damage states (MedChemExpress)
Structured Review
Damage States, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ds2/DS2/10__1016_slash_j__engstruct__2026__122270-149-10-51
Average 94 stars, based on 5 article reviews
Images
Related Articles
other:Article Title: Hazard-based seismic fragility functions for steel moment-resisting frame buildings through data-driven damage state identification Article Snippet: This paper employs supervised and unsupervised learning methods to present hazard-based seismic fragility functions for Steel Moment-Resisting Frame (SMRF) buildings.. The database supporting this research comprises structural responses of over 12,000 time history analyses for 100 SMRF buildings lumped into three categories: low-, mid-, and high-rise.. The ground motions have been selected to represent three hazard levels, resulting in Service Level Earthquake (SLE), Design Basis Earthquake (DBE), and Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE). Article Title: Seismic fragility models for base‐isolated unreinforced masonry buildings with fibre‐reinforced elastomeric isolators Article Snippet: Given Article Title: Seismic fragility models for base‐isolated unreinforced masonry buildings with fibre‐reinforced elastomeric isolators Article Snippet: The implementation of BI system significantly improved the seismic performance of 2S-I building by reducing PoE( Article Title: Incremental dynamic analysis applied to seismic financial risk assessment of bridges Article Snippet: Emerging international best practice for seismic design is tending to adopt a dual level intensity approach: (i) a DBE represented by a 10% Table 1 Damage states adapted from HAZUS [3] and loss ratios assigned Damage state Failure mechanism Repair required Outage Drift limit (%) Loss ratio (%) NZ Japan Caltrans DS1 None Pre-yielding None None – – – 0 DS2 Minor/slight Minor spalling Inspect, Comparison:Article Title: Seismic fragility models for base‐isolated unreinforced masonry buildings with fibre‐reinforced elastomeric isolators Article Snippet: The same comparison on PoE(DS2) given MCE provides a reduction of 95% and 91% for 2S-R and 2S-I buildings, respectively. .. The same comparison on PoE(DS2) given Molecular Weight:Article Title: RAFT synthesis of cellulose-g-polymethylmethacrylate copolymer in an ionic liquid Article Snippet: We demonstrate for the first time the feasibility in conducting the graft copolymerization of methylmethacrylate (MMA) with cellulose by the means of the reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization in an ionic liquid [1-Nbutyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride] (BMIMCl).. Cellulose was first converted to a macromolecular chain transfer agent to which MMA was grafted by RAFT in BMIMCl.. The success of the occurrence of different reactions was validated by elemental analyses, Fourier transform infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopies. |
![Pharmacology of inhibition indicates decreased activation of extrasynaptic GABA A receptors in DBA/2J TC neurons (A) Example peak-normalized IPSCs from TC neurons from D2 and D2-control mice evoked by stimulation with an aCSF-filled patch pipette positioned approximately 25 microns from the recorded TC neuron in the presence of CNQX (20 μM) and D-AP5 (50 μM). Traces show before (gray) and after (black) bath application of 10 μM <t>DS2.</t> (B) Relative effect of DS2 application on peak response of the IPSC (n.s., p = 0.16 via nested t test) and area (∗∗∗ p = 0.0010 via nested t test) of D2 (red) and D2-control (black) mice ( n = 8 cells, four mice [D2-control] and n = 16 cells, six mice [D2]). Bar graphs and error bars show mean ± SEM. (C) Example peak-normalized traces of IPSCs from D2 and D2-control mice before (gray) and after (black) application of SNAP5114 (60 μM). IPSCs were evoked as in A. (D) Relative effect of SNAP5114 application on peak response (n.s., p = 0.70 via nested t test) and area (n.s., p = 0.91 via nested t test) of D2 (red) and D2-control (black) mice ( n = 16 cells, six mice [D2] and n = 14 cells, five mice [D2-control]). Bar graphs and error bars show mean ± SEM.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_5702/pmc12995702/pmc12995702__gr6.jpg)
