gmpcpp (Jena Bioscience)
Structured Review

Gmpcpp, supplied by Jena Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 189 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gmpcpp/product/Jena Bioscience
Average 96 stars, based on 189 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Asgard archaeal origin of microtubules"
Article Title: Asgard archaeal origin of microtubules
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.02.15.705738
Figure Legend Snippet: A) Coomassie-stained SDS PAGE gels showing strong soluble untagged AtubAB expression in E. coli C41(DE3) cells (left), purified His 8 and Strep-tagged AtubAhBs (middle) and purified untagged AtubAB (right), as used in this study. B) Size-exclusion chromatography coupled with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) reveals that purified untagged AtubAB is a stable heterodimer. C) AtubAB is a slow GTPase: 0.192 +/- 0.004 nmol phosphates released/nmol AtubAB/min (25°C), n = 3. D) Critical concentration of AtubAB polymerisation in BRB80 + 500 mM potassium glutamate Polymerisation Buffer (used throughout this study) is ∼3 g/L (62 µM dimer). E) Pelleting assay revealing that AtubAB polymerisation is GTP-dependent and can also be triggered by the non-hydrolysable GTP analogue GMPCPP. L, loaded; S, supernatant; P. pellet. F) 90° 360 nm light scattering assay showing the same GTP/GMPCPP-dependence of AtubAB polymerisation as in E. GTP hydrolysis leads to depolymerisation, adding GTP again leads to re-polymerisation. G) Pelleting assay showing the inhibition of GTP-induced AtubAB polymerisation by the tubulin inhibitor maytansine (MAY). DMSO and MAY reactions also contained GTP. (see also ) H) 90° 360 nm light scattering assay showing the same maytansine inhibition of GTP-induced AtubAB polymerisation as in G.
Techniques Used: Staining, SDS Page, Expressing, Purification, Size-exclusion Chromatography, Multi-Angle Light Scattering, Concentration Assay, Scattering Assay, Inhibition
Figure Legend Snippet: Polymerisation performed in BRB80 + 500 mM potassium glutamate Polymerisation Buffer with GDP, GTP and GMPCPP nucleotides (scale bars = 5 µm). GTP and GMPCPP-containing reactions show many filaments. See also the corresponding pelleting experiment in .
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Inset: assay design; biotinylated, GMPCPP-stabilised AtubAB dimers (labelled with 20% Alexa Fluor 647, shown as red) were anchored via NeutrAvidin to PEG Silane. Free AtubAB dimers (4 µM 20% Atto 488-labelled, cyan) were added, and filament polymerisation was observed by TIRF (total internal reflection fluorescence) microscopy. Field view revealing red GMPCPP seeds with plus- and minus-end growth (cyan). Only this used 20% tagged (unlabelled) AtubAhBs to observe dynamics at high concentrations needed for field views. Scale bar = 10 µm. B) Time-lapse of plus-end growth of untagged AtubAB filament. The 10 th image down shows the moment just after catastrophe, the ultra-rapid depolymerisation of the mini microtubule. Scale bar 5 µm. C) Kymograph (time vertical, filament axis horizontal) showing an untagged AtubAB filament growing and undergoing catastrophe at the plus-end. One growth episode (line) and one catastrophe event (arrowhead) are highlighted - it is the same as in panel B. Scale bars, 2 min / 2 µm. See also Supplementary Figures S4A & B and Movie M5. D) Asgard archaeal 4-pf mini microtubules show all the hallmarks of eukaryotic 13-protofilament microtubules - but are much thinner. We therefore suggest it is possible that Asgard mini microtubules are the evolutionary precursors of eukaryotic microtubules. Arrows do not indicate evolutionary distances or complexity.
Techniques Used: Fluorescence, Microscopy
Figure Legend Snippet: TIRF microscopy, AtubAB polymerisation and kymographs as in . Red: GMPCPP-stabilised seeds (not depolymerising), cyan: AtubAB with GTP/GDP, dynamic . i) Field of view using untagged proteins, only (4 µM final concentration). Scale bar 5 µm. ii) and iii) Further examples of dynamic untagged AtubAB filaments (4 µM final concentration), similar to , showing slow growth at the minus ends (left) and fast growth and dynamic instabilities at the plus ends (right). iv) Same as ii and iii for a sample with 20% tagged, unlabelled AtubAhBs added (Methods), to increase turnover at higher concentrations needed to get highly populated field views (as in ) (5 µM, see Methods). Scale bars = 2 min and 2 µm.
Techniques Used: Microscopy, Concentration Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Relate to and . i) & ii) AtubAB GMPCPP seeds were polymerised and filament growth rates (i) (minus ends, median speed of growth 0.48 µm/min; plus ends, median speed of growth 1.80 µm/min) and maximal lengths before undergoing catastrophe (ii) were measured. p values from two-sided Kruskal-Wallis tests for non-parametric samples are indicated; n, number of individual growth events quantified from at least three independent experiments. Thick lines, median; thin lines, quartile. iii) Cumulative AtubAB filament lifetime distributions of mini microtubules grown at the minus (blue) and plus ends (green). Mean lifetime estimates +/- error (lifetime at half cumulative distribution): 451.9 +/- 55.5 s (minus ends) and 45.1 +/- 1.6 s (plus ends). Line, gamma distribution fits.
Techniques Used:
