ddx6 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Proteintech)
Structured Review

Ddx6 Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 27 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ddx6 rabbit polyclonal antibody/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 27 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Contrastive learning of dynamic processing body formation reveals undefined mechanisms of approved compounds"
Article Title: Contrastive learning of dynamic processing body formation reveals undefined mechanisms of approved compounds
Journal: iScience
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.114866
Figure Legend Snippet: Overview of PB-scope: an unsupervised deep learning-based framework for large-scale phenotypic screening on P-bodies (A) HCT116 cells stably expressing DDX6-GFP were plated in 96-well plates, treated with 280 compounds at 10 μM concentrations, and subjected to high-content imaging using the CQ1 confocal quantitative imaging system. (B) The analyzed images consist of four channels: (1) bright-field image for cellular morphology, (2) mitochondrial network, (3) processing body, and (4) nucleus. Merged composite demonstrates spatial relationships between these subcellular compartments. Scale bar, 10 μm. (C) Mitochondrial channels were processed through Cellpose 3.0 to generate a curated dataset containing over 400,000 high-quality single-cell images. (D) A contrastive clustering framework was implemented for unsupervised feature extraction, followed by UMAP dimensionality reduction to identify compounds with analogous mechanism-of-action (MOA) profiles through cluster localization analysis. (E) Quantitative analysis of P-body formation followed by drug treatment. (F) Mechanistic evaluation of lead compounds via imaging analysis.
Techniques Used: Stable Transfection, Expressing, Imaging, Single Cell, Extraction
Figure Legend Snippet: Quantification and mechanisms of action analysis of selected drugs (A) A simulation model of intracellular P-body was constructed to generate synthetic P-body distributions with ground truth annotations. (B) A YOLO-v7 architecture trained on synthetic datasets was implemented for automated identification and quantitative analysis of P-body formation. (C) Example of P-body detection, achieving >95% agreement with manual annotations . (D) P-body numbers per cell in the time course under different drug treatment groups. (E) DDX6-GFP intensity (a.u.) per cell under different drug treatment groups. Error bars represent the STD of three independent analyses for (D) and (E). (F) Quantitative analysis of P-body numbers at 6 h post-treatment across different drug groups. (G) Quantitative analysis of DDX6-GFP intensity (a.u.) at 6 h post-treatment across different drug groups. The p -values were determined using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test for (F) and (G). The statistical significance compared with DMSO was indicated as ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗ p < 0.05; ns, no significant difference. Data points that lay outside the 15%–85% range were deemed outliers and excluded from the statistical analysis. (H and I) Mechanism of action (MOA) profiling for drugs in Groups 1 and 3.
Techniques Used: Construct, Two Tailed Test, MANN-WHITNEY
Figure Legend Snippet: Perturbation of JAK leads to enhanced P-bodies (A) HCT116 cells were knocked down using JAK1 and JAK2 siRNA, and immunostained for P-body components DDX6 (magenta) and EDC4 (green). The nuclei were visualized with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm. (B) Quantification of P-body number per cell across three experimental groups. Statistical significance determined by an unpaired t test was indicated as ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (C) Model of JAK-STAT signaling pathway-mediated P-body regulation. JAK is activated when cytokines or growth factors bind to their respective receptors, leading to receptor dimerization, JAK and STAT phosphorylation, and subsequent transcriptional regulation. Inhibition of the pathway by knockdown of JAK1/2 leads induction of P-body formation. (D) Summary of JAK inhibitors identified in this work that modulate P-body formation.
Techniques Used: Phospho-proteomics, Inhibition, Knockdown
![a Schematic representation of in vitro and in vivo CRISPR screenings. Created in BioRender. Bi, H. (2025) https://BioRender.com/5y4p2p4 . b – d The normalized median CRISPR scores of the 101 genes in vitro CRISPR screening with Mono-mac-6 AML cells ( b ), in vitro CRISPR screening with AML PDX cells ( c ), and in vivo CRISPR screening with AML PDX mouse model ( d ). e – g Normalized CRISPR scores of the top 5 overlapped genes in vitro CRISPR screening with Mono-mac-6 AML cells ( e ), in vitro CRISPR screening with AML PDX cells ( f ), and in vivo CRISPR screening with AML PDX mouse model ( g ). Data are the mean ± SEM of n = 24 (Positive control), 40 (Negative control), and 20 ( EIF5A , <t>DDX6</t> , CNOT3 , EIF4E , PABPC1 ) independent sgRNAs. Simple one-way ANOVA. Box plots show the median (center line), the first and third quartiles (bounds of the box). Whiskers are chosen to show 1.5 of the Interquartile Range. h The PS-Self scores of the top 5 RBPs. PS-Self: self-assembling phase-separating. i The PS-Part score of the top 5 RBPs. PS-Part: partner-dependent phase-separating. j Representative images showing the impact of KO of CNOT3, EIF4E, PABPC1 , and DDX6 on PB assembly in Mono-mac-6 AML cells. Green: Dcp1b. k Statistical results of PB numbers in Mono-mac-6 AML cells following CNOT3, EIF4E, PABPC1 , and DDX6 KO (n = 11 [sgNS]; 12 [sg DDX6 ], or 13 [sg PABPC1 , sg CNOT3 , and sg EIF4E ]). l Relative expression levels of DDX6 in various AML subtypes compared to healthy controls. m , n Protein levels of DDX6 in AML cells ( m ), PDX cells ( n ), and healthy controls. o Relative growth of Mono-mac-6 AML cells following DDX6 KO. p Relative growth of AML PDX cells following DDX6 KO and overexpression (OE). sg DDX6 -1 was utilized for ( j and p ). o and p : mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments); m and n: n = 3 independent experiments with consistent results; Unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was utilized for all analyses. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_3633/pmc12783633/pmc12783633__41467_2025_66966_Fig1_HTML.jpg)