small-molecule and a multitarget tki anlotinib (MultiTarget Pharmaceuticals)
Structured Review

Small Molecule And A Multitarget Tki Anlotinib, supplied by MultiTarget Pharmaceuticals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/multitarget/anlotinib/pmc12198539-51-6-4
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Efficacy and safety of first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with or without anti-angiogenesis therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis"
Article Title: Efficacy and safety of first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with or without anti-angiogenesis therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis
Journal: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
doi: 10.1177/17588359251348310
Figure Legend Snippet: Network diagrams of comparisons on different treatments. Direct comparisons are represented by the colored lines connecting the treatments. Line width is proportional to the number of trials, including every pair of treatments, whereas circle size is proportional to the total number of patients for each treatment in the network. Adeb, Adebrelimab; Atez, Atezolizumab; Atez-beva, Atezolizumab + bevacizumab; Benm + anlo, Benmelstobart + anlotinib; Durv, Durvalumab; Nivo, Nivolumab; Pemb, Pembrolizumab; Pla, placebo; Serp, Serplulimab; Tira + atez, Tiragolumabz + atezolizumab; Tisl, Tislelizumab; Tori, Toripalimab.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: HRs, ORs, and their 95% confidence intervals from network meta-analysis of different first-line therapeutic regimens in ES-SCLC patients. (a) HRs and 95% CI for overall survival (upper triangle in yellow) and progression-free survival (lower triangle in green). The hazard ratio < 1.00 provides better survival benefits. (b) ORs and 95% CI for objective response rate (upper triangle in yellow) and grade ⩾ 3 adverse events (lower triangle in green). OR < 1.00 indicates a better efficacy or more toxicity. The results are presented as column-defined treatment versus row-defined treatment. Significant results are in bold. Adeb, Adebrelimab; Atez, Atezolizumab; Atez-beva, Atezolizumab + bevacizumab; Benm-anlo, Benmelstobart + anlotinib; Chemo, Chemotherapy; CI, confidence intervals; Durv, Durvalumab; ES-SCLC, extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer; HR, hazard ratios; Nivo, Nivolumab; OR, odds ratio; Pemb, Pembrolizumab; Serp, Serplulimab; Tisl, Tislelizumab; Tori, Toripalimab.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Bayesian ranking profiles of comparable treatments on efficacy and safety for ES-SCLC patients. Ranking plots indicate the probability of each comparable immunotherapy combination being ranked from first to last on OS, PFS, ORR, and grade ⩾ 3 AEs. Adeb, Adebrelimab; AE, adverse event; Atez, Atezolizumab; Atez-beva, Atezolizumab + bevacizumab; Benm-anlo, Benmelstobart + anlotinib; Durv, Durvalumab; ES-SCLC, extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer; Nivo, Nivolumab; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; Pemb, Pembrolizumab; PFS, progression-free survival; Serp, Serplulimab; Tisl, Tislelizumab; Tori, Toripalimab.
Techniques Used:
![Screening potential candidates of TET-family inhibitors in infected hiPSC-CMs via computational molecular docking simulation. (A) The flowchart of the drug screening platform for molecular docking analysis of TET2 in complex with its DNA substrate and representative inhibitors. (B) Schematic representation of the molecular docking of representative TET2 <t>inhibitors—Bobcat339,</t> TFMB-2HG, and TETi76—into the catalytic pocket of TET2. The figure illustrates the catalytic core of TET2 binding to methylated DNA, followed by computational screening and docking of small-molecule inhibitors into the active site. (C) TET2 in complex with DNA substrate (Protein Data Bank [PDB] ID: 7NE3). Left: Overall structure showing TET2 (ribbon representation) bound to DNA (sticks in orange and magenta). Middle: Close-up view of the catalytic pocket highlighting the interaction surface. Right: 2-dimensional (2D) interaction diagram illustrating contacts between TET2 and the DNA substrate. (D) TET2 in complex with TETi76. Left: Chemical structure of TETi76. Middle: Docked pose of TETi76 in the TET2 catalytic site. Right: 2D interaction diagram showing hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic contacts. (E) TET2 in complex with Bobcat339. Left: Chemical structure of Bobcat339. Middle: Docked binding mode of Bobcat339 in the catalytic site. Right: 2D interaction map illustrating hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, and halogen bonding. (F) TET2 in complex with TFMB-2HG. Left: Chemical structure of TFMB-2HG. Middle: Docked pose within the TET2 active site. Right: 2D interaction map showing hydrogen bonding and minimal hydrophobic interactions.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_0876/pmc12280876/pmc12280876__bmr.0229.fig.005.jpg)
