Review



component exponential function  (SYSTAT)


Bioz Verified Symbol SYSTAT is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    SYSTAT component exponential function
    Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
    Component Exponential Function, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 12837 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/component exponential function/product/SYSTAT
    Average 99 stars, based on 12837 article reviews
    component exponential function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    99/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Melanopsin ganglion cells in the mouse retina independently evoke pupillary light reflex"

    Article Title: Melanopsin ganglion cells in the mouse retina independently evoke pupillary light reflex

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2024.05.14.594181

    Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component exponential decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component exponential decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).

    Techniques Used: Injection



    Similar Products

    99
    SYSTAT component exponential function
    Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
    Component Exponential Function, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/component exponential function/product/SYSTAT
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    component exponential function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    OriginLab corp multi-exponential function (3 components) using originpro 2021
    Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
    Multi Exponential Function (3 Components) Using Originpro 2021, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/multi-exponential function (3 components) using originpro 2021/product/OriginLab corp
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    multi-exponential function (3 components) using originpro 2021 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Abbott Laboratories single-component exponential decay function
    Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
    Single Component Exponential Decay Function, supplied by Abbott Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/single-component exponential decay function/product/Abbott Laboratories
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    single-component exponential decay function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc two-component exponential function
    Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
    Two Component Exponential Function, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/two-component exponential function/product/GraphPad Software Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    two-component exponential function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc two component exponential decay function
    Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
    Two Component Exponential Decay Function, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/two component exponential decay function/product/GraphPad Software Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    two component exponential decay function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Rundo Cronova three-component exponential function
    Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component <t>exponential</t> decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).
    Three Component Exponential Function, supplied by Rundo Cronova, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/three-component exponential function/product/Rundo Cronova
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    three-component exponential function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component exponential decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Melanopsin ganglion cells in the mouse retina independently evoke pupillary light reflex

    doi: 10.1101/2024.05.14.594181

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Temporal features of high light-evoked PLRs were equivalent between WT and MNU eyes: A) The initial phase of high light-evoked PLRs is displayed in a short time scale. The latency from the light stimulus onset (black dotted line) to the start of the PLR in WT eyes (blue dotted line) and MNU eyes (red dotted line) are shown. B) A summary graph shows the latency in WT and MNU eyes, which showed a significant delay (p<0.05, Student’s unpaired t-test ). The means for WT and MNU are presented in blue and red. C) The onsets of high light-evoked PLRs were fit by single component exponential decay curves for WT eyes (blue) and MNU (red) injected mice (R2>0.90). D) A scatter plot showing each curve fit’s time constant (tau). MNU exhibited low tau, indicating a faster PLR constriction phase than WT PLR (p<0.05, n=12 mice). E) A scatter plot showing peak constriction showed no differences between WT and MNU mice (p= 0.07, n=12 mice).

    Article Snippet: For the analysis of the transient constriction during high light conditions, raw traces were fitted with a single component exponential function (R 2 > .90, SigmaPlot14.5, Systat).

    Techniques: Injection