random permutation sequence generator (MathWorks Inc)
MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier 
96
Structured Review
MathWorks Inc
random permutation sequence generator
![Detailed information extracted from studies included in this systematic review [part 2]](https://pub-med-central-html-table-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_5071/pmc11635071/pmc11635071__Tab4__random_ascii32_permutation_ascii32_sequence_ascii32_generator__mathworks_ascii32_inc.jpg)
Random Permutation Sequence Generator, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 456 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/random+permutation+sequence+generator/Instrument+Control+Toolbox/pmc11635071-34-103-112
Average 96 stars, based on 456 article reviews
Random Permutation Sequence Generator, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 456 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/random+permutation+sequence+generator/Instrument+Control+Toolbox/pmc11635071-34-103-112
Average 96 stars, based on 456 article reviews
random permutation sequence generator - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
96/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "Systematic review of peri-implant conditions and aesthetic outcomes of customized versus conventional healing abutments"
Article Title: Systematic review of peri-implant conditions and aesthetic outcomes of customized versus conventional healing abutments
Journal: International Journal of Implant Dentistry
doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00581-8
Figure Legend Snippet: Detailed information extracted from studies included in this systematic review [part 2]
Techniques Used: Control, Selection, Polymer, Injection, Comparison, Sequencing
Related Articles
Sequencing:Article Title: Maxillary sinus augmentation with three different biomaterials: Histological, histomorphometric, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Article Snippet: Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain Formerly, Unit of Oral Surgery and Implantology, University Hospitals of Geneva, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Science, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti, Chieti, Italy Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and of the Critical Needs Pathologies, University-Hospital of Pisa, Complex Unit of Stomatology and Oral Surgery, Pisa, Italy Article Title: Systematic review of peri-implant conditions and aesthetic outcomes of customized versus conventional healing abutments Article Snippet: Hu et al. [ ] , Fit titanium healing abutment (Straumann RC Healing Abutment, conical shape) , Circumference of a PEEK (polyether ether ketone) healing abutment (Straumann Regular CrossFit Healing Abutment, customizable, D 7 mm, polymer) was roughened by carving some grooves; light-polymerizing acrylic resin (ShoFu, Kyoto, Japan) was injected in the space between the abutment and the working cast to sculpt the emergence profile of the natural tooth , Resin hand-made , No information , Vertical bone changes horizontal bone changes, facial mucosal level (FML) (distance between mid-buccal mucosal margin to reference tooth cusps) , none , 100% , 100% , No clear information (all surgical sites were distributed into 2 groups according to the size of the alveolar socket (for sockets too large to be closed by titanium healing abutments)). .. Perez et al. [ ] , Standard healing abutment (cylindrical/convex) , Fabricated in resin after an impression taken with the pick-up impression copings using a polyether material (insertion within 24 h after implant placement) , Resin rand-made , Screw-retained crown (4 months after implant placement) , Papilla Index Pink Esthetic Score (PES) , (a) Comparison of the changes of soft tissues facial soft tissue level, width of keratinized gingiva (b) comparison of changes of the peri-implant bone level (c) comparison of implant success rate (d) comparison of implant failure and complication rate (biological and technical complications) , 100% , 100% , Using a Comparison:Article Title: Systematic review of peri-implant conditions and aesthetic outcomes of customized versus conventional healing abutments Article Snippet: Hu et al. [ ] , Fit titanium healing abutment (Straumann RC Healing Abutment, conical shape) , Circumference of a PEEK (polyether ether ketone) healing abutment (Straumann Regular CrossFit Healing Abutment, customizable, D 7 mm, polymer) was roughened by carving some grooves; light-polymerizing acrylic resin (ShoFu, Kyoto, Japan) was injected in the space between the abutment and the working cast to sculpt the emergence profile of the natural tooth , Resin hand-made , No information , Vertical bone changes horizontal bone changes, facial mucosal level (FML) (distance between mid-buccal mucosal margin to reference tooth cusps) , none , 100% , 100% , No clear information (all surgical sites were distributed into 2 groups according to the size of the alveolar socket (for sockets too large to be closed by titanium healing abutments)). .. Perez et al. [ ] , Standard healing abutment (cylindrical/convex) , Fabricated in resin after an impression taken with the pick-up impression copings using a polyether material (insertion within 24 h after implant placement) , Resin rand-made , Screw-retained crown (4 months after implant placement) , Papilla Index Pink Esthetic Score (PES) , (a) Comparison of the changes of soft tissues facial soft tissue level, width of keratinized gingiva (b) comparison of changes of the peri-implant bone level (c) comparison of implant success rate (d) comparison of implant failure and complication rate (biological and technical complications) , 100% , 100% , Using a |