Review



pathogen free c57bl 6j olahsd immune competent female mice  (Envigo)


Bioz Verified Symbol Envigo is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    Envigo pathogen free c57bl 6j olahsd immune competent female mice
    Pathogen Free C57bl 6j Olahsd Immune Competent Female Mice, supplied by Envigo, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1815 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/10__22203_slash_ecm__v033a11-101-1-8?v=Envigo
    Average 99 stars, based on 1815 article reviews
    pathogen free c57bl 6j olahsd immune competent female mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    Envigo pathogen free c57bl 6j olahsd immune competent female mice
    Pathogen Free C57bl 6j Olahsd Immune Competent Female Mice, supplied by Envigo, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/10__22203_slash_ecm__v033a11-101-1-8?v=Envigo
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pathogen free c57bl 6j olahsd immune competent female mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Charles River Laboratories c57bl 6 n virgin female mice
    C57bl 6 N Virgin Female Mice, supplied by Charles River Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/pmc12819348-47-1-9?v=Charles+River+Laboratories
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    c57bl 6 n virgin female mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Jackson Laboratory male c57bl 6j mice
    Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
    Male C57bl 6j Mice, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/pmc12816905-34-0-8?v=Jackson+Laboratory
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    male c57bl 6j mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Charles River Laboratories c57bl
    Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
    C57bl, supplied by Charles River Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/pmc13141601-184-1-12?v=Charles+River+Laboratories
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    c57bl - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Shanghai Model Organisms Center c57bl 6j background
    Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
    C57bl 6j Background, supplied by Shanghai Model Organisms Center, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/pmc13276144-33-5-10?v=Shanghai+Model+Organisms+Center
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    c57bl 6j background - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Jackson Laboratory c57bl 6 mice
    Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
    C57bl 6 Mice, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/pmc13141773-190-9-14?v=Jackson+Laboratory
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    c57bl 6 mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Jackson Laboratory c57bl 6
    Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
    C57bl 6, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/pmc13200734-207-8-9?v=Jackson+Laboratory
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    c57bl 6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Jackson Laboratory forty male c57bl 6j mice
    Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
    Forty Male C57bl 6j Mice, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/pmc12969341-248-1-10?v=Jackson+Laboratory
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    forty male c57bl 6j mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Charles River Laboratories male c57bl 6 mice
    Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
    Male C57bl 6 Mice, supplied by Charles River Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/pmc12969335-254-0-5?v=Charles+River+Laboratories
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    male c57bl 6 mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Changsheng Bio Technology Co male c57bl 6 mice
    Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) <t>Male</t> <t>C57BL/6J</t> mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.
    Male C57bl 6 Mice, supplied by Changsheng Bio Technology Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/c57bl/pmc13273589-199-0-5?v=Changsheng+Bio+Technology+Co
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    male c57bl 6 mice - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) Male C57BL/6J mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.

    Journal: Journal of Sport and Health Science

    Article Title: Weightlifting outperforms voluntary wheel running for improving adiposity and insulin sensitivity in obese mice

    doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101100

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Endurance and resistance exercise training differentially impact endurance exercise capacity and fat accumulation in response to HFD feeding. (A) Male C57BL/6J mice (8–10 weeks) were separated into 4 groups differentiated by diet (normal chow vs . HFD) and exercise (sedentary vs . weightlifting (R EX ) or voluntary wheel running (E EX )) with endpoint measures made after 8 weeks of treatment. Body weight was measured weekly, and body composition was determined at the end of the study. (B) Weightlifting model and cage for R EX . (C) R EX began with 100% body weight load and increased by 20% daily until achieving 240% body weight load (8 days) where it remained for the entirety of the study. (D) Average daily lifts (repetitions) for R EX and (E) average daily kilometers for E EX . (F) Body weight gain over study period. Colored * indicates significant difference from NC-SED. (G) Body weight at endpoint. (H and I) Body composition measurements by EchoMRI for fat mass (% BW) and lean mass (g/mm tibia length). (J–L) Weight of epididymal fat, inguinal fat, and brown fat (mg) normalized by tibia length (mm). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance among groups: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001. NC-SED n : 8–16 (white); HFD-SED n : 8–18 (red); HFD-R EX n : 10–16 (blue); HFD-E EX n : 8–15 (green). BW = body weight; E EX = endurance exercise; ETT = exercise tolerance test; GTT = glucose tolerance test; HFD = high-fat diet; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ITT = insulin tolerance test; NC = normal chow; R EX = resistance exercise; SED = sedentary; VWR = voluntary weightlifting.

    Article Snippet: Male C57BL/6J mice (8–10 weeks) were purchased from the Jackson Lab (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and housed in the animal care facility under 12-h light and dark cycle standard conditions.

    Techniques: