efficientnetb7 model (Kaggle Inc)
Structured Review

Efficientnetb7 Model, supplied by Kaggle Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/efficientnetb7/efficientnetb0/pmc11620061-218-17-7
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Introducing a novel dataset for facial emotion recognition and demonstrating significant enhancements in deep learning performance through pre-processing techniques"
Article Title: Introducing a novel dataset for facial emotion recognition and demonstrating significant enhancements in deep learning performance through pre-processing techniques
Journal: Heliyon
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38913
Figure Legend Snippet: EfficientnetB7_CNN model architecture.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Evaluation of the models using FER13 and FER24_CK + datasets.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: EfficientNetB7-CNN (implementation parameters).
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Confusion matrix of EfficientNetB7-CNN for FER task on FER24-CK+ (7 classes) private testing.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Outlines the EfficientNetB7-CNN performance measure for private testing.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: State-of-the-art comparison of models’ accuracy using the FER13 dataset as a base.
Techniques Used: Comparison
Related Articles
other:Article Title: SmartSkin-XAI: An Interpretable Deep Learning Approach for Enhanced Skin Cancer Diagnosis in Smart Healthcare Article Snippet: Modified EfficientNet-B3 with Deep Transfer Learning , 90.6% , Magnetic Resonance Imaging:Article Title: A novel hybrid vision UNet architecture for brain tumor segmentation and classification. Article Snippet: .. Recall = TN TP + FN (4) Authors Dataset Approach Results / Metrics Limitations / Future Work Mehta & Arbel et al.17 BraTS2018 3D UNet Dice scores: ET: 0.706 WT: 0.871 TC: 0.771 Need to improve testing accuracy; limited generalizability Cicek et al. (2016)18 Xenopus kidney 3D UNet from sparse annotation IoU: 0.863 Performance may vary with different dataset characteristics; sensitive to annotation quality Gitonga et al.19 BraTS2021 3D Attention-based UNet Dice Coefficient: 0.9864 Computationally intensive Asiri et al. (2023)20 TCGA-LGG, TCIA MRI ResNet50 + UNet IoU: 0.91, DSC: 0.95, SI: 0.95 Limited to LGG class Shedbalkar & Prabhushetty et al.21 Figshare MRI UNet + chopped VGGNet Accuracy: 98.93%, Sensitivity: 0.98, Precision: 0.9833, F1-score: 0.9833 Limited validation and generalization Pravitasari et al.22 Custom UNet-VGG16 Accuracy: 96.1% Need to explore different architecture Kolarik et al.24 Custom + MICCAI 2016 MRI 3D Dense-U-Net SSIM: 0.78547, PSNR: 24.09 dB Need to explore different datasets Chen et al.27 Synapse multi-organ segmentation dataset TransUNet DSC: 77.48, HD: 31.69 Need to evaluate on different dataset Wang et al.28 BraTS 2019 TransBTS Dice scores: ET: 78.92 WT: 90.23 TC: 81.19 Computationally intensive Hatamizadeh et al.29 BraTS 2021 Swin UNETR ET DSC: 0.858, HD: 6.016 WT DSC: 0.926, HD: 5.831 TC DSC: 0.885, HD: 3.770 High memory usage Cao et al.30 Synapse multi-organ segmentation dataset Swin-Unet DSC: 79.13 HD: 21.55 Pure transformer; still evolving for medical images Aloraini et al.31 BraTS 2018 and Figshare ViT-CNN Accuracy: 96.75% (BraTS), 99.10% (Figshare) Need to explore with lightweight CNN model Khushi et al.32 Article Title: Explainable AI in Diagnostic Radiology for Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review, and What Doctors Think About It. Article Snippet: .. Study Pathology Modality Technology Accuracy XAI Dataset [82] 2024 Brain tumor MRI T1w 10 TL frameworks Up to 98% for Biomarker Discovery:Article Title: A novel hybrid vision UNet architecture for brain tumor segmentation and classification. Article Snippet: .. Recall = TN TP + FN (4) Authors Dataset Approach Results / Metrics Limitations / Future Work Mehta & Arbel et al.17 BraTS2018 3D UNet Dice scores: ET: 0.706 WT: 0.871 TC: 0.771 Need to improve testing accuracy; limited generalizability Cicek et al. (2016)18 Xenopus kidney 3D UNet from sparse annotation IoU: 0.863 Performance may vary with different dataset characteristics; sensitive to annotation quality Gitonga et al.19 BraTS2021 3D Attention-based UNet Dice Coefficient: 0.9864 Computationally intensive Asiri et al. (2023)20 TCGA-LGG, TCIA MRI ResNet50 + UNet IoU: 0.91, DSC: 0.95, SI: 0.95 Limited to LGG class Shedbalkar & Prabhushetty et al.21 Figshare MRI UNet + chopped VGGNet Accuracy: 98.93%, Sensitivity: 0.98, Precision: 0.9833, F1-score: 0.9833 Limited validation and generalization Pravitasari et al.22 Custom UNet-VGG16 Accuracy: 96.1% Need to explore different architecture Kolarik et al.24 Custom + MICCAI 2016 MRI 3D Dense-U-Net SSIM: 0.78547, PSNR: 24.09 dB Need to explore different datasets Chen et al.27 Synapse multi-organ segmentation dataset TransUNet DSC: 77.48, HD: 31.69 Need to evaluate on different dataset Wang et al.28 BraTS 2019 TransBTS Dice scores: ET: 78.92 WT: 90.23 TC: 81.19 Computationally intensive Hatamizadeh et al.29 BraTS 2021 Swin UNETR ET DSC: 0.858, HD: 6.016 WT DSC: 0.926, HD: 5.831 TC DSC: 0.885, HD: 3.770 High memory usage Cao et al.30 Synapse multi-organ segmentation dataset Swin-Unet DSC: 79.13 HD: 21.55 Pure transformer; still evolving for medical images Aloraini et al.31 BraTS 2018 and Figshare ViT-CNN Accuracy: 96.75% (BraTS), 99.10% (Figshare) Need to explore with lightweight CNN model Khushi et al.32 Control:Article Title: Using image augmentation techniques and convolutional neural networks to identify insect infestations on tomatoes Article Snippet: .. [ ] , 2022 , Pest Identification and Control with AR. , Xception, MobileNet, Mo-bilenetV2 and |