proteinchip pbs ii reader (Bio-Rad)
Bio-Rad is a verified supplier 
Bio-Rad manufactures this product 
90
Structured Review
Bio-Rad
proteinchip pbs ii reader
Proteinchip Pbs Ii Reader, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/proteinchip+pbs+ii+reader/ProteinChip+All-In-One+Protein+Standard+II/pm28088872-45-6-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Proteinchip Pbs Ii Reader, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/proteinchip+pbs+ii+reader/ProteinChip+All-In-One+Protein+Standard+II/pm28088872-45-6-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
proteinchip pbs ii reader - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
Software:Article Title: Prognostic prediction by liver tissue proteomic profiling in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Article Snippet: Liver Surgery & Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, ICMDM, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain Biochemistry & Molecular Genetics Service, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain Physiological Sciences Department I, University of Barcelona, Casanova, 143, 08036, Barcelona, Spain *Author for correspondence: Tel.. : +34 93 227 54 00; Fax: +34 93 227 98 07; jfuster@clinic.cat aim: To obtain proteomic profiles in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and identify the relationship between profiles and the prognosis of CRLM patients. materials & methods: Prognosis prediction (favorable or unfavorable according to Fong’s score) by a classification and regression tree algorithm of surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization TOF–MS proteomic profiles from cryopreserved CRLM (patients) and normal liver tissue (controls). results: The protein peak 7371 m/z showed the clearest differences between CRLM and control groups (94.1% sensitivity, 100% specificity, p < 0.001).. The algorithm that best differentiated favorable and unfavorable groups combined 2970 and 2871 m/z protein peaks (100% sensitivity, 90% specificity). |
