hsp70 inhibitor ver 155008 (MedChemExpress)
Structured Review
Hsp70 Inhibitor Ver 155008, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 63 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ver+155008/VER-155008/pm42501861-58-0-10
Average 95 stars, based on 63 article reviews
Images
Related Articles
Concentration Assay:Article Title: Stress-specific NONO interactomes reveal a key role of Hsp70 chaperone activity in regulation of paraspeckle formation. Article Snippet: Sulforaphane (SFN, Sigma-Aldrich, S4441) was added to the cells at a final concentration of 20 μM for 6 h. For starvation, cells were washed thoroughly with Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 14025092) before being left in the solution for 6 h. For heat shock (HS), cells were subjected to 43°C for 30 min and then returned to 37°C for recovery. .. Article Title: Stress-specific NONO interactomes reveal a key role of Hsp70 chaperone activity in regulation of paraspeckle formation Article Snippet: Sulforaphane (SFN, Sigma-Aldrich, S4441) was added to the cells at a final concentration of 20 μM for 6 h. For starvation, cells were washed thoroughly with Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 14025092) before being left in the solution for 6 h. For heat shock (HS), cells were subjected to 43°C for 30 min and then returned to 37°C for recovery. .. other:Article Title: Patient therapy outcome modeling in cancer organoids is improved by cancer‐associated fibroblasts and organoid assembly convolution Article Snippet: Thw following drugs were used in this study: Article Title: Insights into SARS-CoV-2 replication control via targeting the host hijacking function of NSP12 Article Snippet: Cycloheximide, Pronase E, Bafilomycin A1, Chloroquine, MG132, AR7, VER-155008, Geldanamycin, and Remdesivir (MedChemExpress, Shanghai, China) were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) as stock solutions, followed by storage at − 20 ◦ C. The antibodies used were as follows: Hsc70 primary antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); ß-actin, GAPDH, SARSCoV-2 NSP12 primary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA); HA, Flag, GFP primary antibody (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China); Strep and SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein primary antibody, HRP-conjugated mouse anti-DDDDKTag, HRP-conjugated goat anti-Mouse, HRP-conjugated goat anti-Rabbit (ABclonal Technology, Wuhan, China); and ß-tubulin, LC3B, p62/SQSTM1, ATG5, LAMP2a, HSP90 primary antibody (Abmart, Shanghai, China). |


![(A) Left upper panel: schematic diagram of the experimental design. Left lower panel: the embryo development rate upon DMSO or G&V treatment (Ganetespib 5nM and <t>VER155008</t> 5μM). The data are presented as mean ± SEM. [DMSO, n = 67; G&V (1C-B), n = 64; G&V (4C-B), n = 47. N represents the total number of embryos from two independent experiments]. Right panel: representative images of blastocyst stage embryos after chaperones inhibition (G&V). Scale bar,100 μm. Red arrows indicate representative arrested embryos in G&V (1C-B) group. (B) Scatter plots comparing gene expression profiles of late-2cell embryos treated with G&V or DMSO. The x and y axis of the dot plots are Log 2 CPM from RNA-seq. Fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. ZGA genes, n=2,773. (C) Venn diagram showing the overlapped downregulated ZGA genes between NFYA depleted (NFYA-dTAG) and G&V treated L2C embryos. P values (Fisher’s exact test, two-sided) for overlapped genes are also shown. (D) Upper panel: schematic diagram of the experimental design. Lower left panel: ovarian morphology of 6 days in vitro cultured P4 ovaries with DMSO and G&V treatment. DDX4 stained oocytes. The white arrowhead indicates representative growing oocytes. Scale bar, 50 μm. Lower right panel: numbers of growing oocytes (DDX4 positive oocytes bigger than 25 μm in diameter that were surrounded by cuboidal granulosa cells) in each ovary after 6 days culture with DMSO and G&V treatment. Quantitative data are shown as mean ± SEM; ∗∗p < 0.01, Student’s t test. (E) Scatter plots comparing the gene expression profiles of growing oocytes (GOs) from 6 days in vitro cultured P4 ovaries with G&V or DMSO. The x and y axis of the dot plots are Log 2 CPM from RNA-seq. Fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. PFA genes, n=2,463. (F) Venn diagram showing the overlapped downregulated PFA genes between Nfy a-cKO and G&V treated GOs. P values (Fisher’s exact test, two-sided) for overlapped genes are also shown. (G) Model illustrating the role of NFYA in PFA and ZGA. Before PFA (primordial), the PFA genes are silenced. Subsequently (primary and secondary), NFYA binding promotes open chromatin and activates PFA genes through promoter and distal binding. Loss of NFYA leads to reduced chromatin accessibility, defective PFA, and early follicular degeneration. Before ZGA (1C), the ZGA genes are silenced. Subsequently (L2C), NFYA activates ZGA genes through promoter and enhancer binding. Loss of NFYA leads to defective ZGA and predominantly embryo arrest at 2-cell stage. (H) NFYA pre-occupies and regulates a set of genes, including chaperones and histone genes, common in both PFA and ZGA through conserved promoter binding.](https://bio-rxiv-images-cdn.bioz.com/dois_ending_with_71/10__64898_slash_2026__03__30__715371/10__64898_slash_2026__03__30__715371___F7.large.jpg)
