17 aag (MedChemExpress)
Structured Review

17 Aag, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 96 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/17+aag/Tanespimycin/pmc13178563-223-5-6
Average 96 stars, based on 96 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "TP53 -mutant AML with ribosomal gene loss exhibits impaired protein translation and sensitivity to HSP90 inhibition"
Article Title: TP53 -mutant AML with ribosomal gene loss exhibits impaired protein translation and sensitivity to HSP90 inhibition
Journal: Science Advances
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aed7122
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Icicle representation of selective hit compounds of the initial single-dose HTS assay depicting peaks of highly correlating inhibitory profiles constituting compound correlation clusters (CCCs). Concentric circles depict levels of correlation as indicated on the figure (from 0 at the center to 1 at the edge). CCC HSP90i composed of the 17-AAG and 33 of its analogs is depicted by a blue peak. ( B ) Inhibition footprint (%) obtained for compounds composing the CCC HSP90i . Orange and blue lines represent data corresponding to the 17-AAG and its analogs, respectively. ( C ) Volcano plot representation of the correlation level between compounds constituting the CCCs and the ribosomal eigengene expression values obtained for tested specimens. The horizontal dashed line indicates a P value of 0.05 and vertical dashed lines indicate correlation of 0.2 and −0.2. Orange and blue dots correspond to compounds significantly correlated and inversely correlated (correlation > |0.2|, P < 0.05), respectively. Dark blue diamonds depict compounds from the CCC HSP90i composed of the 17-AAG (indicated by a larger blue diamond) and 33 of its analogs. ( D ) Ribosomal eigengene expression values according to tier 1 (“sensitive” tier) and tier 3 (“resistant” tier) sensitivity groups for 17-AAG (left) and the best analog (right), i.e., presenting the strongest difference between the two groups. Median values are indicated by black lines on each dot plot. P values resulting from the comparison between groups are indicated on the plot. ( E ) Ribosomal eigengene expression values according to tier 1 (sensitive tier, n = 114 cell lines) and tier 3 (resistant tier, n = 98) 17-AAG sensitivity groups determined using data obtained from The Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database.
Techniques Used: HTS Assay, Inhibition, Expressing, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Heatmap of responses to HSP90 inhibitors (17-AAG, geldanamycin, and alvespimycin). Colors represent z -scores derived from the median inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) values (scale shown). The bottom annotation indicates specimen subgroup [-3/del(3p) or control AML]. Columns are ordered by unsupervised hierarchical clustering of IC 50 values. ( B ) Correlation between responses to 17-AAG and alvespimycin (Pearson’s r = 0.79). The dashed line indicates least-squares regression. ( C ) Average response to HSP90 inhibitors [avg(HSP90i); mean of rescaled IC 50 values from −1 to 1] according to subgroup [-3/del(3p) versus control AML], TP53 status, and ribosomal eigengene expression (tier 1, low; and tier 3, high). ( D ) Representative Western blots of RPS14, RPL14, RPL29, and α-tubulin (TUBA; loading control) in U937 cells treated for 24 hours with DMSO or HSP90 inhibitors. ( E ) Representative Western blots of RPL29 and TUBA in primary AML cells [(A) to (D): control AML; (E) to (H): -3/del(3p)] treated for 24 hours with DMSO or HSP90 inhibitors. ( F ) Correlations between RPL29 protein levels (normalized to TUBA) and IC 50 values for each HSP90 inhibitor. Pearson’s r values are indicated; dashed lines represent least-squares regression. ( G ) Ex vivo proliferation of primary -3/del(3p) (gray) and control AML (white) following exposure to DMSO, geldanamycin, or alvespimycin. Cell counts were normalized to Fresh (D0) input and expressed as fold change at days 1 and 4 (NS, not significant). ( H ) Ex vivo viability of primary -3/del(3p) (gray) and control AML (white) after treatment, normalized to Fresh (D0), assessed at days 1 and 4.
Techniques Used: Derivative Assay, Concentration Assay, Control, Expressing, Western Blot, Ex Vivo
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Experimental design of the 17-AAG efficacy study in mice engrafted with -3/del(3p) #1 PDX cells ( n = 5 mice per group; lines indicate treatment time points; BM asp, BM aspiration). ( B ) Body weight follow-up during the 17-AAG efficacy study ( n = 5 mice, means ± SD). ( C ) Dot plot representation of the percentage of human CD45 + cells in BM aspirates performed 3 days before the treatment initiation, after 2 weeks of treatment as well as in total BM and peripheral blood (PB) at sacrifice (dots represent individual mice, means ± SD). ( D ) Representative FACS profiles of human CD45 + engrafted cells in total BM and PB at sacrifice.
Techniques Used:

