computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10 (Draftware Developers)
Structured Review

Computerized Method Polyware Pro 3d Digital Vs. 5.10, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/polyware+pro+3d/computer+assisted+method+polywaretm+digital+version+7+24/pmc03214745-71-12-18
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty"
Article Title: The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty
Journal: Acta Orthopaedica
doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.506632
Figure Legend Snippet: Polyethylene wear analysis with the PolyWare software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.
Techniques Used: Software
Figure Legend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots, with lines of equality for repeatability measures for each of the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of two measurements; y-axis: the difference between 2 measurements (y = measurement 1 – measurement 2); red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); x-axis: first measurement; y-axis: second measurement; maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots with lines of equality for concurrent validity between the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of the measurements of 2 methods; y-axis: difference between measurements of 2 methods; red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Marginal cost analysis in € (euros) for polyethylene wear analysis by EGS-RSA and with PolyWare as used in this study. For easy comparison, the staff costs are listed per patient
Techniques Used: Comparison, Software
Related Articles
other:Article Title: The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty Article Snippet: Analysis was performed by an experienced observer (LLA) with a computerized method ( Article Title: Comparison of wear rate and osteolysis between annealed and remelted highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. A case control study at 7 to 10 years follow-up. Article Snippet: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res (2016), a Article Title: Comparison of wear rate and osteolysis between second-generation annealed and first-generation remelted highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. A case control study at a minimum of five years. Article Snippet: Post-operative femoral head penetration was evaluated using a computer-assisted method (PolyWareTM Digital Version 7.24; Article Title: Wear rate and osteolysis in two types of second-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective comparative study with a minimum of five years. Article Snippet: Background: As no previous study has directly compared the linear wear rate in two types of secondgeneration annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene, we performed a retrospective study with a minimum of 5-year follow-up to assess primary arthroplasties in the (1) wear rates and (2) incidence of osteolysis of the two types of HXLPE.. Hypothesis: There was no significant difference in the linear wear rate and the incidence of osteolysis between the two types of second-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene.. Patients and methods: In this single-center study, we reviewed 257 cases of primary cementless total hip arthroplasties between 2011 and 2015, which were performed with 32 mm delta ceramic on secondgeneration annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene (X3 and E1 were used in 105 and 103 cases, respectively.). Article Title: The Absence of Hydroxyapatite Coating on Cementless Acetabular Components Does Not Affect Long-Term Survivorship in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Article Snippet: Background: Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been applied to joint prostheses as a bioactive coating to prolong their durability.. However, HA benefits for cup survival in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain controversial.. In this study, we compared the survival of cups with and without HA coating during a minimum follow-up of 18 years. Article Title: Minimum 7-year results of cementless total hip arthroplasty with vitamin E-diffused and 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine-grafted highly cross-linked polyethylene Article Snippet: [ ] Loosening of the femoral stem was determined radiographically according to the method of Engh et al. [ ] Annual radiographs were analyzed using Migration:Article Title: Comparison of polyethylene wear of vitamin E-diffused and MPC-grafted highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty Article Snippet: .. Loosening of the acetabular cup was determined radiographically according to the method of Hodgkinson et al..11 De nite loosening of the acetabular cup was diagnosed when there was migration of the cup or a radiolucent line wider than 1 mm in all DeLee and Charnley zones.12 Loosening of the femoral stem was determined radiographically according to the method of Engh et al..13 Annual radiographs were analyzed using |