Review



automated quo-test poct device  (EKF diagnostics)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    EKF diagnostics automated quo-test poct device
    Automated Quo Test Poct Device, supplied by EKF diagnostics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/test+device/automated+quo+test+poct+device/pmc05575368-1-8-11
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    automated quo-test poct device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Fluorescence:

    Article Title: Comparison of a point-of-care analyser for the determination of HbA1c with HPLC method
    Article Snippet: This study compared the performance of the automated Quo-Test POCT device (EKF Diagnostics), which uses boronate fluorescence quenching technology, with a laboratory based High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) method (Biorad D10) for measurement of HbA1c.

    High Performance Liquid Chromatography:

    Article Title: Comparison of a point-of-care analyser for the determination of HbA1c with HPLC method
    Article Snippet: This study compared the performance of the automated Quo-Test POCT device (EKF Diagnostics), which uses boronate fluorescence quenching technology, with a laboratory based High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) method (Biorad D10) for measurement of HbA1c.



    Similar Products

    ultrasnap surface atp test devices  (Hygiena Inc)
    86
    Hygiena Inc ultrasnap surface atp test devices
    Ultrasnap Surface Atp Test Devices, supplied by Hygiena Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/test+device/ensure+luminometer+touch/pm42278746-81-17-10
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ultrasnap surface atp test devices - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    neware test equipment  (Neware Technology Limited)
    86
    Neware Technology Limited neware test equipment
    Neware Test Equipment, supplied by Neware Technology Limited, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/test+device/4008+ct/10__1021_slash_acs__energyfuels__6c01689-51-0-0
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    neware test equipment - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    quick test device compolab ts  (Fresenius Kabi)
    86
    Fresenius Kabi quick test device compolab ts
    Quick Test Device Compolab Ts, supplied by Fresenius Kabi, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/test+device/compolab+device+quick+test+ts/pm42230796-258-7-12
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    quick test device compolab ts - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    hargreaves device  (UGO Basile S.R.L)
    96
    UGO Basile S.R.L hargreaves device
    Analysis of nerve sensory and motor function recovery. (A) Latency at different time points of the injured hindlimb paw in response to hot radiation stimulation measured by a <t>Hargreaves</t> test (n=4, 60 s is the threshold). (For IM+DNH/PLGA@BLZ, ***p < 0.001 vs. Sham, US+DNH/PLGA, and US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ; &p< 0.05 vs. Crush; For IM+DNH/PLGA, *p< 0.05 vs. Sham); (B) Withdrawal threshold at different time points of the injured hindlimb paw measured by the von Frey test (n=4, 2 g is the threshold). (For US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ, ###p < 0.001 vs. all other groups; For US+DNH/PLGA, *p < 0.05 vs. US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ and Sham; &&&p < 0.001: US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ and Sham vs. Crush and IM+DNH/PLGA@BLZ); (C) Representative images of mouse footprints recorded while the mice were on a walking apparatus; (D-F) Quantitative data analysis for (n=4) (D) foot pressure, (E) stance duration, and (F) swing duration based on the ratio related to the injury foot (left hind in system, LH) to the healthy foot (right hind in system, RH). (ns = no significant difference, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
    Hargreaves Device, supplied by UGO Basile S.R.L, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/test+device/Plantar+Test/pmc13052476-129-19-21
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hargreaves device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    triage d dimer test device  (Biosite Inc)
    86
    Biosite Inc triage d dimer test device
    Analysis of nerve sensory and motor function recovery. (A) Latency at different time points of the injured hindlimb paw in response to hot radiation stimulation measured by a <t>Hargreaves</t> test (n=4, 60 s is the threshold). (For IM+DNH/PLGA@BLZ, ***p < 0.001 vs. Sham, US+DNH/PLGA, and US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ; &p< 0.05 vs. Crush; For IM+DNH/PLGA, *p< 0.05 vs. Sham); (B) Withdrawal threshold at different time points of the injured hindlimb paw measured by the von Frey test (n=4, 2 g is the threshold). (For US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ, ###p < 0.001 vs. all other groups; For US+DNH/PLGA, *p < 0.05 vs. US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ and Sham; &&&p < 0.001: US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ and Sham vs. Crush and IM+DNH/PLGA@BLZ); (C) Representative images of mouse footprints recorded while the mice were on a walking apparatus; (D-F) Quantitative data analysis for (n=4) (D) foot pressure, (E) stance duration, and (F) swing duration based on the ratio related to the injury foot (left hind in system, LH) to the healthy foot (right hind in system, RH). (ns = no significant difference, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
    Triage D Dimer Test Device, supplied by Biosite Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/test+device/d+device+dimer+test+triage/pm42054137-57-9-13
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    triage d dimer test device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    panbiotm covid 19 igg igm rapid test device  (Abbott Laboratories)
    86
    Abbott Laboratories panbiotm covid 19 igg igm rapid test device
    Analysis of nerve sensory and motor function recovery. (A) Latency at different time points of the injured hindlimb paw in response to hot radiation stimulation measured by a <t>Hargreaves</t> test (n=4, 60 s is the threshold). (For IM+DNH/PLGA@BLZ, ***p < 0.001 vs. Sham, US+DNH/PLGA, and US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ; &p< 0.05 vs. Crush; For IM+DNH/PLGA, *p< 0.05 vs. Sham); (B) Withdrawal threshold at different time points of the injured hindlimb paw measured by the von Frey test (n=4, 2 g is the threshold). (For US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ, ###p < 0.001 vs. all other groups; For US+DNH/PLGA, *p < 0.05 vs. US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ and Sham; &&&p < 0.001: US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ and Sham vs. Crush and IM+DNH/PLGA@BLZ); (C) Representative images of mouse footprints recorded while the mice were on a walking apparatus; (D-F) Quantitative data analysis for (n=4) (D) foot pressure, (E) stance duration, and (F) swing duration based on the ratio related to the injury foot (left hind in system, LH) to the healthy foot (right hind in system, RH). (ns = no significant difference, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
    Panbiotm Covid 19 Igg Igm Rapid Test Device, supplied by Abbott Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/test+device/2+anti+assay+cov+igg+ii+quant+sars/pm42036989-55-9-15
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    panbiotm covid 19 igg igm rapid test device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    instron 4411 test device  (Instron Corp)
    86
    Instron Corp instron 4411 test device
    Analysis of nerve sensory and motor function recovery. (A) Latency at different time points of the injured hindlimb paw in response to hot radiation stimulation measured by a <t>Hargreaves</t> test (n=4, 60 s is the threshold). (For IM+DNH/PLGA@BLZ, ***p < 0.001 vs. Sham, US+DNH/PLGA, and US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ; &p< 0.05 vs. Crush; For IM+DNH/PLGA, *p< 0.05 vs. Sham); (B) Withdrawal threshold at different time points of the injured hindlimb paw measured by the von Frey test (n=4, 2 g is the threshold). (For US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ, ###p < 0.001 vs. all other groups; For US+DNH/PLGA, *p < 0.05 vs. US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ and Sham; &&&p < 0.001: US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ and Sham vs. Crush and IM+DNH/PLGA@BLZ); (C) Representative images of mouse footprints recorded while the mice were on a walking apparatus; (D-F) Quantitative data analysis for (n=4) (D) foot pressure, (E) stance duration, and (F) swing duration based on the ratio related to the injury foot (left hind in system, LH) to the healthy foot (right hind in system, RH). (ns = no significant difference, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
    Instron 4411 Test Device, supplied by Instron Corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/test+device/4411+mechanical+property+tester/10__1080_slash_15440478__2026__2651443-97-24-24
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    instron 4411 test device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Analysis of nerve sensory and motor function recovery. (A) Latency at different time points of the injured hindlimb paw in response to hot radiation stimulation measured by a Hargreaves test (n=4, 60 s is the threshold). (For IM+DNH/PLGA@BLZ, ***p < 0.001 vs. Sham, US+DNH/PLGA, and US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ; &p< 0.05 vs. Crush; For IM+DNH/PLGA, *p< 0.05 vs. Sham); (B) Withdrawal threshold at different time points of the injured hindlimb paw measured by the von Frey test (n=4, 2 g is the threshold). (For US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ, ###p < 0.001 vs. all other groups; For US+DNH/PLGA, *p < 0.05 vs. US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ and Sham; &&&p < 0.001: US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ and Sham vs. Crush and IM+DNH/PLGA@BLZ); (C) Representative images of mouse footprints recorded while the mice were on a walking apparatus; (D-F) Quantitative data analysis for (n=4) (D) foot pressure, (E) stance duration, and (F) swing duration based on the ratio related to the injury foot (left hind in system, LH) to the healthy foot (right hind in system, RH). (ns = no significant difference, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

    Journal: Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society

    Article Title: Ultrasound-guided nanocomposite hydrogel injection to enhance nerve repair via temporal delivery of a colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor

    doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2026.114797

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of nerve sensory and motor function recovery. (A) Latency at different time points of the injured hindlimb paw in response to hot radiation stimulation measured by a Hargreaves test (n=4, 60 s is the threshold). (For IM+DNH/PLGA@BLZ, ***p < 0.001 vs. Sham, US+DNH/PLGA, and US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ; &p< 0.05 vs. Crush; For IM+DNH/PLGA, *p< 0.05 vs. Sham); (B) Withdrawal threshold at different time points of the injured hindlimb paw measured by the von Frey test (n=4, 2 g is the threshold). (For US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ, ###p < 0.001 vs. all other groups; For US+DNH/PLGA, *p < 0.05 vs. US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ and Sham; &&&p < 0.001: US+DNH/PLGA@BLZ and Sham vs. Crush and IM+DNH/PLGA@BLZ); (C) Representative images of mouse footprints recorded while the mice were on a walking apparatus; (D-F) Quantitative data analysis for (n=4) (D) foot pressure, (E) stance duration, and (F) swing duration based on the ratio related to the injury foot (left hind in system, LH) to the healthy foot (right hind in system, RH). (ns = no significant difference, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

    Article Snippet: Thermal hypersensitivity was induced by focusing infrared radiation onto the plantar skin of the hind limb paw using the Hargreaves device (Ugo Basile Thermal Plantar Test Instrument).

    Techniques: