/Met, and the incorporation of 35 S into proteins was quantified and normalized to the total protein amount. Cells treated 30 minutes with 100µg/mL of cycloheximide (CHX) are used as a positive control. The data are presented as the mean (n = 3). I , Protein synthesis rates were determined in YUMM2.1 cells expressing an ectopic empty vector or containing the open reading frame of ASS1. Cells were then pulsed for 30 min with [ 35 S]Cys/Met, and the incorporation of 35 S into proteins was quantified and normalized to the total protein amount. Cells treated 30 minutes with 100µg/mL of cycloheximide (CHX) are used as a positive control. The data are presented as the mean (n = 3). J , Proximity Ligation Assay showing eiF4E/eiF4G interactions in YUMM1.1 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1. Representative images are presented in the left panel, and quantifications are presented in the right panel. K , Proximity Ligation Assay showing eiF4E/eiF4G interactions in YUMM1.7 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1. Representative images are presented in the left panel, and quantifications are presented in the right panel.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Arginine synthesis pathway and ASS1 play a critical role in mRNA translation reprogramming and ICI resistance in cutaneous melanoma

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.17.712479

Figure Lengend Snippet: A , Western blot showing indicated proteins expression levels in YUMM1.1 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1. HSP90 serves as a loading control. B , Western blot showing indicated proteins expression levels in YUMM1.7 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1. HSP90 serves as a loading control. C , Western blot showing indicated proteins expression levels in YUMM2.1 cells expressing an ectopic empty vector or containing the open reading frame of ASS1. HSP90 serves as a loading control. D , Renilla over Firefly luminescent ratio quantification in YUMM1.1 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1 (n=4; mean ± SEM). E , Renilla over Firefly luminescent ratio quantification in YUMM1.7 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1 (n=3; mean ± SEM). F , Renilla over Firefly luminescent ratio quantification in YUMM2.1 cells expressing an ectopic empty vector or containing the open reading frame of ASS1 (n=3; mean ± SEM). G , Protein synthesis rates were determined in YUMM1.1 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1. Cells were then pulsed for 30 min with [ 35 S]Cys/Met, and the incorporation of 35 S into proteins was quantified and normalized to the total protein amount. Cells treated 30 minutes with 100µg/mL of cycloheximide (CHX) are used as a positive control. The data are presented as the mean (n = 4). H , Protein synthesis rates were determined in YUMM1.7 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1. Cells were then pulsed for 30 min with [ 35 S]Cys/Met, and the incorporation of 35 S into proteins was quantified and normalized to the total protein amount. Cells treated 30 minutes with 100µg/mL of cycloheximide (CHX) are used as a positive control. The data are presented as the mean (n = 3). I , Protein synthesis rates were determined in YUMM2.1 cells expressing an ectopic empty vector or containing the open reading frame of ASS1. Cells were then pulsed for 30 min with [ 35 S]Cys/Met, and the incorporation of 35 S into proteins was quantified and normalized to the total protein amount. Cells treated 30 minutes with 100µg/mL of cycloheximide (CHX) are used as a positive control. The data are presented as the mean (n = 3). J , Proximity Ligation Assay showing eiF4E/eiF4G interactions in YUMM1.1 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1. Representative images are presented in the left panel, and quantifications are presented in the right panel. K , Proximity Ligation Assay showing eiF4E/eiF4G interactions in YUMM1.7 cells expressing a shRNA control or targeting ASS1. Representative images are presented in the left panel, and quantifications are presented in the right panel.

Article Snippet: After blocking, the antibodies were used at the following concentrations: eIF4E (mouse, clone A-10, 1:200; SantaCruz Biotechnology, sc-271480) and eIF4G (rabbit, 1:200; Cell Signaling Technology, 2498) and incubated overnight with the primary antibodies at 4 °C.

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, shRNA, Control, Plasmid Preparation, Positive Control, Proximity Ligation Assay

A. Western blot of total cell lysates from MM6 cells grown in suspension demonstrated knockdown of Ezrin (siEZR) or eIF4E (siEIF4E) compared to RNAi to luciferase (siLUC) used as a negative control. b-Actin is provided as a loading control. Other proteins of the Ezrin-CD44-HA axis are also shown. Quantification for these is shown in with 3-6 biological replicates for each protein. B. Adhesion and invasion capacity of MM6 cells onto/through HS-5 bone marrow stroma. Fold change relative to siLUC is shown. Each symbol represents a biological replicate performed independently with replicates. Bars represent the mean, shown with standard deviations and p-values (one-way ANOVA). C. Western blot of eIF4E and Ezrin immunoprecipitations (IPs) using total cell lysates from MM6 cells in suspension. SN, supernatant after immunoprecipitation, IgG, negative control. Representative of three biological replicates. IPs of total cell lysates from THP-1 cells in suspension are provided in . D. IPs from MM6 cells in suspension using the rRNA antibody Y10b. LC indicates antibody light chain. Representative of three biological replicates. E. RNA immunoprecipitations (RIPs) from MM6 total cell lysates grown in suspension using anti-Ezrin (Ezrin RIP) or anti-eIF4E (eIF4E RIP) antibodies. Data are from RT-qPCR and represented relative to input. Each symbol represents a biological replicate performed independently with triplicates. Bars represent the mean, shown with standard deviations and p-values (two tailed Welch’s t test). F. Western blots of eIF4E and Ezrin IPs from the cytoplasmic fractions of MM6 cells in suspension or G . After invasion through HS-5 bone marrow stroma (invaded). Fractionation controls are provided in . H. RIPs from MM6 cytoplasmic fraction from invaded cells using anti-eIF4E (eIF4E RIP) or anti-Ezrin (Ezrin RIP) antibodies. Data are from RT-qPCR represented relative to input. Each symbol represents a biological replicate performed independently with triplicates. Bars represent the mean, shown with standard deviations and p-values (two tailed Welch’s t test). I. Count of the number of pseudopods observed in suspension and invaded MM6 cells represented as a fraction relative to the total cells counted. Each symbol represents a biological replicate. Bars represent the mean, shown with standard deviations and p-values (two-way ANOVA). J . Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy demonstrating eIF4E, Ezrin, CD44 and rRNA are localized to the same pseudopods (white arrows). All confocal micrographs represent a single section through the plane of the cell. Scale bar = 10 µm

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: eIF4E and Ezrin cooperate in pseudopods to drive a localized migratory translation program in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.64898/2026.02.21.707190

Figure Lengend Snippet: A. Western blot of total cell lysates from MM6 cells grown in suspension demonstrated knockdown of Ezrin (siEZR) or eIF4E (siEIF4E) compared to RNAi to luciferase (siLUC) used as a negative control. b-Actin is provided as a loading control. Other proteins of the Ezrin-CD44-HA axis are also shown. Quantification for these is shown in with 3-6 biological replicates for each protein. B. Adhesion and invasion capacity of MM6 cells onto/through HS-5 bone marrow stroma. Fold change relative to siLUC is shown. Each symbol represents a biological replicate performed independently with replicates. Bars represent the mean, shown with standard deviations and p-values (one-way ANOVA). C. Western blot of eIF4E and Ezrin immunoprecipitations (IPs) using total cell lysates from MM6 cells in suspension. SN, supernatant after immunoprecipitation, IgG, negative control. Representative of three biological replicates. IPs of total cell lysates from THP-1 cells in suspension are provided in . D. IPs from MM6 cells in suspension using the rRNA antibody Y10b. LC indicates antibody light chain. Representative of three biological replicates. E. RNA immunoprecipitations (RIPs) from MM6 total cell lysates grown in suspension using anti-Ezrin (Ezrin RIP) or anti-eIF4E (eIF4E RIP) antibodies. Data are from RT-qPCR and represented relative to input. Each symbol represents a biological replicate performed independently with triplicates. Bars represent the mean, shown with standard deviations and p-values (two tailed Welch’s t test). F. Western blots of eIF4E and Ezrin IPs from the cytoplasmic fractions of MM6 cells in suspension or G . After invasion through HS-5 bone marrow stroma (invaded). Fractionation controls are provided in . H. RIPs from MM6 cytoplasmic fraction from invaded cells using anti-eIF4E (eIF4E RIP) or anti-Ezrin (Ezrin RIP) antibodies. Data are from RT-qPCR represented relative to input. Each symbol represents a biological replicate performed independently with triplicates. Bars represent the mean, shown with standard deviations and p-values (two tailed Welch’s t test). I. Count of the number of pseudopods observed in suspension and invaded MM6 cells represented as a fraction relative to the total cells counted. Each symbol represents a biological replicate. Bars represent the mean, shown with standard deviations and p-values (two-way ANOVA). J . Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy demonstrating eIF4E, Ezrin, CD44 and rRNA are localized to the same pseudopods (white arrows). All confocal micrographs represent a single section through the plane of the cell. Scale bar = 10 µm

Article Snippet: Antibodies for immunoblotting: mouse monoclonal anti-eIF4E (cat# 610270, BD Biosciences), mouse monoclonal anti-β-Actin (cat# A5441, Sigma Aldrich), rabbit polyclonal anti-Mcl-1 (S-19) (cat# sc-819, Santa Cruz), mouse monoclonal anti-HSP90α/β (F-8) (cat# sc-13119, Santa Cruz), rabbit polyclonal anti-Myc (cat# ab32072, Abcam), Mouse monoclonal anti-CD44 antibody (cat# 156–3 C11, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit polyclonal anti-CD44 (cat# A12410, Abclonal), rabbit polyclonal anti-HAS3 antibody (cat# ab154104, Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-phosphoglucomutase 5 (cat# AI14638, Abgent), rabbit polyclonal anti-Lamin A (C-terminal) (cat# L1293, Sigma Aldrich), rabbit polyclonal anti-GAPDH (FL-335) (cat# sc-25778, Santa Cruz), rabbit polyclonal anti-UGDH (cat#AP12613b-EV, Abgent), rabbit monoclonal anti-Hexokinase II (cat# 2867, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit monoclonal anti-UAP1 antibody (cat# 2716, GenuinBiotech), mouse monoclonal anti-RPL17 (C-8, cat# sc-515904, Santa Cruz), mouse monoclonal anti-RPS16 (D-8, cat# sc-518206; Santa Cruz), mouse monoclonal anti-RPS6 (C-8, cat# sc-74459, Santa Cruz), mouse monoclonal anti-eIF3e (G-7, cat# sc-390413, Santa Cruz), mouse monoclonal anti-eIF3p110 (B-6, cat# sc-74507, Santa Cruz), mouse monoclonal anti-eIF3b (A-7, cat# sc-374156, Santa Cruz), mouse monoclonal anti-eIF4AI/II (H-5, cat# sc-377315, Santa Cruz), mouse monoclonal anti-eIF4G (A-10, cat# sc-133155, Santa Cruz), mouse monoclonal anti-Nopp140 (E-7, cat# sc-374033, Santa Cruz), rabbit monoclonal anti-histone H3 acetyl K27 (cat# ab177178, Abcam), rabbit polyclonal Calreticulin (cat# AW5211, ABCEPTA), rabbit polyclonal anti-Calnexin (cat# ab22595, Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-Ezrin antibody (cat# PA5-80603, Invitrogen), mouse monoclonal anti-Ezrin (CPTC-Ezrin-1, cat# AB_2100318, DSHB), mouse monoclonal anti-MEK-1 (H-8, sc-6250, Santa Cruz), and mouse monoclonal anti-cytochrome c (A-8, cat# sc-13156, Santa Cruz).

Techniques: Western Blot, Suspension, Knockdown, Luciferase, Negative Control, Control, Immunoprecipitation, Quantitative RT-PCR, Two Tailed Test, Fractionation, Immunofluorescence, Confocal Microscopy

12/15-LOX is required for TXA2-induced platelet activation and hemostasis (A–C) Eight-weeks-old WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were subjected to measurement of body weight (A), tail bleeding time (B), and whole blood clotting time (C) ( n = 10). (D) Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 (1 μM) for the indicated periods at RT and photographed. The percentage of clot retraction and extruded serum volume were calculated as described in the methods ( n = 3). (E) Wahed platelets were plated onto fibrinogen-coated coverslips and after 1 h stained with phalloidin and DAPI and observed under a Zeiss inverted microscope (Axiovision Observer.z1; 40×/NA 0.6). The pictures were captured by a Zeiss AxioCam MRm camera using the microscope operating and image analysis software ZEN 2.6. (F) Washed platelets from WT mice were labeled with calcein acetoxymethyl ester (10 μM) for 30 min and placed onto fibrinogen-coated wells in a 96-well plate. Platelets were then incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 at the indicated concentrations for 30 min, washed with PBS and the bound platelets were lysed with lysis buffer and the fluorescence intensity was measured at 494 excitation and 517 emission ( n = 3). (G) PRP from WT mice treated with and without F 2 -TXA2 at the indicated concentrations was subjected to aggregation assay in an aggregometer ( n = 3). (H) Washed platelets from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were subjected adhesion assay as shown in panel F ( n = 3). (I) PRP from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice with and without the indicated treatments were subjected to aggregation assay in an aggregometer ( n = 3). (J) Washed platelets from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 for 30 min and plated onto fibrinogen-coated coverslips for 1 h. Platelets were then fixed, permeabilized, and stained with phalloidin to visualize F-actin, and pictures were captured. (K and L) Platelets from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 (1 μM) for indicated time periods, and RNA and protein extracts were prepared and analyzed by qRT-PCR (K) and western blotting (L) for 12-LOX, 12/15-LOX and β-actin mRNA and protein levels using their specific primers or antibodies, respectively ( n = 3). (M) Platelets from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were treated with and without F 2 -TXA2 for 30 min, and protein extracts were prepared and analyzed by western blotting for the levels of phospho and total eIF4E and 4EBP1 using their specific antibodies ( n = 3). (N) All the conditions were the same as in panel M except that the extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-4EBP1 antibody, and the immunocomplexes were analyzed by western blotting for eIF4E and normalized for 4EBP1. The input protein was analyzed for β-actin levels. (O and P) Platelets from WT mice were incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 in the presence and absence of rapamycin (100 nM) or torin1 (100 nM) for 30 min, and protein extracts were analyzed by western blotting for p4EBP1, 4EBP1, 12/15-LOX, and β-actin levels using their specific antibodies ( n = 3). (Q) Platelets from WT mice and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were assessed for 12(S)-HETE levels using a kit from Cayman ( n = 7). (R–W) Platelets from WT mice and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were treated with and without U46619 (1 μM) or ADP (40 μM) for 30 min and 12(S)-HETE levels were measured (R and U) ( n = 7) or subjected to adhesion assay (S and V) ( n = 3) or aggregation assay (T and W) ( n = 3). All data are presented as mean ± SD and analyzed by paired Student’s t test. ∗ p < 0.01 versus WT mice or control; # p < 0.01 versus F 2 -TXA2 or WT + F 2 -TXA2 or U46619. Scale bars: 10 μm in (E) and (J).

Journal: iScience

Article Title: Alox15 via H 2 O 2 mediates TP receptor palmitoylation and its membrane trafficking leading to platelet activation

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.114796

Figure Lengend Snippet: 12/15-LOX is required for TXA2-induced platelet activation and hemostasis (A–C) Eight-weeks-old WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were subjected to measurement of body weight (A), tail bleeding time (B), and whole blood clotting time (C) ( n = 10). (D) Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 (1 μM) for the indicated periods at RT and photographed. The percentage of clot retraction and extruded serum volume were calculated as described in the methods ( n = 3). (E) Wahed platelets were plated onto fibrinogen-coated coverslips and after 1 h stained with phalloidin and DAPI and observed under a Zeiss inverted microscope (Axiovision Observer.z1; 40×/NA 0.6). The pictures were captured by a Zeiss AxioCam MRm camera using the microscope operating and image analysis software ZEN 2.6. (F) Washed platelets from WT mice were labeled with calcein acetoxymethyl ester (10 μM) for 30 min and placed onto fibrinogen-coated wells in a 96-well plate. Platelets were then incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 at the indicated concentrations for 30 min, washed with PBS and the bound platelets were lysed with lysis buffer and the fluorescence intensity was measured at 494 excitation and 517 emission ( n = 3). (G) PRP from WT mice treated with and without F 2 -TXA2 at the indicated concentrations was subjected to aggregation assay in an aggregometer ( n = 3). (H) Washed platelets from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were subjected adhesion assay as shown in panel F ( n = 3). (I) PRP from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice with and without the indicated treatments were subjected to aggregation assay in an aggregometer ( n = 3). (J) Washed platelets from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 for 30 min and plated onto fibrinogen-coated coverslips for 1 h. Platelets were then fixed, permeabilized, and stained with phalloidin to visualize F-actin, and pictures were captured. (K and L) Platelets from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 (1 μM) for indicated time periods, and RNA and protein extracts were prepared and analyzed by qRT-PCR (K) and western blotting (L) for 12-LOX, 12/15-LOX and β-actin mRNA and protein levels using their specific primers or antibodies, respectively ( n = 3). (M) Platelets from WT and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were treated with and without F 2 -TXA2 for 30 min, and protein extracts were prepared and analyzed by western blotting for the levels of phospho and total eIF4E and 4EBP1 using their specific antibodies ( n = 3). (N) All the conditions were the same as in panel M except that the extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-4EBP1 antibody, and the immunocomplexes were analyzed by western blotting for eIF4E and normalized for 4EBP1. The input protein was analyzed for β-actin levels. (O and P) Platelets from WT mice were incubated with and without F 2 -TXA2 in the presence and absence of rapamycin (100 nM) or torin1 (100 nM) for 30 min, and protein extracts were analyzed by western blotting for p4EBP1, 4EBP1, 12/15-LOX, and β-actin levels using their specific antibodies ( n = 3). (Q) Platelets from WT mice and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were assessed for 12(S)-HETE levels using a kit from Cayman ( n = 7). (R–W) Platelets from WT mice and 12/15-LOX −/− mice were treated with and without U46619 (1 μM) or ADP (40 μM) for 30 min and 12(S)-HETE levels were measured (R and U) ( n = 7) or subjected to adhesion assay (S and V) ( n = 3) or aggregation assay (T and W) ( n = 3). All data are presented as mean ± SD and analyzed by paired Student’s t test. ∗ p < 0.01 versus WT mice or control; # p < 0.01 versus F 2 -TXA2 or WT + F 2 -TXA2 or U46619. Scale bars: 10 μm in (E) and (J).

Article Snippet: Anti-eIF4E antibody , Santa Cruz Biotechnology , sc-9976.

Techniques: Activation Assay, Coagulation, Clinical Proteomics, Incubation, Staining, Inverted Microscopy, Microscopy, Software, Labeling, Lysis, Fluorescence, Cell Adhesion Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Control