Review



computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10  (Draftware Developers)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Draftware Developers computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10
    Polyethylene wear analysis with the <t>PolyWare</t> software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.
    Computerized Method Polyware Pro 3d Digital Vs. 5.10, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/polyware+pro+3d/computer+assisted+method+polywaretm+digital+version+7+24/pmc03214745-71-12-18
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty"

    Article Title: The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty

    Journal: Acta Orthopaedica

    doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.506632

    Polyethylene wear analysis with the PolyWare software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Polyethylene wear analysis with the PolyWare software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.

    Techniques Used: Software

    Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots, with lines of equality for repeatability measures for each of the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of two measurements; y-axis: the difference between 2 measurements (y = measurement 1 – measurement 2); red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); x-axis: first measurement; y-axis: second measurement; maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots, with lines of equality for repeatability measures for each of the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of two measurements; y-axis: the difference between 2 measurements (y = measurement 1 – measurement 2); red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); x-axis: first measurement; y-axis: second measurement; maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.

    Techniques Used:

    Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots with lines of equality for concurrent validity between the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of the measurements of 2 methods; y-axis: difference between measurements of 2 methods; red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots with lines of equality for concurrent validity between the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of the measurements of 2 methods; y-axis: difference between measurements of 2 methods; red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.

    Techniques Used:

    Marginal cost analysis in € (euros) for polyethylene wear analysis by EGS-RSA and with  PolyWare  as used in this study. For easy comparison, the staff costs are listed per patient
    Figure Legend Snippet: Marginal cost analysis in € (euros) for polyethylene wear analysis by EGS-RSA and with PolyWare as used in this study. For easy comparison, the staff costs are listed per patient

    Techniques Used: Comparison, Software

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty
    Article Snippet: Analysis was performed by an experienced observer (LLA) with a computerized method (PolyWare Pro 3D Digital vs. 5.10; Draftware Developers, Conway, SC).

    Article Title: Comparison of wear rate and osteolysis between annealed and remelted highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. A case control study at 7 to 10 years follow-up.
    Article Snippet: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res (2016), a computer-assisted method (PolyWareTM Digital Version 7.24; Draftware Developers, Inc, Vevay, IN, USA) by two observers (RT, MH) independently.

    Article Title: Comparison of wear rate and osteolysis between second-generation annealed and first-generation remelted highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. A case control study at a minimum of five years.
    Article Snippet: Post-operative femoral head penetration was evaluated using a computer-assisted method (PolyWareTM Digital Version 7.24; Draftware Developers, Inc, Vevay, IN, USA) by one observer (RT).

    Article Title: Wear rate and osteolysis in two types of second-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective comparative study with a minimum of five years.
    Article Snippet: Background: As no previous study has directly compared the linear wear rate in two types of secondgeneration annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene, we performed a retrospective study with a minimum of 5-year follow-up to assess primary arthroplasties in the (1) wear rates and (2) incidence of osteolysis of the two types of HXLPE.. Hypothesis: There was no significant difference in the linear wear rate and the incidence of osteolysis between the two types of second-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene.. Patients and methods: In this single-center study, we reviewed 257 cases of primary cementless total hip arthroplasties between 2011 and 2015, which were performed with 32 mm delta ceramic on secondgeneration annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene (X3 and E1 were used in 105 and 103 cases, respectively.).

    Article Title: The Absence of Hydroxyapatite Coating on Cementless Acetabular Components Does Not Affect Long-Term Survivorship in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Article Snippet: Background: Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been applied to joint prostheses as a bioactive coating to prolong their durability.. However, HA benefits for cup survival in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain controversial.. In this study, we compared the survival of cups with and without HA coating during a minimum follow-up of 18 years.

    Article Title: Minimum 7-year results of cementless total hip arthroplasty with vitamin E-diffused and 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine-grafted highly cross-linked polyethylene
    Article Snippet: [ ] Loosening of the femoral stem was determined radiographically according to the method of Engh et al. [ ] Annual radiographs were analyzed using computerized method (PolyWare Rev 8; Draftware Developers Inc., Vevay, IN), and 2-dimensional femoral head penetration into the polyethylene was measured.

    Migration:

    Article Title: Comparison of polyethylene wear of vitamin E-diffused and MPC-grafted highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty
    Article Snippet: .. Loosening of the acetabular cup was determined radiographically according to the method of Hodgkinson et al..11 De nite loosening of the acetabular cup was diagnosed when there was migration of the cup or a radiolucent line wider than 1 mm in all DeLee and Charnley zones.12 Loosening of the femoral stem was determined radiographically according to the method of Engh et al..13 Annual radiographs were analyzed using computerized method (PolyWare Rev 8; Draftware Developers Inc., Vevay, IN), for which accuracy threshold was 0.022 mm, and two-dimensional femoral head penetration into the polyethylene was measured. ..



    Similar Products

    90
    Draftware Developers polyware pro 3d digital version 5.10
    Polyware Pro 3d Digital Version 5.10, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/polyware+pro+3d/polyware+3d+digital+version+5+10/pm29890909-54-17-25
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    polyware pro 3d digital version 5.10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Draftware Developers computerised method polyware pro 3d digital version 5.10
    Computerised Method Polyware Pro 3d Digital Version 5.10, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/polyware+pro+3d/polyware+3d+digital+version+5+10/pm28967052-54-21-29
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    computerised method polyware pro 3d digital version 5.10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Draftware Developers polyware pro/3d software
    Polyware Pro/3d Software, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/polyware+pro+3d/polyware+software/pm26041645-57-6-9
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    polyware pro/3d software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Draftware Developers polyware 3d pro 5.10
    Polyware 3d Pro 5.10, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/polyware+pro+3d/polyware+3d+digital+version+5+10/pmc03626226-94-7-11
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    polyware 3d pro 5.10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Draftware Developers software program polyware pro 3d
    Software Program Polyware Pro 3d, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/polyware+pro+3d/software+program+polyware+pro+3d/pm19643564-32-24-28
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    software program polyware pro 3d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Draftware Developers polyware pro 3d
    Polyware Pro 3d, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/polyware+pro+3d/polyware+3d+digital+version+5+10/pm19643564-32-25-28
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    polyware pro 3d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Draftware Developers computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10
    Polyethylene wear analysis with the <t>PolyWare</t> software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.
    Computerized Method Polyware Pro 3d Digital Vs. 5.10, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/polyware+pro+3d/computer+assisted+method+polywaretm+digital+version+7+24/pmc03214745-71-12-18
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Draftware Developers polyethylene wear measurement software polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10
    Polyethylene wear analysis with the <t>PolyWare</t> software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.
    Polyethylene Wear Measurement Software Polyware Pro 3d Digital Vs. 5.10, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/polyware+pro+3d/software+program+polyware+pro+3d/pm19929253-595-7-17
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    polyethylene wear measurement software polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Polyethylene wear analysis with the PolyWare software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.

    Journal: Acta Orthopaedica

    Article Title: The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty

    doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.506632

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Polyethylene wear analysis with the PolyWare software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.

    Article Snippet: Analysis was performed by an experienced observer (LLA) with a computerized method (PolyWare Pro 3D Digital vs. 5.10; Draftware Developers, Conway, SC).

    Techniques: Software

    Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots, with lines of equality for repeatability measures for each of the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of two measurements; y-axis: the difference between 2 measurements (y = measurement 1 – measurement 2); red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); x-axis: first measurement; y-axis: second measurement; maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.

    Journal: Acta Orthopaedica

    Article Title: The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty

    doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.506632

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots, with lines of equality for repeatability measures for each of the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of two measurements; y-axis: the difference between 2 measurements (y = measurement 1 – measurement 2); red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); x-axis: first measurement; y-axis: second measurement; maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.

    Article Snippet: Analysis was performed by an experienced observer (LLA) with a computerized method (PolyWare Pro 3D Digital vs. 5.10; Draftware Developers, Conway, SC).

    Techniques:

    Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots with lines of equality for concurrent validity between the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of the measurements of 2 methods; y-axis: difference between measurements of 2 methods; red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.

    Journal: Acta Orthopaedica

    Article Title: The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty

    doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.506632

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots with lines of equality for concurrent validity between the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of the measurements of 2 methods; y-axis: difference between measurements of 2 methods; red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.

    Article Snippet: Analysis was performed by an experienced observer (LLA) with a computerized method (PolyWare Pro 3D Digital vs. 5.10; Draftware Developers, Conway, SC).

    Techniques:

    Marginal cost analysis in € (euros) for polyethylene wear analysis by EGS-RSA and with  PolyWare  as used in this study. For easy comparison, the staff costs are listed per patient

    Journal: Acta Orthopaedica

    Article Title: The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty

    doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.506632

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Marginal cost analysis in € (euros) for polyethylene wear analysis by EGS-RSA and with PolyWare as used in this study. For easy comparison, the staff costs are listed per patient

    Article Snippet: Analysis was performed by an experienced observer (LLA) with a computerized method (PolyWare Pro 3D Digital vs. 5.10; Draftware Developers, Conway, SC).

    Techniques: Comparison, Software