abcc5 (Bioss)
Structured Review

Abcc5, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/abcc5/product/Bioss
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "PPARγ contributes to cardioprotection against heat stroke through ABCC5-dependent lipid metabolism"
Article Title: PPARγ contributes to cardioprotection against heat stroke through ABCC5-dependent lipid metabolism
Journal: Redox Biology
doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2026.104113
Figure Legend Snippet: RNA-seq identifies ABCC5 as a potential key downstream effector of PPARγ in HS. (A) Volcano plot illustrating differentially expressed genes between the WT + HS and PPARγ-OE + HS groups. (B) GO enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes between the WT + HS and PPARγ-OE + HS groups. (C) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs between the WT + HS and PPARγ-OE + HS groups. (D) Heatmap displaying expression changes of ABC transporter family members across the indicated groups. (E) Measurement of cellular free fatty acids and triglycerides in cells under the indicated treatments. (F) RT-qPCR analysis of PPARγ mRNA expression in PPARγ NC + HS and PPARγ OE + HS cells. (G) RT-qPCR analysis of selected ABC transporter genes (ABCC5, ABCB1A, ABCC6, TAP2, ABCA6, ABCB4, ABCC10, ABCA2, ABCG4, ABCA1, ABCA8A, ABCA9, ABCB2, ABCB7, and ABCA3) under the specified conditions. Error bars represent mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001 versus the PPARγ-NC + HS group (E–G). Statistical comparisons were performed using Student's t-test (F–G) or one-way ANOVA (E).
Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: Time-dependent changes in ABCC5 expression in vivo. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images of ABCC5 (green) and DAPI (blue) in cardiac tissues from sham mice and from mice subjected to HS at the indicated time points after injury. (B) Representative immunohistochemical staining of ABCC5 in cardiac tissues from sham and HS-injured mice. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of Leptin mRNA in cardiac tissues after 2.5 h or 3 weeks of heat injury. (D) Representative immunofluorescence images of ABCC5 in cardiac sections from PPARγ-cKO mice after HS). (E–F) Representative immunofluorescence images of PPARγ and ABCC5 in cardiac sections from PPARγ-cKO mice at 3 weeks after HS). Error bars represent mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001 versus the sham group (B–C). Statistical comparisons were performed using Student's t-test (B) or one-way ANOVA (C).
Techniques Used: Expressing, In Vivo, Immunofluorescence, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: ABCC5 siRNA abolishes the cardioprotective effects of PPARγ overexpression against HS . (A) Luciferase activity in cells co-transfected with ABCC5 wild-type or mutant (Mut1/2/3) reporter plasmids and adenovirus expressing PPARγ. (B) CUT&Tag assay using a PPARγ-specific antibody to detect PPARγ binding to the ABCC5 promoter. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of ABCC5 mRNA in cells transfected with control siRNA or ABCC5 siRNA. (D – F) Cell morphology and viability in cells transfected with ABCC5 siRNA and/or PPARγ overexpression vector under HS conditions. (G – H) Apoptosis levels measured by flow cytometry in cells transfected with ABCC5 siRNA and PPARγ-OE under HS conditions. (I – J) DCFH-DA staining for ROS detection in cells transfected with ABCC5 siRNA and PPARγ-OE under HS conditions. (K – L) Mitochondrial membrane potential assessed by JC-1 fluorescence in the indicated groups. (M) Western blot analysis of PPARγ, ABCC5, ABCC1, Leptin, and β-actin (loading control) in cells treated as follows: PPARγ-NC + HS, PPARγ-OE + HS, and PPARγ-OE + ABCC5 siRNA + HS. Molecular weight markers are shown on the right. (N) Quantification of protein levels normalized to β-actin, corresponding to the blots in (M). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001 versus the indicated control, PPARγ + ABCC5 group (A–B), control siRNA group (C), PPARγ-NC + HS group, PPARγ-OE + HS group, or PPARγ-OE + ABCC5 siRNA + HS group (D–L), or versus the PPARγ-NC + HS group and PPARγ-OE + HS group (M − N). Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA.
Techniques Used: Over Expression, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Transfection, Mutagenesis, Expressing, Binding Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Plasmid Preparation, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Membrane, Fluorescence, Western Blot, Molecular Weight
Figure Legend Snippet: The PPARγ/ABCC5 pathway alleviates lipid accumulation in HS-injured mice . (A – D) Cardiac sections from sham mice and from mice at indicated time points after HS were stained with HE (A) , PSR (B) , Masson's trichrome (C) , or Oil Red O (D) (n = 3 per group). (E) Serum levels of HDL-C and LDL-C in sham mice and in mice 3 weeks after HS (n = 6–7 per group). Error bars represent mean ± SD. ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001 versus the sham group. Statistical comparisons were performed using Student's t-test.
Techniques Used: Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: Rosiglitazone pretreatment alleviates HS-induced myocardial injury via the PPARγ/ABCC5 pathway in HL-1 cells . (A – C) Cell viability and morphology in cells treated with different concentrations of rosiglitazone (5 μM, 10 μM, 20 μM, 40 μM) under HS conditions. (D – E) Apoptosis levels in cells treated with different concentrations of rosiglitazone under HS conditions. (F–I) DHE staining (F) and DCFH-DA staining (I) for ROS detection in cells treated with different concentrations of rosiglitazone under HS conditions. (J – K) Mitochondrial membrane potential assessed by JC-1 fluorescence in the indicated groups. (L) RT-qPCR analysis of PPARγ, ABCC5, Leptin, and SREBP-1c in cells treated with different concentrations of rosiglitazone under HS conditions. (M – N) Representative Western blots and quantification of PPARγ, ABCC5, ABCC1, ABCG1, ABCA1, and Leptin in cells treated with different concentrations of rosiglitazone under HS conditions. Error bars represent mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001 versus the control group or the HS group. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA.
Techniques Used: Staining, Membrane, Fluorescence, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: The PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone confers pharmacological protection against HS-induced myocardial dysfunction . (A – C) Cell viability and morphology in cells transfected with PPARγ siRNA and pretreated with rosiglitazone under HS conditions. (D – E) Apoptosis levels measured by flow cytometry in cells transfected with PPARγ siRNA and pretreated with rosiglitazone under HS conditions. (F) LDH release in cells transfected with PPARγ siRNA and pretreated with rosiglitazone under HS conditions. (G – H) DCFH-DA staining for ROS detection in cells transfected with PPARγ siRNA and pretreated with rosiglitazone under HS conditions. (I – J) Mitochondrial membrane potential assessed by JC-1 fluorescence in the indicated groups. (K) RT-qPCR analysis of PPARγ and CPT1β mRNA in cells transfected with PPARγ siRNA and pretreated with rosiglitazone under HS conditions. (L) Representative Western blots and quantification of PPARγ, ABCC5, PGC-1α, and PPARγ in cells transfected with PPARγ siRNA and pretreated with rosiglitazone under HS conditions. Error bars represent mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001 versus the control group, the HS group, or the ROSI + HS group as indicated. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA.
Techniques Used: Transfection, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Membrane, Fluorescence, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: The proposed scheme describing the signaling pathway of PPARγ/ABCC5-elicted cardioprotective effect against HS.
Techniques Used:

