jpeg/heif encoder canon digic (Canon inc)
Structured Review
![Comparison of energy consumption (given by Energy/MAC) as a function of number of inputs pixels N for encoding via matrix multiplication using electronic approaches such as GPU, SoC, or <t>ASIC-based</t> (black solid line with a red band) and the presented optical approach using a photonic encoder with average transmission \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${T}_{{scatter}}=20\%$$\end{document} T s c a t t e r = 20 % (blue solid line). For the electronic approaches, typical energy efficiency of these digital accelerators is on the order of ~1 pJ/MAC and the red band shows the range of values for different accelerators. For the photonic approach, different color-coded lines correspond to the different components contributing to the total energy consumption such as the laser (dashed red line), modulators (dashed yellow lines), and detectors (dashed magenta line). The vertical gray line corresponds to energy consumption values for an 8 × 8 kernel or a 64-input pixel block. The energy consumption is dominated by the input laser and the overall energy efficiency of the presented optical approach improves as N or number of input pixels increases.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_0346/pmc11130346/pmc11130346__41467_2024_48099_Fig7_HTML.jpg)
Jpeg/Heif Encoder Canon Digic, supplied by Canon inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/jpeg+encoder/jpeg+heif+encoder+canon+digic/pmc11130346-290-27-24
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Integrated photonic encoder for low power and high-speed image processing"
Article Title: Integrated photonic encoder for low power and high-speed image processing
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48099-2
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of energy consumption (given by Energy/MAC) as a function of number of inputs pixels N for encoding via matrix multiplication using electronic approaches such as GPU, SoC, or ASIC-based (black solid line with a red band) and the presented optical approach using a photonic encoder with average transmission \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${T}_{{scatter}}=20\%$$\end{document} T s c a t t e r = 20 % (blue solid line). For the electronic approaches, typical energy efficiency of these digital accelerators is on the order of ~1 pJ/MAC and the red band shows the range of values for different accelerators. For the photonic approach, different color-coded lines correspond to the different components contributing to the total energy consumption such as the laser (dashed red line), modulators (dashed yellow lines), and detectors (dashed magenta line). The vertical gray line corresponds to energy consumption values for an 8 × 8 kernel or a 64-input pixel block. The energy consumption is dominated by the input laser and the overall energy efficiency of the presented optical approach improves as N or number of input pixels increases.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Transmission Assay, Blocking Assay
