finite impulse response function of marsbar (SourceForge net)
Structured Review

Finite Impulse Response Function Of Marsbar, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/finite+impulse+response+function+marsbar/finite+impulse+response+function+implemented+with+marsbar/pmc04162742-157-11-12
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Aberrant supplementary motor complex and limbic activity during motor preparation in motor conversion disorder"
Article Title: Aberrant supplementary motor complex and limbic activity during motor preparation in motor conversion disorder
Journal: Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society
doi: 10.1002/mds.23890
Figure Legend Snippet: The SPM image represents the Group effect of the mixed measures ANOVA comparing internally generated versus fixation (I–F) and externally generated versus fixation (E–F) as within-subject factors and conversion disorder patients (CD) and normal subjects (NV) as between-subject factors. The SPM image shows decreased activity of the left supplementary motor area (SMA) in CD patients relative to NV during I-E. The contrast estimate and time course analysis for I and E in CD patients and NV are also shown for the left SMA. The time course analysis using the Finite Impulse Response function of MarsBar (marsbar.sourceforge.net) was time-locked to the two-second cue and the areas in white indicate the cue-related peak hemodynamic response function. The SPM image is shown at P<0.001 uncorrected Cluster size >10. S=seconds. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Techniques Used: Generated, Activity Assay, Standard Deviation
Related Articles
Comparison:Article Title: Decreased demands on cognitive control reveal the neural processing benefits of forgetting. Article Snippet: Remembering often requires the selection of goal-relevant memories in the face of competition from irrelevant memories.. Although there is a cost of selecting target memories over competing memories (increased forgetting of the competing memories), here we report neural evidence for the adaptive benefits of forgetting—namely, reduced demands on cognitive control during future acts of remembering.. Functional magnetic resonance imaging during selective retrieval showed that repeated retrieval of target memories was accompanied by dynamic reductions in the engagement of functionally coupled cognitive control mechanisms that detect (anterior cingulate cortex) and resolve (dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex) mnemonic competition. |