Review




Structured Review

10X Genomics 10x genomics single cell transcriptome
Decoding single‐cell <t>transcriptome</t> profiles during rat placentation using scRNA‐seq. A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The study included three critical stages of placental development in rats. The labyrinth zone (LZ) and junction zone (JZ) of rat placenta were collected. B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization showing seven major cell types. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase of rat placental cells. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) Line charts showing the proportion of major cell types in three stages. F) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of rat placental cell types. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of trophoblast subclusters, and the GO biological process terms enriched by corresponding subcluster DEGs. I) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of trophoblast ( Krt7 ) and immune ( Ptprc ) cell in clustered trophoblast subclusters. J,K) UMAP visualization showing the results of iTrophoblast integration with trophoblast and immune cell subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of trophoblast and immune cell marker genes. L) Immunostainings of Krt7 and Cd45 (Ptprc) protein in E15.5 rat placenta. M) Hierarchical clustering of iTrophoblast, trophoblast and immune cell subclusters. N) Violin plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. O) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. E0.5‐E15.5, embryonic day 0.5 until 15.5; SC, stromal cell; EC, endothelial cell; Blood P., blood progenitor cells; Ery., erythrocyte; VE, visceral endoderm; TrPC, trophoblast progenitor cell; LaTP, labyrinth trophoblast progenitor cell; SpT, spongiotrophoblast; TGC, trophoblast giant cell; iTrophoblast, immune‐featured trophoblast cell; iSC, immune‐featured stromal cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell; IPC, immune progenitor cell; HBC, hofbauer cell; DC, dendritic cell; NK Cell, natural killer cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; EndMT Cell, endothelial to mesenchymal transition cell.
10x Genomics Single Cell Transcriptome, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/10x+genomics+single+cell+transcriptomics/data+spatial+transcriptomic/pmc11558115-88-4-4
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
10x genomics single cell transcriptome - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Cross‐Species Insights into Trophoblast Invasion During Placentation Governed by Immune‐Featured Trophoblast Cells"

Article Title: Cross‐Species Insights into Trophoblast Invasion During Placentation Governed by Immune‐Featured Trophoblast Cells

Journal: Advanced Science

doi: 10.1002/advs.202407221

Decoding single‐cell transcriptome profiles during rat placentation using scRNA‐seq. A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The study included three critical stages of placental development in rats. The labyrinth zone (LZ) and junction zone (JZ) of rat placenta were collected. B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization showing seven major cell types. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase of rat placental cells. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) Line charts showing the proportion of major cell types in three stages. F) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of rat placental cell types. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of trophoblast subclusters, and the GO biological process terms enriched by corresponding subcluster DEGs. I) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of trophoblast ( Krt7 ) and immune ( Ptprc ) cell in clustered trophoblast subclusters. J,K) UMAP visualization showing the results of iTrophoblast integration with trophoblast and immune cell subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of trophoblast and immune cell marker genes. L) Immunostainings of Krt7 and Cd45 (Ptprc) protein in E15.5 rat placenta. M) Hierarchical clustering of iTrophoblast, trophoblast and immune cell subclusters. N) Violin plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. O) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. E0.5‐E15.5, embryonic day 0.5 until 15.5; SC, stromal cell; EC, endothelial cell; Blood P., blood progenitor cells; Ery., erythrocyte; VE, visceral endoderm; TrPC, trophoblast progenitor cell; LaTP, labyrinth trophoblast progenitor cell; SpT, spongiotrophoblast; TGC, trophoblast giant cell; iTrophoblast, immune‐featured trophoblast cell; iSC, immune‐featured stromal cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell; IPC, immune progenitor cell; HBC, hofbauer cell; DC, dendritic cell; NK Cell, natural killer cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; EndMT Cell, endothelial to mesenchymal transition cell.
Figure Legend Snippet: Decoding single‐cell transcriptome profiles during rat placentation using scRNA‐seq. A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The study included three critical stages of placental development in rats. The labyrinth zone (LZ) and junction zone (JZ) of rat placenta were collected. B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization showing seven major cell types. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase of rat placental cells. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) Line charts showing the proportion of major cell types in three stages. F) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of rat placental cell types. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of trophoblast subclusters, and the GO biological process terms enriched by corresponding subcluster DEGs. I) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of trophoblast ( Krt7 ) and immune ( Ptprc ) cell in clustered trophoblast subclusters. J,K) UMAP visualization showing the results of iTrophoblast integration with trophoblast and immune cell subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of trophoblast and immune cell marker genes. L) Immunostainings of Krt7 and Cd45 (Ptprc) protein in E15.5 rat placenta. M) Hierarchical clustering of iTrophoblast, trophoblast and immune cell subclusters. N) Violin plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. O) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. E0.5‐E15.5, embryonic day 0.5 until 15.5; SC, stromal cell; EC, endothelial cell; Blood P., blood progenitor cells; Ery., erythrocyte; VE, visceral endoderm; TrPC, trophoblast progenitor cell; LaTP, labyrinth trophoblast progenitor cell; SpT, spongiotrophoblast; TGC, trophoblast giant cell; iTrophoblast, immune‐featured trophoblast cell; iSC, immune‐featured stromal cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell; IPC, immune progenitor cell; HBC, hofbauer cell; DC, dendritic cell; NK Cell, natural killer cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; EndMT Cell, endothelial to mesenchymal transition cell.

Techniques Used: Marker, Gene Expression, Expressing

Constructing of the single‐cell transcriptome atlas during early placentation in pigs. A) Schematic diagram of experimental design. The study included four different stages of early placentation in pigs. B) UMAP visualization showing seven major cell types of pig placenta. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of pig placental cell types. F) Stacked bar plot showing the proportion of each trophoblast subcluster in four stages. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top DEGs of trophoblast subclusters and the enriched GO terms by corresponding DEGs. I) Dot plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. J) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. K) Dot plot showing the top DEGs in immune cell subclusters, and the heatmap showing the enriched GO terms. L) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of immune ( PTPRC ) and stromal ( HAND2 ) cell in clustered immune cell subclusters. M,N) UMAP visualization showing the results of iSC integration with immune cell and SC subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of immune cell and SC marker genes. O) Hierarchical clustering of iSC, SC and immune cell subclusters. P0‐P28, day 0 to 28 of pregnancy.
Figure Legend Snippet: Constructing of the single‐cell transcriptome atlas during early placentation in pigs. A) Schematic diagram of experimental design. The study included four different stages of early placentation in pigs. B) UMAP visualization showing seven major cell types of pig placenta. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of pig placental cell types. F) Stacked bar plot showing the proportion of each trophoblast subcluster in four stages. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top DEGs of trophoblast subclusters and the enriched GO terms by corresponding DEGs. I) Dot plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. J) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. K) Dot plot showing the top DEGs in immune cell subclusters, and the heatmap showing the enriched GO terms. L) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of immune ( PTPRC ) and stromal ( HAND2 ) cell in clustered immune cell subclusters. M,N) UMAP visualization showing the results of iSC integration with immune cell and SC subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of immune cell and SC marker genes. O) Hierarchical clustering of iSC, SC and immune cell subclusters. P0‐P28, day 0 to 28 of pregnancy.

Techniques Used: Marker, Gene Expression, Expressing

Related Articles

Spatial Transcriptomics:

Article Title: Single-cell multiomics gene regulatory landscape reveals impaired spermatogonial stem cells and macrophage-driven inflammaging during testicular aging.
Article Snippet: 29 Testicular aging is a key driver of declining male reproductive health, but a comprehensive 30 understanding of its underlying epigenetic drivers is lacking.. To address this, we construct a 31 multiomics aging atlas by integrating single-cell RNA sequencing, single-cell assay for 32 transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (scATAC-seq), and spatial transcriptomics of 33 young and aged mouse testes.. Our analysis reveals that altered chromatin accessibility 34 accompanies transcriptional dysregulation and identifies spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) as 35 the most epigenetically vulnerable population.

Sequencing:

Article Title: Single-cell multiomics gene regulatory landscape reveals impaired spermatogonial stem cells and macrophage-driven inflammaging during testicular aging.
Article Snippet: 29 Testicular aging is a key driver of declining male reproductive health, but a comprehensive 30 understanding of its underlying epigenetic drivers is lacking.. To address this, we construct a 31 multiomics aging atlas by integrating single-cell RNA sequencing, single-cell assay for 32 transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (scATAC-seq), and spatial transcriptomics of 33 young and aged mouse testes.. Our analysis reveals that altered chromatin accessibility 34 accompanies transcriptional dysregulation and identifies spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) as 35 the most epigenetically vulnerable population.

Article Title: Spatial single-cell landscape of tumor-associated macrophages and their crosstalk with the tumor microenvironment.
Article Snippet: .. To minimize batch effects caused by differences in sequencing platforms and methodologies, all single-cell and spatial transcriptomic data were obtained exclusively from the 10x Genomics and 10x Visium platforms. ..

Gene Expression:

Article Title: Single-cell multiomics gene regulatory landscape reveals impaired spermatogonial stem cells and macrophage-driven inflammaging during testicular aging.
Article Snippet: 29 Testicular aging is a key driver of declining male reproductive health, but a comprehensive 30 understanding of its underlying epigenetic drivers is lacking.. To address this, we construct a 31 multiomics aging atlas by integrating single-cell RNA sequencing, single-cell assay for 32 transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (scATAC-seq), and spatial transcriptomics of 33 young and aged mouse testes.. Our analysis reveals that altered chromatin accessibility 34 accompanies transcriptional dysregulation and identifies spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) as 35 the most epigenetically vulnerable population.

Single Cell:

Article Title: Spatial single-cell landscape of tumor-associated macrophages and their crosstalk with the tumor microenvironment.
Article Snippet: .. To minimize batch effects caused by differences in sequencing platforms and methodologies, all single-cell and spatial transcriptomic data were obtained exclusively from the 10x Genomics and 10x Visium platforms. ..

Article Title: The Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor Signaling in Atherosclerosis and Stroke
Article Snippet: .. To characterise TNF signaling within atherosclerotic plaques, we analysed two publicly available datasets: (i) an integrated single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) atlas of 259,116 cells from human carotid, coronary, and femoral plaques (73 donors), and (ii) Xenium (10x Genomics) spatial transcriptomic data comprising 120,164 cells from carotid endarterectomy specimens with pathologist-annotated subregions (12 donors). ..

In Situ:

Article Title: SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination elicit distinct pharyngeal mucosal B cell responses in children.
Article Snippet: .. Spatial transcriptomic profiling with Xenium In Situ platform Slides were prepared following the manufacturer’s instructions and workflow for FFPE tissue samples (CG000578 Rev A; 10x Genomics). .. A 5-μm section from the tissue block containing the same paired tonsil and adenoid samples (one from INF donor and one from VAC donor) used for immunofluorescence were carefully attached to the sample area on a Xenium slide (Histoserv, MD).

Article Title: An antioxidant therapy elicits distinct transcriptome responses in 22q11-deleted upper layer cortical projection neurons.
Article Snippet: .. To assess L 2/3 PN transcriptional responses that underlie NAC’s therapeutic effects in vivo, we first established that spatial transcriptomic RNA quantification in situ (10X Genomics Xenium) securely identifies L 2/3 PNs and their neighbors, thus ensuring that transcriptional states can be assessed in intact cortices of early post-natal WT, LgDel, LgDel + NAC and WT + NAC L 2/3 mice. ..

Article Title: Won't you be my neighbor? Control of the immune response by stromal and immune cell microenvironments within the lymph node.
Article Snippet: Efficacious immune responses require the coordinated encounter of rare antigen-specific adaptive lymphocytes with their cognate innate antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in space and time.. This spatiotemporal problem of immunity is solved by secondary lymphoid organs, such as lymph nodes (LNs), which coordinate adaptive immune responses by recruiting APCs and lymphocytes into close juxtaposition with tissue antigens drained from the periphery.. A central tenet to the overall function of the LN is the spatial organization of leukocytes into discrete microenvironments orchestrated by the mesenchymal and endothelial cells, collectively termed LN stromal cells (LNSCs).

Formalin-fixed Paraffin-Embedded:

Article Title: SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination elicit distinct pharyngeal mucosal B cell responses in children.
Article Snippet: .. Spatial transcriptomic profiling with Xenium In Situ platform Slides were prepared following the manufacturer’s instructions and workflow for FFPE tissue samples (CG000578 Rev A; 10x Genomics). .. A 5-μm section from the tissue block containing the same paired tonsil and adenoid samples (one from INF donor and one from VAC donor) used for immunofluorescence were carefully attached to the sample area on a Xenium slide (Histoserv, MD).

In Vivo:

Article Title: An antioxidant therapy elicits distinct transcriptome responses in 22q11-deleted upper layer cortical projection neurons.
Article Snippet: .. To assess L 2/3 PN transcriptional responses that underlie NAC’s therapeutic effects in vivo, we first established that spatial transcriptomic RNA quantification in situ (10X Genomics Xenium) securely identifies L 2/3 PNs and their neighbors, thus ensuring that transcriptional states can be assessed in intact cortices of early post-natal WT, LgDel, LgDel + NAC and WT + NAC L 2/3 mice. ..

RNA sequencing:

Article Title: The Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor Signaling in Atherosclerosis and Stroke
Article Snippet: .. To characterise TNF signaling within atherosclerotic plaques, we analysed two publicly available datasets: (i) an integrated single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) atlas of 259,116 cells from human carotid, coronary, and femoral plaques (73 donors), and (ii) Xenium (10x Genomics) spatial transcriptomic data comprising 120,164 cells from carotid endarterectomy specimens with pathologist-annotated subregions (12 donors). ..



Similar Products

86
10X Genomics 10x genomics single cell transcriptomics
10x Genomics Single Cell Transcriptomics, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/10x+genomics+single+cell+transcriptomics/cell+single+transcriptomics/pm42054370-629-10-10
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
10x genomics single cell transcriptomics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
10X Genomics 10x genomics single cell transcriptome
Decoding single‐cell <t>transcriptome</t> profiles during rat placentation using scRNA‐seq. A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The study included three critical stages of placental development in rats. The labyrinth zone (LZ) and junction zone (JZ) of rat placenta were collected. B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization showing seven major cell types. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase of rat placental cells. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) Line charts showing the proportion of major cell types in three stages. F) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of rat placental cell types. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of trophoblast subclusters, and the GO biological process terms enriched by corresponding subcluster DEGs. I) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of trophoblast ( Krt7 ) and immune ( Ptprc ) cell in clustered trophoblast subclusters. J,K) UMAP visualization showing the results of iTrophoblast integration with trophoblast and immune cell subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of trophoblast and immune cell marker genes. L) Immunostainings of Krt7 and Cd45 (Ptprc) protein in E15.5 rat placenta. M) Hierarchical clustering of iTrophoblast, trophoblast and immune cell subclusters. N) Violin plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. O) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. E0.5‐E15.5, embryonic day 0.5 until 15.5; SC, stromal cell; EC, endothelial cell; Blood P., blood progenitor cells; Ery., erythrocyte; VE, visceral endoderm; TrPC, trophoblast progenitor cell; LaTP, labyrinth trophoblast progenitor cell; SpT, spongiotrophoblast; TGC, trophoblast giant cell; iTrophoblast, immune‐featured trophoblast cell; iSC, immune‐featured stromal cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell; IPC, immune progenitor cell; HBC, hofbauer cell; DC, dendritic cell; NK Cell, natural killer cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; EndMT Cell, endothelial to mesenchymal transition cell.
10x Genomics Single Cell Transcriptome, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/10x+genomics+single+cell+transcriptomics/data+spatial+transcriptomic/pmc11558115-88-4-4
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
10x genomics single cell transcriptome - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
10X Genomics chromium next gem single cell fixed rna human transcriptome probe kits 10x genomics pn
Decoding single‐cell <t>transcriptome</t> profiles during rat placentation using scRNA‐seq. A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The study included three critical stages of placental development in rats. The labyrinth zone (LZ) and junction zone (JZ) of rat placenta were collected. B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization showing seven major cell types. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase of rat placental cells. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) Line charts showing the proportion of major cell types in three stages. F) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of rat placental cell types. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of trophoblast subclusters, and the GO biological process terms enriched by corresponding subcluster DEGs. I) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of trophoblast ( Krt7 ) and immune ( Ptprc ) cell in clustered trophoblast subclusters. J,K) UMAP visualization showing the results of iTrophoblast integration with trophoblast and immune cell subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of trophoblast and immune cell marker genes. L) Immunostainings of Krt7 and Cd45 (Ptprc) protein in E15.5 rat placenta. M) Hierarchical clustering of iTrophoblast, trophoblast and immune cell subclusters. N) Violin plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. O) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. E0.5‐E15.5, embryonic day 0.5 until 15.5; SC, stromal cell; EC, endothelial cell; Blood P., blood progenitor cells; Ery., erythrocyte; VE, visceral endoderm; TrPC, trophoblast progenitor cell; LaTP, labyrinth trophoblast progenitor cell; SpT, spongiotrophoblast; TGC, trophoblast giant cell; iTrophoblast, immune‐featured trophoblast cell; iSC, immune‐featured stromal cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell; IPC, immune progenitor cell; HBC, hofbauer cell; DC, dendritic cell; NK Cell, natural killer cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; EndMT Cell, endothelial to mesenchymal transition cell.
Chromium Next Gem Single Cell Fixed Rna Human Transcriptome Probe Kits 10x Genomics Pn, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/10x+genomics+single+cell+transcriptomics/cellranger/pm38029745-258-222-233
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chromium next gem single cell fixed rna human transcriptome probe kits 10x genomics pn - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
10X Genomics mouse transcriptome 10x genomics 1000469 chromium next gem single cell fixed rna sample preparation kit 10x genomics 1000414
Decoding single‐cell <t>transcriptome</t> profiles during rat placentation using scRNA‐seq. A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The study included three critical stages of placental development in rats. The labyrinth zone (LZ) and junction zone (JZ) of rat placenta were collected. B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization showing seven major cell types. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase of rat placental cells. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) Line charts showing the proportion of major cell types in three stages. F) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of rat placental cell types. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of trophoblast subclusters, and the GO biological process terms enriched by corresponding subcluster DEGs. I) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of trophoblast ( Krt7 ) and immune ( Ptprc ) cell in clustered trophoblast subclusters. J,K) UMAP visualization showing the results of iTrophoblast integration with trophoblast and immune cell subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of trophoblast and immune cell marker genes. L) Immunostainings of Krt7 and Cd45 (Ptprc) protein in E15.5 rat placenta. M) Hierarchical clustering of iTrophoblast, trophoblast and immune cell subclusters. N) Violin plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. O) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. E0.5‐E15.5, embryonic day 0.5 until 15.5; SC, stromal cell; EC, endothelial cell; Blood P., blood progenitor cells; Ery., erythrocyte; VE, visceral endoderm; TrPC, trophoblast progenitor cell; LaTP, labyrinth trophoblast progenitor cell; SpT, spongiotrophoblast; TGC, trophoblast giant cell; iTrophoblast, immune‐featured trophoblast cell; iSC, immune‐featured stromal cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell; IPC, immune progenitor cell; HBC, hofbauer cell; DC, dendritic cell; NK Cell, natural killer cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; EndMT Cell, endothelial to mesenchymal transition cell.
Mouse Transcriptome 10x Genomics 1000469 Chromium Next Gem Single Cell Fixed Rna Sample Preparation Kit 10x Genomics 1000414, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/10x+genomics+single+cell+transcriptomics/cellranger/pm38086373-210-258-260
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse transcriptome 10x genomics 1000469 chromium next gem single cell fixed rna sample preparation kit 10x genomics 1000414 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
10X Genomics 10x genomics for genomic and transcriptomic analyses at the single cell level
Decoding single‐cell <t>transcriptome</t> profiles during rat placentation using scRNA‐seq. A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The study included three critical stages of placental development in rats. The labyrinth zone (LZ) and junction zone (JZ) of rat placenta were collected. B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization showing seven major cell types. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase of rat placental cells. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) Line charts showing the proportion of major cell types in three stages. F) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of rat placental cell types. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of trophoblast subclusters, and the GO biological process terms enriched by corresponding subcluster DEGs. I) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of trophoblast ( Krt7 ) and immune ( Ptprc ) cell in clustered trophoblast subclusters. J,K) UMAP visualization showing the results of iTrophoblast integration with trophoblast and immune cell subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of trophoblast and immune cell marker genes. L) Immunostainings of Krt7 and Cd45 (Ptprc) protein in E15.5 rat placenta. M) Hierarchical clustering of iTrophoblast, trophoblast and immune cell subclusters. N) Violin plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. O) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. E0.5‐E15.5, embryonic day 0.5 until 15.5; SC, stromal cell; EC, endothelial cell; Blood P., blood progenitor cells; Ery., erythrocyte; VE, visceral endoderm; TrPC, trophoblast progenitor cell; LaTP, labyrinth trophoblast progenitor cell; SpT, spongiotrophoblast; TGC, trophoblast giant cell; iTrophoblast, immune‐featured trophoblast cell; iSC, immune‐featured stromal cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell; IPC, immune progenitor cell; HBC, hofbauer cell; DC, dendritic cell; NK Cell, natural killer cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; EndMT Cell, endothelial to mesenchymal transition cell.
10x Genomics For Genomic And Transcriptomic Analyses At The Single Cell Level, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/10x+genomics+single+cell+transcriptomics/10x+genomics+for+genomic+and+transcriptomic+analyses+at+the+single+cell+level/pm37803464-206-17-7
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
10x genomics for genomic and transcriptomic analyses at the single cell level - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
10X Genomics single-cell transcriptomic data 10x genomics
Decoding single‐cell <t>transcriptome</t> profiles during rat placentation using scRNA‐seq. A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The study included three critical stages of placental development in rats. The labyrinth zone (LZ) and junction zone (JZ) of rat placenta were collected. B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization showing seven major cell types. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase of rat placental cells. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) Line charts showing the proportion of major cell types in three stages. F) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of rat placental cell types. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of trophoblast subclusters, and the GO biological process terms enriched by corresponding subcluster DEGs. I) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of trophoblast ( Krt7 ) and immune ( Ptprc ) cell in clustered trophoblast subclusters. J,K) UMAP visualization showing the results of iTrophoblast integration with trophoblast and immune cell subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of trophoblast and immune cell marker genes. L) Immunostainings of Krt7 and Cd45 (Ptprc) protein in E15.5 rat placenta. M) Hierarchical clustering of iTrophoblast, trophoblast and immune cell subclusters. N) Violin plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. O) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. E0.5‐E15.5, embryonic day 0.5 until 15.5; SC, stromal cell; EC, endothelial cell; Blood P., blood progenitor cells; Ery., erythrocyte; VE, visceral endoderm; TrPC, trophoblast progenitor cell; LaTP, labyrinth trophoblast progenitor cell; SpT, spongiotrophoblast; TGC, trophoblast giant cell; iTrophoblast, immune‐featured trophoblast cell; iSC, immune‐featured stromal cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell; IPC, immune progenitor cell; HBC, hofbauer cell; DC, dendritic cell; NK Cell, natural killer cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; EndMT Cell, endothelial to mesenchymal transition cell.
Single Cell Transcriptomic Data 10x Genomics, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/10x+genomics+single+cell+transcriptomics/single+cell+transcriptome+analysis/pmc09715630__42003_2022_4255_MOESM1_ESM-568-8-11
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
single-cell transcriptomic data 10x genomics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
10X Genomics single-cell transcriptomic profiling 10x genomics chromium
Decoding single‐cell <t>transcriptome</t> profiles during rat placentation using scRNA‐seq. A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The study included three critical stages of placental development in rats. The labyrinth zone (LZ) and junction zone (JZ) of rat placenta were collected. B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization showing seven major cell types. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase of rat placental cells. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) Line charts showing the proportion of major cell types in three stages. F) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of rat placental cell types. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of trophoblast subclusters, and the GO biological process terms enriched by corresponding subcluster DEGs. I) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of trophoblast ( Krt7 ) and immune ( Ptprc ) cell in clustered trophoblast subclusters. J,K) UMAP visualization showing the results of iTrophoblast integration with trophoblast and immune cell subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of trophoblast and immune cell marker genes. L) Immunostainings of Krt7 and Cd45 (Ptprc) protein in E15.5 rat placenta. M) Hierarchical clustering of iTrophoblast, trophoblast and immune cell subclusters. N) Violin plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. O) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. E0.5‐E15.5, embryonic day 0.5 until 15.5; SC, stromal cell; EC, endothelial cell; Blood P., blood progenitor cells; Ery., erythrocyte; VE, visceral endoderm; TrPC, trophoblast progenitor cell; LaTP, labyrinth trophoblast progenitor cell; SpT, spongiotrophoblast; TGC, trophoblast giant cell; iTrophoblast, immune‐featured trophoblast cell; iSC, immune‐featured stromal cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell; IPC, immune progenitor cell; HBC, hofbauer cell; DC, dendritic cell; NK Cell, natural killer cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; EndMT Cell, endothelial to mesenchymal transition cell.
Single Cell Transcriptomic Profiling 10x Genomics Chromium, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/10x+genomics+single+cell+transcriptomics/single+cell+transcriptome+analysis/bio_rxiv__2022__09__15__508118-50-0-3
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
single-cell transcriptomic profiling 10x genomics chromium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
10X Genomics 10x genomics single-cell transcriptome library kit
Decoding single‐cell <t>transcriptome</t> profiles during rat placentation using scRNA‐seq. A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The study included three critical stages of placental development in rats. The labyrinth zone (LZ) and junction zone (JZ) of rat placenta were collected. B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization showing seven major cell types. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase of rat placental cells. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) Line charts showing the proportion of major cell types in three stages. F) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of rat placental cell types. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of trophoblast subclusters, and the GO biological process terms enriched by corresponding subcluster DEGs. I) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of trophoblast ( Krt7 ) and immune ( Ptprc ) cell in clustered trophoblast subclusters. J,K) UMAP visualization showing the results of iTrophoblast integration with trophoblast and immune cell subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of trophoblast and immune cell marker genes. L) Immunostainings of Krt7 and Cd45 (Ptprc) protein in E15.5 rat placenta. M) Hierarchical clustering of iTrophoblast, trophoblast and immune cell subclusters. N) Violin plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. O) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. E0.5‐E15.5, embryonic day 0.5 until 15.5; SC, stromal cell; EC, endothelial cell; Blood P., blood progenitor cells; Ery., erythrocyte; VE, visceral endoderm; TrPC, trophoblast progenitor cell; LaTP, labyrinth trophoblast progenitor cell; SpT, spongiotrophoblast; TGC, trophoblast giant cell; iTrophoblast, immune‐featured trophoblast cell; iSC, immune‐featured stromal cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell; IPC, immune progenitor cell; HBC, hofbauer cell; DC, dendritic cell; NK Cell, natural killer cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; EndMT Cell, endothelial to mesenchymal transition cell.
10x Genomics Single Cell Transcriptome Library Kit, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/10x+genomics+single+cell+transcriptomics/10x+genomics+cdna/pmc09023782__mmc1-85-7-5
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
10x genomics single-cell transcriptome library kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
10X Genomics 10x genomics single cell 3’ transcriptome library
Decoding single‐cell <t>transcriptome</t> profiles during rat placentation using scRNA‐seq. A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The study included three critical stages of placental development in rats. The labyrinth zone (LZ) and junction zone (JZ) of rat placenta were collected. B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization showing seven major cell types. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase of rat placental cells. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) Line charts showing the proportion of major cell types in three stages. F) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of rat placental cell types. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of trophoblast subclusters, and the GO biological process terms enriched by corresponding subcluster DEGs. I) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of trophoblast ( Krt7 ) and immune ( Ptprc ) cell in clustered trophoblast subclusters. J,K) UMAP visualization showing the results of iTrophoblast integration with trophoblast and immune cell subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of trophoblast and immune cell marker genes. L) Immunostainings of Krt7 and Cd45 (Ptprc) protein in E15.5 rat placenta. M) Hierarchical clustering of iTrophoblast, trophoblast and immune cell subclusters. N) Violin plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. O) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. E0.5‐E15.5, embryonic day 0.5 until 15.5; SC, stromal cell; EC, endothelial cell; Blood P., blood progenitor cells; Ery., erythrocyte; VE, visceral endoderm; TrPC, trophoblast progenitor cell; LaTP, labyrinth trophoblast progenitor cell; SpT, spongiotrophoblast; TGC, trophoblast giant cell; iTrophoblast, immune‐featured trophoblast cell; iSC, immune‐featured stromal cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell; IPC, immune progenitor cell; HBC, hofbauer cell; DC, dendritic cell; NK Cell, natural killer cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; EndMT Cell, endothelial to mesenchymal transition cell.
10x Genomics Single Cell 3’ Transcriptome Library, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/10x+genomics+single+cell+transcriptomics/10x+genomics+cdna/pmc08782722__41388_2021_2107_MOESM1_ESM-151-0-2
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
10x genomics single cell 3’ transcriptome library - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Decoding single‐cell transcriptome profiles during rat placentation using scRNA‐seq. A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The study included three critical stages of placental development in rats. The labyrinth zone (LZ) and junction zone (JZ) of rat placenta were collected. B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization showing seven major cell types. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase of rat placental cells. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) Line charts showing the proportion of major cell types in three stages. F) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of rat placental cell types. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of trophoblast subclusters, and the GO biological process terms enriched by corresponding subcluster DEGs. I) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of trophoblast ( Krt7 ) and immune ( Ptprc ) cell in clustered trophoblast subclusters. J,K) UMAP visualization showing the results of iTrophoblast integration with trophoblast and immune cell subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of trophoblast and immune cell marker genes. L) Immunostainings of Krt7 and Cd45 (Ptprc) protein in E15.5 rat placenta. M) Hierarchical clustering of iTrophoblast, trophoblast and immune cell subclusters. N) Violin plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. O) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. E0.5‐E15.5, embryonic day 0.5 until 15.5; SC, stromal cell; EC, endothelial cell; Blood P., blood progenitor cells; Ery., erythrocyte; VE, visceral endoderm; TrPC, trophoblast progenitor cell; LaTP, labyrinth trophoblast progenitor cell; SpT, spongiotrophoblast; TGC, trophoblast giant cell; iTrophoblast, immune‐featured trophoblast cell; iSC, immune‐featured stromal cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell; IPC, immune progenitor cell; HBC, hofbauer cell; DC, dendritic cell; NK Cell, natural killer cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; EndMT Cell, endothelial to mesenchymal transition cell.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Cross‐Species Insights into Trophoblast Invasion During Placentation Governed by Immune‐Featured Trophoblast Cells

doi: 10.1002/advs.202407221

Figure Lengend Snippet: Decoding single‐cell transcriptome profiles during rat placentation using scRNA‐seq. A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. The study included three critical stages of placental development in rats. The labyrinth zone (LZ) and junction zone (JZ) of rat placenta were collected. B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) visualization showing seven major cell types. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase of rat placental cells. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) Line charts showing the proportion of major cell types in three stages. F) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of rat placental cell types. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of trophoblast subclusters, and the GO biological process terms enriched by corresponding subcluster DEGs. I) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of trophoblast ( Krt7 ) and immune ( Ptprc ) cell in clustered trophoblast subclusters. J,K) UMAP visualization showing the results of iTrophoblast integration with trophoblast and immune cell subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of trophoblast and immune cell marker genes. L) Immunostainings of Krt7 and Cd45 (Ptprc) protein in E15.5 rat placenta. M) Hierarchical clustering of iTrophoblast, trophoblast and immune cell subclusters. N) Violin plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. O) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. E0.5‐E15.5, embryonic day 0.5 until 15.5; SC, stromal cell; EC, endothelial cell; Blood P., blood progenitor cells; Ery., erythrocyte; VE, visceral endoderm; TrPC, trophoblast progenitor cell; LaTP, labyrinth trophoblast progenitor cell; SpT, spongiotrophoblast; TGC, trophoblast giant cell; iTrophoblast, immune‐featured trophoblast cell; iSC, immune‐featured stromal cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell; IPC, immune progenitor cell; HBC, hofbauer cell; DC, dendritic cell; NK Cell, natural killer cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; EndMT Cell, endothelial to mesenchymal transition cell.

Article Snippet: [ ] For our 10X Genomics single‐cell transcriptome of placental cells, a total of 13515 homologous genes in rats and pigs were identified for subsequent analysis (Figure ).

Techniques: Marker, Gene Expression, Expressing

Constructing of the single‐cell transcriptome atlas during early placentation in pigs. A) Schematic diagram of experimental design. The study included four different stages of early placentation in pigs. B) UMAP visualization showing seven major cell types of pig placenta. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of pig placental cell types. F) Stacked bar plot showing the proportion of each trophoblast subcluster in four stages. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top DEGs of trophoblast subclusters and the enriched GO terms by corresponding DEGs. I) Dot plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. J) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. K) Dot plot showing the top DEGs in immune cell subclusters, and the heatmap showing the enriched GO terms. L) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of immune ( PTPRC ) and stromal ( HAND2 ) cell in clustered immune cell subclusters. M,N) UMAP visualization showing the results of iSC integration with immune cell and SC subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of immune cell and SC marker genes. O) Hierarchical clustering of iSC, SC and immune cell subclusters. P0‐P28, day 0 to 28 of pregnancy.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Cross‐Species Insights into Trophoblast Invasion During Placentation Governed by Immune‐Featured Trophoblast Cells

doi: 10.1002/advs.202407221

Figure Lengend Snippet: Constructing of the single‐cell transcriptome atlas during early placentation in pigs. A) Schematic diagram of experimental design. The study included four different stages of early placentation in pigs. B) UMAP visualization showing seven major cell types of pig placenta. C) UMAP visualization showing the cell cycle phase. D) UMAP visualization showing the origin of placental cells at different stages. E) UMAP visualization showing subclusters of pig placental cell types. F) Stacked bar plot showing the proportion of each trophoblast subcluster in four stages. G) UMAP visualization showing marker gene expression in different placental trophoblast subclusters. H) Heatmap showing the top DEGs of trophoblast subclusters and the enriched GO terms by corresponding DEGs. I) Dot plot showing the expression of top DEGs in SC subclusters. J) GO term clustering results of SC subclusters. K) Dot plot showing the top DEGs in immune cell subclusters, and the heatmap showing the enriched GO terms. L) UMAP visualization showing typical maker gene expression of immune ( PTPRC ) and stromal ( HAND2 ) cell in clustered immune cell subclusters. M,N) UMAP visualization showing the results of iSC integration with immune cell and SC subclusters, and the corresponding average expression levels of immune cell and SC marker genes. O) Hierarchical clustering of iSC, SC and immune cell subclusters. P0‐P28, day 0 to 28 of pregnancy.

Article Snippet: [ ] For our 10X Genomics single‐cell transcriptome of placental cells, a total of 13515 homologous genes in rats and pigs were identified for subsequent analysis (Figure ).

Techniques: Marker, Gene Expression, Expressing