Review



rabbit anti cpap  (Proteintech)


Bioz Verified Symbol Proteintech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Proteintech rabbit anti cpap
    CPAP was detected on endosomes in quiescent and EGF-treated cells, and its co-localization with ESCRT proteins increased during EVT HeLa cells were treated with untagged EGF for different time points, stained with AF488-linked sheep anti-EEA antibody, rabbit <t>anti-CPAP,</t> and mouse anti-HRS, or -TSG101 primary antibodies, followed by AF647- and AF568-linked anti-rabbit and -mouse secondary antibodies, and imaged using Lightning super-resolution microscopy. (A) Two-color co-localization. Left: single Z-plane of images showing EEA1 and CPAP staining of representative cells. Right: co-localization (yellow) was quantified by determining the percentages of EEA1-positive (green) puncta containing CPAP (red) puncta in representative single Z-planes of each cell and quantified from multiple cells across at least three experiments. (B) Three-color co-localization. Left: representative single Z-plane of images showing co-localization of CPAP, along with HRS or TSG101, on EEA1-positive puncta. Right: triple co-localization (white) was quantified by determining the percentages of EEA1-positive (green) puncta containing CPAP (red) and HRS/TSG101 (magenta) puncta in representative single Z-planes of each cell and quantified from multiple cells across at least three experiments. Zoomed images correspond to the dashed inset boxes of the indicated images. Scale bars: 10 μm. p values: ∗<0.05, ∗∗<0.01, ∗∗∗<0.001, ∗∗∗∗<0.0001 by unpaired nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Note: (A) and (B) present data from the same experiments where 4-color imaging was done and convey information on two different aspects based on three or four markers at a time. Since the visuals of the same cell can help with more reliable interpretation of the data, images of the same cell were used, where possible, for (A) and (B) with the same or different pseudo-color. Hence, duplication of some sub-images among (A) and (B) is intentional.
    Rabbit Anti Cpap, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti cpap/product/Proteintech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti cpap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Centrosomal P4.1-associated protein is a novel regulator of ESCRT pathway function during endosome maturation"

    Article Title: Centrosomal P4.1-associated protein is a novel regulator of ESCRT pathway function during endosome maturation

    Journal: iScience

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.114659

    CPAP was detected on endosomes in quiescent and EGF-treated cells, and its co-localization with ESCRT proteins increased during EVT HeLa cells were treated with untagged EGF for different time points, stained with AF488-linked sheep anti-EEA antibody, rabbit anti-CPAP, and mouse anti-HRS, or -TSG101 primary antibodies, followed by AF647- and AF568-linked anti-rabbit and -mouse secondary antibodies, and imaged using Lightning super-resolution microscopy. (A) Two-color co-localization. Left: single Z-plane of images showing EEA1 and CPAP staining of representative cells. Right: co-localization (yellow) was quantified by determining the percentages of EEA1-positive (green) puncta containing CPAP (red) puncta in representative single Z-planes of each cell and quantified from multiple cells across at least three experiments. (B) Three-color co-localization. Left: representative single Z-plane of images showing co-localization of CPAP, along with HRS or TSG101, on EEA1-positive puncta. Right: triple co-localization (white) was quantified by determining the percentages of EEA1-positive (green) puncta containing CPAP (red) and HRS/TSG101 (magenta) puncta in representative single Z-planes of each cell and quantified from multiple cells across at least three experiments. Zoomed images correspond to the dashed inset boxes of the indicated images. Scale bars: 10 μm. p values: ∗<0.05, ∗∗<0.01, ∗∗∗<0.001, ∗∗∗∗<0.0001 by unpaired nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Note: (A) and (B) present data from the same experiments where 4-color imaging was done and convey information on two different aspects based on three or four markers at a time. Since the visuals of the same cell can help with more reliable interpretation of the data, images of the same cell were used, where possible, for (A) and (B) with the same or different pseudo-color. Hence, duplication of some sub-images among (A) and (B) is intentional.
    Figure Legend Snippet: CPAP was detected on endosomes in quiescent and EGF-treated cells, and its co-localization with ESCRT proteins increased during EVT HeLa cells were treated with untagged EGF for different time points, stained with AF488-linked sheep anti-EEA antibody, rabbit anti-CPAP, and mouse anti-HRS, or -TSG101 primary antibodies, followed by AF647- and AF568-linked anti-rabbit and -mouse secondary antibodies, and imaged using Lightning super-resolution microscopy. (A) Two-color co-localization. Left: single Z-plane of images showing EEA1 and CPAP staining of representative cells. Right: co-localization (yellow) was quantified by determining the percentages of EEA1-positive (green) puncta containing CPAP (red) puncta in representative single Z-planes of each cell and quantified from multiple cells across at least three experiments. (B) Three-color co-localization. Left: representative single Z-plane of images showing co-localization of CPAP, along with HRS or TSG101, on EEA1-positive puncta. Right: triple co-localization (white) was quantified by determining the percentages of EEA1-positive (green) puncta containing CPAP (red) and HRS/TSG101 (magenta) puncta in representative single Z-planes of each cell and quantified from multiple cells across at least three experiments. Zoomed images correspond to the dashed inset boxes of the indicated images. Scale bars: 10 μm. p values: ∗<0.05, ∗∗<0.01, ∗∗∗<0.001, ∗∗∗∗<0.0001 by unpaired nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Note: (A) and (B) present data from the same experiments where 4-color imaging was done and convey information on two different aspects based on three or four markers at a time. Since the visuals of the same cell can help with more reliable interpretation of the data, images of the same cell were used, where possible, for (A) and (B) with the same or different pseudo-color. Hence, duplication of some sub-images among (A) and (B) is intentional.

    Techniques Used: Staining, Super-Resolution Microscopy, MANN-WHITNEY, Imaging



    Similar Products

    99
    ATCC b16 b cpap cal 62 hela mcf 7 skbr 3 tc 1 a549
    B16 B Cpap Cal 62 Hela Mcf 7 Skbr 3 Tc 1 A549, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/b16 b cpap cal 62 hela mcf 7 skbr 3 tc 1 a549/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    b16 b cpap cal 62 hela mcf 7 skbr 3 tc 1 a549 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH bcpap
    Bcpap, supplied by CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/bcpap/product/CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bcpap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Philips Healthcare cpap machine
    Cpap Machine, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cpap machine/product/Philips Healthcare
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cpap machine - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH b-cpap cells
    B Cpap Cells, supplied by CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/b-cpap cells/product/CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    b-cpap cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Vyaire Medical Inc cpap
    Cpap, supplied by Vyaire Medical Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cpap/product/Vyaire Medical Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cpap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    DSMZ papillary thyroid cancer cell line bcpap
    Papillary Thyroid Cancer Cell Line Bcpap, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/papillary thyroid cancer cell line bcpap/product/DSMZ
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    papillary thyroid cancer cell line bcpap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    DSMZ bcpap homozygous mutated braf v600e cell line
    (A) Immunobloting of pPDPK1, PDPK1, pMEK, and MEK in thyroid cancer lines: papillary thyroid cancer (PTC, brown color) (TPC1), follicular thyroid cancer (FTC, blue color) (FTC-133 and FTC-236), poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC, green color) (BCPAP), BRAF wild type anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) (red color) (C643 and THJ29T), BRAF <t>V600E–mutant</t> ATC (8505C, SW1736, and THJ16T), and HEK293 cells using β-actin as a loading control. The relative ratio of pPDPK1 to total PDPK1 and pMEK to total MEK is listed below each phospho-protein compared to HEK293 cells. (B) Immunoblotting of phosphoPDPK1, total PDPK1 in untreated and dabrafenib (Dab) and trametinib–treated patient derived ATC and normal thyroid tissues using β-actin as a loading control. The relative ratio of pPDPK1 to total PDPK1 and pMEK to total MEK is listed below each phospho-protein compared to normal thyroid tissue. (C–D) Dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation with BX795 treatment in 8505C and SW1736 cells after 48 h. (E–F) Dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation with Dab treatment in 8505C and SW1736 ATC cells after 48 h. (G–H) Analysis of the combination index (CI) using the CompuSyn software for BX795, Dab, and their combination in BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cell lines. CI < 1 indicates synergism, and fa denotes fraction affected. (I–J) The effect of BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), and their combination on cellular proliferation in 8505C and SW1736 cells after 48 h. (K–L) Colony-formation assay in 8505C and SW1736 cells treated with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination. Quantification was performed using ImageJ. (M–N) Cellular migration as measured with a wound-healing assay in 8505C and SW1736 cells treated with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination. Quantification was performed using the ImageJ software. (O–P) Concentration-dependent effects of BX795 treatment on proliferation of patient-derived ATC cells (ATC01 and ATC02). ATC01 was derived from a treatment-naïve patient tumor positive for BRAF V600E mutation, and ATC02 was derived from a residual tumor in a patient with an exceptional treatment response to Dab and trametinib, and the tumor was positive for BRAF V600E mutation. (Q–R) The effects of treatment with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination on the proliferation of patient-derived ATC cells (ATC01 and ATC02). (S) The effect of treatment with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination on ATC spheroids in BRAF V600E–mutant in the 8505C and SW1736 cell lines. (T) The effect of treatment with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination on patient-derived ATC spheroids (ATC01 and ATC02). All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.
    Bcpap Homozygous Mutated Braf V600e Cell Line, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/bcpap homozygous mutated braf v600e cell line/product/DSMZ
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bcpap homozygous mutated braf v600e cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech rabbit anti cpap
    CPAP was detected on endosomes in quiescent and EGF-treated cells, and its co-localization with ESCRT proteins increased during EVT HeLa cells were treated with untagged EGF for different time points, stained with AF488-linked sheep anti-EEA antibody, rabbit <t>anti-CPAP,</t> and mouse anti-HRS, or -TSG101 primary antibodies, followed by AF647- and AF568-linked anti-rabbit and -mouse secondary antibodies, and imaged using Lightning super-resolution microscopy. (A) Two-color co-localization. Left: single Z-plane of images showing EEA1 and CPAP staining of representative cells. Right: co-localization (yellow) was quantified by determining the percentages of EEA1-positive (green) puncta containing CPAP (red) puncta in representative single Z-planes of each cell and quantified from multiple cells across at least three experiments. (B) Three-color co-localization. Left: representative single Z-plane of images showing co-localization of CPAP, along with HRS or TSG101, on EEA1-positive puncta. Right: triple co-localization (white) was quantified by determining the percentages of EEA1-positive (green) puncta containing CPAP (red) and HRS/TSG101 (magenta) puncta in representative single Z-planes of each cell and quantified from multiple cells across at least three experiments. Zoomed images correspond to the dashed inset boxes of the indicated images. Scale bars: 10 μm. p values: ∗<0.05, ∗∗<0.01, ∗∗∗<0.001, ∗∗∗∗<0.0001 by unpaired nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Note: (A) and (B) present data from the same experiments where 4-color imaging was done and convey information on two different aspects based on three or four markers at a time. Since the visuals of the same cell can help with more reliable interpretation of the data, images of the same cell were used, where possible, for (A) and (B) with the same or different pseudo-color. Hence, duplication of some sub-images among (A) and (B) is intentional.
    Rabbit Anti Cpap, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti cpap/product/Proteintech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti cpap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Immunobloting of pPDPK1, PDPK1, pMEK, and MEK in thyroid cancer lines: papillary thyroid cancer (PTC, brown color) (TPC1), follicular thyroid cancer (FTC, blue color) (FTC-133 and FTC-236), poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC, green color) (BCPAP), BRAF wild type anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) (red color) (C643 and THJ29T), BRAF V600E–mutant ATC (8505C, SW1736, and THJ16T), and HEK293 cells using β-actin as a loading control. The relative ratio of pPDPK1 to total PDPK1 and pMEK to total MEK is listed below each phospho-protein compared to HEK293 cells. (B) Immunoblotting of phosphoPDPK1, total PDPK1 in untreated and dabrafenib (Dab) and trametinib–treated patient derived ATC and normal thyroid tissues using β-actin as a loading control. The relative ratio of pPDPK1 to total PDPK1 and pMEK to total MEK is listed below each phospho-protein compared to normal thyroid tissue. (C–D) Dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation with BX795 treatment in 8505C and SW1736 cells after 48 h. (E–F) Dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation with Dab treatment in 8505C and SW1736 ATC cells after 48 h. (G–H) Analysis of the combination index (CI) using the CompuSyn software for BX795, Dab, and their combination in BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cell lines. CI < 1 indicates synergism, and fa denotes fraction affected. (I–J) The effect of BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), and their combination on cellular proliferation in 8505C and SW1736 cells after 48 h. (K–L) Colony-formation assay in 8505C and SW1736 cells treated with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination. Quantification was performed using ImageJ. (M–N) Cellular migration as measured with a wound-healing assay in 8505C and SW1736 cells treated with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination. Quantification was performed using the ImageJ software. (O–P) Concentration-dependent effects of BX795 treatment on proliferation of patient-derived ATC cells (ATC01 and ATC02). ATC01 was derived from a treatment-naïve patient tumor positive for BRAF V600E mutation, and ATC02 was derived from a residual tumor in a patient with an exceptional treatment response to Dab and trametinib, and the tumor was positive for BRAF V600E mutation. (Q–R) The effects of treatment with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination on the proliferation of patient-derived ATC cells (ATC01 and ATC02). (S) The effect of treatment with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination on ATC spheroids in BRAF V600E–mutant in the 8505C and SW1736 cell lines. (T) The effect of treatment with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination on patient-derived ATC spheroids (ATC01 and ATC02). All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Dual targeting of PDPK1 and BRAF V600E is synthetically lethal

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.15.711663

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Immunobloting of pPDPK1, PDPK1, pMEK, and MEK in thyroid cancer lines: papillary thyroid cancer (PTC, brown color) (TPC1), follicular thyroid cancer (FTC, blue color) (FTC-133 and FTC-236), poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC, green color) (BCPAP), BRAF wild type anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) (red color) (C643 and THJ29T), BRAF V600E–mutant ATC (8505C, SW1736, and THJ16T), and HEK293 cells using β-actin as a loading control. The relative ratio of pPDPK1 to total PDPK1 and pMEK to total MEK is listed below each phospho-protein compared to HEK293 cells. (B) Immunoblotting of phosphoPDPK1, total PDPK1 in untreated and dabrafenib (Dab) and trametinib–treated patient derived ATC and normal thyroid tissues using β-actin as a loading control. The relative ratio of pPDPK1 to total PDPK1 and pMEK to total MEK is listed below each phospho-protein compared to normal thyroid tissue. (C–D) Dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation with BX795 treatment in 8505C and SW1736 cells after 48 h. (E–F) Dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation with Dab treatment in 8505C and SW1736 ATC cells after 48 h. (G–H) Analysis of the combination index (CI) using the CompuSyn software for BX795, Dab, and their combination in BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cell lines. CI < 1 indicates synergism, and fa denotes fraction affected. (I–J) The effect of BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), and their combination on cellular proliferation in 8505C and SW1736 cells after 48 h. (K–L) Colony-formation assay in 8505C and SW1736 cells treated with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination. Quantification was performed using ImageJ. (M–N) Cellular migration as measured with a wound-healing assay in 8505C and SW1736 cells treated with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination. Quantification was performed using the ImageJ software. (O–P) Concentration-dependent effects of BX795 treatment on proliferation of patient-derived ATC cells (ATC01 and ATC02). ATC01 was derived from a treatment-naïve patient tumor positive for BRAF V600E mutation, and ATC02 was derived from a residual tumor in a patient with an exceptional treatment response to Dab and trametinib, and the tumor was positive for BRAF V600E mutation. (Q–R) The effects of treatment with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination on the proliferation of patient-derived ATC cells (ATC01 and ATC02). (S) The effect of treatment with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination on ATC spheroids in BRAF V600E–mutant in the 8505C and SW1736 cell lines. (T) The effect of treatment with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination on patient-derived ATC spheroids (ATC01 and ATC02). All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: The BCPAP (homozygous mutated BRAF V600E) cell line was purchased from Leibniz Institute DSMZ (Lower Saxony, Germany).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Mutagenesis, Control, Derivative Assay, Inhibition, Software, Colony Assay, Migration, Wound Healing Assay, Concentration Assay, Standard Deviation

    (A) Mutated BRAF V600E ATC cells (8505C) were treated for 48 h with BX795 (2.5 µM), dabrafenib (Dab) (2.5 µM), or their combination. Then, total and phosphorylated protein levels were measured using mass spectrometry. (A–C) The volcano plots show significantly upregulated proteins in red, significantly downregulated proteins in blue (p < 0.05), and non-significant proteins in gray. The x-axis represents log 2 fold change, and the y-axis shows –log 10 (p-value). The dashed lines indicate thresholds for statistical significance and fold change. (D) The Venn diagrams shows shared and treatment-specific differentially expressed proteins and phosphorylated proteins across the treatment groups (p < 0.05). The overlapping regions represent a conserved core proteomic response, while the non-overlapping regions indicate pathway-specific effects of PDPK1 or BRAF inhibition. (E–G) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of ranked phosphorylated site changes following BX795 (E), Dab (F), or combination (G) treatment. The bar plots show normalized enrichment scores (NES) for Hallmark Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) signaling pathways. (H) Western blot analysis of the effect of BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or combination treatment on BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cell lines (8505C and SW1736) after 48 h. pMEK, total MEK, pAKT 308 , total AKT, pPDPK1 S241 , PARP-1, BCL2, and caspase-3 protein levels are shown, with β-actin used as a loading control. (I) Flow cytometry results of Annexin V/PI staining with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or combination treatment. (J) Western blot analysis of apoptosis regulatory proteins 40 h after treatment. pBAD S112 , BAD, BCL2, pGSK3β Ser9 , GSK3β, and the double-stranded DNA damage marker pH2AX S139 are shown, with β-actin used as a loading control. Protein band density was measured and normalized to β-actin. The phosphorylated to total protein ratios were measured, and the values are listed above the phosphoprotein band. Protein band density of BCL-xL and pH2AX S139 were also measured and normalized to β-actin. (K) Immunoprecipitation of BCL-xL and BCL2 with BAD 30 h after treatment with BX795 and Dab in BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cell lines. Protein band density was measured and normalized to the input protein band. The ratio of immunoprecipitated to total input protein was measured and is listed below the protein blot. P = phosphorylation. The superscript indicates the amino acid phosphorylation site. (L) The heatmap shows z-scored log 2 -transformed abundance of apoptosis-related proteins for the BX795, Dab, and combination treatment groups in 8505C ATC cells. The proteins are displayed in sequential order—BAD, TNFRSF10A, PARP1, FAS, BID, CASP3, CASP8, BAX, CASP9, CASP7, BCL2L1, and BAK1—with hierarchical clustering applied to the rows. (M) The effect of BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or combination treatment for 16 h on γH2AX foci formation in the 8505C and SW1736 ATC cell lines using immunofluorescence. γH2AX was labelled with Alexa Fluor™ 546 secondary antibody, with DAPI used for nuclear staining. A Zeiss LSM 800 confocal microscope was used to examine the cells (400× magnification). The number of foci per cell was quantified using ImageJ. All data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean of 25 cells. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p < 0.0001. (N) Western blot analysis of the effect of BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or combination treatment for 16 h on DNA damage–dependent proteins (pATM, total ATM, pCHK2, Total CHK2, and pCHK1). β-Actin was used as a loading control. (O) Cell cycle analysis after BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or combination treatment for 16 h in BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cell lines (8505C and SW1736). Cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI) and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. The DNA content was measured, 2N (diploid) and 4N (tetraploid), based on the PI-stained DNA content. (P) The effect of BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or combination treatment for 16 h on DNA repair proteins—cyclin D, cyclin B, pcdc25c, pCDK1, total CDK1, pH3A, H3A, and cyclin A2—by immunoblotting. β-actin was used as a loading control. The ratio of phospho-H3A to total H3A was measured and is listed below the phospho-H3A protein band. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. (Q) Analysis of the effect of combination BX795 (2.5 µM) and Dab (2.5 µM) treatment for 16 h followed by proteasomal degradation inhibition for 6 h (MG132, 10 µM). Protein band density was measured and normalized to β-actin. (R) The heatmap shows z-scored log2-transformed phosphorylation levels of DNA damage response, DNA repair, and cell-cycle regulatory proteins for the BX795, Dab, and combination treatment groups in 8505C ATC cell line. Proteins are displayed in sequential order as RAD50, CDK1, MCM2, PRKDC, RB1, TP53BP1, TP53, XRCC1, XRCC5, LIG1, MDC1, and MSH6, with supervised hierarchical clustering applied to the rows. The color scale represents relative protein levels (red = higher; blue = lower).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Dual targeting of PDPK1 and BRAF V600E is synthetically lethal

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.15.711663

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Mutated BRAF V600E ATC cells (8505C) were treated for 48 h with BX795 (2.5 µM), dabrafenib (Dab) (2.5 µM), or their combination. Then, total and phosphorylated protein levels were measured using mass spectrometry. (A–C) The volcano plots show significantly upregulated proteins in red, significantly downregulated proteins in blue (p < 0.05), and non-significant proteins in gray. The x-axis represents log 2 fold change, and the y-axis shows –log 10 (p-value). The dashed lines indicate thresholds for statistical significance and fold change. (D) The Venn diagrams shows shared and treatment-specific differentially expressed proteins and phosphorylated proteins across the treatment groups (p < 0.05). The overlapping regions represent a conserved core proteomic response, while the non-overlapping regions indicate pathway-specific effects of PDPK1 or BRAF inhibition. (E–G) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of ranked phosphorylated site changes following BX795 (E), Dab (F), or combination (G) treatment. The bar plots show normalized enrichment scores (NES) for Hallmark Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) signaling pathways. (H) Western blot analysis of the effect of BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or combination treatment on BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cell lines (8505C and SW1736) after 48 h. pMEK, total MEK, pAKT 308 , total AKT, pPDPK1 S241 , PARP-1, BCL2, and caspase-3 protein levels are shown, with β-actin used as a loading control. (I) Flow cytometry results of Annexin V/PI staining with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or combination treatment. (J) Western blot analysis of apoptosis regulatory proteins 40 h after treatment. pBAD S112 , BAD, BCL2, pGSK3β Ser9 , GSK3β, and the double-stranded DNA damage marker pH2AX S139 are shown, with β-actin used as a loading control. Protein band density was measured and normalized to β-actin. The phosphorylated to total protein ratios were measured, and the values are listed above the phosphoprotein band. Protein band density of BCL-xL and pH2AX S139 were also measured and normalized to β-actin. (K) Immunoprecipitation of BCL-xL and BCL2 with BAD 30 h after treatment with BX795 and Dab in BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cell lines. Protein band density was measured and normalized to the input protein band. The ratio of immunoprecipitated to total input protein was measured and is listed below the protein blot. P = phosphorylation. The superscript indicates the amino acid phosphorylation site. (L) The heatmap shows z-scored log 2 -transformed abundance of apoptosis-related proteins for the BX795, Dab, and combination treatment groups in 8505C ATC cells. The proteins are displayed in sequential order—BAD, TNFRSF10A, PARP1, FAS, BID, CASP3, CASP8, BAX, CASP9, CASP7, BCL2L1, and BAK1—with hierarchical clustering applied to the rows. (M) The effect of BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or combination treatment for 16 h on γH2AX foci formation in the 8505C and SW1736 ATC cell lines using immunofluorescence. γH2AX was labelled with Alexa Fluor™ 546 secondary antibody, with DAPI used for nuclear staining. A Zeiss LSM 800 confocal microscope was used to examine the cells (400× magnification). The number of foci per cell was quantified using ImageJ. All data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean of 25 cells. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p < 0.0001. (N) Western blot analysis of the effect of BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or combination treatment for 16 h on DNA damage–dependent proteins (pATM, total ATM, pCHK2, Total CHK2, and pCHK1). β-Actin was used as a loading control. (O) Cell cycle analysis after BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or combination treatment for 16 h in BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cell lines (8505C and SW1736). Cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI) and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. The DNA content was measured, 2N (diploid) and 4N (tetraploid), based on the PI-stained DNA content. (P) The effect of BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or combination treatment for 16 h on DNA repair proteins—cyclin D, cyclin B, pcdc25c, pCDK1, total CDK1, pH3A, H3A, and cyclin A2—by immunoblotting. β-actin was used as a loading control. The ratio of phospho-H3A to total H3A was measured and is listed below the phospho-H3A protein band. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. (Q) Analysis of the effect of combination BX795 (2.5 µM) and Dab (2.5 µM) treatment for 16 h followed by proteasomal degradation inhibition for 6 h (MG132, 10 µM). Protein band density was measured and normalized to β-actin. (R) The heatmap shows z-scored log2-transformed phosphorylation levels of DNA damage response, DNA repair, and cell-cycle regulatory proteins for the BX795, Dab, and combination treatment groups in 8505C ATC cell line. Proteins are displayed in sequential order as RAD50, CDK1, MCM2, PRKDC, RB1, TP53BP1, TP53, XRCC1, XRCC5, LIG1, MDC1, and MSH6, with supervised hierarchical clustering applied to the rows. The color scale represents relative protein levels (red = higher; blue = lower).

    Article Snippet: The BCPAP (homozygous mutated BRAF V600E) cell line was purchased from Leibniz Institute DSMZ (Lower Saxony, Germany).

    Techniques: Mass Spectrometry, Inhibition, Protein-Protein interactions, Western Blot, Mutagenesis, Control, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Marker, Immunoprecipitation, Phospho-proteomics, Transformation Assay, Immunofluorescence, Microscopy, Cell Cycle Assay, Fluorescence, FACS, Standard Deviation

    Mutated BRAF V600E cell were treated with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination. (A) Total cellular ROS was measured using the DCFH-DA fluorescent dye and quantified with flow cytometry. (B) Mitochondrial superoxide was measured based on MitoSOX red fluorescence, quantified with flow cytometry. (C–D) The mitochondrial content was assessed by MitoTracker green fluorescence, as quantified by flow cytometry and visualized with live-cell confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 800, 400× magnification). (E) The mitochondrial membrane potential was evaluated by TMRM (100 nM) fluorescence and analyzed by flow cytometry. (F) The oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was measured using a Seahorse analyzer with sequential injections of oligomycin (Oligo), 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP), and antimycin A plus rotenone (Rot+AA). The data were normalized to the total protein content, and maximal respiration and adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-linked respiration were quantified accordingly. (G) The heatmap shows z-scored log 2 -transformed abundance of proteins associated with mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, mitochondrial ribosomal, transport, and mitochondrial dynamics–associated proteins in 8505C ATC cells treated with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination. The proteins include representatives of electron transport chain complexes I–V (NDUF subunits, SDHA–D, UQCRC1/2, COX subunits, and ATP5 subunits), TCA cycle enzymes (IDH1, IDH2, IDH3, FH, OGDH, DLST, CS, MDH2, and PDHA1/PDHB), mitochondrial transport and structure (TOMM20, TIMM23, VDAC1–3, MFN1, OPA1, DNM1L), and mitochondrial genome maintenance (TFAM). Hierarchical clustering was applied to the rows. The color scale represents relative protein abundance (red = higher; blue = lower). All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Dual targeting of PDPK1 and BRAF V600E is synthetically lethal

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.15.711663

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Mutated BRAF V600E cell were treated with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination. (A) Total cellular ROS was measured using the DCFH-DA fluorescent dye and quantified with flow cytometry. (B) Mitochondrial superoxide was measured based on MitoSOX red fluorescence, quantified with flow cytometry. (C–D) The mitochondrial content was assessed by MitoTracker green fluorescence, as quantified by flow cytometry and visualized with live-cell confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 800, 400× magnification). (E) The mitochondrial membrane potential was evaluated by TMRM (100 nM) fluorescence and analyzed by flow cytometry. (F) The oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was measured using a Seahorse analyzer with sequential injections of oligomycin (Oligo), 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP), and antimycin A plus rotenone (Rot+AA). The data were normalized to the total protein content, and maximal respiration and adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-linked respiration were quantified accordingly. (G) The heatmap shows z-scored log 2 -transformed abundance of proteins associated with mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, mitochondrial ribosomal, transport, and mitochondrial dynamics–associated proteins in 8505C ATC cells treated with BX795 (2.5 µM), Dab (2.5 µM), or their combination. The proteins include representatives of electron transport chain complexes I–V (NDUF subunits, SDHA–D, UQCRC1/2, COX subunits, and ATP5 subunits), TCA cycle enzymes (IDH1, IDH2, IDH3, FH, OGDH, DLST, CS, MDH2, and PDHA1/PDHB), mitochondrial transport and structure (TOMM20, TIMM23, VDAC1–3, MFN1, OPA1, DNM1L), and mitochondrial genome maintenance (TFAM). Hierarchical clustering was applied to the rows. The color scale represents relative protein abundance (red = higher; blue = lower). All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: The BCPAP (homozygous mutated BRAF V600E) cell line was purchased from Leibniz Institute DSMZ (Lower Saxony, Germany).

    Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Confocal Microscopy, Membrane, Transformation Assay, Phospho-proteomics, Quantitative Proteomics, Standard Deviation

    (A) Time-dependent effect of combination BX795 and Dab treatment based on propidium iodide (PI) staining, showing the proportion of cells arrested in the G2/M phase. Cells were stained with PI and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. (B) Intracellular ROS levels were measured using DCFH-DA staining and analyzed by flow cytometry. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. (C–E) The effects of N -acetyl cysteine (NAC) (5 mM) on combination treatment–induced responses in BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cell lines. (C) ROS generation was analyzed by DCFH-DA staining and is presented as the mean ± standard deviation. (D) Apoptosis was assessed based on Annexin V/PI staining. (E) Immunoblot analysis of PARP-1 cleavage using β-actin as a loading control. The densitometric quantification of cleaved vs pro-PARP cleavage in relation to loading control is shown below the bands. (F) The effect of the mitochondrial ROS scavenger MitoQ on combination treatment–induced G2/M arrest in BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cell lines. The DNA content was measured, 2N (diploid) and 4N (tetraploid), based on PI staining. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. (G–H) The impact of CHK2 phosphorylation inhibitor BML-277 (ML277) on combination BX795 and Dab treatment-induced. (G) Cell cycle arrest was analyzed by PI staining and flow cytometry. (H) Antiproliferative effect in BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cells. The DNA content was measured, 2N (diploid) and 4N (tetraploid), based on PI staining. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. (I) Apoptosis was measured with Annexin V/PI staining and flow cytometry. The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Dual targeting of PDPK1 and BRAF V600E is synthetically lethal

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.15.711663

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Time-dependent effect of combination BX795 and Dab treatment based on propidium iodide (PI) staining, showing the proportion of cells arrested in the G2/M phase. Cells were stained with PI and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. (B) Intracellular ROS levels were measured using DCFH-DA staining and analyzed by flow cytometry. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. (C–E) The effects of N -acetyl cysteine (NAC) (5 mM) on combination treatment–induced responses in BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cell lines. (C) ROS generation was analyzed by DCFH-DA staining and is presented as the mean ± standard deviation. (D) Apoptosis was assessed based on Annexin V/PI staining. (E) Immunoblot analysis of PARP-1 cleavage using β-actin as a loading control. The densitometric quantification of cleaved vs pro-PARP cleavage in relation to loading control is shown below the bands. (F) The effect of the mitochondrial ROS scavenger MitoQ on combination treatment–induced G2/M arrest in BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cell lines. The DNA content was measured, 2N (diploid) and 4N (tetraploid), based on PI staining. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. (G–H) The impact of CHK2 phosphorylation inhibitor BML-277 (ML277) on combination BX795 and Dab treatment-induced. (G) Cell cycle arrest was analyzed by PI staining and flow cytometry. (H) Antiproliferative effect in BRAF V600E–mutant ATC cells. The DNA content was measured, 2N (diploid) and 4N (tetraploid), based on PI staining. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. (I) Apoptosis was measured with Annexin V/PI staining and flow cytometry. The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance is indicated as ns = nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: The BCPAP (homozygous mutated BRAF V600E) cell line was purchased from Leibniz Institute DSMZ (Lower Saxony, Germany).

    Techniques: Staining, Fluorescence, FACS, Standard Deviation, Flow Cytometry, Mutagenesis, Western Blot, Control, Phospho-proteomics

    CPAP was detected on endosomes in quiescent and EGF-treated cells, and its co-localization with ESCRT proteins increased during EVT HeLa cells were treated with untagged EGF for different time points, stained with AF488-linked sheep anti-EEA antibody, rabbit anti-CPAP, and mouse anti-HRS, or -TSG101 primary antibodies, followed by AF647- and AF568-linked anti-rabbit and -mouse secondary antibodies, and imaged using Lightning super-resolution microscopy. (A) Two-color co-localization. Left: single Z-plane of images showing EEA1 and CPAP staining of representative cells. Right: co-localization (yellow) was quantified by determining the percentages of EEA1-positive (green) puncta containing CPAP (red) puncta in representative single Z-planes of each cell and quantified from multiple cells across at least three experiments. (B) Three-color co-localization. Left: representative single Z-plane of images showing co-localization of CPAP, along with HRS or TSG101, on EEA1-positive puncta. Right: triple co-localization (white) was quantified by determining the percentages of EEA1-positive (green) puncta containing CPAP (red) and HRS/TSG101 (magenta) puncta in representative single Z-planes of each cell and quantified from multiple cells across at least three experiments. Zoomed images correspond to the dashed inset boxes of the indicated images. Scale bars: 10 μm. p values: ∗<0.05, ∗∗<0.01, ∗∗∗<0.001, ∗∗∗∗<0.0001 by unpaired nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Note: (A) and (B) present data from the same experiments where 4-color imaging was done and convey information on two different aspects based on three or four markers at a time. Since the visuals of the same cell can help with more reliable interpretation of the data, images of the same cell were used, where possible, for (A) and (B) with the same or different pseudo-color. Hence, duplication of some sub-images among (A) and (B) is intentional.

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Centrosomal P4.1-associated protein is a novel regulator of ESCRT pathway function during endosome maturation

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.114659

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CPAP was detected on endosomes in quiescent and EGF-treated cells, and its co-localization with ESCRT proteins increased during EVT HeLa cells were treated with untagged EGF for different time points, stained with AF488-linked sheep anti-EEA antibody, rabbit anti-CPAP, and mouse anti-HRS, or -TSG101 primary antibodies, followed by AF647- and AF568-linked anti-rabbit and -mouse secondary antibodies, and imaged using Lightning super-resolution microscopy. (A) Two-color co-localization. Left: single Z-plane of images showing EEA1 and CPAP staining of representative cells. Right: co-localization (yellow) was quantified by determining the percentages of EEA1-positive (green) puncta containing CPAP (red) puncta in representative single Z-planes of each cell and quantified from multiple cells across at least three experiments. (B) Three-color co-localization. Left: representative single Z-plane of images showing co-localization of CPAP, along with HRS or TSG101, on EEA1-positive puncta. Right: triple co-localization (white) was quantified by determining the percentages of EEA1-positive (green) puncta containing CPAP (red) and HRS/TSG101 (magenta) puncta in representative single Z-planes of each cell and quantified from multiple cells across at least three experiments. Zoomed images correspond to the dashed inset boxes of the indicated images. Scale bars: 10 μm. p values: ∗<0.05, ∗∗<0.01, ∗∗∗<0.001, ∗∗∗∗<0.0001 by unpaired nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Note: (A) and (B) present data from the same experiments where 4-color imaging was done and convey information on two different aspects based on three or four markers at a time. Since the visuals of the same cell can help with more reliable interpretation of the data, images of the same cell were used, where possible, for (A) and (B) with the same or different pseudo-color. Hence, duplication of some sub-images among (A) and (B) is intentional.

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies used in this study: rabbit anti-CPAP (Proteintech,11517-1-AP); mouse anti-CPAP (Abnova, H00055835-M01); anti-Rab5 (Proteintech, 20228-1-AP); anti-Rab7 (Proteintech, 55469-1-AP or Santa Cruz, sc-376362); Actin-HRP (Proteintech, 60008-1-Ig); -GFP (Proteintech, 66002-1-Ig or 50430-2-AP); -HRS (Santa Cruz, sc-271455); -TSG101 (Santa Cruz, sc-7964; Proteintech, 28283-1-AP); and -ALIX (Biolegend, 634502), EEA1 (Invitrogen, PA1-0337 or BD biosciences 610456) and CD63 (BD biosciences, 556019).

    Techniques: Staining, Super-Resolution Microscopy, MANN-WHITNEY, Imaging