polyethylene wear measurement software polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10 (Draftware Developers)
90
Structured Review
Draftware Developers
polyethylene wear measurement software polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10
Polyethylene Wear Measurement Software Polyware Pro 3d Digital Vs. 5.10, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyware+pro+3d/software+program+polyware+pro+3d/pm19929253-595-7-17
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Polyethylene Wear Measurement Software Polyware Pro 3d Digital Vs. 5.10, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyware+pro+3d/software+program+polyware+pro+3d/pm19929253-595-7-17
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyethylene wear measurement software polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
other:Article Title: Polyethylene wear of the porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty with an average 11-year follow-up. Article Snippet: The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that affect polyethylene wear of 55 porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasties after 9 to 14 years selected from a study population of 311 implants.. The average three-dimensional linear, two-dimensional linear, and volumetric wear rates were 0.096 mm/y, 0.052 mm/y, and 34 mm/y.. Negative wear was noted in 7 patients using two-dimensional techniques. Article Title: Outcome of an acetabular design with hydroxyapatite coating on a rough substrate. Article Snippet: Outcomes of hydroxyapatite-coated cups have not been as consistently successful as outcomes of hydroxyapatite-coated stems; therefore, we studied a newer generation acetabular design with a plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating on an arc-deposited rough titanium substrate.. Our objective was to determine whether clinical and radiographic outcomes would be better than reported for earlier-generation designs.. Ninety consecutive hips in 85 patients implanted with this design were followed up prospectively for 2 to 5 years after surgery. Article Title: Early Follow-up for a Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Metal-Backed Acetabular Component Designed to Reduce “Backside” Polyethylene Wear Article Snippet: Initial postoperative and long-term follow-up radiographs were digitized using a flatbed scanner (Scanmaker 9600XL, Microtek Inc, Carson, CA, USA) and were analyzed using Article Title: Fifteen-year to twenty-year results of cementless Harris-Galante porous femoral and Harris-Galante porous I and II acetabular components. Article Snippet: This study examined long-term survivorship of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using cementless Harris-Galante porous femoral and Harris-Galante porous I or II acetabular components.. Of 113 hips (101 patients) studied, 60 hips (53 patients) were available for follow-up at a mean of 17.2 years after surgery.. A total of 10 hips had documented revision, and 2 hips had failed radiographically. Article Title: Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem survivorship at 10 years. Article Snippet: From the Shiley C Scripps Clinic, Departm Submitted Janua No benefits or fu Reprint requests: for Orthopedic Rese North Torrey Pines n 2005 Published 0883-5403/05/19 doi:10.1016/j.arth Abstract: Ninety-six patients were implanted with the Omnifit-HA femoral stem and the Omnifit-PSL porous-coated dual-radius acetabular shell (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) and liners that were sterilized by c-radiation in air.. The mean age at the time of surgery was 52 years (range, 27-78 years), and male/female ratio was 54:42.. The mean follow-up was 10.3 years (range, 7-12 years). Software:Article Title: Polyethylene wear analysis. Article Snippet: .. In all five studies we utilized the |
