mouse olfactory bulb st data (Spatial Transcriptomics Inc)
86
Structured Review
Spatial Transcriptomics Inc
mouse olfactory bulb st data
Mouse Olfactory Bulb St Data, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/transcriptomics+st/pmc12103236-331-3-9?v=Spatial+Transcriptomics+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Mouse Olfactory Bulb St Data, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/transcriptomics+st/pmc12103236-331-3-9?v=Spatial+Transcriptomics+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse olfactory bulb st data - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
86/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "Robust Spatial Cell‐Type Deconvolution with Qualitative Reference for Spatial Transcriptomics"
Article Title: Robust Spatial Cell‐Type Deconvolution with Qualitative Reference for Spatial Transcriptomics
Journal: Small Methods
doi: 10.1002/smtd.202401145
Figure Legend Snippet: Analysis of mouse olfactory bulb data. a) H&E staining of the olfactory bulb (top) and the deconvolution results of all candidate methods displayed by the spatial scatter pie plot of cell‐type composition on each spatial location. The examined cell types were granule cells (GC), olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), periglomerular cells (PGC), mitral/tufted cells (M‐TC), and external plexiform layer interneurons (EPL‐IN) b) Manual annotation of anatomic layers (top), including the granule cell layer (GCL), the mitral cell layer (MCL), the glomerular layer (GL), and the nerve layer (ONL), and the spatial domains of different deconvolution methods visualized by spatial scatters of specific domain types. c) Performance comparison between candidate deconvolution methods, including QR‐SIDE, STdeconvolve, CARDfree, RCTD, CARD, SPOTlight, and spatialDWLS in terms of NMI (left) and ARI (right). d) UMAP plots of gene expression for Topic 1, 2, 3 identified by QR‐SIDE. The color scheme of each topic domain was the same as in (b). e) The heatmap of normalized expression level for the top 10 DE genes for topic domain 1, 2, 3. f) The correlation between DE genes of identified domains and marker genes of each cell type. g) The mean expression level of an example marker gene list for QR‐SIDE, where Tyro3 was included as the interference marker gene of cell type GC. h) Left and middle panels: The estimated spot‐separable η scores of correct marker Penk and misclassified marker Tyro3 . Right panel: The line plots of mean η of all markers across all spatial spots and the RMSE between estimated cell‐type composition by varying the inclusion of top 3‐7 marker genes of each cell type as the input gene list and the deconvolution results using high‐quality marker genes (as shown in a).
Techniques Used: Staining, Comparison, Gene Expression, Expressing, Marker
