Review



yld2000-2d  (POSTECH Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    POSTECH Inc yld2000-2d
    Yld2000 2d, supplied by POSTECH Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/yld2000-2d/yld2000+2d/pmc09284507-736-10-1
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    yld2000-2d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Shear:

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations.
    Article Snippet: Yld2000‐2D and Yld 2004‐18p POSTECH, as benchmark organizer provided dataset for the participants not performing their own identification.

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: Fig. 60 Comparison of the experimental yield locus and the predictions using Yld2000-2D and Yld2004–18p identified by POSTECH on physical experiments Fig. 61 Comparison of the experimental with the predictions using Yld2000-2D and Yld2004–18p identified by POSTECH on physical experiments: a normalized flow stress and b r -values

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations.
    Article Snippet: Specifically, POSTECH organizer supplied the values of the parameters for Yld2000-2D and Yld2004–18p (see Table 27 and 28); REEF supplied the values of the Caz2018-Orth yield criterion (see Table 30); UCoimbra supplied the parameters values for Hill 48 yield criterion (stress- r-based identification, see Table 22).

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: POSTECH , Yld2000-2D , X , X , X , X , – , – , O.

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: Specifically, POSTECH organizer supplied the values of the parameters for Yld2000-2D and Yld2004–18p (see Table and ); REEF supplied the values of the Caz2018-Orth yield criterion (see Table ); UCoimbra supplied the parameters values for Hill 48 yield criterion (stress- r -based identification, see Table ).

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: Fig. 58 Validation of Yld2000-2D predictions by UGent and POSTECH vs. experiments at 10% of effective plastic strain: a normalized yield stresses and b r -values Fig. 59 Directions of plastic strain rate obtained in the experimental tests and predicted by VPSC and Yld2000-2D as a function of the angle φ at 10% of effective plastic strain The flexible model Yld2004–18p proposed in [ ] and described by Eq. , “ ” Section, was identified by POSTECH based on physical experiments, but also by NTNU using the same kind of experimental data and also relying on crystal plasticity results (see “ ” Section).

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: The models that predict 8 ears (the 2-D orthotropic yield criteria HomPol4, HomPol6, Yld2000-2D) and the 3-D orthotropic yield criterion Yld2004–18p (POSTECH data set and NTNU based on physical experiments and simulations conducted with their own implementations in the FE code ABAQUS) have an earing amplitude much lower than Hill48 or the experimental one (see Fig. or Tables and ).

    Biomarker Discovery:

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations.
    Article Snippet: Yld2000‐2D and Yld 2004‐18p POSTECH, as benchmark organizer provided dataset for the participants not performing their own identification.

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: Fig. 60 Comparison of the experimental yield locus and the predictions using Yld2000-2D and Yld2004–18p identified by POSTECH on physical experiments Fig. 61 Comparison of the experimental with the predictions using Yld2000-2D and Yld2004–18p identified by POSTECH on physical experiments: a normalized flow stress and b r -values

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations.
    Article Snippet: Specifically, POSTECH organizer supplied the values of the parameters for Yld2000-2D and Yld2004–18p (see Table 27 and 28); REEF supplied the values of the Caz2018-Orth yield criterion (see Table 30); UCoimbra supplied the parameters values for Hill 48 yield criterion (stress- r-based identification, see Table 22).

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: POSTECH , Yld2000-2D , X , X , X , X , – , – , O.

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: Specifically, POSTECH organizer supplied the values of the parameters for Yld2000-2D and Yld2004–18p (see Table and ); REEF supplied the values of the Caz2018-Orth yield criterion (see Table ); UCoimbra supplied the parameters values for Hill 48 yield criterion (stress- r -based identification, see Table ).

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: Fig. 58 Validation of Yld2000-2D predictions by UGent and POSTECH vs. experiments at 10% of effective plastic strain: a normalized yield stresses and b r -values Fig. 59 Directions of plastic strain rate obtained in the experimental tests and predicted by VPSC and Yld2000-2D as a function of the angle φ at 10% of effective plastic strain The flexible model Yld2004–18p proposed in [ ] and described by Eq. , “ ” Section, was identified by POSTECH based on physical experiments, but also by NTNU using the same kind of experimental data and also relying on crystal plasticity results (see “ ” Section).

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: The models that predict 8 ears (the 2-D orthotropic yield criteria HomPol4, HomPol6, Yld2000-2D) and the 3-D orthotropic yield criterion Yld2004–18p (POSTECH data set and NTNU based on physical experiments and simulations conducted with their own implementations in the FE code ABAQUS) have an earing amplitude much lower than Hill48 or the experimental one (see Fig. or Tables and ).

    Comparison:

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations.
    Article Snippet: Yld2000‐2D and Yld 2004‐18p POSTECH, as benchmark organizer provided dataset for the participants not performing their own identification.

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: Fig. 60 Comparison of the experimental yield locus and the predictions using Yld2000-2D and Yld2004–18p identified by POSTECH on physical experiments Fig. 61 Comparison of the experimental with the predictions using Yld2000-2D and Yld2004–18p identified by POSTECH on physical experiments: a normalized flow stress and b r -values

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations.
    Article Snippet: Specifically, POSTECH organizer supplied the values of the parameters for Yld2000-2D and Yld2004–18p (see Table 27 and 28); REEF supplied the values of the Caz2018-Orth yield criterion (see Table 30); UCoimbra supplied the parameters values for Hill 48 yield criterion (stress- r-based identification, see Table 22).

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: POSTECH , Yld2000-2D , X , X , X , X , – , – , O.

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: Specifically, POSTECH organizer supplied the values of the parameters for Yld2000-2D and Yld2004–18p (see Table and ); REEF supplied the values of the Caz2018-Orth yield criterion (see Table ); UCoimbra supplied the parameters values for Hill 48 yield criterion (stress- r -based identification, see Table ).

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: Fig. 58 Validation of Yld2000-2D predictions by UGent and POSTECH vs. experiments at 10% of effective plastic strain: a normalized yield stresses and b r -values Fig. 59 Directions of plastic strain rate obtained in the experimental tests and predicted by VPSC and Yld2000-2D as a function of the angle φ at 10% of effective plastic strain The flexible model Yld2004–18p proposed in [ ] and described by Eq. , “ ” Section, was identified by POSTECH based on physical experiments, but also by NTNU using the same kind of experimental data and also relying on crystal plasticity results (see “ ” Section).

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations
    Article Snippet: The models that predict 8 ears (the 2-D orthotropic yield criteria HomPol4, HomPol6, Yld2000-2D) and the 3-D orthotropic yield criterion Yld2004–18p (POSTECH data set and NTNU based on physical experiments and simulations conducted with their own implementations in the FE code ABAQUS) have an earing amplitude much lower than Hill48 or the experimental one (see Fig. or Tables and ).



    Similar Products

    material models yld2000-2d  (Abaqus Inc)
    90
    Abaqus Inc material models yld2000-2d
    Material Models Yld2000 2d, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/yld2000-2d/yld2004+18p/10__1007_slash_s00170___024___14211___5-221-4-16
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    material models yld2000-2d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    yld2000-2d  (POSTECH Inc)
    90
    POSTECH Inc yld2000-2d
    Yld2000 2d, supplied by POSTECH Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/yld2000-2d/yld2000+2d/pmc09284507-736-10-1
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    yld2000-2d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    yld2000-2d with vpsc  (Abaqus Inc)
    90
    Abaqus Inc yld2000-2d with vpsc
    Number of crystals used to model the texture and target model for each team
    Yld2000 2d With Vpsc, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/yld2000-2d/yld2004+18p/pmc09284507-305-7-9
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    yld2000-2d with vpsc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    yld2000-2d  (Abaqus Inc)
    90
    Abaqus Inc yld2000-2d
    FE code and yield criterion used by each team, with (A) for an associated law, (NA) for a non-associated choice. For polycrystalline model, their use for identification (I) or forming simulations (F) is noted in last column. The source of the set of anisotropy parameters used (benchmark committee, own identification) is also indicated
    Yld2000 2d, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/yld2000-2d/yld2004+18p/pmc09284507-90-4-2
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    yld2000-2d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    yld2000-2d criterion  (POSTECH Inc)
    90
    POSTECH Inc yld2000-2d criterion
    FE code and yield criterion used by each team, with (A) for an associated law, (NA) for a non-associated choice. For polycrystalline model, their use for identification (I) or forming simulations (F) is noted in last column. The source of the set of anisotropy parameters used (benchmark committee, own identification) is also indicated
    Yld2000 2d Criterion, supplied by POSTECH Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/yld2000-2d/yld2000+2d/pmc09284507-1265-9-50
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    yld2000-2d criterion - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Number of crystals used to model the texture and target model for each team

    Journal: International Journal of Material Forming

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations

    doi: 10.1007/s12289-022-01672-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Number of crystals used to model the texture and target model for each team

    Article Snippet: Same + virtual tests , Yld2000-2D with VPSC , ABAQUS , UGent , 0.070 , 4 , 30.59 , 3.31 , 0.208.

    Techniques:

    Identification method and validation of VPSC and Yld2000-2D predictions vs. experiments: a Experimental, virtual and predicted work contours at 10% of effective plastic strain and b Scheme of calibration procedure for m

    Journal: International Journal of Material Forming

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations

    doi: 10.1007/s12289-022-01672-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Identification method and validation of VPSC and Yld2000-2D predictions vs. experiments: a Experimental, virtual and predicted work contours at 10% of effective plastic strain and b Scheme of calibration procedure for m

    Article Snippet: Same + virtual tests , Yld2000-2D with VPSC , ABAQUS , UGent , 0.070 , 4 , 30.59 , 3.31 , 0.208.

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery

    Directions of plastic strain rate obtained in the experimental tests and predicted by VPSC and Yld2000-2D as a function of the angle φ at 10% of effective plastic strain

    Journal: International Journal of Material Forming

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations

    doi: 10.1007/s12289-022-01672-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Directions of plastic strain rate obtained in the experimental tests and predicted by VPSC and Yld2000-2D as a function of the angle φ at 10% of effective plastic strain

    Article Snippet: Same + virtual tests , Yld2000-2D with VPSC , ABAQUS , UGent , 0.070 , 4 , 30.59 , 3.31 , 0.208.

    Techniques:

    Effort required to model the texture and to identify the data set for the polycrystalline models including hardening data. In the last column, referring to the tensile test with the polycrystal model, the number of Finite elements (FE) or the FFT grid size used is indicated in square brackets

    Journal: International Journal of Material Forming

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations

    doi: 10.1007/s12289-022-01672-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effort required to model the texture and to identify the data set for the polycrystalline models including hardening data. In the last column, referring to the tensile test with the polycrystal model, the number of Finite elements (FE) or the FFT grid size used is indicated in square brackets

    Article Snippet: Same + virtual tests , Yld2000-2D with VPSC , ABAQUS , UGent , 0.070 , 4 , 30.59 , 3.31 , 0.208.

    Techniques: Software

    Comparison between experimental and predicted results by Yld2000-2D criterion, with the anisotropy coefficients identified by VPSC virtual tests, as described in “ ” Section: a punch force-displacement, b earing profile

    Journal: International Journal of Material Forming

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations

    doi: 10.1007/s12289-022-01672-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison between experimental and predicted results by Yld2000-2D criterion, with the anisotropy coefficients identified by VPSC virtual tests, as described in “ ” Section: a punch force-displacement, b earing profile

    Article Snippet: Same + virtual tests , Yld2000-2D with VPSC , ABAQUS , UGent , 0.070 , 4 , 30.59 , 3.31 , 0.208.

    Techniques: Comparison

    Predicted FE results by Yld2000-2D criterion, with the anisotropy coefficients identified by VPSC virtual tests, as described in “ ” Section: a uniaxial tensile flow stresses, b Lankford coefficients ( r -values)

    Journal: International Journal of Material Forming

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations

    doi: 10.1007/s12289-022-01672-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Predicted FE results by Yld2000-2D criterion, with the anisotropy coefficients identified by VPSC virtual tests, as described in “ ” Section: a uniaxial tensile flow stresses, b Lankford coefficients ( r -values)

    Article Snippet: Same + virtual tests , Yld2000-2D with VPSC , ABAQUS , UGent , 0.070 , 4 , 30.59 , 3.31 , 0.208.

    Techniques:

    FE prediction synthesis and error vs. experimental values for models using a blank discretization by shell elements. Global error values lower than 0.01 are highlighted in bold

    Journal: International Journal of Material Forming

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations

    doi: 10.1007/s12289-022-01672-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FE prediction synthesis and error vs. experimental values for models using a blank discretization by shell elements. Global error values lower than 0.01 are highlighted in bold

    Article Snippet: Same + virtual tests , Yld2000-2D with VPSC , ABAQUS , UGent , 0.070 , 4 , 30.59 , 3.31 , 0.208.

    Techniques:

    FE code and yield criterion used by each team, with (A) for an associated law, (NA) for a non-associated choice. For polycrystalline model, their use for identification (I) or forming simulations (F) is noted in last column. The source of the set of anisotropy parameters used (benchmark committee, own identification) is also indicated

    Journal: International Journal of Material Forming

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations

    doi: 10.1007/s12289-022-01672-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FE code and yield criterion used by each team, with (A) for an associated law, (NA) for a non-associated choice. For polycrystalline model, their use for identification (I) or forming simulations (F) is noted in last column. The source of the set of anisotropy parameters used (benchmark committee, own identification) is also indicated

    Article Snippet: UGent , ABAQUS , Yld2000-2D (A) , , X , VPSC (I).

    Techniques:

    Coefficients of Yld2000-2D (Line 1: POSTECH identification method based on classical experiments and Line 2: UGent identification method based on virtual tests)

    Journal: International Journal of Material Forming

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations

    doi: 10.1007/s12289-022-01672-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Coefficients of Yld2000-2D (Line 1: POSTECH identification method based on classical experiments and Line 2: UGent identification method based on virtual tests)

    Article Snippet: UGent , ABAQUS , Yld2000-2D (A) , , X , VPSC (I).

    Techniques:

    Mechanical tests used for the phenomenological yield locus identification

    Journal: International Journal of Material Forming

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations

    doi: 10.1007/s12289-022-01672-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Mechanical tests used for the phenomenological yield locus identification

    Article Snippet: UGent , ABAQUS , Yld2000-2D (A) , , X , VPSC (I).

    Techniques: Shear

    FE prediction synthesis and error vs. experimental values for models using a blank discretization by shell elements. Global error values lower than 0.01 are highlighted in bold

    Journal: International Journal of Material Forming

    Article Title: Analysis of ESAFORM 2021 cup drawing benchmark of an Al alloy, critical factors for accuracy and efficiency of FE simulations

    doi: 10.1007/s12289-022-01672-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FE prediction synthesis and error vs. experimental values for models using a blank discretization by shell elements. Global error values lower than 0.01 are highlighted in bold

    Article Snippet: UGent , ABAQUS , Yld2000-2D (A) , , X , VPSC (I).

    Techniques: