Review



data analysis microarray slides  (Danaher Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Danaher Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Danaher Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 94
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Danaher Inc data analysis microarray slides
    Percentage of probes that recognized four bacterial species tested by <t> microarray </t> analysis.
    Data Analysis Microarray Slides, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 444 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tissue+microarray+analysis+tissue+microarray+slides/pmc06640225-367-2-14?v=Danaher+Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 444 article reviews
    data analysis microarray slides - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Distinguishing bacterial pathogens of potato using a genome‐wide microarray approach"

    Article Title: Distinguishing bacterial pathogens of potato using a genome‐wide microarray approach

    Journal: Molecular Plant Pathology

    doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00482.x

    Percentage of probes that recognized four bacterial species tested by microarray analysis.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Percentage of probes that recognized four bacterial species tested by microarray analysis.

    Techniques Used: Microarray

    Scanned images of the signals detected on the microarray. A view of the whole microarray with eight subarrays is shown in (A), whereas areas covered by c. 800 probes (of the total of 9676 probes of one subarray) are shown at higher magnification in B and C. Total DNA extracted from pure cultures of bacteria and pooled from several strains of each species was used for hybridization. (A) Two samples were hybridized on each of the eight subarrays. The sample labelled with Cy5 (red) in all eight subarrays was Pectobacterium atrosepticum. The other samples labelled with Cy3 (illustrated as green) were (1) Streptomyces scabies, (2) Dickeya sp., (3) P. carotovorum, (4) Clavibacter michiganensis, (5) P. atrosepticum and (6–8) S. turgidiscabies. The amount of DNA per sample was 500 ng in subarrays 1–6. Signals were clear also with 50 ng of sample DNA (dilution 1 : 10, subarray 7). The image shown here was scanned using constant laser power and detector gain, and signals in subarray 8 (5 ng of DNA; dilution 1 : 100) cannot be seen. However, using increased detector gain, the most species‐specific signals (highest signal intensity) could be detected on subarray 8. (B) Magnification of a part of subarray 5: two samples of P. atrosepticum labelled each with a different dye. Intensive yellow spots (equal hybridization) correspond to probes specific to P. atrosepticum, whereas the spots with faint signal indicate non‐specific hybridization. (C) Magnification of part of the subarray 1: P. atrosepticum labelled with Cy5 and S. scabies labelled with Cy3. A ‘black spot’ (no signal) indicates no hybridization with the probe. The probes were designed to be gene‐specific, taking the whole‐genome sequence information of the species into consideration. Results indicate that most probes detect only the respective species based on which the probes were designed.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Scanned images of the signals detected on the microarray. A view of the whole microarray with eight subarrays is shown in (A), whereas areas covered by c. 800 probes (of the total of 9676 probes of one subarray) are shown at higher magnification in B and C. Total DNA extracted from pure cultures of bacteria and pooled from several strains of each species was used for hybridization. (A) Two samples were hybridized on each of the eight subarrays. The sample labelled with Cy5 (red) in all eight subarrays was Pectobacterium atrosepticum. The other samples labelled with Cy3 (illustrated as green) were (1) Streptomyces scabies, (2) Dickeya sp., (3) P. carotovorum, (4) Clavibacter michiganensis, (5) P. atrosepticum and (6–8) S. turgidiscabies. The amount of DNA per sample was 500 ng in subarrays 1–6. Signals were clear also with 50 ng of sample DNA (dilution 1 : 10, subarray 7). The image shown here was scanned using constant laser power and detector gain, and signals in subarray 8 (5 ng of DNA; dilution 1 : 100) cannot be seen. However, using increased detector gain, the most species‐specific signals (highest signal intensity) could be detected on subarray 8. (B) Magnification of a part of subarray 5: two samples of P. atrosepticum labelled each with a different dye. Intensive yellow spots (equal hybridization) correspond to probes specific to P. atrosepticum, whereas the spots with faint signal indicate non‐specific hybridization. (C) Magnification of part of the subarray 1: P. atrosepticum labelled with Cy5 and S. scabies labelled with Cy3. A ‘black spot’ (no signal) indicates no hybridization with the probe. The probes were designed to be gene‐specific, taking the whole‐genome sequence information of the species into consideration. Results indicate that most probes detect only the respective species based on which the probes were designed.

    Techniques Used: Microarray, Bacteria, Hybridization, Sequencing

    Pooled DNA of the strains of Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. sepedonicus (Cms) (labelled with Cy3) and Pectobacterium atrosepticum (Pat) (labelled with Cy5) analysed on the microarray. (A) Scatterplot shows signal intensities from each probe on the array. Signals for Cms are given on the x‐axis and those for Pat on the y‐axis. Data reveal that the samples are not detected with common probes giving high signal intensities. (B) The scatterplot presented in a logarithmic domain places the probes within four groups: (1) high signal intensities for both samples (very few probes); (2) non‐specific probes detecting both samples (relatively low signal intensities); (3) probes giving high signal intensities only for Pat; and (4) probes giving high signal intensities only for Cms. In (C) (Cms) and (D) (Pat), the histograms of the logarithmic signal intensities show three peaks (histograms smoothened by the kernel density method). A threshold value of ~10 separates the two right‐most peaks (II and III) corresponding to the non‐specific and specific probes, respectively, as shown in B. The threshold value corresponds to the raw (non‐logarithmic) intensity value of c. 1000. In (E) (Cms) and (F) (Pat) the hybridization signal intensities are indicated per groups of probes. In the boxplot, the horizontal line in the middle of the box indicates the median value of the data. The box itself shows the first and third quartile of data. Whiskers outside the box indicate the range of data up to 1.5× the box height from both ends. Data beyond these limits are shown as circles. The intensity values of all probes are shown; however, in the final classification, the probes with intensities below the threshold obtained from the intensity histogram would be eliminated. Abbreviations used in the probe group names: Pat, P. atrosepticum; Sca, S. scabies; Cms, C. michiganensis spp. sepedonicus; IGS, 16S–23S intergenic spacer; Pca, P. carotovorum; IGS Dic, probes to the IGS of Dickeya spp.; Stu, S. turgidiscabies; Rso, R. solanacearum; nip, gene for necrosis‐inducing protein; Dic Nip30‐Nip50, probes of different lengths (30–50 nt) designed for the nip gene of D. dadantii; PAI, pathogenicity island.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Pooled DNA of the strains of Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. sepedonicus (Cms) (labelled with Cy3) and Pectobacterium atrosepticum (Pat) (labelled with Cy5) analysed on the microarray. (A) Scatterplot shows signal intensities from each probe on the array. Signals for Cms are given on the x‐axis and those for Pat on the y‐axis. Data reveal that the samples are not detected with common probes giving high signal intensities. (B) The scatterplot presented in a logarithmic domain places the probes within four groups: (1) high signal intensities for both samples (very few probes); (2) non‐specific probes detecting both samples (relatively low signal intensities); (3) probes giving high signal intensities only for Pat; and (4) probes giving high signal intensities only for Cms. In (C) (Cms) and (D) (Pat), the histograms of the logarithmic signal intensities show three peaks (histograms smoothened by the kernel density method). A threshold value of ~10 separates the two right‐most peaks (II and III) corresponding to the non‐specific and specific probes, respectively, as shown in B. The threshold value corresponds to the raw (non‐logarithmic) intensity value of c. 1000. In (E) (Cms) and (F) (Pat) the hybridization signal intensities are indicated per groups of probes. In the boxplot, the horizontal line in the middle of the box indicates the median value of the data. The box itself shows the first and third quartile of data. Whiskers outside the box indicate the range of data up to 1.5× the box height from both ends. Data beyond these limits are shown as circles. The intensity values of all probes are shown; however, in the final classification, the probes with intensities below the threshold obtained from the intensity histogram would be eliminated. Abbreviations used in the probe group names: Pat, P. atrosepticum; Sca, S. scabies; Cms, C. michiganensis spp. sepedonicus; IGS, 16S–23S intergenic spacer; Pca, P. carotovorum; IGS Dic, probes to the IGS of Dickeya spp.; Stu, S. turgidiscabies; Rso, R. solanacearum; nip, gene for necrosis‐inducing protein; Dic Nip30‐Nip50, probes of different lengths (30–50 nt) designed for the nip gene of D. dadantii; PAI, pathogenicity island.

    Techniques Used: Microarray, Hybridization

    Pooled DNA of the strains of Streptomyces scabies (Sca) and S. turgidiscabies (Stu) analysed on the microarray. (A) Scatterplot showing signal intensities from each probe on the array. Signals for Sca are given on the x‐axis and those for Stu on the y‐axis. (B) The scatterplot presented on a logarithmic scale places the probes within four groups: (1) high signal intensities for both samples [of the total of 3894 probes designed to target genes of Sca, 1462 probes (c. 40%) show high signal intensities also for Stu]; (2) non‐specific probes giving relatively weak signals for both samples; (3) probes giving high signals only for Stu; and (4) probes giving high signals only for Sc. In (C) (Sca) and (D) (Stu), the histograms of the logarithmic signal intensities show three peaks corresponding to the groups of probes in B, as explained in Fig. 2. In (E) (Sca) and (F) (Stu) the hybridization signal intensities are indicated per three groups of probes. Interpretation of the boxplots is as in Fig. 1. The data indicate that the probes targeting the 16S–23S intergenic spacer (IGS) can be used to distinguish the two species.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Pooled DNA of the strains of Streptomyces scabies (Sca) and S. turgidiscabies (Stu) analysed on the microarray. (A) Scatterplot showing signal intensities from each probe on the array. Signals for Sca are given on the x‐axis and those for Stu on the y‐axis. (B) The scatterplot presented on a logarithmic scale places the probes within four groups: (1) high signal intensities for both samples [of the total of 3894 probes designed to target genes of Sca, 1462 probes (c. 40%) show high signal intensities also for Stu]; (2) non‐specific probes giving relatively weak signals for both samples; (3) probes giving high signals only for Stu; and (4) probes giving high signals only for Sc. In (C) (Sca) and (D) (Stu), the histograms of the logarithmic signal intensities show three peaks corresponding to the groups of probes in B, as explained in Fig. 2. In (E) (Sca) and (F) (Stu) the hybridization signal intensities are indicated per three groups of probes. Interpretation of the boxplots is as in Fig. 1. The data indicate that the probes targeting the 16S–23S intergenic spacer (IGS) can be used to distinguish the two species.

    Techniques Used: Microarray, Hybridization



    Similar Products

    melanoma tissue microarray analysis (tma) slides  (Biomax Inc)
    90
    Biomax Inc melanoma tissue microarray analysis (tma) slides
    The consistency of YAP and LRP1 in tissue <t>microarray</t> specimen. ( a , b ) <t>TMA</t> slides include forty skin melanoma tissues and eight skin normal tissues which locate on the bottom of the each TMA. Representative images of IHC from HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. Scale bar, 100 μM. ( c ) Representative images of IHC from skin melanoma HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. Scale bar, 100 μM. ( d ) The statistical figure of skin melanoma IHC images from HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. The TMA data were analyzed using the χ2 test.
    Melanoma Tissue Microarray Analysis (Tma) Slides, supplied by Biomax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tissue+microarray+analysis+tissue+microarray+slides/pmc05686191-177-2-11?v=Biomax+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    melanoma tissue microarray analysis (tma) slides - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    tissue microarray analysis tissue microarray slides  (Novus Biologicals)
    92
    Novus Biologicals tissue microarray analysis tissue microarray slides
    The consistency of YAP and LRP1 in tissue <t>microarray</t> specimen. ( a , b ) <t>TMA</t> slides include forty skin melanoma tissues and eight skin normal tissues which locate on the bottom of the each TMA. Representative images of IHC from HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. Scale bar, 100 μM. ( c ) Representative images of IHC from skin melanoma HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. Scale bar, 100 μM. ( d ) The statistical figure of skin melanoma IHC images from HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. The TMA data were analyzed using the χ2 test.
    Tissue Microarray Analysis Tissue Microarray Slides, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tissue+microarray+analysis+tissue+microarray+slides/yee_kathleen_miuyi__2016__gene_regulation_by_epigenetic_modifiers_in_stem_cells_cancer_and_immunology-1243-0-9?v=Novus+Biologicals
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tissue microarray analysis tissue microarray slides - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    92/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    tissue microarray analysis (tma) slides  (Shanghai Biochip Co. Ltd)
    90
    Shanghai Biochip Co. Ltd tissue microarray analysis (tma) slides
    The consistency of YAP and LRP1 in tissue <t>microarray</t> specimen. ( a , b ) <t>TMA</t> slides include forty skin melanoma tissues and eight skin normal tissues which locate on the bottom of the each TMA. Representative images of IHC from HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. Scale bar, 100 μM. ( c ) Representative images of IHC from skin melanoma HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. Scale bar, 100 μM. ( d ) The statistical figure of skin melanoma IHC images from HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. The TMA data were analyzed using the χ2 test.
    Tissue Microarray Analysis (Tma) Slides, supplied by Shanghai Biochip Co. Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tissue+microarray+analysis+tissue+microarray+slides/pm24863391-51-10-17?v=Shanghai+Biochip+Co.+Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tissue microarray analysis (tma) slides - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The consistency of YAP and LRP1 in tissue microarray specimen. ( a , b ) TMA slides include forty skin melanoma tissues and eight skin normal tissues which locate on the bottom of the each TMA. Representative images of IHC from HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. Scale bar, 100 μM. ( c ) Representative images of IHC from skin melanoma HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. Scale bar, 100 μM. ( d ) The statistical figure of skin melanoma IHC images from HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. The TMA data were analyzed using the χ2 test.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Yes-Associated Protein (YAP) Promotes Tumorigenesis in Melanoma Cells Through Stimulation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 1 (LRP1)

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14764-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The consistency of YAP and LRP1 in tissue microarray specimen. ( a , b ) TMA slides include forty skin melanoma tissues and eight skin normal tissues which locate on the bottom of the each TMA. Representative images of IHC from HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. Scale bar, 100 μM. ( c ) Representative images of IHC from skin melanoma HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. Scale bar, 100 μM. ( d ) The statistical figure of skin melanoma IHC images from HCC TMA stained with anti-YAP or anti-LRP1 antibodies. The TMA data were analyzed using the χ2 test.

    Article Snippet: For IHC, melanoma tissue microarray analysis (TMA) slides were purchased from Biomax (Rockville, MD, USA).

    Techniques: Microarray, Staining