Review



ct26 cells  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    ATCC ct26 cells
    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of <t>CT26</t> tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Ct26 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 3037 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ct26 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 3037 article reviews
    ct26 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Chronic inflammation-responsive hydrogel restores myeloid-T cell crosstalk to reinvigorate antitumor immunity against metastatic colorectal cancer"

    Article Title: Chronic inflammation-responsive hydrogel restores myeloid-T cell crosstalk to reinvigorate antitumor immunity against metastatic colorectal cancer

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.03.012

    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of CT26 tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Figure Legend Snippet: PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of CT26 tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Techniques Used: Gene Expression, Incubation, Concentration Assay, In Vitro, Expressing, Cell Culture

    Sustained PGE2 blockade prompts immune activ ation. (A) Structure of hydrogel matrix and scheme of Gel-CXB preparation (Source material from BioRender). (B) Microstructure of the hydrogel. (C) Rheological evaluation of Gel-CXB. (D) CXB release from Gel-CXB in PBS or PBS containing 0.5 mM H 2 O 2 ; n = 3. (E and F) Flow chart (E) and Quantification (F) of CD103 + DC within BMDCs; n = 3. (G and H) Flow chart (G) and Heatmap (H) of costimulatory molecular expression on CD103 - DC, CD103 + DC, or total DC with different treatments; n = 3. (I and J) CXCL9 (I) and Costimulatory molecular expression (J) on cDC1; n = 3. (K – M) CD86 and CD206 expression (K), MHC-II expression (L), and Antigen processing capability (M) of BMDMs incubated with different TCM; n = 3. (N and O) CD69 (N) and CD137 (O) expression on CD8 + T cells co-incubated with different TCM; n = 3. (P) Scheme of Gel-CXB-regulated CT26 TME at different time points in vivo . (Q) Changes of several immune cells within TME at Day 1, 5, and 9; n = 3. (R) Tumor volume of mice treated with CXB alone or Gel-CXB in vivo ; n = 5. (S) CD137 expression on CD8 + T cells in vivo ; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Sustained PGE2 blockade prompts immune activ ation. (A) Structure of hydrogel matrix and scheme of Gel-CXB preparation (Source material from BioRender). (B) Microstructure of the hydrogel. (C) Rheological evaluation of Gel-CXB. (D) CXB release from Gel-CXB in PBS or PBS containing 0.5 mM H 2 O 2 ; n = 3. (E and F) Flow chart (E) and Quantification (F) of CD103 + DC within BMDCs; n = 3. (G and H) Flow chart (G) and Heatmap (H) of costimulatory molecular expression on CD103 - DC, CD103 + DC, or total DC with different treatments; n = 3. (I and J) CXCL9 (I) and Costimulatory molecular expression (J) on cDC1; n = 3. (K – M) CD86 and CD206 expression (K), MHC-II expression (L), and Antigen processing capability (M) of BMDMs incubated with different TCM; n = 3. (N and O) CD69 (N) and CD137 (O) expression on CD8 + T cells co-incubated with different TCM; n = 3. (P) Scheme of Gel-CXB-regulated CT26 TME at different time points in vivo . (Q) Changes of several immune cells within TME at Day 1, 5, and 9; n = 3. (R) Tumor volume of mice treated with CXB alone or Gel-CXB in vivo ; n = 5. (S) CD137 expression on CD8 + T cells in vivo ; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Incubation, In Vivo

    TRANS inhibits tumor growth and enhances local and systemic immune resp onses. (A) Scheme of GC, GCF, or TRANS preparation (Source material from BioRender). (B) Microstructure of GC and TRANS. (C) Experimental design for administration and immune cell analysis. (D) Tumor growth curves under different treatments; n = 5. (E) Tumor weight post-treatment; n = 5. (F – H) CD45 + leukocytes and CD11c + DCs (F), CD86 + M1 and CD206 + M2 macrophages (G), and Tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells (H) within TME; n = 5. (I – L) Mature DCs (I), CD8α + cDC1s (J), CD4 + and CD8 + T cells (K) and CD69 + CD8 + T cells (L) in lymph nodes; n = 5. (M – Q) CD11c + MHC II + DCs (M), CD8α + cDC1s (N), CD4 + and CD8 + T cells (O), CD69 + CD8 + T cells (P), and IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells (Q) in the spleen; n = 5. (R – T) CD8 + T cells (R), The ratio of CD8 + T /CD4 + T cells (S), and IFN-γ levels (T) in blood; n = 5. (U) IFN-γ + CD4 + T and IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells with ex vivo stimulation of PMA/ionomycin for 6 h; n = 3. (V) Apoptosis of CT26 cells co-incubated with splenic T cells for 24 h; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Figure Legend Snippet: TRANS inhibits tumor growth and enhances local and systemic immune resp onses. (A) Scheme of GC, GCF, or TRANS preparation (Source material from BioRender). (B) Microstructure of GC and TRANS. (C) Experimental design for administration and immune cell analysis. (D) Tumor growth curves under different treatments; n = 5. (E) Tumor weight post-treatment; n = 5. (F – H) CD45 + leukocytes and CD11c + DCs (F), CD86 + M1 and CD206 + M2 macrophages (G), and Tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells (H) within TME; n = 5. (I – L) Mature DCs (I), CD8α + cDC1s (J), CD4 + and CD8 + T cells (K) and CD69 + CD8 + T cells (L) in lymph nodes; n = 5. (M – Q) CD11c + MHC II + DCs (M), CD8α + cDC1s (N), CD4 + and CD8 + T cells (O), CD69 + CD8 + T cells (P), and IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells (Q) in the spleen; n = 5. (R – T) CD8 + T cells (R), The ratio of CD8 + T /CD4 + T cells (S), and IFN-γ levels (T) in blood; n = 5. (U) IFN-γ + CD4 + T and IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells with ex vivo stimulation of PMA/ionomycin for 6 h; n = 3. (V) Apoptosis of CT26 cells co-incubated with splenic T cells for 24 h; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Techniques Used: Cell Analysis, Ex Vivo, Incubation

    TRANS inhibits tumor metastasis and induces immune memory in vivo . (A) Experimental design for secondary tumor model. (B and C) Tumor volume curves of primary tumor (B) and secondary tumor (C) during different therapy; n = 5. (D and E) Statistical diagram (D) and flow charts (E) of T cells within secondary tumors; n = 5. (F) Immunofluorescence images of immune cell in primary tumor. (G) Schematic of lung metastasis tumor model and treatment regimen. Mice received subcutaneous and intravenous injections of CT26-Luc. (H – J) In vivo images (H), Primary tumor volume curves (I), and Average radiance in lungs (J) of CT26-Luc tumor-bearing mice; n = 5. (K – M) Lung image (K), Lung metastasis foci counts and weights (L), and H&E staining of lungs (M) from CT26-Luc tumor-bearing mice; n = 5. (N) Schematic of liver metastasis tumor model and treatment regimen. Mice received subcutaneous CT26 tumor and splenic CT26-Luc injections. (O and P) In vivo imaging (O) and Individual radiance in livers (P) of CT26-Luc tumor-bearing mice; n = 10. (Q – S) Live images (Q), Liver weights (R), and H&E staining images of livers (S) from PBS- or TRANS-treated mice; n = 5. (T) Scheme of tumor rechallenge model. (U) Tumor changes in mice rechallenged with CT26 or 4T1; n = 9. (V) Central memory (T CM ) and effector memory (T EM ) gated on CD8 + T cells; n = 5. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Figure Legend Snippet: TRANS inhibits tumor metastasis and induces immune memory in vivo . (A) Experimental design for secondary tumor model. (B and C) Tumor volume curves of primary tumor (B) and secondary tumor (C) during different therapy; n = 5. (D and E) Statistical diagram (D) and flow charts (E) of T cells within secondary tumors; n = 5. (F) Immunofluorescence images of immune cell in primary tumor. (G) Schematic of lung metastasis tumor model and treatment regimen. Mice received subcutaneous and intravenous injections of CT26-Luc. (H – J) In vivo images (H), Primary tumor volume curves (I), and Average radiance in lungs (J) of CT26-Luc tumor-bearing mice; n = 5. (K – M) Lung image (K), Lung metastasis foci counts and weights (L), and H&E staining of lungs (M) from CT26-Luc tumor-bearing mice; n = 5. (N) Schematic of liver metastasis tumor model and treatment regimen. Mice received subcutaneous CT26 tumor and splenic CT26-Luc injections. (O and P) In vivo imaging (O) and Individual radiance in livers (P) of CT26-Luc tumor-bearing mice; n = 10. (Q – S) Live images (Q), Liver weights (R), and H&E staining images of livers (S) from PBS- or TRANS-treated mice; n = 5. (T) Scheme of tumor rechallenge model. (U) Tumor changes in mice rechallenged with CT26 or 4T1; n = 9. (V) Central memory (T CM ) and effector memory (T EM ) gated on CD8 + T cells; n = 5. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Techniques Used: In Vivo, Immunofluorescence, Staining, In Vivo Imaging



    Similar Products

    99
    ATCC ct26 cells
    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of <t>CT26</t> tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Ct26 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ct26 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ct26 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH wt cls1 cells
    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of <t>CT26</t> tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Wt Cls1 Cells, supplied by CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/wt cls1 cells/product/CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wt cls1 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC ct26 wt cells
    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of <t>CT26</t> tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Ct26 Wt Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ct26 wt cells/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ct26 wt cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC ct26 murine crc cells
    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of <t>CT26</t> tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Ct26 Murine Crc Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ct26 murine crc cells/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ct26 murine crc cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    ATCC molt4 1 wt cell line
    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of <t>CT26</t> tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Molt4 1 Wt Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/molt4 1 wt cell line/product/ATCC
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    molt4 1 wt cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC colo320 cells
    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of <t>CT26</t> tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Colo320 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/colo320 cells/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    colo320 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Qiagen wt rbl 2h3 cells
    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of <t>CT26</t> tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.
    Wt Rbl 2h3 Cells, supplied by Qiagen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/wt rbl 2h3 cells/product/Qiagen
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wt rbl 2h3 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC mdck wt cell line
    <t>MDCK</t> permeability assay results for selected compounds (A–C) Efflux ratios are shown for the <t>(A)</t> <t>MDCK-WT,</t> (B) MDCK-MDR1, and (C) MDCK-BCRP assays. The dotted line marks the favorable efflux ratio <2. Favorable values are highlighted in green, unfavorable ratios in purple. Note that dactolisib shows a moderate to good efflux ratio in all three assays; however, generally a poor permeability (see ).
    Mdck Wt Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mdck wt cell line/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mdck wt cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of CT26 tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Chronic inflammation-responsive hydrogel restores myeloid-T cell crosstalk to reinvigorate antitumor immunity against metastatic colorectal cancer

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.03.012

    Figure Lengend Snippet: PGE2 blockade modulates immune cell phenotypes in antitumor resp onses. (A) Inflammatory gene expression across cancer types (GEPIA2 database). (B) Gene expression of Il1b , Cxcl8 , and Lif in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tumor tissue and normal tissue (GEPIA2 database). (C and D) Correlation between Ptgs2 and inflammatory genes in various cancers (C) and COAD (D) (TIMER 2.0). (E) Schematic of immune cells co-incubated with CXB treated tumor conditional medium (TCM) (Source material from BioRender). (F and G) Cell viability (F) and Cell cycle arrest (G) detection of CT26 tumor cells treated with gradient concentrations of CXB; n = 3. (H) PGE2 concentration in CT26 cell supernatants; n = 3. (I) The proportion of CD103 + DC within BMDCs after CXB treatments in vitro ; n = 3. (J and K) Maturation (J) and Antigen processing capability (K) on BMDCs; n = 3. (L – N) Flow charts of CD86 or CD206 expression on Raw 264.7 cells (L). Quantification of CD86 (M) and CD206 (N) expression on Raw 264.7 cells; n = 3. (O and P) Flow charts (O) and Quantification (P) of CD69 and CD137 expression on splenic T cells exposed to CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. (Q) IFN-γ secretion by T cells co-cultured with CXB-pretreated TCM; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Article Snippet: CT26 cells and Raw 264.7 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA).

    Techniques: Gene Expression, Incubation, Concentration Assay, In Vitro, Expressing, Cell Culture

    Sustained PGE2 blockade prompts immune activ ation. (A) Structure of hydrogel matrix and scheme of Gel-CXB preparation (Source material from BioRender). (B) Microstructure of the hydrogel. (C) Rheological evaluation of Gel-CXB. (D) CXB release from Gel-CXB in PBS or PBS containing 0.5 mM H 2 O 2 ; n = 3. (E and F) Flow chart (E) and Quantification (F) of CD103 + DC within BMDCs; n = 3. (G and H) Flow chart (G) and Heatmap (H) of costimulatory molecular expression on CD103 - DC, CD103 + DC, or total DC with different treatments; n = 3. (I and J) CXCL9 (I) and Costimulatory molecular expression (J) on cDC1; n = 3. (K – M) CD86 and CD206 expression (K), MHC-II expression (L), and Antigen processing capability (M) of BMDMs incubated with different TCM; n = 3. (N and O) CD69 (N) and CD137 (O) expression on CD8 + T cells co-incubated with different TCM; n = 3. (P) Scheme of Gel-CXB-regulated CT26 TME at different time points in vivo . (Q) Changes of several immune cells within TME at Day 1, 5, and 9; n = 3. (R) Tumor volume of mice treated with CXB alone or Gel-CXB in vivo ; n = 5. (S) CD137 expression on CD8 + T cells in vivo ; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Chronic inflammation-responsive hydrogel restores myeloid-T cell crosstalk to reinvigorate antitumor immunity against metastatic colorectal cancer

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.03.012

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Sustained PGE2 blockade prompts immune activ ation. (A) Structure of hydrogel matrix and scheme of Gel-CXB preparation (Source material from BioRender). (B) Microstructure of the hydrogel. (C) Rheological evaluation of Gel-CXB. (D) CXB release from Gel-CXB in PBS or PBS containing 0.5 mM H 2 O 2 ; n = 3. (E and F) Flow chart (E) and Quantification (F) of CD103 + DC within BMDCs; n = 3. (G and H) Flow chart (G) and Heatmap (H) of costimulatory molecular expression on CD103 - DC, CD103 + DC, or total DC with different treatments; n = 3. (I and J) CXCL9 (I) and Costimulatory molecular expression (J) on cDC1; n = 3. (K – M) CD86 and CD206 expression (K), MHC-II expression (L), and Antigen processing capability (M) of BMDMs incubated with different TCM; n = 3. (N and O) CD69 (N) and CD137 (O) expression on CD8 + T cells co-incubated with different TCM; n = 3. (P) Scheme of Gel-CXB-regulated CT26 TME at different time points in vivo . (Q) Changes of several immune cells within TME at Day 1, 5, and 9; n = 3. (R) Tumor volume of mice treated with CXB alone or Gel-CXB in vivo ; n = 5. (S) CD137 expression on CD8 + T cells in vivo ; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Article Snippet: CT26 cells and Raw 264.7 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Incubation, In Vivo

    TRANS inhibits tumor growth and enhances local and systemic immune resp onses. (A) Scheme of GC, GCF, or TRANS preparation (Source material from BioRender). (B) Microstructure of GC and TRANS. (C) Experimental design for administration and immune cell analysis. (D) Tumor growth curves under different treatments; n = 5. (E) Tumor weight post-treatment; n = 5. (F – H) CD45 + leukocytes and CD11c + DCs (F), CD86 + M1 and CD206 + M2 macrophages (G), and Tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells (H) within TME; n = 5. (I – L) Mature DCs (I), CD8α + cDC1s (J), CD4 + and CD8 + T cells (K) and CD69 + CD8 + T cells (L) in lymph nodes; n = 5. (M – Q) CD11c + MHC II + DCs (M), CD8α + cDC1s (N), CD4 + and CD8 + T cells (O), CD69 + CD8 + T cells (P), and IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells (Q) in the spleen; n = 5. (R – T) CD8 + T cells (R), The ratio of CD8 + T /CD4 + T cells (S), and IFN-γ levels (T) in blood; n = 5. (U) IFN-γ + CD4 + T and IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells with ex vivo stimulation of PMA/ionomycin for 6 h; n = 3. (V) Apoptosis of CT26 cells co-incubated with splenic T cells for 24 h; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Chronic inflammation-responsive hydrogel restores myeloid-T cell crosstalk to reinvigorate antitumor immunity against metastatic colorectal cancer

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.03.012

    Figure Lengend Snippet: TRANS inhibits tumor growth and enhances local and systemic immune resp onses. (A) Scheme of GC, GCF, or TRANS preparation (Source material from BioRender). (B) Microstructure of GC and TRANS. (C) Experimental design for administration and immune cell analysis. (D) Tumor growth curves under different treatments; n = 5. (E) Tumor weight post-treatment; n = 5. (F – H) CD45 + leukocytes and CD11c + DCs (F), CD86 + M1 and CD206 + M2 macrophages (G), and Tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells (H) within TME; n = 5. (I – L) Mature DCs (I), CD8α + cDC1s (J), CD4 + and CD8 + T cells (K) and CD69 + CD8 + T cells (L) in lymph nodes; n = 5. (M – Q) CD11c + MHC II + DCs (M), CD8α + cDC1s (N), CD4 + and CD8 + T cells (O), CD69 + CD8 + T cells (P), and IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells (Q) in the spleen; n = 5. (R – T) CD8 + T cells (R), The ratio of CD8 + T /CD4 + T cells (S), and IFN-γ levels (T) in blood; n = 5. (U) IFN-γ + CD4 + T and IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells with ex vivo stimulation of PMA/ionomycin for 6 h; n = 3. (V) Apoptosis of CT26 cells co-incubated with splenic T cells for 24 h; n = 3. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Article Snippet: CT26 cells and Raw 264.7 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA).

    Techniques: Cell Analysis, Ex Vivo, Incubation

    TRANS inhibits tumor metastasis and induces immune memory in vivo . (A) Experimental design for secondary tumor model. (B and C) Tumor volume curves of primary tumor (B) and secondary tumor (C) during different therapy; n = 5. (D and E) Statistical diagram (D) and flow charts (E) of T cells within secondary tumors; n = 5. (F) Immunofluorescence images of immune cell in primary tumor. (G) Schematic of lung metastasis tumor model and treatment regimen. Mice received subcutaneous and intravenous injections of CT26-Luc. (H – J) In vivo images (H), Primary tumor volume curves (I), and Average radiance in lungs (J) of CT26-Luc tumor-bearing mice; n = 5. (K – M) Lung image (K), Lung metastasis foci counts and weights (L), and H&E staining of lungs (M) from CT26-Luc tumor-bearing mice; n = 5. (N) Schematic of liver metastasis tumor model and treatment regimen. Mice received subcutaneous CT26 tumor and splenic CT26-Luc injections. (O and P) In vivo imaging (O) and Individual radiance in livers (P) of CT26-Luc tumor-bearing mice; n = 10. (Q – S) Live images (Q), Liver weights (R), and H&E staining images of livers (S) from PBS- or TRANS-treated mice; n = 5. (T) Scheme of tumor rechallenge model. (U) Tumor changes in mice rechallenged with CT26 or 4T1; n = 9. (V) Central memory (T CM ) and effector memory (T EM ) gated on CD8 + T cells; n = 5. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Chronic inflammation-responsive hydrogel restores myeloid-T cell crosstalk to reinvigorate antitumor immunity against metastatic colorectal cancer

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.03.012

    Figure Lengend Snippet: TRANS inhibits tumor metastasis and induces immune memory in vivo . (A) Experimental design for secondary tumor model. (B and C) Tumor volume curves of primary tumor (B) and secondary tumor (C) during different therapy; n = 5. (D and E) Statistical diagram (D) and flow charts (E) of T cells within secondary tumors; n = 5. (F) Immunofluorescence images of immune cell in primary tumor. (G) Schematic of lung metastasis tumor model and treatment regimen. Mice received subcutaneous and intravenous injections of CT26-Luc. (H – J) In vivo images (H), Primary tumor volume curves (I), and Average radiance in lungs (J) of CT26-Luc tumor-bearing mice; n = 5. (K – M) Lung image (K), Lung metastasis foci counts and weights (L), and H&E staining of lungs (M) from CT26-Luc tumor-bearing mice; n = 5. (N) Schematic of liver metastasis tumor model and treatment regimen. Mice received subcutaneous CT26 tumor and splenic CT26-Luc injections. (O and P) In vivo imaging (O) and Individual radiance in livers (P) of CT26-Luc tumor-bearing mice; n = 10. (Q – S) Live images (Q), Liver weights (R), and H&E staining images of livers (S) from PBS- or TRANS-treated mice; n = 5. (T) Scheme of tumor rechallenge model. (U) Tumor changes in mice rechallenged with CT26 or 4T1; n = 9. (V) Central memory (T CM ) and effector memory (T EM ) gated on CD8 + T cells; n = 5. Data are presented as mean ± SD, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA.

    Article Snippet: CT26 cells and Raw 264.7 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Immunofluorescence, Staining, In Vivo Imaging

    MDCK permeability assay results for selected compounds (A–C) Efflux ratios are shown for the (A) MDCK-WT, (B) MDCK-MDR1, and (C) MDCK-BCRP assays. The dotted line marks the favorable efflux ratio <2. Favorable values are highlighted in green, unfavorable ratios in purple. Note that dactolisib shows a moderate to good efflux ratio in all three assays; however, generally a poor permeability (see ).

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Repurposing drugs for treating the neurobehavioral manifestations of PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115428

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MDCK permeability assay results for selected compounds (A–C) Efflux ratios are shown for the (A) MDCK-WT, (B) MDCK-MDR1, and (C) MDCK-BCRP assays. The dotted line marks the favorable efflux ratio <2. Favorable values are highlighted in green, unfavorable ratios in purple. Note that dactolisib shows a moderate to good efflux ratio in all three assays; however, generally a poor permeability (see ).

    Article Snippet: The MDCK WT cell line was obtained from ATCC (CRTL-2936) and grown in DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium, GlutaMAX) with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (HI FBS), at 37°C and 5% CO2.

    Techniques: Permeability